Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

STATE v. McFARLAND and Fisher: Defining the Boundaries of Warrantless Arrest Appeals and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

STATE v. McFARLAND and Fisher: Defining the Boundaries of Warrantless Arrest Appeals and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Date: Jul 21, 1995
STATE v. McFARLAND and Fisher: Defining the Boundaries of Warrantless Arrest Appeals and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Introduction STATE v. McFARLAND and Fisher, 127 Wn.2d 322 (1995),...
Unconscionability in Heir-Hunting Agreements: Analysis of Maynard Nelson v. Mary McGoldrick

Unconscionability in Heir-Hunting Agreements: Analysis of Maynard Nelson v. Mary McGoldrick

Date: Jun 23, 1995
Unconscionability in Heir-Hunting Agreements: Analysis of Maynard Nelson v. Mary McGoldrick (127 Wn. 2d 124) Introduction The case of Maynard Nelson v. Mary M. McGoldrick presents a pivotal...
Same Elements Test Affirmed for Double Jeopardy under Washington State Constitution

Same Elements Test Affirmed for Double Jeopardy under Washington State Constitution

Date: Jun 23, 1995
Same Elements Test Affirmed for Double Jeopardy under Washington State Constitution Introduction In the landmark decision of State of Washington v. Frederick Leslie Gocken, 127 Wn. 2d 95 (1995), the...
FIFRA Preemption of Common-Law Product Liability Claims: Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co.

FIFRA Preemption of Common-Law Product Liability Claims: Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co.

Date: Jun 16, 1995
FIFRA Preemption of Common-Law Product Liability Claims: Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co. Analysis Introduction Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., 127 Wn.2d 67 (1995), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Washington,...
Duty of Care of Real Estate Appraisers to Third Parties: Insights from Schaaf v. Highfield

Duty of Care of Real Estate Appraisers to Third Parties: Insights from Schaaf v. Highfield

Date: Jun 16, 1995
Duty of Care of Real Estate Appraisers to Third Parties: Insights from Schaaf v. Highfield Introduction The case of John Schaaf v. Blaine Highfield, et al. (127 Wn. 2d 17) adjudicated by the Supreme...
STATE v. AUMICK: Clarifying Lesser Included Offenses and Intent in Criminal Attempts

STATE v. AUMICK: Clarifying Lesser Included Offenses and Intent in Criminal Attempts

Date: May 19, 1995
STATE v. AUMICK: Clarifying Lesser Included Offenses and Intent in Criminal Attempts Introduction State of Washington v. Bruce Wayne Aumick, 126 Wn. 2d 422 (1995), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Abuse of Discretion Standard for Exceptional Sentencing in Washington

Affirmation of Abuse of Discretion Standard for Exceptional Sentencing in Washington

Date: May 12, 1995
Affirmation of Abuse of Discretion Standard for Exceptional Sentencing in Washington Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. Steven W. Ritchie, Jeffrey M. Hamrick, and Jai-Mar...
Promoting Substance Over Form: Supreme Court of Washington Upholds Merit-Based Appellate Review in STATE v. OLSON

Promoting Substance Over Form: Supreme Court of Washington Upholds Merit-Based Appellate Review in STATE v. OLSON

Date: Apr 28, 1995
Promoting Substance Over Form: Supreme Court of Washington Upholds Merit-Based Appellate Review in STATE v. OLSON Introduction State of Washington v. Bryan P. Olson, 126 Wn. 2d 315 (1995), is a...
Admissibility of Prior Misconduct Evidence to Prove Motive in Murder Trials: The State of Washington v. Ford Powell, Jr.

Admissibility of Prior Misconduct Evidence to Prove Motive in Murder Trials: The State of Washington v. Ford Powell, Jr.

Date: Apr 14, 1995
Admissibility of Prior Misconduct Evidence to Prove Motive in Murder Trials The State of Washington v. Ford Powell, Jr. (126 Wn. 2d 244, 1995) Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. Ford...
State v. Brett: Clarifying Aggravating Circumstances and Death Penalty Sentencing in Washington

State v. Brett: Clarifying Aggravating Circumstances and Death Penalty Sentencing in Washington

Date: Apr 5, 1995
State v. Brett: Clarifying Aggravating Circumstances and Death Penalty Sentencing in Washington Introduction In State v. James Leroy Brett, 126 Wn. 2d 136 (1995), the Supreme Court of Washington, En...
Contempt for Non-Compliance with Court Orders: Insights from Moreman v. Butcher

Contempt for Non-Compliance with Court Orders: Insights from Moreman v. Butcher

Date: Mar 31, 1995
Contempt for Non-Compliance with Court Orders: Insights from Moreman v. Butcher Introduction In the landmark case of Stanley H. Moreman v. Wilbert Butcher, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Res Judicata in Quasi-Judicial Land Use Decisions: Hilltop Terrace Homeowner's Association v. Island County

Res Judicata in Quasi-Judicial Land Use Decisions: Hilltop Terrace Homeowner's Association v. Island County

Date: Mar 31, 1995
Res Judicata in Quasi-Judicial Land Use Decisions: Hilltop Terrace Homeowner's Association v. Island County Introduction The case of Hilltop Terrace Homeowner's Association, et al. v. Island County,...
Establishing a Common Scheme or Plan: Admissibility of Prior Misconduct under ER 404(b)

Establishing a Common Scheme or Plan: Admissibility of Prior Misconduct under ER 404(b)

Date: Feb 24, 1995
Establishing a Common Scheme or Plan: Admissibility of Prior Misconduct under ER 404(b) Introduction In the landmark case The State of Washington v. Lynn Roderick Lough (125 Wn. 2d 847, 1995), the...
Clarifying the Res Gestae Exception and Judicial Conduct in Evidence Admissibility: State v. Lane et al.

Clarifying the Res Gestae Exception and Judicial Conduct in Evidence Admissibility: State v. Lane et al.

Date: Feb 17, 1995
Clarifying the Res Gestae Exception and Judicial Conduct in Evidence Admissibility: State v. Lane et al. Introduction The case State of Washington v. Jeffrey Eugene Lane et al. (125 Wn.2d 825)...
Vangerpen v. State of Washington: Strict Limitations on Amendment of Charging Documents and Reinforcement of the Essential Elements Rule

Vangerpen v. State of Washington: Strict Limitations on Amendment of Charging Documents and Reinforcement of the Essential Elements Rule

Date: Feb 10, 1995
Vangerpen v. State of Washington: Strict Limitations on Amendment of Charging Documents and Reinforcement of the Essential Elements Rule Introduction Vangerpen v. State of Washington is a landmark...
Separate Convictions for Incest and Rape Do Not Violate Double Jeopardy: Washington v. Calle

Separate Convictions for Incest and Rape Do Not Violate Double Jeopardy: Washington v. Calle

Date: Jan 27, 1995
Separate Convictions for Incest and Rape Do Not Violate Double Jeopardy: Washington v. Calle Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington v. James L. Calle, 125 Wn.2d 769 (1995), the...
Extended Protections for Nonunionized Workers: Analysis of BRAVO v. DOLSEN COMPANIES

Extended Protections for Nonunionized Workers: Analysis of BRAVO v. DOLSEN COMPANIES

Date: Jan 27, 1995
Extended Protections for Nonunionized Workers: Analysis of BRAVO v. DOLSEN COMPANIES Introduction BRAVO v. DOLSEN COMPANIES, 125 Wn. 2d 745 (1995), represents a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court...
Res Judicata and EEOC Consent Decrees: Analysis of LOVERIDGE v. FRED MEYER, INC.

Res Judicata and EEOC Consent Decrees: Analysis of LOVERIDGE v. FRED MEYER, INC.

Date: Jan 27, 1995
Res Judicata and EEOC Consent Decrees: Analysis of LOVERIDGE v. FRED MEYER, INC. Introduction Kimberly LOVERIDGE v. FRED MEYER, INC. is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Washington...
Affirmation of Specific Intent Requirement in Second Degree Assault: STATE v. BYRD

Affirmation of Specific Intent Requirement in Second Degree Assault: STATE v. BYRD

Date: Jan 20, 1995
Affirmation of Specific Intent Requirement in Second Degree Assault: STATE v. BYRD Introduction In the landmark case of The State of Washington v. James Mitchell Byrd, 125 Wn. 2d 707 (1995), the...
Establishing Road Maintenance Standards: An Analysis of Ruff v. King County

Establishing Road Maintenance Standards: An Analysis of Ruff v. King County

Date: Jan 20, 1995
Establishing Road Maintenance Standards: An Analysis of Ruff v. King County Introduction Rita S. Ruff, et al. v. The County of King, et al., 125 Wn. 2d 697 (1995), is a seminal case in Washington...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert