Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Wisconsin Case Commentaries

STATE v. PERRY: Affirming the Right to Complete Trial Transcripts for Meaningful Appeals

STATE v. PERRY: Affirming the Right to Complete Trial Transcripts for Meaningful Appeals

Date: Mar 7, 1987
STATE v. PERRY: Affirming the Right to Complete Trial Transcripts for Meaningful Appeals Introduction In State of Wisconsin v. Robert L. Perry, 136 Wis. 2d 92 (1987), the Supreme Court of Wisconsin...
Wisconsin Supreme Court Establishes Criteria for Voluntariness of Confessions Amidst Physical Pain and Intoxication

Wisconsin Supreme Court Establishes Criteria for Voluntariness of Confessions Amidst Physical Pain and Intoxication

Date: Mar 7, 1987
Wisconsin Supreme Court Establishes Criteria for Voluntariness of Confessions Amidst Physical Pain and Intoxication Introduction In the landmark case of State of Wisconsin vs. Douglas H. Clappes and...
Admissibility of Prior Acts Evidence in Sexual Assault Cases: Insights from STATE of Wisconsin v. Larry W. Friedrich

Admissibility of Prior Acts Evidence in Sexual Assault Cases: Insights from STATE of Wisconsin v. Larry W. Friedrich

Date: Jan 15, 1987
Admissibility of Prior Acts Evidence in Sexual Assault Cases: Insights from State of Wisconsin v. Larry W. Friedrich Introduction The case of State of Wisconsin v. Larry W. Friedrich (135 Wis. 2d 1),...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Competency Challenges: An Analysis of STATE v. JOHNSON (1986)

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Competency Challenges: An Analysis of STATE v. JOHNSON (1986)

Date: Oct 30, 1986
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Competency Challenges: An Analysis of STATE v. JOHNSON (1986) Introduction In the landmark case of State of Wisconsin v. Oliver Ross Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d 207...
Shift in Plea Withdrawal Standards: State v. Bangert Establishes Comprehensive Review Procedures in Wisconsin

Shift in Plea Withdrawal Standards: State v. Bangert Establishes Comprehensive Review Procedures in Wisconsin

Date: Jun 25, 1986
Shift in Plea Withdrawal Standards: State v. Bangert Establishes Comprehensive Review Procedures in Wisconsin Introduction In State of Wisconsin v. Christian R. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246 (1986), the...
Enhanced Protections for Warrantless Home Arrests: Insights from State v. Per

Enhanced Protections for Warrantless Home Arrests: Insights from State v. Per

Date: Jun 25, 1986
Enhanced Protections for Warrantless Home Arrests: Insights from State of Wisconsin v. Per Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Per is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, delivered...
State v. Fry: Clarifying the Scope of Automobile Searches Incident to Arrest

State v. Fry: Clarifying the Scope of Automobile Searches Incident to Arrest

Date: Jun 21, 1986
State v. Fry: Clarifying the Scope of Automobile Searches Incident to Arrest Introduction In State of Wisconsin v. Leroy Fry, 131 Wis. 2d 153 (1986), the Supreme Court of Wisconsin addressed a...
Borello v. U.S. Oil Company: Retroactive Application of the Discovery Rule in Wisconsin Personal Injury Claims

Borello v. U.S. Oil Company: Retroactive Application of the Discovery Rule in Wisconsin Personal Injury Claims

Date: Jun 5, 1986
Retroactive Application of the Discovery Rule in Personal Injury Claims: Borello v. U.S. Oil Company Introduction Borello v. U.S. Oil Company, The Williamson Company, and Royal Globe Insurance...
Defining the Scope of Revocation Hearings under Implied Consent: Analysis of State v. Nordness

Defining the Scope of Revocation Hearings under Implied Consent: Analysis of State v. Nordness

Date: Feb 12, 1986
Defining the Scope of Revocation Hearings under Implied Consent: Analysis of State v. Nordness Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Robert W. Nordness, 128 Wis. 2d 15 (1986), adjudicated by the Supreme...
State of Wisconsin v. Fishnick: Defining the Limits of Other-Acts Evidence Admissibility

State of Wisconsin v. Fishnick: Defining the Limits of Other-Acts Evidence Admissibility

Date: Dec 21, 1985
State of Wisconsin v. Fishnick: Defining the Limits of Other-Acts Evidence Admissibility Introduction In the landmark case of State of Wisconsin v. Paul J. Fishnick, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin...
Wisconsin Court of Appeals Establishes Strict Interpretation of Multiplicity under Sec. 939.71

Wisconsin Court of Appeals Establishes Strict Interpretation of Multiplicity under Sec. 939.71

Date: Dec 5, 1985
Wisconsin Court of Appeals Establishes Strict Interpretation of Multiplicity under Sec. 939.71 Introduction The case of STATE of Wisconsin v. Thomas J. Holt represents a significant appellate...
Effective Assistance of Counsel: A Comprehensive Analysis of State of Wisconsin v. Thomas L. Pitsch

Effective Assistance of Counsel: A Comprehensive Analysis of State of Wisconsin v. Thomas L. Pitsch

Date: Jun 29, 1985
Effective Assistance of Counsel: A Comprehensive Analysis of State of Wisconsin v. Thomas L. Pitsch Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Thomas L. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628 (1985), adjudicated by the...
State v. Wyss (1985): Clarifying Standards for Discretionary Reversal and Juror Misrepresentation in Wisconsin Criminal Law

State v. Wyss (1985): Clarifying Standards for Discretionary Reversal and Juror Misrepresentation in Wisconsin Criminal Law

Date: Jun 29, 1985
State v. Wyss (1985): Clarifying Standards for Discretionary Reversal and Juror Misrepresentation in Wisconsin Criminal Law Introduction In the landmark case of State of Wisconsin v. Elmer F. Wyss,...
Mandating Presumptions in Jury Instructions Violates Sec. 903.03(3): STATE v. Dyess

Mandating Presumptions in Jury Instructions Violates Sec. 903.03(3): STATE v. Dyess

Date: Jun 29, 1985
Mandating Presumptions in Jury Instructions Violates Sec. 903.03(3): STATE of Wisconsin v. Johrie Dyess Introduction STATE of Wisconsin v. Johrie Dyess is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
State of Wisconsin Ex Rel. M.L.B. v. D.G.H. (1985): Expanding Relief Under Sec. 806.07(1)(h) in Paternity Cases

State of Wisconsin Ex Rel. M.L.B. v. D.G.H. (1985): Expanding Relief Under Sec. 806.07(1)(h) in Paternity Cases

Date: Feb 28, 1985
State of Wisconsin Ex Rel. M.L.B. v. D.G.H. (1985): Expanding Relief Under Sec. 806.07(1)(h) in Paternity Cases Introduction The case of State of Wisconsin Ex Rel. M.L.B. v. D.G.H. (122 Wis. 2d 536,...
Equal Protection Violation in Wisconsin's Protective Placement Statutes

Equal Protection Violation in Wisconsin's Protective Placement Statutes

Date: Feb 1, 1985
Equal Protection Violation in Wisconsin's Protective Placement Statutes Introduction In the landmark case of State ex rel. Patricia A. Watts and Gertrude Huerlimann, indi v. Combined Community...
Objective Standard for Damages in Legal Malpractice: Helmbrecht v. St. Paul Insurance Company

Objective Standard for Damages in Legal Malpractice: Helmbrecht v. St. Paul Insurance Company

Date: Feb 1, 1985
Objective Standard for Damages in Legal Malpractice: Helmbrecht v. St. Paul Insurance Company Introduction The case of Jeanette Helmbrecht v. St. Paul Insurance Company and Raymond Colwin (122 Wis....
Wisconsin Stacking Statute Prohibits Reducing Clauses in Uninsured Motorist Coverage: Tahtinen v. MSI Insurance Co.

Wisconsin Stacking Statute Prohibits Reducing Clauses in Uninsured Motorist Coverage: Tahtinen v. MSI Insurance Co.

Date: Feb 1, 1985
Wisconsin Stacking Statute Prohibits Reducing Clauses in Uninsured Motorist Coverage: Tahtinen v. MSI Insurance Co. Introduction The case of Rudolph Tahtinen v. MSI Insurance Company (122 Wis.2d 158,...
Establishing Probable Cause in Preliminary Hearings: STATE v. DUNN Analysis

Establishing Probable Cause in Preliminary Hearings: STATE v. DUNN Analysis

Date: Dec 22, 1984
Establishing Probable Cause in Preliminary Hearings: STATE v. DUNN Analysis Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Ronald J. Dunn, 121 Wis. 2d 389 (1984), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Interpretation of 'Occurrence' in Liability Insurance: Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co. Establishes Key Precedent

Interpretation of 'Occurrence' in Liability Insurance: Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co. Establishes Key Precedent

Date: Jun 30, 1984
Interpretation of 'Occurrence' in Liability Insurance: Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co. Establishes Key Precedent Introduction In Kremers-Urban Company v. American Employers...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert