Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Non-Retroactivity of 1997 Amendments to Juvenile Wash-Out Provisions under the Sentencing Reform Act

Non-Retroactivity of 1997 Amendments to Juvenile Wash-Out Provisions under the Sentencing Reform Act

Date: Sep 7, 2001
Non-Retroactivity of 1997 Amendments to Juvenile Wash-Out Provisions under the Sentencing Reform Act Introduction The case of State of Washington v. Rodney A. Smith et al. consolidated four...
Balancing Due Process and Child Welfare: The Precedential Ruling in In re Dependency of T.R.

Balancing Due Process and Child Welfare: The Precedential Ruling in In re Dependency of T.R.

Date: Aug 28, 2001
Balancing Due Process and Child Welfare: The Precedential Ruling in In re Dependency of T.R. Introduction The case of In re the Dependency of T.R., STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND...
Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Medical Disciplinary Proceedings Established

Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Medical Disciplinary Proceedings Established

Date: Aug 24, 2001
Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Medical Disciplinary Proceedings Established Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington, in the case of Bang D. Nguyen v. Department of Health Medical...
Protective Pat-Downs of Vehicle Passengers: State v. Horrace

Protective Pat-Downs of Vehicle Passengers: State v. Horrace

Date: Aug 3, 2001
Protective Pat-Downs of Vehicle Passengers: State of Washington v. Ronald James Horrace Introduction State of Washington v. Ronald James Horrace, 144 Wn.2d 386 (2001), is a landmark case adjudicated...
Clarifying "Knowingly" in Felony Harassment: Insights from STATE v. J.M.

Clarifying "Knowingly" in Felony Harassment: Insights from STATE v. J.M.

Date: Aug 3, 2001
Clarifying "Knowingly" in Felony Harassment: Insights from STATE v. J.M. Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington's decision in State of Washington v. J.M., 144 Wn. 2d 472 (2001), addresses a...
Affirmation of Standing Requirements in Declaratory Judgments: TO-RO TRADE SHOWS v. COLLINS

Affirmation of Standing Requirements in Declaratory Judgments: TO-RO TRADE SHOWS v. COLLINS

Date: Aug 3, 2001
Affirmation of Standing Requirements in Declaratory Judgments: TO-RO TRADE SHOWS v. COLLINS Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington, in the case of To-Ro Trade Shows, d/b/a O'LOUGHLIN TRADE...
Correcting Sentencing Errors: Establishing Precedent in Call v. State on Offender Score Miscalculations

Correcting Sentencing Errors: Establishing Precedent in Call v. State on Offender Score Miscalculations

Date: Jul 27, 2001
Correcting Sentencing Errors: Establishing Precedent in Call v. State on Offender Score Miscalculations Introduction Call v. State, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Washington on July 26, 2001,...
Collateral Estoppel Not Applicable to Minor Traffic Infractions in Subsequent Civil Actions

Collateral Estoppel Not Applicable to Minor Traffic Infractions in Subsequent Civil Actions

Date: Jul 27, 2001
Collateral Estoppel Not Applicable to Minor Traffic Infractions in Subsequent Civil Actions Introduction The case of HARRY W. HADLEY and JEWELL HADLEY v. JOHN DOE MAXWELL and HELEN MAXWELL,...
Panorama Village Condo Owners v. Allstate: New Precedents on Suit Limitations and Attorney Fee Recoveries in Insurance Contracts

Panorama Village Condo Owners v. Allstate: New Precedents on Suit Limitations and Attorney Fee Recoveries in Insurance Contracts

Date: Jul 13, 2001
Panorama Village Condo Owners v. Allstate: New Precedents on Suit Limitations and Attorney Fee Recoveries in Insurance Contracts Introduction Panorama Village Condominium Owners Association Board of...
Reaffirming Accomplice Liability Requirements in Washington State: Pinkerton Doctrine Rejected

Reaffirming Accomplice Liability Requirements in Washington State: Pinkerton Doctrine Rejected

Date: Jul 13, 2001
Reaffirming Accomplice Liability Requirements in Washington State: Pinkerton Doctrine Rejected Introduction State of Washington v. John Kenneth Stein, 144 Wn. 2d 236 (2001), is a landmark decision by...
State v. Cienfuegos: Affirming Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Jury Representation

State v. Cienfuegos: Affirming Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Jury Representation

Date: Jul 6, 2001
State v. Cienfuegos: Affirming Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Jury Representation Introduction In State of Washington v. Guillermo W. Cienfuegos (144 Wn. 2d 222), the Washington...
Unauthorized Disclosure of Patient Confidentiality: Insights from BERGER v. SONNELAND

Unauthorized Disclosure of Patient Confidentiality: Insights from BERGER v. SONNELAND

Date: Jul 6, 2001
Unauthorized Disclosure of Patient Confidentiality: Insights from BERGER v. SONNELAND Introduction The case of Suzan Berger v. John Sonneland, M.D. (144 Wn. 2d 91) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
RCW 9A.46.020(1)(a)(iv) Unconstitutional: Implications from STATE v. WILLIAMS

RCW 9A.46.020(1)(a)(iv) Unconstitutional: Implications from STATE v. WILLIAMS

Date: Jun 29, 2001
RCW 9A.46.020(1)(a)(iv) Unconstitutional: Implications from STATE v. WILLIAMS Introduction In the landmark case State of Washington v. Chris Edward Williams, the Supreme Court of Washington addressed...
Limits on Admissible Evidence in Penalty Phase: STATE v. CLARK Establishes Boundaries Under Bartholomew II

Limits on Admissible Evidence in Penalty Phase: STATE v. CLARK Establishes Boundaries Under Bartholomew II

Date: Jun 8, 2001
Limits on Admissible Evidence in Penalty Phase: STATE v. CLARK Establishes Boundaries Under Bartholomew II Introduction State of Washington v. Richard M. Clark is a landmark decision rendered by the...
RCW 40.16.030: Explicit Authorization Required to Constitute a False Instrument - STATE v. HAMPTON

RCW 40.16.030: Explicit Authorization Required to Constitute a False Instrument - STATE v. HAMPTON

Date: Jun 8, 2001
RCW 40.16.030: Explicit Authorization Required to Constitute a False Instrument - STATE v. HAMPTON Introduction State of Washington v. Charles R. Hampton (143 Wn. 2d 789) is a landmark decision by...
State of Washington v. Dwayne Anthony Woods: Procedural Safeguards in Capital Sentencing

State of Washington v. Dwayne Anthony Woods: Procedural Safeguards in Capital Sentencing

Date: May 25, 2001
State of Washington v. Dwayne Anthony Woods: Procedural Safeguards in Capital Sentencing Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington v. Dwayne Anthony Woods, 143 Wn. 2d 561 (2001), the...
HILL v. BCTI INCOME FUND-I: Establishing a Hybrid-Pretext Standard for Employment Discrimination Claims under RCW 49.60

HILL v. BCTI INCOME FUND-I: Establishing a Hybrid-Pretext Standard for Employment Discrimination Claims under RCW 49.60

Date: May 18, 2001
HILL v. BCTI INCOME FUND-I: Establishing a Hybrid-Pretext Standard for Employment Discrimination Claims under RCW 49.60 Introduction In the landmark case of HILL v. BCTI INCOME FUND-I, the Supreme...
Affirmation of DNA Evidence Admissibility and Exceptional Sentencing Standards in State v. Gore

Affirmation of DNA Evidence Admissibility and Exceptional Sentencing Standards in State v. Gore

Date: Mar 23, 2001
Affirmation of DNA Evidence Admissibility and Exceptional Sentencing Standards in State of Washington v. Paul C. Gore Introduction State of Washington v. Paul C. Gore (143 Wn.2d 288, 2001) is a...
STATE v. KELLER: Clarification on Counting Concurrent Felonies as Multiple Strikes under Washington's Persistent Offender Act

STATE v. KELLER: Clarification on Counting Concurrent Felonies as Multiple Strikes under Washington's Persistent Offender Act

Date: Mar 23, 2001
STATE v. KELLER: Clarification on Counting Concurrent Felonies as Multiple Strikes under Washington's Persistent Offender Act Introduction State of Washington v. Lawrence John Keller (143 Wn. 2d 267)...
Voluntariness of Plea Agreements and Mutual Mistake: Insights from State v. Walsh

Voluntariness of Plea Agreements and Mutual Mistake: Insights from State v. Walsh

Date: Feb 9, 2001
Voluntariness of Plea Agreements and Mutual Mistake: Insights from State v. Walsh Introduction The case of State of Washington v. Timothy Patrick Walsh, 143 Wn.2d 1 (2001), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert