Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Wisconsin Case Commentaries

Borello v. U.S. Oil Company: Retroactive Application of the Discovery Rule in Wisconsin Personal Injury Claims

Borello v. U.S. Oil Company: Retroactive Application of the Discovery Rule in Wisconsin Personal Injury Claims

Date: Jun 5, 1986
Retroactive Application of the Discovery Rule in Personal Injury Claims: Borello v. U.S. Oil Company Introduction Borello v. U.S. Oil Company, The Williamson Company, and Royal Globe Insurance...
Defining the Scope of Revocation Hearings under Implied Consent: Analysis of State v. Nordness

Defining the Scope of Revocation Hearings under Implied Consent: Analysis of State v. Nordness

Date: Feb 12, 1986
Defining the Scope of Revocation Hearings under Implied Consent: Analysis of State v. Nordness Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Robert W. Nordness, 128 Wis. 2d 15 (1986), adjudicated by the Supreme...
State of Wisconsin v. Fishnick: Defining the Limits of Other-Acts Evidence Admissibility

State of Wisconsin v. Fishnick: Defining the Limits of Other-Acts Evidence Admissibility

Date: Dec 21, 1985
State of Wisconsin v. Fishnick: Defining the Limits of Other-Acts Evidence Admissibility Introduction In the landmark case of State of Wisconsin v. Paul J. Fishnick, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin...
Wisconsin Court of Appeals Establishes Strict Interpretation of Multiplicity under Sec. 939.71

Wisconsin Court of Appeals Establishes Strict Interpretation of Multiplicity under Sec. 939.71

Date: Dec 5, 1985
Wisconsin Court of Appeals Establishes Strict Interpretation of Multiplicity under Sec. 939.71 Introduction The case of STATE of Wisconsin v. Thomas J. Holt represents a significant appellate...
Effective Assistance of Counsel: A Comprehensive Analysis of State of Wisconsin v. Thomas L. Pitsch

Effective Assistance of Counsel: A Comprehensive Analysis of State of Wisconsin v. Thomas L. Pitsch

Date: Jun 29, 1985
Effective Assistance of Counsel: A Comprehensive Analysis of State of Wisconsin v. Thomas L. Pitsch Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Thomas L. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628 (1985), adjudicated by the...
State v. Wyss (1985): Clarifying Standards for Discretionary Reversal and Juror Misrepresentation in Wisconsin Criminal Law

State v. Wyss (1985): Clarifying Standards for Discretionary Reversal and Juror Misrepresentation in Wisconsin Criminal Law

Date: Jun 29, 1985
State v. Wyss (1985): Clarifying Standards for Discretionary Reversal and Juror Misrepresentation in Wisconsin Criminal Law Introduction In the landmark case of State of Wisconsin v. Elmer F. Wyss,...
Mandating Presumptions in Jury Instructions Violates Sec. 903.03(3): STATE v. Dyess

Mandating Presumptions in Jury Instructions Violates Sec. 903.03(3): STATE v. Dyess

Date: Jun 29, 1985
Mandating Presumptions in Jury Instructions Violates Sec. 903.03(3): STATE of Wisconsin v. Johrie Dyess Introduction STATE of Wisconsin v. Johrie Dyess is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
State of Wisconsin Ex Rel. M.L.B. v. D.G.H. (1985): Expanding Relief Under Sec. 806.07(1)(h) in Paternity Cases

State of Wisconsin Ex Rel. M.L.B. v. D.G.H. (1985): Expanding Relief Under Sec. 806.07(1)(h) in Paternity Cases

Date: Feb 28, 1985
State of Wisconsin Ex Rel. M.L.B. v. D.G.H. (1985): Expanding Relief Under Sec. 806.07(1)(h) in Paternity Cases Introduction The case of State of Wisconsin Ex Rel. M.L.B. v. D.G.H. (122 Wis. 2d 536,...
Equal Protection Violation in Wisconsin's Protective Placement Statutes

Equal Protection Violation in Wisconsin's Protective Placement Statutes

Date: Feb 1, 1985
Equal Protection Violation in Wisconsin's Protective Placement Statutes Introduction In the landmark case of State ex rel. Patricia A. Watts and Gertrude Huerlimann, indi v. Combined Community...
Objective Standard for Damages in Legal Malpractice: Helmbrecht v. St. Paul Insurance Company

Objective Standard for Damages in Legal Malpractice: Helmbrecht v. St. Paul Insurance Company

Date: Feb 1, 1985
Objective Standard for Damages in Legal Malpractice: Helmbrecht v. St. Paul Insurance Company Introduction The case of Jeanette Helmbrecht v. St. Paul Insurance Company and Raymond Colwin (122 Wis....
Wisconsin Stacking Statute Prohibits Reducing Clauses in Uninsured Motorist Coverage: Tahtinen v. MSI Insurance Co.

Wisconsin Stacking Statute Prohibits Reducing Clauses in Uninsured Motorist Coverage: Tahtinen v. MSI Insurance Co.

Date: Feb 1, 1985
Wisconsin Stacking Statute Prohibits Reducing Clauses in Uninsured Motorist Coverage: Tahtinen v. MSI Insurance Co. Introduction The case of Rudolph Tahtinen v. MSI Insurance Company (122 Wis.2d 158,...
Establishing Probable Cause in Preliminary Hearings: STATE v. DUNN Analysis

Establishing Probable Cause in Preliminary Hearings: STATE v. DUNN Analysis

Date: Dec 22, 1984
Establishing Probable Cause in Preliminary Hearings: STATE v. DUNN Analysis Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Ronald J. Dunn, 121 Wis. 2d 389 (1984), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Interpretation of 'Occurrence' in Liability Insurance: Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co. Establishes Key Precedent

Interpretation of 'Occurrence' in Liability Insurance: Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co. Establishes Key Precedent

Date: Jun 30, 1984
Interpretation of 'Occurrence' in Liability Insurance: Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co. Establishes Key Precedent Introduction In Kremers-Urban Company v. American Employers...
Limiting Repeater Statute Enhancements to Maximum Prescribed Sentences: STATE v. HARRIS

Limiting Repeater Statute Enhancements to Maximum Prescribed Sentences: STATE v. HARRIS

Date: Jun 29, 1984
Limiting Repeater Statute Enhancements to Maximum Prescribed Sentences: STATE v. HARRIS Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Denia Harris is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin...
Reversing Conviction: The Boundary of Expert Testimony in Incest Cases

Reversing Conviction: The Boundary of Expert Testimony in Incest Cases

Date: Jun 20, 1984
Reversing Conviction: The Boundary of Expert Testimony in Incest Cases Introduction In the landmark case of State of Wisconsin v. Charles Haseltine, the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin grappled with...
Mandatory Knowledge of Lawful Authority in Resisting Officers: State of Wisconsin v. Lossman

Mandatory Knowledge of Lawful Authority in Resisting Officers: State of Wisconsin v. Lossman

Date: May 31, 1984
Mandatory Knowledge of Lawful Authority in Resisting Officers: State of Wisconsin v. Lossman Introduction State of Wisconsin v. Thomas C. Lossman is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Standard Theatres v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation: Reaffirming Reasonableness in Attorney Fee Awards

Standard Theatres v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation: Reaffirming Reasonableness in Attorney Fee Awards

Date: May 31, 1984
Standard Theatres v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation: Reaffirming Reasonableness in Attorney Fee Awards Introduction Standard Theatres, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin, Department of Transportation...
State v. Sarabia: Clarifying Lesser Included Offense Instructions in Second-Degree Murder Cases

State v. Sarabia: Clarifying Lesser Included Offense Instructions in Second-Degree Murder Cases

Date: May 31, 1984
State v. Sarabia: Clarifying Lesser Included Offense Instructions in Second-Degree Murder Cases Introduction The Supreme Court of Wisconsin's decision in State of Wisconsin v. Abel Sarabia, 118...
Republic Insurance Co. v. Fehring: Establishing Standards for Bad Faith and Attorney Fee Recovery in Wisconsin Insurance Law

Republic Insurance Co. v. Fehring: Establishing Standards for Bad Faith and Attorney Fee Recovery in Wisconsin Insurance Law

Date: May 5, 1984
Republic Insurance Co. v. Fehring: Establishing Standards for Bad Faith and Attorney Fee Recovery in Wisconsin Insurance Law Introduction In the landmark case of Timothy Fehring and Susan M. Fehring...
Unconscionability of Exculpatory Clauses in Standard Form Advertising Contracts

Unconscionability of Exculpatory Clauses in Standard Form Advertising Contracts

Date: Mar 28, 1984
Unconscionability of Exculpatory Clauses in Standard Form Advertising Contracts Introduction The case of Discount Fabric House of Racine, Inc. v. Wisconsin Telephone Company explores the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert