Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Wisconsin Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Good Faith Exception in Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Decision in STATE v. DEARBORN

Affirmation of Good Faith Exception in Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Decision in STATE v. DEARBORN

Date: Jul 16, 2010
Affirmation of Good Faith Exception in Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Decision in STATE v. DEARBORN Introduction The State of Wisconsin v. David A. Dearborn, decided on July 15, 2010, by the Supreme Court...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Reaffirms Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Improper Sentencing Factors

Wisconsin Supreme Court Reaffirms Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Improper Sentencing Factors

Date: Jul 15, 2010
Wisconsin Supreme Court Reaffirms Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Improper Sentencing Factors Introduction In the case of State of Wisconsin v. Landray M. Harris (326 Wis. 2d 685), the...
Establishing the 'Interest of Justice' Framework for Relief from Default Judgments under Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1)(h)

Establishing the 'Interest of Justice' Framework for Relief from Default Judgments under Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1)(h)

Date: Jul 14, 2010
Establishing the 'Interest of Justice' Framework for Relief from Default Judgments under Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1)(h) Introduction The Supreme Court of Wisconsin, in the case of Miller v. Hanover...
STATE v. IMANI: Upholding Mandatory Colloquy Requirements for Valid Waiver of Counsel in Self-Representation

STATE v. IMANI: Upholding Mandatory Colloquy Requirements for Valid Waiver of Counsel in Self-Representation

Date: Jul 8, 2010
STATE v. IMANI: Upholding Mandatory Colloquy Requirements for Valid Waiver of Counsel in Self-Representation Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Rashaad A. Imani is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Ambiguity in Lease Liability: Tenant Not Automatically Liable for Non-Negligent Acts

Ambiguity in Lease Liability: Tenant Not Automatically Liable for Non-Negligent Acts

Date: Jul 8, 2010
Ambiguity in Lease Liability: Tenant Not Automatically Liable for Non-Negligent Acts Introduction Maryland Arms Limited Partnership v. Cari M. Connell and Linda J. Connell is a notable case...
State v. Carter: Upholding Rape Shield Protections in Ineffective Assistance Claims

State v. Carter: Upholding Rape Shield Protections in Ineffective Assistance Claims

Date: May 26, 2010
State v. Carter: Upholding Rape Shield Protections in Ineffective Assistance Claims Introduction In State v. Carter, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin addressed a crucial issue concerning the...
Affirming Strict Liability for Statutory Dog Keepers: Pawlowski v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Affirming Strict Liability for Statutory Dog Keepers: Pawlowski v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Date: Dec 30, 2009
Affirming Strict Liability for Statutory Dog Keepers: Pawlowski v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. Introduction The case of Colleen Pawlowski and Thomas Pawlowski v. American Family Mutual...
STATE v. PAYANO: Upholding the Use of 'Other Acts' Evidence to Rebut Self-Defense Claims in Wisconsin

STATE v. PAYANO: Upholding the Use of 'Other Acts' Evidence to Rebut Self-Defense Claims in Wisconsin

Date: Jul 22, 2009
STATE v. PAYANO: Upholding the Use of 'Other Acts' Evidence to Rebut Self-Defense Claims in Wisconsin Introduction The Supreme Court of Wisconsin, in State of Wisconsin v. Tony Payano (2009),...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Limits Bystander Emotional Distress Claims in Medical Malpractice Cases

Wisconsin Supreme Court Limits Bystander Emotional Distress Claims in Medical Malpractice Cases

Date: Jul 11, 2009
Wisconsin Supreme Court Limits Bystander Emotional Distress Claims in Medical Malpractice Cases Introduction The case of Gregory Phelps et al. v. Physicians Insurance Co. of Wisconsin, Inc. (319 Wis....
State v. Lange: Upholding Probable Cause in DUI Arrests Based on Totality of Circumstances

State v. Lange: Upholding Probable Cause in DUI Arrests Based on Totality of Circumstances

Date: Jun 17, 2009
State v. Lange: Upholding Probable Cause in DUI Arrests Based on Totality of Circumstances Introduction In State of Wisconsin v. Mitchell A. Lange, 317 Wis. 2d 383 (2009), the Supreme Court of...
Ensuring Substantive Plea Colloquies: STATE of Wisconsin v. Christopher S. Hoppe

Ensuring Substantive Plea Colloquies: STATE of Wisconsin v. Christopher S. Hoppe

Date: May 30, 2009
Ensuring Substantive Plea Colloquies: STATE of Wisconsin v. Christopher S. Hoppe Introduction In State of Wisconsin v. Christopher S. Hoppe, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin addressed critical issues...
Operating Left of Center as Probable Cause for Traffic Stops: Analysis of State v. Popke

Operating Left of Center as Probable Cause for Traffic Stops: Analysis of State v. Popke

Date: May 28, 2009
Operating Left of Center as Probable Cause for Traffic Stops: Analysis of State v. Popke 1. Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Michael L. Popke, decided by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin on May 27,...
Wisconsin Court Clarifies Joint and Several Liability and Upholds Settlement Cost Provisions in Industrial Risk v. Denzin Engineering

Wisconsin Court Clarifies Joint and Several Liability and Upholds Settlement Cost Provisions in Industrial Risk v. Denzin Engineering

Date: Apr 15, 2009
Wisconsin Court Clarifies Joint and Several Liability and Upholds Settlement Cost Provisions in Industrial Risk v. Denzin Engineering Introduction The case of Industrial Risk Insurers and Quad...
Balancing Public Trial Rights and Courtroom Sequestration: Insights from STATE of Wisconsin v. Dhosi J. Ndina

Balancing Public Trial Rights and Courtroom Sequestration: Insights from STATE of Wisconsin v. Dhosi J. Ndina

Date: Feb 27, 2009
Balancing Public Trial Rights and Courtroom Sequestration: Insights from STATE of Wisconsin v. Dhosi J. Ndina Introduction The case of STATE of Wisconsin v. Dhosi J. Ndina presents a pivotal...
Affirmation of Community Caretaker Function in Fourth Amendment Seizures: STATE v. KRAMER

Affirmation of Community Caretaker Function in Fourth Amendment Seizures: STATE v. KRAMER

Date: Jan 30, 2009
Affirmation of Community Caretaker Function in Fourth Amendment Seizures: STATE v. KRAMER Introduction STATE v. KRAMER, 315 Wis. 2d 414 (2009), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin,...
Intentional Acts Excluded as 'Accidents' and No Duty to Defend Under Four-Corners Rule – Supreme Court of Wisconsin

Intentional Acts Excluded as 'Accidents' and No Duty to Defend Under Four-Corners Rule – Supreme Court of Wisconsin

Date: Jul 11, 2008
Intentional Acts Excluded as 'Accidents' and No Duty to Defend Under Four-Corners Rule – Supreme Court of Wisconsin Introduction The Supreme Court of Wisconsin, in the case of Estate of James B....
Wisconsin Supreme Court Establishes Non-Search Status for Vehicle Dog Sniffs in Arias Case

Wisconsin Supreme Court Establishes Non-Search Status for Vehicle Dog Sniffs in Arias Case

Date: Jul 10, 2008
Wisconsin Supreme Court Establishes Non-Search Status for Vehicle Dog Sniffs in Arias Case Introduction In the landmark case State of Wisconsin v. Ramon Lopez Arias, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin...
Strict Notice Requirements for Sua Sponte Summary Judgments: Insights from LARRY v. HARRIS

Strict Notice Requirements for Sua Sponte Summary Judgments: Insights from LARRY v. HARRIS

Date: Jul 10, 2008
Strict Notice Requirements for Sua Sponte Summary Judgments: Insights from LARRY v. HARRIS Introduction LARRY v. HARRIS, 311 Wis. 2d 326 (2008), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin,...
Plain Error Doctrine in Confrontation and Due Process: Analysis of State v. Jorgensen

Plain Error Doctrine in Confrontation and Due Process: Analysis of State v. Jorgensen

Date: Jun 14, 2008
Plain Error Doctrine in Confrontation and Due Process: Analysis of State v. Jorgensen Introduction State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Donald W. Jorgensen, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner is...
LaCount Decision: Clarifying the Scope of Expert Testimony and Search Warrant Execution

LaCount Decision: Clarifying the Scope of Expert Testimony and Search Warrant Execution

Date: Jun 11, 2008
LaCount Decision: Clarifying the Scope of Expert Testimony and Search Warrant Execution Introduction In the landmark case of State of Wisconsin v. Louis H. LaCount, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert