Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Substantial Similarity Suffices for Admissibility of Prior Bad Acts under ER 404(b) in Washington

Substantial Similarity Suffices for Admissibility of Prior Bad Acts under ER 404(b) in Washington

Date: Aug 15, 2003
Substantial Similarity Suffices for Admissibility of Prior Bad Acts under ER 404(b) in Washington Introduction In the landmark case State of Washington v. Louis A. DeVincentis, the Supreme Court of...
Jury Instruction Sufficiency for Attempted First Degree Rape: STATE v. DERYKE

Jury Instruction Sufficiency for Attempted First Degree Rape: STATE v. DERYKE

Date: Aug 8, 2003
Jury Instruction Sufficiency for Attempted First Degree Rape: STATE v. DERYKE Introduction In State of Washington v. Patrick A. DeRyke, the Supreme Court of Washington addressed critical issues...
Expansion of Floating Easements: Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. Dyke Dickie

Expansion of Floating Easements: Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. Dyke Dickie

Date: Jul 25, 2003
Expansion of Floating Easements: Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. Dyke Dickie Introduction Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District (SVID) v. Dyke Dickie et al. is a landmark case decided by the...
STATE v. DEVRIES: Clarifying the Standards for Evidence Admissibility and Sufficiency in Controlled Substance Cases

STATE v. DEVRIES: Clarifying the Standards for Evidence Admissibility and Sufficiency in Controlled Substance Cases

Date: Jul 18, 2003
STATE v. DEVRIES: Clarifying the Standards for Evidence Admissibility and Sufficiency in Controlled Substance Cases Introduction State of Washington v. Collette S. DeVries is a pivotal case...
Insufficient Record Reconstruction and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: An Analysis of State v. Tilton

Insufficient Record Reconstruction and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: An Analysis of State v. Tilton

Date: Jul 11, 2003
Insufficient Record Reconstruction and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: An Analysis of State v. Tilton Introduction State of Washington v. Nathaniel E. Tilton, 149 Wn. 2d 775 (2003), addresses...
Supreme Court of Washington Clarifies SVPA Commitment Standards and Actuarial Evidence Admissibility

Supreme Court of Washington Clarifies SVPA Commitment Standards and Actuarial Evidence Admissibility

Date: Jul 11, 2003
Supreme Court of Washington Clarifies SVPA Commitment Standards and Actuarial Evidence Admissibility Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington's decision in In the Matter of the Detention of...
Reinforcing Fair Trial Rights: Rohrich v. State of Washington Establishes Actual Prejudice Standard for CrR 8.3(b) Dismissals

Reinforcing Fair Trial Rights: Rohrich v. State of Washington Establishes Actual Prejudice Standard for CrR 8.3(b) Dismissals

Date: Jun 20, 2003
Reinforcing Fair Trial Rights: Rohrich v. State of Washington Establishes Actual Prejudice Standard for CrR 8.3(b) Dismissals Introduction In the landmark case The State of Washington v. Gregory...
Defining Essential Job Functions in Disability Accommodation: The Davis v. Microsoft Decision

Defining Essential Job Functions in Disability Accommodation: The Davis v. Microsoft Decision

Date: Jun 6, 2003
Defining Essential Job Functions in Disability Accommodation: The Davis v. Microsoft Decision Introduction The case of Thomas DAVIS v. MICROSOFT CORPoration addressed critical issues surrounding...
Indivisibility of Plea Agreements in Multiple Charge Cases: Insights from State v. Turley

Indivisibility of Plea Agreements in Multiple Charge Cases: Insights from State v. Turley

Date: May 23, 2003
Indivisibility of Plea Agreements in Multiple Charge Cases: Insights from State v. Turley A Comprehensive Commentary on 149 Wn. 2d 395 Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington v....
Restitution for Counseling in Juvenile Non-Sex Offenses: Insights from STATE v. J.P.

Restitution for Counseling in Juvenile Non-Sex Offenses: Insights from STATE v. J.P.

Date: May 23, 2003
Restitution for Counseling in Juvenile Non-Sex Offenses: Insights from State of Washington v. J.P. Introduction State of Washington v. J.P., 149 Wn.2d 444 (2003), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
State of Washington v. Wentz: Redefining 'Fenced Area' in Burglary Statutes

State of Washington v. Wentz: Redefining 'Fenced Area' in Burglary Statutes

Date: May 9, 2003
State of Washington v. Wentz: Redefining 'Fenced Area' in Burglary Statutes Introduction State of Washington v. Gerald Lee Wentz, 149 Wn.2d 342 (2003), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Cameron v. Plein: Clarifying Accommodation Party Enforcement Rights under RCW 62A.3-419

Cameron v. Plein: Clarifying Accommodation Party Enforcement Rights under RCW 62A.3-419

Date: Apr 18, 2003
Cameron v. Plein: Clarifying Accommodation Party Enforcement Rights under RCW 62A.3-419 Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington, in the case of Cameron v. Plein, addressed pivotal issues...
Washington Supreme Court Abolishes Objective Symptomatology Requirement for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

Washington Supreme Court Abolishes Objective Symptomatology Requirement for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

Date: Apr 18, 2003
Washington Supreme Court Abolishes Objective Symptomatology Requirement for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Introduction In Judy Kloepfelf v. Joseph Bokor, 149 Wn. 2d 192 (2003), the...
Abuse of Discretion Standard in RCW 26.09.270 Adequate Cause Determinations

Abuse of Discretion Standard in RCW 26.09.270 Adequate Cause Determinations

Date: Mar 28, 2003
Abuse of Discretion Standard in RCW 26.09.270 Adequate Cause Determinations Introduction The case of In the Matter of the Parentage of Logan Russell Jannot addresses the appellate review standard...
Authorized Amendment of Legal Descriptions in Title Insurance Commitments

Authorized Amendment of Legal Descriptions in Title Insurance Commitments

Date: Mar 7, 2003
Authorized Amendment of Legal Descriptions in Title Insurance Commitments Introduction The case of PATRICIA S. MICHAK v. TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Washington Supreme Court Upholds Community Caretaking Detention of Juvenile in State v. Acrey

Washington Supreme Court Upholds Community Caretaking Detention of Juvenile in State v. Acrey

Date: Feb 28, 2003
Washington Supreme Court Upholds Community Caretaking Detention of Juvenile in State v. Acrey Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. Adam Lamour Acrey, adjudicated by the Washington...
Interpretation of the Two-Strike Statute in Washington: STATE v. DELGADO

Interpretation of the Two-Strike Statute in Washington: STATE v. DELGADO

Date: Feb 21, 2003
Interpretation of the Two-Strike Statute in Washington: STATE v. DELGADO Introduction State of Washington v. Dumas A. Delgado is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Washington on...
Admissibility of Child Hearsay Statements Under RCW 9A.44.120 Without Prior Competency

Admissibility of Child Hearsay Statements Under RCW 9A.44.120 Without Prior Competency

Date: Feb 7, 2003
Admissibility of Child Hearsay Statements Under RCW 9A.44.120 Without Prior Competency Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. C.J. (148 Wn. 2d 672) represents a significant development...
Mandated Custodial Arrest Prior to Search Incident to Arrest under Washington’s Article I, Section 7

Mandated Custodial Arrest Prior to Search Incident to Arrest under Washington’s Article I, Section 7

Date: Jan 31, 2003
Mandated Custodial Arrest Prior to Search Incident to Arrest under Washington’s Article I, Section 7: Analysis from STATE v. O'NEILl Introduction State of Washington v. Matthew Glynn O'Neill, 148 Wn....
Specific Performance of Plea Agreements and the Discretion on Exceptional Sentencing: Washington v. Harrison

Specific Performance of Plea Agreements and the Discretion on Exceptional Sentencing: Washington v. Harrison

Date: Jan 24, 2003
Specific Performance of Plea Agreements and the Discretion on Exceptional Sentencing: Washington v. Harrison Introduction In State of Washington v. Richard Harrison, 148 Wn.2d 550 (2003), the Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert