Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

State of Washington v. Herbert David Hardesty: Redefining Double Jeopardy in Sentencing Fraud Cases

State of Washington v. Herbert David Hardesty: Redefining Double Jeopardy in Sentencing Fraud Cases

Date: May 10, 1996
State of Washington v. Herbert David Hardesty: Redefining Double Jeopardy in Sentencing Fraud Cases Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. Herbert David Hardesty addresses the intricate...
Establishing Liability for Naturally Accumulated Snow and Ice: Insights from IWAI v. STATE of Washington

Establishing Liability for Naturally Accumulated Snow and Ice: Insights from IWAI v. STATE of Washington

Date: May 10, 1996
Establishing Liability for Naturally Accumulated Snow and Ice: Insights from IWAI v. STATE of Washington Introduction The case of Barbara Iwai, et al. v. The State of Washington, et al., decided by...
Landowner Duty Extended to Natural Water Hazards: Analysis of Majestic Mobile Manor v. Degel

Landowner Duty Extended to Natural Water Hazards: Analysis of Majestic Mobile Manor v. Degel

Date: Apr 19, 1996
Landowner Duty Extended to Natural Water Hazards: Analysis of Majestic Mobile Manor v. Degel Introduction The case of James Degel, as Guardian, et al. v. Majestic Mobile Manor, Inc., et al., 129...
Public Policy Exception to At-Will Employment in Life-Threatening Situations

Public Policy Exception to At-Will Employment in Life-Threatening Situations

Date: Apr 5, 1996
Public Policy Exception to At-Will Employment in Life-Threatening Situations Introduction The legal case of Kevin M. Gardner v. Loomis Armored, Inc. addresses the complexities surrounding wrongful...
Right to Present Defense Witnesses Affirms Sixth Amendment Protections in STATE v. MAUPIN

Right to Present Defense Witnesses Affirms Sixth Amendment Protections in STATE v. MAUPIN

Date: Apr 5, 1996
Right to Present Defense Witnesses Affirms Sixth Amendment Protections in STATE v. MAUPIN Introduction State of Washington v. Thomas Edward Maupin is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
STATE v. LeFABER: Affirming the Subjective Reasonable Belief Standard in Self-Defense

STATE v. LeFABER: Affirming the Subjective Reasonable Belief Standard in Self-Defense

Date: Mar 29, 1996
STATE v. LeFABER: Affirming the Subjective Reasonable Belief Standard in Self-Defense Introduction State of Washington v. Victor A. LeFaber is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Private Project Classification and EIS Requirements under SEPA: ORGANIZATION TO PRESERVE AGRICULTURAL LANDS v. ADAMS COUNTY

Private Project Classification and EIS Requirements under SEPA: ORGANIZATION TO PRESERVE AGRICULTURAL LANDS v. ADAMS COUNTY

Date: Mar 29, 1996
Private Project Classification and EIS Requirements under SEPA: ORGANIZATION TO PRESERVE AGRICULTURAL LANDS v. ADAMS COUNTY Introduction Organization to Preserve Agricultural Lands (OPAL), a...
Permissive Inferences and Burden of Persuasion in First Degree Burglary: Insights from State v. John L. Deal

Permissive Inferences and Burden of Persuasion in First Degree Burglary: Insights from State v. John L. Deal

Date: Mar 1, 1996
Permissive Inferences and Burden of Persuasion in First Degree Burglary: Insights from State of Washington v. John L. Deal Introduction State of Washington v. John L. Deal, 128 Wn.2d 693 (1996),...
Comparable Treatment Test Established under RCW 49.60.215 in Disability Discrimination Cases

Comparable Treatment Test Established under RCW 49.60.215 in Disability Discrimination Cases

Date: Mar 1, 1996
Comparable Treatment Test Established under RCW 49.60.215 in Disability Discrimination Cases Introduction Evelyn Fell et al. v. Spokane Transit Authority (STA), 128 Wn. 2d 618 (1996), is a landmark...
Clarifying Service Area Agreements and Consumer Protection Exemptions: Insights from Tanner Electric Cooperative v. Puget Sound Power Light

Clarifying Service Area Agreements and Consumer Protection Exemptions: Insights from Tanner Electric Cooperative v. Puget Sound Power Light

Date: Mar 1, 1996
Clarifying Service Area Agreements and Consumer Protection Exemptions: Insights from Tanner Electric Cooperative v. Puget Sound Power Light Introduction The case of Tanner Electric Cooperative,...
Continental Sports Corp. v. Dept. of Labor and Industries: Substantial Compliance in Filing Appeals

Continental Sports Corp. v. Dept. of Labor and Industries: Substantial Compliance in Filing Appeals

Date: Feb 23, 1996
Continental Sports Corp. v. Dept. of Labor and Industries: Substantial Compliance in Filing Appeals Introduction The case of Continental Sports Corporation v. The Department of Labor and Industries...
De Facto Repeal of Municipal Criminal Codes: Precedent Set in Whatcom County v. City of Bellingham

De Facto Repeal of Municipal Criminal Codes: Precedent Set in Whatcom County v. City of Bellingham

Date: Feb 2, 1996
De Facto Repeal of Municipal Criminal Codes: Precedent Set in Whatcom County v. City of Bellingham Introduction Whatcom County v. City of Bellingham is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Attorneys' Fees Under RCW 90.14.190 in Water Rights Litigation

Affirmation of Attorneys' Fees Under RCW 90.14.190 in Water Rights Litigation

Date: Feb 2, 1996
Affirmation of Attorneys' Fees Under RCW 90.14.190 in Water Rights Litigation Introduction The case of CRAIG RETTKOWSKI, ET AL., Petitioners, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY, Respondent, adjudicated by...
Lawful Scope of Search Incident to Arrest: Inclusion of Sleeping Compartments in Tractor-Trailers

Lawful Scope of Search Incident to Arrest: Inclusion of Sleeping Compartments in Tractor-Trailers

Date: Jan 19, 1996
Lawful Scope of Search Incident to Arrest: Inclusion of Sleeping Compartments in Tractor-Trailers Introduction In State of Washington v. Dennis M. Johnson (128 Wn.2d 431, 1996), the Supreme Court of...
Civil Forfeiture of Criminal Proceeds Does Not Constitute Punishment: Implications for Double Jeopardy

Civil Forfeiture of Criminal Proceeds Does Not Constitute Punishment: Implications for Double Jeopardy

Date: Dec 8, 1995
Civil Forfeiture of Criminal Proceeds Does Not Constitute Punishment: Implications for Double Jeopardy Introduction In The State of Washington v. Michael Cole and James Szymanowski, decided by the...
Enhanced Protection of Public Trial Rights: State v. Bone-Club Establishes Rigorous Closure Test

Enhanced Protection of Public Trial Rights: State v. Bone-Club Establishes Rigorous Closure Test

Date: Dec 1, 1995
Enhanced Protection of Public Trial Rights: State v. Bone-Club Establishes Rigorous Closure Test Introduction State of Washington v. Joseph Bone-Club (128 Wn.2d 254, 1995) is a landmark decision by...
Defining Procedural Due Process in Medical Residency Terminations: Sherman v. State of Washington

Defining Procedural Due Process in Medical Residency Terminations: Sherman v. State of Washington

Date: Nov 17, 1995
Defining Procedural Due Process in Medical Residency Terminations: Sherman v. State of Washington Introduction The case of Sherman v. The State of Washington (128 Wn. 2d 164) addresses significant...
Clarifying Termination Standards: In the Matter of the DEPENDENCY OF K.R. et al. v. Steven Jones et al.

Clarifying Termination Standards: In the Matter of the DEPENDENCY OF K.R. et al. v. Steven Jones et al.

Date: Nov 10, 1995
Clarifying Termination Standards: In the Matter of the DEPENDENCY OF K.R. et al. v. Steven Jones et al. Introduction The case of In the Matter of the DEPENDENCY OF K.R., ET AL. v. Steven Jones, ET...
STATE v. ALVAREZ: Affirming Single-Act Harassment Under RCW 9A.46.020

STATE v. ALVAREZ: Affirming Single-Act Harassment Under RCW 9A.46.020

Date: Nov 3, 1995
STATE v. ALVAREZ: Affirming Single-Act Harassment Under RCW 9A.46.020 Introduction The State of Washington v. David A. Alvarez, 128 Wn. 2d 1 (1995), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Supreme Court of Washington Rules Against Class Actions for B&O Tax Refunds under RCW 82.32.180

Supreme Court of Washington Rules Against Class Actions for B&O Tax Refunds under RCW 82.32.180

Date: Nov 3, 1995
Supreme Court of Washington Rules Against Class Actions for B&O Tax Refunds under RCW 82.32.180 Introduction In the landmark case Lacey Nursing Center, Inc., et al. v. The Department of Revenue (128...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert