Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Wisconsin Case Commentaries

Admissibility of Juvenile Confessions: Insights from STATE v. BURDETTE WOODS

Admissibility of Juvenile Confessions: Insights from STATE v. BURDETTE WOODS

Date: Mar 28, 1984
Admissibility of Juvenile Confessions: Insights from STATE v. Burdette Woods Introduction The case of STATE of Wisconsin v. Burdette Woods (117 Wis. 2d 701, 1984) presents a pivotal examination of...
Exemption of Pre-1980 Approved Building Programs Under Section 38.15, Stats.

Exemption of Pre-1980 Approved Building Programs Under Section 38.15, Stats.

Date: Mar 28, 1984
Exemption of Pre-1980 Approved Building Programs Under Section 38.15, Stats. Introduction The case of Philip D. Ball et al. v. District No. 4, Area Board of Vocational, Technical Adult Education (117...
Comparative Negligence in DES Litigation: Gastrow v. Eli Lilly Company and Others

Comparative Negligence in DES Litigation: Gastrow v. Eli Lilly Company and Others

Date: Jan 5, 1984
Comparative Negligence in DES Litigation: Gastrow v. Eli Lilly Company and Others Introduction The case of Therese Marie Gastrow v. Eli Lilly Company et al., decided by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin...
Refined Admissibility Criteria for Other Crimes Evidence Under Wisconsin Statutes: State v. Pharr

Refined Admissibility Criteria for Other Crimes Evidence Under Wisconsin Statutes: State v. Pharr

Date: Dec 1, 1983
Refined Admissibility Criteria for Other Crimes Evidence Under Wisconsin Statutes: State v. Pharr Introduction The case of State of Wisconsin v. Justin Pharr, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing the Emergency Rule Exception in Child Abuse Investigations: STATE of Wisconsin v. Boggess

Establishing the Emergency Rule Exception in Child Abuse Investigations: STATE of Wisconsin v. Boggess

Date: Dec 1, 1983
Establishing the Emergency Rule Exception in Child Abuse Investigations: STATE of Wisconsin v. Boggess Introduction STATE of Wisconsin v. Calvin Boggess, 115 Wis. 2d 443 (1983), addresses the...
Res Judicata and Transactional Claims: Insights from DePratt v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Co.

Res Judicata and Transactional Claims: Insights from DePratt v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Co.

Date: Jul 2, 1983
Res Judicata and Transactional Claims: Insights from DePratt v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. Introduction DePratt v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Co., decided by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin in...
Discretionary Sentencing and the Non-Superseding Nature of Sentencing Guidelines: Insights from State v. Macemon

Discretionary Sentencing and the Non-Superseding Nature of Sentencing Guidelines: Insights from State v. Macemon

Date: Jul 2, 1983
Discretionary Sentencing and the Non-Superseding Nature of Sentencing Guidelines: Insights from State v. Macemon Introduction In State of Wisconsin v. Robert J. Macemon, decided on July 1, 1983, the...
Limited Public Policy Exceptions Established in Wisconsin's Employment At Will Doctrine

Limited Public Policy Exceptions Established in Wisconsin's Employment At Will Doctrine

Date: Jul 2, 1983
Limited Public Policy Exceptions Established in Wisconsin's Employment At Will Doctrine Introduction The case of Charles J. BROCKMEYER v. DUN BRADSTREET (113 Wis. 2d 561, 1983) marks a significant...
Adoption of the Discovery Rule for Tort Claims in Wisconsin: Analysis of Hansen v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc.

Adoption of the Discovery Rule for Tort Claims in Wisconsin: Analysis of Hansen v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc.

Date: Jul 2, 1983
Adoption of the Discovery Rule for Tort Claims in Wisconsin: Analysis of Hansen v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc. Introduction The case of Kathleen M. Hansen v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc. (113 Wis. 2d...
Summary Judgment Reversed: Evidentiary Requirements for Police Power Special Assessments

Summary Judgment Reversed: Evidentiary Requirements for Police Power Special Assessments

Date: Apr 27, 1983
Summary Judgment Reversed: Evidentiary Requirements for Police Power Special Assessments Introduction The case of In re the Matter of the Construction of Concrete Sidewalks in the Fourth Addition to...
Conditional Guilty Pleas Do Not Preserve Appellate Rights: Analysis of State v. Riekkoff

Conditional Guilty Pleas Do Not Preserve Appellate Rights: Analysis of State v. Riekkoff

Date: Apr 27, 1983
Conditional Guilty Pleas Do Not Preserve Appellate Rights: Analysis of State v. Riekkoff Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Ronald Craig Riekkoff, 112 Wis.2d 119 (1983), is a landmark decision by the...
Affirmation of Procedural Due Process in Strict Foreclosure Under Land Contracts

Affirmation of Procedural Due Process in Strict Foreclosure Under Land Contracts

Date: Apr 20, 1983
Affirmation of Procedural Due Process in Strict Foreclosure Under Land Contracts Introduction In the case of Robert J. Sweet, Helen Sweet, and Robert J. Sweet Co., Inc. v. Philip L. Berge and Betty...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Enforceability of Liquidated Damages Clauses in Employment Contracts: Wassenaar v. Panos

Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Enforceability of Liquidated Damages Clauses in Employment Contracts: Wassenaar v. Panos

Date: Mar 30, 1983
Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Enforceability of Liquidated Damages Clauses in Employment Contracts: Wassenaar v. Panos Introduction The case of Donald Wassenaar v. Theanne Panos d/b/a The Towne...
Strid v. Converse: Establishing Boundaries for Attorney Immunity in Abuse of Process Claims

Strid v. Converse: Establishing Boundaries for Attorney Immunity in Abuse of Process Claims

Date: Mar 30, 1983
Strid v. Converse: Establishing Boundaries for Attorney Immunity in Abuse of Process Claims Introduction Strid v. Converse is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin on March 29,...
Princess House, Inc. v. DILHR: Establishing Employee Status for Contractual Consultants under Wisconsin Unemployment Compensation Act

Princess House, Inc. v. DILHR: Establishing Employee Status for Contractual Consultants under Wisconsin Unemployment Compensation Act

Date: Mar 2, 1983
Princess House, Inc. v. DILHR: Establishing Employee Status for Contractual Consultants under Wisconsin Unemployment Compensation Act Introduction The case of Princess House, Inc. v. Department of...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in State v. Felton: Establishing Critical Standards for Defense Representation

Effective Assistance of Counsel in State v. Felton: Establishing Critical Standards for Defense Representation

Date: Feb 4, 1983
Effective Assistance of Counsel in State of Wisconsin v. Rita A. Felton: Establishing Critical Standards for Defense Representation Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Rita A. Felton (110 Wis. 2d 485,...
Admissibility of Opinion Evidence in Criminal Trials: Insights from STATE v. CUYLER

Admissibility of Opinion Evidence in Criminal Trials: Insights from STATE v. CUYLER

Date: Jan 6, 1983
Admissibility of Opinion Evidence in Criminal Trials: Insights from STATE v. CUYLER Introduction STATE of Wisconsin v. Rick L. Cuyler is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin on...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Establishes Right of Innocent Insured to Recover in Cases of Co-Insured Arson

Wisconsin Supreme Court Establishes Right of Innocent Insured to Recover in Cases of Co-Insured Arson

Date: Dec 1, 1982
Wisconsin Supreme Court Establishes Right of Innocent Insured to Recover in Cases of Co-Insured Arson Introduction In the landmark case of Judith A. Hedtcke v. Sentry Insurance Company, 109 Wis.2d...
Finality of Foreclosure Judgments: An Analysis of George Shupput Jr. v. John W. Lauer Jr.

Finality of Foreclosure Judgments: An Analysis of George Shupput Jr. v. John W. Lauer Jr.

Date: Nov 3, 1982
Finality of Foreclosure Judgments: An Analysis of George Shupput Jr. v. John W. Lauer Jr. Introduction The case of George Shupput, Jr. v. John W. Lauer, Jr. addresses significant issues surrounding...
Admissibility of Prior Sexual Conduct Evidence in Consent-Based Sexual Assault Cases: STATE v. ALSTEEN

Admissibility of Prior Sexual Conduct Evidence in Consent-Based Sexual Assault Cases: STATE v. ALSTEEN

Date: Oct 6, 1982
Admissibility of Prior Sexual Conduct Evidence in Consent-Based Sexual Assault Cases: STATE of Wisconsin v. James Alsteen Introduction The landmark case of STATE of Wisconsin v. James Alsteen,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert