Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

clarifying-state-action-doctrine:-acgme&amp Case Commentaries

Change in Law Alone Is Not an “Extraordinary Circumstance”: The Post-Remand Rule 60(b)(6) Boundary in Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services

Change in Law Alone Is Not an “Extraordinary Circumstance”: The Post-Remand Rule 60(b)(6) Boundary in Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services

Date: Aug 5, 2025
Change in Law Alone Is Not an “Extraordinary Circumstance”: The Post-Remand Rule 60(b)(6) Boundary in Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services 1. Introduction Court – Date: United States Court of...
Swango v. Virginia State Bar: The Supreme Court of Virginia Prohibits Non-Refundable Consultation Fees and Clarifies “Retainer” vs. “Advanced Legal Fee”

Swango v. Virginia State Bar: The Supreme Court of Virginia Prohibits Non-Refundable Consultation Fees and Clarifies “Retainer” vs. “Advanced Legal Fee”

Date: Aug 5, 2025
Swango v. Virginia State Bar: The Supreme Court of Virginia Prohibits Non-Refundable Consultation Fees and Clarifies “Retainer” vs. “Advanced Legal Fee” 1. Introduction Swango v. Virginia State Bar,...
Third Circuit Narrows the Reach of PHRA’s “Best Able and Most Competent” Clause and Raises the Bar for Certified Questions

Third Circuit Narrows the Reach of PHRA’s “Best Able and Most Competent” Clause and Raises the Bar for Certified Questions

Date: Aug 5, 2025
Third Circuit Narrows the Reach of PHRA’s “Best Able and Most Competent” Clause and Raises the Bar for Certified Questions Introduction The decision in Pamela Kern v. DAS Companies Inc. (3d Cir. No....

        Third Circuit Declares “Non-Renewal” Clauses That Waive NJFPA Protections Unenforceable:
        Commentary on Scion Hotels LLC v. Holiday Hospitality Franchising LLC

Third Circuit Declares “Non-Renewal” Clauses That Waive NJFPA Protections Unenforceable: Commentary on Scion Hotels LLC v. Holiday Hospitality Franchising LLC

Date: Aug 5, 2025
Third Circuit Declares “Non-Renewal” Clauses That Waive NJFPA Protections Unenforceable: Commentary on Scion Hotels LLC v. Holiday Hospitality Franchising LLC, No. 24-2800 (3d Cir. 2025) 1....
“Targeted Maritime Presumptions” – Case-by-Case Application of the Louisiana and Pennsylvania Rules after Gulf Island Shipyards v. LaShip (5th Cir. 2025)

“Targeted Maritime Presumptions” – Case-by-Case Application of the Louisiana and Pennsylvania Rules after Gulf Island Shipyards v. LaShip (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 5, 2025
“Targeted Maritime Presumptions” – Case-by-Case Application of the Louisiana and Pennsylvania Rules after Gulf Island Shipyards v. LaShip (5th Cir. 2025) Introduction Hurricane Ida’s catastrophic...
Parental Facilitation of Sexual Abuse Constitutes “Aggravated Circumstances”: A Commentary on In re Barber/Espinoza (Mich. 2025)

Parental Facilitation of Sexual Abuse Constitutes “Aggravated Circumstances”: A Commentary on In re Barber/Espinoza (Mich. 2025)

Date: Aug 5, 2025
Parental Facilitation of Sexual Abuse Constitutes “Aggravated Circumstances”: A Commentary on In re Barber/Espinoza, Supreme Court of Michigan (2025) 1. Introduction The Michigan Supreme Court’s...
From General Warrants to Digital Precision: People v Carson and Michigan’s New Particularity Standard for Cell-Phone Search Warrants

From General Warrants to Digital Precision: People v Carson and Michigan’s New Particularity Standard for Cell-Phone Search Warrants

Date: Aug 5, 2025
From General Warrants to Digital Precision: People v Carson and Michigan’s New Particularity Standard for Cell-Phone Search Warrants 1. Introduction People of Michigan v. Michael Georgie Carson...
Rayford v American House (2025): Michigan Supreme Court Revives “Reasonableness” Review and Adhesion-Contract Scrutiny for Contractual Limitation Periods in Employment Agreements

Rayford v American House (2025): Michigan Supreme Court Revives “Reasonableness” Review and Adhesion-Contract Scrutiny for Contractual Limitation Periods in Employment Agreements

Date: Aug 5, 2025
Rayford v American House Roseville I, LLC (Mich, 2025) A New Era of “Reasonableness” & Adhesion Scrutiny in Michigan Employment Contracts 1. Introduction The Michigan Supreme Court’s 2025 decision in...
Anderson v. Ferguson – No Clearly-Established Prohibition on Police Use of the “Mandibular-Angle” Pressure Point Technique

Anderson v. Ferguson – No Clearly-Established Prohibition on Police Use of the “Mandibular-Angle” Pressure Point Technique

Date: Aug 5, 2025
Anderson v. Ferguson – No Clearly-Established Prohibition on Police Use of the “Mandibular-Angle” Pressure Point Technique Introduction In Albert Anderson v. B. Ferguson, No. 22-7199 (4th Cir....
“Geographic Proximity Alone Does Not Equal ‘Substantial Control’” – The Fourth Circuit Narrows Title IX Liability for Off-Campus Misconduct

“Geographic Proximity Alone Does Not Equal ‘Substantial Control’” – The Fourth Circuit Narrows Title IX Liability for Off-Campus Misconduct

Date: Aug 5, 2025
“Geographic Proximity Alone Does Not Equal ‘Substantial Control’” – The Fourth Circuit Narrows Title IX Liability for Off-Campus Misconduct Introduction In Jane Roe v. Marshall University Board of...
Colorado Navarro v. Bondi (4th Cir. 2025): Quantifying “More-Likely-Than-Not” Torture and Re-affirming the BIA’s Clear-Error Authority

Colorado Navarro v. Bondi (4th Cir. 2025): Quantifying “More-Likely-Than-Not” Torture and Re-affirming the BIA’s Clear-Error Authority

Date: Aug 5, 2025
Colorado Navarro v. Bondi (4th Cir. 2025): Quantifying “More-Likely-Than-Not” Torture and Re-affirming the BIA’s Clear-Error Authority 1. Introduction In Jonathan Alexander Colorado Navarro v. Pamela...
“Speak Now or Forever Waive It” – The Fourth Circuit’s Specific-Objection Rule for Source-Code Attacks on Probabilistic DNA Software (United States v. Chavis, 2025)

“Speak Now or Forever Waive It” – The Fourth Circuit’s Specific-Objection Rule for Source-Code Attacks on Probabilistic DNA Software (United States v. Chavis, 2025)

Date: Aug 5, 2025
“Speak Now or Forever Waive It” – The Fourth Circuit’s Specific-Objection Rule for Source-Code Attacks on Probabilistic DNA Software (United States v. Brandon Chavis & Melissa Beasley, 4th Cir. 2025)...
No “Magic-Words” Requirement: The Fourth Circuit Re-Affirms Minimal-Explanation Standard for Compassionate-Release Denials

No “Magic-Words” Requirement: The Fourth Circuit Re-Affirms Minimal-Explanation Standard for Compassionate-Release Denials

Date: Aug 5, 2025
No “Magic-Words” Requirement: The Fourth Circuit Re-Affirms Minimal-Explanation Standard for Compassionate-Release Denials 1. Introduction In United States v. Larry Antonio Burleigh, No. 23-6254 (4th...
“Preservation over Source-Code”: The Fourth Circuit’s Guidance on Challenging Probabilistic DNA Evidence and Indictment Variance in United States v. Melissa Beasley

“Preservation over Source-Code”: The Fourth Circuit’s Guidance on Challenging Probabilistic DNA Evidence and Indictment Variance in United States v. Melissa Beasley

Date: Aug 5, 2025
“Preservation over Source-Code”: Fourth Circuit Restricts Appellate Review of Probabilistic Genotyping Challenges and Clarifies Indictment-Variance Doctrine Introduction United States v. Melissa...
“Martinez v. Bondi”: The Fourth Circuit Clarifies the BIA’s Duty to Assess Prima-Facie Eligibility and Discretion in Motions to Reopen for Cancellation of Removal

“Martinez v. Bondi”: The Fourth Circuit Clarifies the BIA’s Duty to Assess Prima-Facie Eligibility and Discretion in Motions to Reopen for Cancellation of Removal

Date: Aug 5, 2025
“Martinez v. Bondi”: The Fourth Circuit Clarifies the BIA’s Duty to Assess Prima-Facie Eligibility and Discretion in Motions to Reopen for Cancellation of Removal 1. Introduction The unpublished...
“Legal Theories Are Not ‘New Facts’: The Tenth Circuit’s Clarification of § 2244(b)(2)(B) in In re: Meza”

“Legal Theories Are Not ‘New Facts’: The Tenth Circuit’s Clarification of § 2244(b)(2)(B) in In re: Meza”

Date: Aug 5, 2025
“Legal Theories Are Not ‘New Facts’: The Tenth Circuit’s Clarification of § 2244(b)(2)(B) in In re: Meza” 1. Introduction On 31 July 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit...
“Plea-Induced Waiver” Doctrine Fortified: State v. Brown Jr. (W. Va. 2025)

“Plea-Induced Waiver” Doctrine Fortified: State v. Brown Jr. (W. Va. 2025)

Date: Aug 5, 2025
“Plea-Induced Waiver” Doctrine Fortified: State v. Brown Jr. (Supreme Court of West Virginia, 2025) I. Introduction State of West Virginia v. Robert I. Brown Jr., Nos. 24-576, 24-578, and 24-579,...
Between Expungement and Transparency: The “Redact-Then-Balance” Rule for Police Internal-Affairs Records — Commentary on States Newsroom Inc. v. City of Jersey City (N.J. 2025)

Between Expungement and Transparency: The “Redact-Then-Balance” Rule for Police Internal-Affairs Records — Commentary on States Newsroom Inc. v. City of Jersey City (N.J. 2025)

Date: Aug 5, 2025
Between Expungement and Transparency: The “Redact-Then-Balance” Rule for Police Internal-Affairs Records — Commentary on States Newsroom Inc. v. City of Jersey City (Supreme Court of New Jersey,...
Exclusive Authority of the Tennessee Supreme Court over Execution Orders: Limits on Trial-Court Injunctions in Method-of-Execution Litigation

Exclusive Authority of the Tennessee Supreme Court over Execution Orders: Limits on Trial-Court Injunctions in Method-of-Execution Litigation

Date: Aug 2, 2025
Exclusive Authority of the Tennessee Supreme Court over Execution Orders: Limits on Trial-Court Injunctions in Method-of-Execution Litigation Introduction In Byron Black v. Frank Strada, the...
United States v. King, II: The Sixth Circuit Expands the “Concurrent-Task” Doctrine for Traffic Stops

United States v. King, II: The Sixth Circuit Expands the “Concurrent-Task” Doctrine for Traffic Stops

Date: Aug 2, 2025
United States v. King, II: The Sixth Circuit Expands the “Concurrent-Task” Doctrine for Traffic Stops Introduction United States v. James Russell King, II, No. 24-1089 (6th Cir. 2025) is a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert