Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

affirmation-of-death-penalty-in-farris-genner-morris-jr.-for-heinous Case Commentaries

“Minutes Rule Trumps Judicial Estoppel”: A Commentary on Retro Metro, LLC v. City of Jackson

“Minutes Rule Trumps Judicial Estoppel”: A Commentary on Retro Metro, LLC v. City of Jackson

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Minutes Rule Trumps Judicial Estoppel”: A Comprehensive Commentary on the Fifth Circuit’s Decision in Retro Metro, LLC v. City of Jackson 1. Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the...
Residual Pollution Is Not a Continuing Violation: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms “Hamker Rule” in Save the Cutoff v. Iron River

Residual Pollution Is Not a Continuing Violation: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms “Hamker Rule” in Save the Cutoff v. Iron River

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Residual Pollution Is Not a Continuing Violation: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms “Hamker Rule” in Save the Cutoff v. Iron River Introduction On 7 August 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
The Richburg Clarification: Fifth Circuit Tightens the Pre-Judgment Standard for Showing Prejudice in Plea-Related Ineffective-Assistance Claims

The Richburg Clarification: Fifth Circuit Tightens the Pre-Judgment Standard for Showing Prejudice in Plea-Related Ineffective-Assistance Claims

Date: Aug 13, 2025
The Richburg Clarification: Fifth Circuit Tightens the Pre-Judgment Standard for Showing Prejudice in Plea-Related Ineffective-Assistance Claims Introduction In United States v. Richburg, No....
Clarifying “Dangerous and Unusual”: Sixth Circuit Affirms Constitutionality of the Federal Machine-Gun Ban After Bruen

Clarifying “Dangerous and Unusual”: Sixth Circuit Affirms Constitutionality of the Federal Machine-Gun Ban After Bruen

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Clarifying “Dangerous and Unusual”: Sixth Circuit Affirms Constitutionality of the Federal Machine-Gun Ban After Bruen 1. Introduction Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit | Caption:...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: No Heightened Pleading Standard for Breach-of-Contract Claims under Rule 8(a)

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: No Heightened Pleading Standard for Breach-of-Contract Claims under Rule 8(a)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: No Heightened Pleading Standard for Breach-of-Contract Claims under Rule 8(a) Introduction In Caterpillar Financial Services Corp. v. Venequip Machinery Sales Corp., No....
Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific § 3292 Tolling:  A Deep Dive into United States v. Mark Gyetvay

Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific § 3292 Tolling: A Deep Dive into United States v. Mark Gyetvay

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific § 3292 Tolling: A Deep Dive into United States v. Mark Gyetvay 1. Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s published opinion in United States v. Mark Gyetvay,...
Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific §3292 Tolling Applications: A Commentary on United States v. Mark Gyetvay

Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific §3292 Tolling Applications: A Commentary on United States v. Mark Gyetvay

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific § 3292 Tolling Applications: A Commentary on United States v. Mark Gyetvay Introduction On 7 August 2025 the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh...
Fiddler v. Bondi: Clarifying the “Symbiotic” Link Between Specific-Intent and Proscribed-Purpose in CAT Claims

Fiddler v. Bondi: Clarifying the “Symbiotic” Link Between Specific-Intent and Proscribed-Purpose in CAT Claims

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Fiddler v. Bondi: Clarifying the “Symbiotic” Link Between Specific-Intent and Proscribed-Purpose in CAT Claims Introduction In David Japheth Fiddler v. Pamela J. Bondi (7th Cir. Aug. 7, 2025, No....
Seventh Circuit Clarifies “Intent-to-Harm” Standard for Bystander Deaths in Emergency Police Pursuits – Commentary on Flynn v. Indianapolis (2025)

Seventh Circuit Clarifies “Intent-to-Harm” Standard for Bystander Deaths in Emergency Police Pursuits – Commentary on Flynn v. Indianapolis (2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Seventh Circuit Clarifies “Intent-to-Harm” Standard for Bystander Deaths in Emergency Police Pursuits – Commentary on Gayl Flynn v. Consolidated City of Indianapolis & Marion County (2025) 1....
United States v. Farias: Seventh Circuit Clarifies that Translated Transcripts Are Substantive Evidence

United States v. Farias: Seventh Circuit Clarifies that Translated Transcripts Are Substantive Evidence

Date: Aug 13, 2025
United States v. Farias: Seventh Circuit Clarifies that Translated Transcripts Are Substantive Evidence 1. Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s decision in United States v. Jose Farias (No. 24-2725,...
Piecemeal Action ≠ Reasonable Action: The Fourth Circuit’s Expansion of “Deliberate Indifference” under Title IX in Sage Blair v. Appomattox County School Board

Piecemeal Action ≠ Reasonable Action: The Fourth Circuit’s Expansion of “Deliberate Indifference” under Title IX in Sage Blair v. Appomattox County School Board

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Piecemeal Action ≠ Reasonable Action: The Fourth Circuit’s Expansion of “Deliberate Indifference” under Title IX in Sage Blair v. Appomattox County School Board Introduction The United States Court...
United States v. Terry: Post-Bruen Reaffirmation of § 922(g)(1) Constitutionality and Clarification of Sentencing-Explanation Duties

United States v. Terry: Post-Bruen Reaffirmation of § 922(g)(1) Constitutionality and Clarification of Sentencing-Explanation Duties

Date: Aug 13, 2025
United States v. Terry: Post-Bruen Reaffirmation of § 922(g)(1) Constitutionality and Clarification of Sentencing-Explanation Duties 1. Introduction United States v. Charod Terron Terry, an...
“Interstate Domestic Violence Ends at Death” – A Fourth-Circuit Limitation on § 2261 and on the Use-of-Fire Enhancement

“Interstate Domestic Violence Ends at Death” – A Fourth-Circuit Limitation on § 2261 and on the Use-of-Fire Enhancement

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Interstate Domestic Violence Ends at Death” – A Fourth-Circuit Limitation on 18 U.S.C. § 2261 and Confining the § 844(h)(1) Use-of-Fire Enhancement 1. Introduction In United States v. Lawrence...
The “Collective-Injury” Doctrine: A New Limitation on Smith Allocation in South Carolina Set-Off Law – Commentary on W.S. v. Cassandra Daniels, 4th Cir. (2025)

The “Collective-Injury” Doctrine: A New Limitation on Smith Allocation in South Carolina Set-Off Law – Commentary on W.S. v. Cassandra Daniels, 4th Cir. (2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
The “Collective-Injury” Doctrine: A New Limitation on Smith Allocation in South Carolina Set-Off Law Commentary on W.S. v. Cassandra Daniels, et al. United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth...
“Collective Injury” Supplants Smith Allocation: The Fourth Circuit’s Affirmance of a Full Set-Off in W.S. v. Cassandra Daniels

“Collective Injury” Supplants Smith Allocation: The Fourth Circuit’s Affirmance of a Full Set-Off in W.S. v. Cassandra Daniels

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Collective Injury” Supplants Smith Allocation: The Fourth Circuit’s Affirmance of a Full Set-Off in W.S. v. Cassandra Daniels Introduction The Fourth Circuit’s unpublished opinion in W.S. v....
“Jurisdiction First, Mootness Later” – The Tenth Circuit BAP’s Clarification on Stay-Relief Orders Entered Before Case Dismissal

“Jurisdiction First, Mootness Later” – The Tenth Circuit BAP’s Clarification on Stay-Relief Orders Entered Before Case Dismissal

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Jurisdiction First, Mootness Later” – The Tenth Circuit BAP’s Clarification on Stay-Relief Orders Entered Before Case Dismissal 1. Introduction The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) for the Tenth...
Smith v. Fontes: Cementing the “Exactly-15 %” Initiative Signature Standard and Barring Double-Counting of Invalid Signatures

Smith v. Fontes: Cementing the “Exactly-15 %” Initiative Signature Standard and Barring Double-Counting of Invalid Signatures

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Smith v. Fontes: Cementing the “Exactly-15 %” Initiative Signature Standard and Barring Double-Counting of Invalid Signatures Introduction Smith v. Fontes, decided by the Arizona Supreme Court on 6...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ADEA Prima Facie Proof: Replacement by a Younger Employee Is Enough — Commentary on Gallimore v. City of Opa-Locka

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ADEA Prima Facie Proof: Replacement by a Younger Employee Is Enough — Commentary on Gallimore v. City of Opa-Locka

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ADEA Prima Facie Proof: Replacement by a Younger Employee Is Enough In-Depth Commentary on Sharon Gallimore v. City of Opa-Locka, No. 23-12241 (11th Cir. Aug. 6, 2025) 1....
United States v. Petersen (11th Cir. 2025):  A Clearer Timeliness Standard for Successive Coram Nobis Petitions

United States v. Petersen (11th Cir. 2025): A Clearer Timeliness Standard for Successive Coram Nobis Petitions

Date: Aug 13, 2025
United States v. Petersen (11th Cir. 2025): A Clearer Timeliness Standard for Successive Coram Nobis Petitions Introduction In United States v. David Petersen, the Eleventh Circuit again confronted...
“When Futility Trumps the Right to Amend” – Eleventh Circuit Harmonises Rule 15(a)(1) with § 1915(e)(2) Screening in Willy Toussaint v. U.S. Attorney’s Office

“When Futility Trumps the Right to Amend” – Eleventh Circuit Harmonises Rule 15(a)(1) with § 1915(e)(2) Screening in Willy Toussaint v. U.S. Attorney’s Office

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“When Futility Trumps the Right to Amend” – Eleventh Circuit Harmonises Rule 15(a)(1) with § 1915(e)(2) Screening in Willy Toussaint v. U.S. Attorney’s Office 1. Introduction The unpublished decision...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert