Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Reaffirming Accomplice Liability Requirements in Washington State: Pinkerton Doctrine Rejected

Reaffirming Accomplice Liability Requirements in Washington State: Pinkerton Doctrine Rejected

Date: Jul 13, 2001
Reaffirming Accomplice Liability Requirements in Washington State: Pinkerton Doctrine Rejected Introduction State of Washington v. John Kenneth Stein, 144 Wn. 2d 236 (2001), is a landmark decision by...
State v. Cienfuegos: Affirming Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Jury Representation

State v. Cienfuegos: Affirming Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Jury Representation

Date: Jul 6, 2001
State v. Cienfuegos: Affirming Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Jury Representation Introduction In State of Washington v. Guillermo W. Cienfuegos (144 Wn. 2d 222), the Washington...
Unauthorized Disclosure of Patient Confidentiality: Insights from BERGER v. SONNELAND

Unauthorized Disclosure of Patient Confidentiality: Insights from BERGER v. SONNELAND

Date: Jul 6, 2001
Unauthorized Disclosure of Patient Confidentiality: Insights from BERGER v. SONNELAND Introduction The case of Suzan Berger v. John Sonneland, M.D. (144 Wn. 2d 91) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
RCW 9A.46.020(1)(a)(iv) Unconstitutional: Implications from STATE v. WILLIAMS

RCW 9A.46.020(1)(a)(iv) Unconstitutional: Implications from STATE v. WILLIAMS

Date: Jun 29, 2001
RCW 9A.46.020(1)(a)(iv) Unconstitutional: Implications from STATE v. WILLIAMS Introduction In the landmark case State of Washington v. Chris Edward Williams, the Supreme Court of Washington addressed...
Limits on Admissible Evidence in Penalty Phase: STATE v. CLARK Establishes Boundaries Under Bartholomew II

Limits on Admissible Evidence in Penalty Phase: STATE v. CLARK Establishes Boundaries Under Bartholomew II

Date: Jun 8, 2001
Limits on Admissible Evidence in Penalty Phase: STATE v. CLARK Establishes Boundaries Under Bartholomew II Introduction State of Washington v. Richard M. Clark is a landmark decision rendered by the...
RCW 40.16.030: Explicit Authorization Required to Constitute a False Instrument - STATE v. HAMPTON

RCW 40.16.030: Explicit Authorization Required to Constitute a False Instrument - STATE v. HAMPTON

Date: Jun 8, 2001
RCW 40.16.030: Explicit Authorization Required to Constitute a False Instrument - STATE v. HAMPTON Introduction State of Washington v. Charles R. Hampton (143 Wn. 2d 789) is a landmark decision by...
State of Washington v. Dwayne Anthony Woods: Procedural Safeguards in Capital Sentencing

State of Washington v. Dwayne Anthony Woods: Procedural Safeguards in Capital Sentencing

Date: May 25, 2001
State of Washington v. Dwayne Anthony Woods: Procedural Safeguards in Capital Sentencing Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington v. Dwayne Anthony Woods, 143 Wn. 2d 561 (2001), the...
HILL v. BCTI INCOME FUND-I: Establishing a Hybrid-Pretext Standard for Employment Discrimination Claims under RCW 49.60

HILL v. BCTI INCOME FUND-I: Establishing a Hybrid-Pretext Standard for Employment Discrimination Claims under RCW 49.60

Date: May 18, 2001
HILL v. BCTI INCOME FUND-I: Establishing a Hybrid-Pretext Standard for Employment Discrimination Claims under RCW 49.60 Introduction In the landmark case of HILL v. BCTI INCOME FUND-I, the Supreme...
Affirmation of DNA Evidence Admissibility and Exceptional Sentencing Standards in State v. Gore

Affirmation of DNA Evidence Admissibility and Exceptional Sentencing Standards in State v. Gore

Date: Mar 23, 2001
Affirmation of DNA Evidence Admissibility and Exceptional Sentencing Standards in State of Washington v. Paul C. Gore Introduction State of Washington v. Paul C. Gore (143 Wn.2d 288, 2001) is a...
STATE v. KELLER: Clarification on Counting Concurrent Felonies as Multiple Strikes under Washington's Persistent Offender Act

STATE v. KELLER: Clarification on Counting Concurrent Felonies as Multiple Strikes under Washington's Persistent Offender Act

Date: Mar 23, 2001
STATE v. KELLER: Clarification on Counting Concurrent Felonies as Multiple Strikes under Washington's Persistent Offender Act Introduction State of Washington v. Lawrence John Keller (143 Wn. 2d 267)...
Voluntariness of Plea Agreements and Mutual Mistake: Insights from State v. Walsh

Voluntariness of Plea Agreements and Mutual Mistake: Insights from State v. Walsh

Date: Feb 9, 2001
Voluntariness of Plea Agreements and Mutual Mistake: Insights from State v. Walsh Introduction The case of State of Washington v. Timothy Patrick Walsh, 143 Wn.2d 1 (2001), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Reinforcing Relevance Standards for Diminished Capacity Defense: An Analysis of STATE v. ATSBEHA

Reinforcing Relevance Standards for Diminished Capacity Defense: An Analysis of STATE v. ATSBEHA

Date: Feb 2, 2001
Reinforcing Relevance Standards for Diminished Capacity Defense: An Analysis of STATE v. ATSBEHA Introduction State of Washington v. Negash Atsbeha is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Establishing the Right to Effective Counsel: The Brett Case

Establishing the Right to Effective Counsel: The Brett Case

Date: Jan 26, 2001
Establishing the Right to Effective Counsel: The Brett Case Introduction The case of In the Matter of the Personal Restraint Petition of James Leroy Brett, reported at 16 P.3d 601, adjudicated by the...
Establishing the Right to Competency Hearings: Fleming v. Supreme Court of Washington

Establishing the Right to Competency Hearings: Fleming v. Supreme Court of Washington

Date: Jan 26, 2001
Establishing the Right to Competency Hearings: Fleming v. Supreme Court of Washington Introduction In the landmark case of In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of Jon Royal Fleming, adjudicated by...
Health Care Coverage Included in 'Wages' for Workers' Compensation: Cockle v. Department of Labor and Industries

Health Care Coverage Included in 'Wages' for Workers' Compensation: Cockle v. Department of Labor and Industries

Date: Jan 19, 2001
Health Care Coverage Included in 'Wages' for Workers' Compensation: Cockle v. Department of Labor and Industries 1. Introduction Cockle v. Department of Labor and Industries of Washington is a...
Affirmation of Effective Assistance of Counsel in Strategic Disagreements: STATE v. STENSON

Affirmation of Effective Assistance of Counsel in Strategic Disagreements: STATE v. STENSON

Date: Jan 5, 2001
Affirmation of Effective Assistance of Counsel in Strategic Disagreements: STATE v. STENSON Introduction The case of STATE v. STENSON, 142 Wn. 2d 710 (2001), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Jury Instructions on Death Penalty in Non-Capital Cases: Insights from STATE v. TOWNSEND

Jury Instructions on Death Penalty in Non-Capital Cases: Insights from STATE v. TOWNSEND

Date: Jan 5, 2001
Jury Instructions on Death Penalty in Non-Capital Cases: Insights from STATE v. TOWNSEND Introduction State of Washington v. Roy James Townsend is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Comprehensive Analysis of Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co.: Implications for Environmental Liability Insurance Coverage

Comprehensive Analysis of Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co.: Implications for Environmental Liability Insurance Coverage

Date: Dec 22, 2000
Comprehensive Analysis of Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co.: Implications for Environmental Liability Insurance Coverage Introduction The case of Weyerhaeuser Company v. Commercial...
Public Policy and Wrongful Discharge: Insights from Ellis v. City of Seattle

Public Policy and Wrongful Discharge: Insights from Ellis v. City of Seattle

Date: Dec 15, 2000
Public Policy and Wrongful Discharge: Insights from Ellis v. City of Seattle Introduction Ellis v. City of Seattle, 142 Wn. 2d 450 (2000), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Supreme Court Upholds GMA's Strict Conservation Mandate: Limiting Recreational Uses in Agricultural Production Districts

Supreme Court Upholds GMA's Strict Conservation Mandate: Limiting Recreational Uses in Agricultural Production Districts

Date: Dec 15, 2000
Supreme Court Upholds GMA's Strict Conservation Mandate: Limiting Recreational Uses in Agricultural Production Districts Introduction In the landmark case of King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert