Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Wisconsin Case Commentaries

Reevaluation of Expert Witness Credibility: The State v. Douglas J. Plude

Reevaluation of Expert Witness Credibility: The State v. Douglas J. Plude

Date: Jun 11, 2008
Reevaluation of Expert Witness Credibility: The State v. Douglas J. Plude Introduction In the landmark case of State of Wisconsin v. Douglas J. Plude, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin addressed the...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules Out Reasonable Reliance as an Element in Statutory Misrepresentation Claims Under § 100.18

Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules Out Reasonable Reliance as an Element in Statutory Misrepresentation Claims Under § 100.18

Date: May 29, 2008
Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules Out Reasonable Reliance as an Element in Statutory Misrepresentation Claims Under § 100.18 Introduction In the landmark case of Chad Novell v. Anthony and Andrea...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Establishes Broad Interpretation of HIPA for Double Damages and Personal Liability

Wisconsin Supreme Court Establishes Broad Interpretation of HIPA for Double Damages and Personal Liability

Date: Mar 29, 2008
Wisconsin Supreme Court Establishes Broad Interpretation of HIPA for Double Damages and Personal Liability Introduction In the case of STUART v. WEISFLOG'S SHOWROOM Gallery, Inc., the Supreme Court...
Reaffirmation of Mistrial Standards in Jury-Bailiff Interactions: State v. Ford

Reaffirmation of Mistrial Standards in Jury-Bailiff Interactions: State v. Ford

Date: Dec 12, 2007
Reaffirmation of Mistrial Standards in Jury-Bailiff Interactions: State of Wisconsin v. Ford Introduction State of Wisconsin v. William Troy Ford, 306 Wis. 2d 1 (2007), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Three-Year Suspension of Attorney Michael R. Inglimo for Professional Misconduct

Three-Year Suspension of Attorney Michael R. Inglimo for Professional Misconduct

Date: Oct 19, 2007
Three-Year Suspension of Attorney Michael R. Inglimo for Professional Misconduct Introduction The Supreme Court of Wisconsin issued a significant ruling on October 18, 2007, in the disciplinary...
Understanding Plea Withdrawal: Insights from STATE v. JENKINS

Understanding Plea Withdrawal: Insights from STATE v. JENKINS

Date: Jul 13, 2007
Understanding Plea Withdrawal: Insights from State of Wisconsin v. Barry M. Jenkins Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Barry M. Jenkins, 303 Wis. 2d 157 (2007), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Cumulative Errors in Criminal Trials: Analysis of State v. Mayo

Cumulative Errors in Criminal Trials: Analysis of State v. Mayo

Date: Jun 27, 2007
Cumulative Errors in Criminal Trials: Analysis of State v. Mayo Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Thomas S. Mayo is a significant case reviewed by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin in 2007. The...
Affirming Bangert Standards: Entitlement to Evidentiary Hearings in Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas – State v. Andrae D. Howell

Affirming Bangert Standards: Entitlement to Evidentiary Hearings in Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas – State v. Andrae D. Howell

Date: Jun 22, 2007
Affirming Bangert Standards: Entitlement to Evidentiary Hearings in Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas – State v. Andrae D. Howell Introduction In the landmark case of State of Wisconsin v. Andrae D. Howell,...
Defining 'The Public' under Wisconsin's Deceptive Trade Practices Act: Insights from KS Tool Die Corp. v. Perfection Mach. Sales, Inc.

Defining 'The Public' under Wisconsin's Deceptive Trade Practices Act: Insights from KS Tool Die Corp. v. Perfection Mach. Sales, Inc.

Date: Jun 13, 2007
Defining 'The Public' under Wisconsin's Deceptive Trade Practices Act: Insights from KS Tool Die Corporation v. Perfection Machinery Sales, Inc. Introduction The case of KS Tool Die Corporation v....
State v. Post: Emphasizing Totality of Circumstances Over Bright-Line Rules in Establishing Reasonable Suspicion for Traffic Stops

State v. Post: Emphasizing Totality of Circumstances Over Bright-Line Rules in Establishing Reasonable Suspicion for Traffic Stops

Date: May 24, 2007
State v. Post: Emphasizing Totality of Circumstances Over Bright-Line Rules in Establishing Reasonable Suspicion for Traffic Stops Introduction In the landmark case of State of Wisconsin v. Robert E....
Imputing Attorney Misconduct to Clients in Civil Litigation: A Comprehensive Commentary on Industrial Roofing Services v. Marquardt

Imputing Attorney Misconduct to Clients in Civil Litigation: A Comprehensive Commentary on Industrial Roofing Services v. Marquardt

Date: Feb 9, 2007
Imputing Attorney Misconduct to Clients in Civil Litigation: A Comprehensive Commentary on Industrial Roofing Services, Inc. v. Marquardt, 299 Wis.2d 81 (2007) Introduction Industrial Roofing...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Clarifies Civil Remedies for Confidential Information Misappropriation Beyond Statutory Trade Secrets

Wisconsin Supreme Court Clarifies Civil Remedies for Confidential Information Misappropriation Beyond Statutory Trade Secrets

Date: Jul 14, 2006
Wisconsin Supreme Court Clarifies Civil Remedies for Confidential Information Misappropriation Beyond Statutory Trade Secrets Introduction The case of Burbank Grease Services, LLC v. Larry Sokoloski...
Reaffirming Defendants' Rights: STATE v. Brown Establishes Stringent Requirements for Valid Guilty Pleas

Reaffirming Defendants' Rights: STATE v. Brown Establishes Stringent Requirements for Valid Guilty Pleas

Date: Jul 13, 2006
Reaffirming Defendants' Rights: STATE v. Brown Establishes Stringent Requirements for Valid Guilty Pleas Introduction State of Wisconsin v. James E. Brown (293 Wis. 2d 594, 2006) is a landmark...
Reconciling Mendenhall and Hodari D.: The STATE v. YOUNG Decision and Its Implications for Seizure Analysis

Reconciling Mendenhall and Hodari D.: The STATE v. YOUNG Decision and Its Implications for Seizure Analysis

Date: Jul 13, 2006
Reconciling Mendenhall and Hodari D.: The STATE v. YOUNG Decision and Its Implications for Seizure Analysis Introduction The case of State of Wisconsin v. Charles E. Young (294 Wis. 2d 1) represents...
Reaffirmation of Guilty-Plea-Waiver Rule in Double Jeopardy Challenges

Reaffirmation of Guilty-Plea-Waiver Rule in Double Jeopardy Challenges

Date: Jul 13, 2006
Reaffirmation of Guilty-Plea-Waiver Rule in Double Jeopardy Challenges Introduction In STATE of Wisconsin v. Rachel W. Kelty, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin revisited the interplay between guilty...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process in Termination of Parental Rights

Wisconsin Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process in Termination of Parental Rights

Date: Jul 12, 2006
Wisconsin Supreme Court Reinforces Due Process in Termination of Parental Rights Introduction The case of In Re the Termination of Parental Rights to Max G. W. (2006) addresses the constitutional...
Affirmation on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims Regarding Identification Evidence in STATE v. ROBERSON

Affirmation on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims Regarding Identification Evidence in STATE v. ROBERSON

Date: Jul 1, 2006
Affirmation on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims Regarding Identification Evidence in STATE v. ROBERSON Introduction State of Wisconsin v. David J. Roberson is a pivotal case heard by the...
Revisiting Habitual Criminality Standards: Analysis of State v. Jamale A. Bonds

Revisiting Habitual Criminality Standards: Analysis of State v. Jamale A. Bonds

Date: Jul 1, 2006
Revisiting Habitual Criminality Standards: Analysis of State of Wisconsin v. Jamale A. Bonds Introduction The case of State of Wisconsin v. Jamale A. Bonds (292 Wis. 2d 344) adjudicated by the...
Priority Statutes Shield Construction Lenders from Subcontractor Claims: HOIDA, INC. v. MI MIDSTATE BANK

Priority Statutes Shield Construction Lenders from Subcontractor Claims: HOIDA, INC. v. MI MIDSTATE BANK

Date: Jun 14, 2006
Priority Statutes Shield Construction Lenders from Subcontractor Claims: HOIDA, INC. v. MI MIDSTATE BANK Introduction In the case of HOIDA, INC. v. MI MIDSTATE BANK and McDonald Title Company, Inc.,...
Actual Reliance Standard Established in Resentencing Motions: Insights from STATE v. TIEPELMAN

Actual Reliance Standard Established in Resentencing Motions: Insights from STATE v. TIEPELMAN

Date: Jun 10, 2006
Actual Reliance Standard Established in Resentencing Motions: Insights from STATE of Wisconsin v. Larry A. Tiepelman Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of Wisconsin v. Larry A. Tiepelman,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert