Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Defendant's Confrontation Rights Override State's Surveillance Secrecy

Defendant's Confrontation Rights Override State's Surveillance Secrecy

Date: Mar 8, 2002
Defendant's Confrontation Rights Override State's Surveillance Secrecy Introduction State of Washington v. Clarence Larnell Darden is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Washington in...
Judicial Discretion and Due Process in Sanctions for Discovery Non-Compliance: Rivers v. Washington State Conference of Mason Contractors

Judicial Discretion and Due Process in Sanctions for Discovery Non-Compliance: Rivers v. Washington State Conference of Mason Contractors

Date: Mar 8, 2002
Judicial Discretion and Due Process in Sanctions for Discovery Non-Compliance: Rivers v. Washington State Conference of Mason Contractors Case: Kathy Rivers v. Washington State Conference of Mason...
State v. Vy Thang: Reversing Admission of Prior Bad Acts for Identity under ER 404(b)

State v. Vy Thang: Reversing Admission of Prior Bad Acts for Identity under ER 404(b)

Date: Mar 8, 2002
State v. Vy Thang: Reversing Admission of Prior Bad Acts for Identity under ER 404(b) Introduction State of Washington v. Vy Thang, 145 Wn.2d 630 (2002), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Reevaluation of ER 404(b) Applicability in State v. Everybodytalksabout Establishes Broader Scope for Inadmissible Acts

Reevaluation of ER 404(b) Applicability in State v. Everybodytalksabout Establishes Broader Scope for Inadmissible Acts

Date: Feb 8, 2002
Reevaluation of ER 404(b) Applicability in State v. Everybodytalksabout Establishes Broader Scope for Inadmissible Acts Introduction In the landmark case State of Washington v. Darrell D....
Pre-Existing Known Contamination Excludes Coverage: OVERTON v. CONSOLIDATED INSurance Co.

Pre-Existing Known Contamination Excludes Coverage: OVERTON v. CONSOLIDATED INSurance Co.

Date: Jan 18, 2002
Pre-Existing Known Contamination Excludes Coverage: OVERTON v. CONSOLIDATED INSurance Co. Introduction The case of Jerry Overton f/d/b/a Spokane Transformer Company; and Richard Boyce, Respondents v....
State v. McNeal: Affirmation of Evidentiary Support and Jury Lenity in Inconsistent Convictions

State v. McNeal: Affirmation of Evidentiary Support and Jury Lenity in Inconsistent Convictions

Date: Jan 4, 2002
State v. McNeal: Affirmation of Evidentiary Support and Jury Lenity in Inconsistent Convictions Introduction In State of Washington v. John K. McNeal, 145 Wn.2d 352 (2002), the Supreme Court of...
Constructive Discharge and Disability Discrimination: Insights from Snyder v. MSC of Eastern Washington

Constructive Discharge and Disability Discrimination: Insights from Snyder v. MSC of Eastern Washington

Date: Dec 14, 2001
Constructive Discharge and Disability Discrimination: Insights from SNYDER v. MEDICAL SERVICE CORPORATION of Eastern Washington Introduction The case of Michelle SNYDER v. MEDICAL SERVICE CORPORATION...
Affirmation of Judgment as a Matter of Law in Consumer Protection Act Claims

Affirmation of Judgment as a Matter of Law in Consumer Protection Act Claims

Date: Oct 5, 2001
Affirmation of Judgment as a Matter of Law in Consumer Protection Act Claims Introduction The case of Delgado GUIJOSA v. WAL-MART STORES, Inc. involves a dispute between Salvador Delgado Guijosa,...
Admissibility of Police Accusations of Defendant’s Credibility in Taped Interviews: State v. Demery

Admissibility of Police Accusations of Defendant’s Credibility in Taped Interviews: State v. Demery

Date: Sep 14, 2001
Admissibility of Police Accusations of Defendant’s Credibility in Taped Interviews: State v. Demery Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington v. Kenneth L. Demery (144 Wn. 2d 753), the...
BABCOCK v. MASON COUNTY FIRE DISTrict No. 6: Affirmation of the Public Duty Doctrine and Special Relationship Exception

BABCOCK v. MASON COUNTY FIRE DISTrict No. 6: Affirmation of the Public Duty Doctrine and Special Relationship Exception

Date: Sep 14, 2001
BABCOCK v. MASON COUNTY FIRE DISTrict No. 6: Affirmation of the Public Duty Doctrine and Special Relationship Exception Introduction BABCOCK v. MASON COUNTY FIRE DISTrict No. 6, 144 Wn.2d 774 (2001),...
Strict Compliance Required for Admissibility of Expert Reports under CrR 6.13(b): STATE v. NEAL

Strict Compliance Required for Admissibility of Expert Reports under CrR 6.13(b): STATE v. NEAL

Date: Sep 7, 2001
Strict Compliance Required for Admissibility of Expert Reports under CrR 6.13(b): STATE v. NEAL Introduction State of Washington v. Lisa Marie Neal, 144 Wn. 2d 600 (2001), represents a pivotal...
Non-Retroactivity of 1997 Amendments to Juvenile Wash-Out Provisions under the Sentencing Reform Act

Non-Retroactivity of 1997 Amendments to Juvenile Wash-Out Provisions under the Sentencing Reform Act

Date: Sep 7, 2001
Non-Retroactivity of 1997 Amendments to Juvenile Wash-Out Provisions under the Sentencing Reform Act Introduction The case of State of Washington v. Rodney A. Smith et al. consolidated four...
Balancing Due Process and Child Welfare: The Precedential Ruling in In re Dependency of T.R.

Balancing Due Process and Child Welfare: The Precedential Ruling in In re Dependency of T.R.

Date: Aug 28, 2001
Balancing Due Process and Child Welfare: The Precedential Ruling in In re Dependency of T.R. Introduction The case of In re the Dependency of T.R., STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND...
Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Medical Disciplinary Proceedings Established

Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Medical Disciplinary Proceedings Established

Date: Aug 24, 2001
Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Medical Disciplinary Proceedings Established Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington, in the case of Bang D. Nguyen v. Department of Health Medical...
Protective Pat-Downs of Vehicle Passengers: State v. Horrace

Protective Pat-Downs of Vehicle Passengers: State v. Horrace

Date: Aug 3, 2001
Protective Pat-Downs of Vehicle Passengers: State of Washington v. Ronald James Horrace Introduction State of Washington v. Ronald James Horrace, 144 Wn.2d 386 (2001), is a landmark case adjudicated...
Clarifying "Knowingly" in Felony Harassment: Insights from STATE v. J.M.

Clarifying "Knowingly" in Felony Harassment: Insights from STATE v. J.M.

Date: Aug 3, 2001
Clarifying "Knowingly" in Felony Harassment: Insights from STATE v. J.M. Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington's decision in State of Washington v. J.M., 144 Wn. 2d 472 (2001), addresses a...
Affirmation of Standing Requirements in Declaratory Judgments: TO-RO TRADE SHOWS v. COLLINS

Affirmation of Standing Requirements in Declaratory Judgments: TO-RO TRADE SHOWS v. COLLINS

Date: Aug 3, 2001
Affirmation of Standing Requirements in Declaratory Judgments: TO-RO TRADE SHOWS v. COLLINS Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington, in the case of To-Ro Trade Shows, d/b/a O'LOUGHLIN TRADE...
Correcting Sentencing Errors: Establishing Precedent in Call v. State on Offender Score Miscalculations

Correcting Sentencing Errors: Establishing Precedent in Call v. State on Offender Score Miscalculations

Date: Jul 27, 2001
Correcting Sentencing Errors: Establishing Precedent in Call v. State on Offender Score Miscalculations Introduction Call v. State, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Washington on July 26, 2001,...
Collateral Estoppel Not Applicable to Minor Traffic Infractions in Subsequent Civil Actions

Collateral Estoppel Not Applicable to Minor Traffic Infractions in Subsequent Civil Actions

Date: Jul 27, 2001
Collateral Estoppel Not Applicable to Minor Traffic Infractions in Subsequent Civil Actions Introduction The case of HARRY W. HADLEY and JEWELL HADLEY v. JOHN DOE MAXWELL and HELEN MAXWELL,...
Panorama Village Condo Owners v. Allstate: New Precedents on Suit Limitations and Attorney Fee Recoveries in Insurance Contracts

Panorama Village Condo Owners v. Allstate: New Precedents on Suit Limitations and Attorney Fee Recoveries in Insurance Contracts

Date: Jul 13, 2001
Panorama Village Condo Owners v. Allstate: New Precedents on Suit Limitations and Attorney Fee Recoveries in Insurance Contracts Introduction Panorama Village Condominium Owners Association Board of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert