Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

affirmation-of-combination-jury-instructions-in-murder-conviction-upholds-kentucky& Case Commentaries

When “Different Occasions” Becomes a Jury Question: Seventh Circuit Embraces Erlinger and Vacates ACCA Sentence in United States v. Santana

When “Different Occasions” Becomes a Jury Question: Seventh Circuit Embraces Erlinger and Vacates ACCA Sentence in United States v. Santana

Date: Jun 30, 2025
When “Different Occasions” Becomes a Jury Question: Seventh Circuit Embraces Erlinger and Vacates ACCA Sentence in United States v. Santana Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s decision in United...
“Plain-Error Limits on Flight Instructions & Party Liability Proof” – A Commentary on Arnsdorff v. State (Ga. 2025)

“Plain-Error Limits on Flight Instructions & Party Liability Proof” – A Commentary on Arnsdorff v. State (Ga. 2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Plain-Error Limits on Flight Instructions & Party Liability Proof” A Structured Commentary on Arnsdorff v. State, Supreme Court of Georgia, 24 June 2025 I. Introduction On 24 June 2025 the Supreme...
“Slight but Sufficient” — Bowdery v. State and the Modern Standard for Corroborating Accomplice Testimony in Georgia

“Slight but Sufficient” — Bowdery v. State and the Modern Standard for Corroborating Accomplice Testimony in Georgia

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Slight but Sufficient” — Bowdery v. State and the Modern Standard for Corroborating Accomplice Testimony in Georgia Introduction Bowdery v. State, Supreme Court of Georgia, decided 24 June 2025, is...
Coleman v. State: One Proceeding, One Penalty – Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Criminal Contempt and Fifth-Amendment Protection

Coleman v. State: One Proceeding, One Penalty – Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Criminal Contempt and Fifth-Amendment Protection

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Coleman v. State: One Proceeding, One Penalty – Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Criminal Contempt and Fifth-Amendment Protection Introduction On 24 June 2025, the Supreme Court of Georgia...
Service to the Office, Not the Individual: Fleureme v. City of Atlanta and the Flexible Interpretation of OCGA § 36-33-5(f)

Service to the Office, Not the Individual: Fleureme v. City of Atlanta and the Flexible Interpretation of OCGA § 36-33-5(f)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Service to the Office, Not the Individual: Fleureme v. City of Atlanta and the Flexible Interpretation of OCGA § 36-33-5(f) Introduction On 24 June 2025 the Supreme Court of Georgia delivered a...
Foots v. State: Strengthening the Jury’s Power to Convert Disbelieved Self-Defense Testimony into Substantive Evidence of Guilt

Foots v. State: Strengthening the Jury’s Power to Convert Disbelieved Self-Defense Testimony into Substantive Evidence of Guilt

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Foots v. State: Strengthening the Jury’s Power to Convert Disbelieved Self-Defense Testimony into Substantive Evidence of Guilt Introduction In Foots v. State, S25A0646 (Ga. June 24 2025), the...
The Fuller Doctrine: Reconciling Constitutional Sufficiency with Georgia’s Circumstantial-Evidence Statute in Party-to-Crime Convictions

The Fuller Doctrine: Reconciling Constitutional Sufficiency with Georgia’s Circumstantial-Evidence Statute in Party-to-Crime Convictions

Date: Jun 30, 2025
The Fuller Doctrine: Reconciling Constitutional Sufficiency with Georgia’s Circumstantial-Evidence Statute in Party-to-Crime Convictions Introduction Fuller v. State, decided by the Supreme Court of...
“Plea-Bound but Not Fixed”: Gayle v. State and the Expanded Discretion of Georgia Juries to Treat Guilty-Plea Witnesses as Non-Accomplices

“Plea-Bound but Not Fixed”: Gayle v. State and the Expanded Discretion of Georgia Juries to Treat Guilty-Plea Witnesses as Non-Accomplices

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Plea-Bound but Not Fixed”: Gayle v. State and the Expanded Discretion of Georgia Juries to Treat Guilty-Pleas as Non-Accomplice Testimony Introduction On 24 June 2025, the Supreme Court of Georgia...
Reframing Municipal Instrumentality Sovereign Immunity: Guy v. Housing Authority of Augusta and the Common-Law Mandate

Reframing Municipal Instrumentality Sovereign Immunity: Guy v. Housing Authority of Augusta and the Common-Law Mandate

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Reframing Municipal Instrumentality Sovereign Immunity: Guy v. Housing Authority of the City of Augusta, 312 Ga. ___ (2025) Introduction The Supreme Court of Georgia’s decision in Guy v. Housing...
Hart v. State – 2025:  Supreme Court of Georgia Re-anchors Appellate Jurisdiction in Non-Capital Murder Appeals on its Certiorari Power

Hart v. State – 2025: Supreme Court of Georgia Re-anchors Appellate Jurisdiction in Non-Capital Murder Appeals on its Certiorari Power

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Hart v. State – 2025: Supreme Court of Georgia Re-anchors Appellate Jurisdiction in Non-Capital Murder Appeals on its Certiorari Power Introduction In Hart v. State the Supreme Court of Georgia...
The “Crime-Spree Joinder” Doctrine & Harmless Rule 404(b) Error: A Commentary on Lee v. State (Ga. 2025)

The “Crime-Spree Joinder” Doctrine & Harmless Rule 404(b) Error: A Commentary on Lee v. State (Ga. 2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
The “Crime-Spree Joinder” Doctrine & Harmless Rule 404(b) Error: A Commentary on Lee v. State, 321 Ga. 87 (2025) Introduction In Lee v. State, the Supreme Court of Georgia faced an appeal arising...
No Proffer, No Prejudice: The Padgett Clarification on Ineffective-Assistance Claims in Georgia

No Proffer, No Prejudice: The Padgett Clarification on Ineffective-Assistance Claims in Georgia

Date: Jun 30, 2025
No Proffer, No Prejudice: The Padgett Clarification on Ineffective-Assistance Claims in Georgia Introduction Padgett v. State, S25A0719 (Ga. June 24, 2025), presented the Supreme Court of Georgia...
“Quintanar v. State”: Georgia Supreme Court Re-anchors Juvenile Confession Analysis on “Coercive-Police-Activity” and Clarifies Limits on Self-Defense & Mutual-Combat Charges

“Quintanar v. State”: Georgia Supreme Court Re-anchors Juvenile Confession Analysis on “Coercive-Police-Activity” and Clarifies Limits on Self-Defense & Mutual-Combat Charges

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Quintanar v. State”: Georgia Supreme Court Re-anchors Juvenile Confession Analysis on “Coercive-Police-Activity” and Clarifies Limits on Self-Defense & Mutual-Combat Charges I. Introduction...
Turner v. MCCG: Re-defining the Reach of Nestlehutt and Requiring Claim-Specific Analysis of Georgia’s Medical Malpractice Damage Caps

Turner v. MCCG: Re-defining the Reach of Nestlehutt and Requiring Claim-Specific Analysis of Georgia’s Medical Malpractice Damage Caps

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Turner v. MCCG: Re-defining the Reach of Nestlehutt and Requiring Claim-Specific Analysis of Georgia’s Medical Malpractice Damage Caps Introduction In The Medical Center of Central Georgia, Inc. v....
“A Trivial Sum, Not a Treasure Chest” – Georgia Supreme Court Re-defines the Ceiling on Nominal Damages in Walmart Stores East, LP v. Leverette

“A Trivial Sum, Not a Treasure Chest” – Georgia Supreme Court Re-defines the Ceiling on Nominal Damages in Walmart Stores East, LP v. Leverette

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“A Trivial Sum, Not a Treasure Chest” – Georgia Supreme Court Re-defines the Ceiling on Nominal Damages in Walmart Stores East, LP v. Leverette Introduction On 24 June 2025, the Supreme Court of...
Wilson v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Narrows “Common Plan or Scheme” under Rule 404(b) and Clarifies Harmless-Error Review

Wilson v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Narrows “Common Plan or Scheme” under Rule 404(b) and Clarifies Harmless-Error Review

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Wilson v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Narrows “Common Plan or Scheme” under Rule 404(b) and Clarifies Harmless-Error Review 1. Introduction Citation: Wilson v. State, S25A0430, Supreme Court of...
“Model or Miss the Boat” – Sixth Circuit Requires Site-Specific Hydrologic Modeling and Full Rule 26 Compliance for Flood-Causation Experts

“Model or Miss the Boat” – Sixth Circuit Requires Site-Specific Hydrologic Modeling and Full Rule 26 Compliance for Flood-Causation Experts

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Model or Miss the Boat” – Sixth Circuit Requires Site-Specific Hydrologic Modeling and Full Rule 26 Compliance for Flood-Causation Experts Introduction In Eugene Baker v. Blackhawk Mining, LLC, No....
Martinez v. Wayne County (2025): Sixth Circuit Defines the Outer Boundary of Next-of-Kin Due-Process Rights over Naturally Decomposed Remains

Martinez v. Wayne County (2025): Sixth Circuit Defines the Outer Boundary of Next-of-Kin Due-Process Rights over Naturally Decomposed Remains

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Martinez v. Wayne County (2025): Sixth Circuit Defines the Outer Boundary of Next-of-Kin Due-Process Rights over Naturally Decomposed Remains Introduction In Luis Antonio Martinez, Sr. v. Wayne...

        Sixth Circuit Clarifies Two Key Points: 
        (1) § 3742(a) Does Not Bar Appeals from Denials of Early-Termination Motions, and 
        (2) District Courts Must Show Consideration of § 3553(a) Factors When They Deny Early Termination of Supervised Release

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Two Key Points: (1) § 3742(a) Does Not Bar Appeals from Denials of Early-Termination Motions, and (2) District Courts Must Show Consideration of § 3553(a) Factors When They Deny Early Termination of Supervised Release

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Edwin Tavarez – A New Framework for Early Termination of Supervised Release in the Sixth Circuit Introduction In United States v. Edwin Tavarez, No. 23-3666 (6th Cir. 2025), the...

The Zambrano Clarification: Inadvertent Police Misstatements Do Not Constitute
“Fabricated Evidence” Absent Proof of Bad-Faith Knowledge and Materiality

The Zambrano Clarification: Inadvertent Police Misstatements Do Not Constitute “Fabricated Evidence” Absent Proof of Bad-Faith Knowledge and Materiality

Date: Jun 30, 2025
The Zambrano Clarification: Inadvertent Police Misstatements Do Not Constitute “Fabricated Evidence” Absent Proof of Bad-Faith Knowledge and Materiality 1. Introduction Jesus Zambrano v. City of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert