Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Lawful Warrantless Seizure of Inmate Property in Unrelated Investigations: The Cheatam Decision

Lawful Warrantless Seizure of Inmate Property in Unrelated Investigations: The Cheatam Decision

Date: Dec 12, 2003
Lawful Warrantless Seizure of Inmate Property in Unrelated Investigations: The Cheatam Decision Introduction State of Washington v. Jerry Dawayne Cheatam (150 Wn.2d 626) is a pivotal decision by the...
Washington Supreme Court Upholds Add-On Interest Calculation under IPFCA

Washington Supreme Court Upholds Add-On Interest Calculation under IPFCA

Date: Dec 12, 2003
Washington Supreme Court Upholds Add-On Interest Calculation under IPFCA Introduction Restaurant Development, Inc. (RDI), a Washington corporation, initiated a class action lawsuit against Cananwill,...
Washington Education Association v. Washington State Public Disclosure Commission: Clarifying the Boundaries of Advisory Guidelines in Administrative Law

Washington Education Association v. Washington State Public Disclosure Commission: Clarifying the Boundaries of Advisory Guidelines in Administrative Law

Date: Dec 12, 2003
Washington Education Association v. Washington State Public Disclosure Commission: Clarifying the Boundaries of Advisory Guidelines in Administrative Law Introduction In Washington Education...
Reasonable Fear Required for Felony Harassment Conviction: State v. C.G. Analysis

Reasonable Fear Required for Felony Harassment Conviction: State v. C.G. Analysis

Date: Dec 12, 2003
Reasonable Fear Required for Felony Harassment Conviction: State v. C.G. Analysis Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington v. C.G., the Supreme Court of Washington addressed critical...
Conflict-Free Counsel and Prosecutorial Conduct in Dhaliwal v. State of Washington

Conflict-Free Counsel and Prosecutorial Conduct in Dhaliwal v. State of Washington

Date: Nov 21, 2003
Conflict-Free Counsel and Prosecutorial Conduct in Dhaliwal v. State of Washington Introduction The case of State of Washington v. Paramjit Singh Dhaliwal (150 Wn. 2d 559) presents significant legal...
STATE v. BALDWIN: Distinct Offenses Affirmed for Double Jeopardy and Vagueness of Sentencing Guidelines Overruled

STATE v. BALDWIN: Distinct Offenses Affirmed for Double Jeopardy and Vagueness of Sentencing Guidelines Overruled

Date: Nov 7, 2003
STATE v. BALDWIN: Distinct Offenses Affirmed for Double Jeopardy and Vagueness of Sentencing Guidelines Overruled Introduction State of Washington v. Jeanne Pearl Baldwin, 150 Wn. 2d 448 (2003),...
Clarifying Summary Judgment Standards in Insurance Bad Faith Claims: Smith v. Safeco

Clarifying Summary Judgment Standards in Insurance Bad Faith Claims: Smith v. Safeco

Date: Nov 7, 2003
Clarifying Summary Judgment Standards in Insurance Bad Faith Claims: Smith v. Safeco Introduction Janice M. Smith and Randal Smith, Individually and as Assignees v. Safeco Insurance Company;...
Establishing Parental Accountability in Enforcement of Parenting Plans: Insights from Rideout v. Rideout

Establishing Parental Accountability in Enforcement of Parenting Plans: Insights from Rideout v. Rideout

Date: Oct 3, 2003
Establishing Parental Accountability in Enforcement of Parenting Plans: Insights from Rideout v. Rideout Introduction In In the Matter of the Marriage of JOHN CHRISTOPHER RIDEOUT and SARA DIXON...
Clarification of Venue vs. Jurisdiction in Workers' Compensation Appeals under RCW 51.52.110

Clarification of Venue vs. Jurisdiction in Workers' Compensation Appeals under RCW 51.52.110

Date: Sep 26, 2003
Clarification of Venue vs. Jurisdiction in Workers' Compensation Appeals under RCW 51.52.110 Introduction The case of Daniel L. Dougherty v. The Department of Labor Industries for the State of...
Washington Supreme Court Requires Warrant for GPS Tracking on Vehicles

Washington Supreme Court Requires Warrant for GPS Tracking on Vehicles

Date: Sep 12, 2003
Washington Supreme Court Requires Warrant for GPS Tracking on Vehicles Introduction The case of State of Washington v. William Bradley Jackson addresses the critical issue of privacy rights in the...
One-Year Time Limitation Applied to Civil Restraint Petitions for Sexually Violent Predators: Turay v. Washington

One-Year Time Limitation Applied to Civil Restraint Petitions for Sexually Violent Predators: Turay v. Washington

Date: Aug 22, 2003
One-Year Time Limitation Applied to Civil Restraint Petitions for Sexually Violent Predators: Turay v. Washington Introduction In In the Matter of the Personal Restraint Petition of Richard Garrett...
Substantial Similarity Suffices for Admissibility of Prior Bad Acts under ER 404(b) in Washington

Substantial Similarity Suffices for Admissibility of Prior Bad Acts under ER 404(b) in Washington

Date: Aug 15, 2003
Substantial Similarity Suffices for Admissibility of Prior Bad Acts under ER 404(b) in Washington Introduction In the landmark case State of Washington v. Louis A. DeVincentis, the Supreme Court of...
Jury Instruction Sufficiency for Attempted First Degree Rape: STATE v. DERYKE

Jury Instruction Sufficiency for Attempted First Degree Rape: STATE v. DERYKE

Date: Aug 8, 2003
Jury Instruction Sufficiency for Attempted First Degree Rape: STATE v. DERYKE Introduction In State of Washington v. Patrick A. DeRyke, the Supreme Court of Washington addressed critical issues...
Expansion of Floating Easements: Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. Dyke Dickie

Expansion of Floating Easements: Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. Dyke Dickie

Date: Jul 25, 2003
Expansion of Floating Easements: Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. Dyke Dickie Introduction Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District (SVID) v. Dyke Dickie et al. is a landmark case decided by the...
STATE v. DEVRIES: Clarifying the Standards for Evidence Admissibility and Sufficiency in Controlled Substance Cases

STATE v. DEVRIES: Clarifying the Standards for Evidence Admissibility and Sufficiency in Controlled Substance Cases

Date: Jul 18, 2003
STATE v. DEVRIES: Clarifying the Standards for Evidence Admissibility and Sufficiency in Controlled Substance Cases Introduction State of Washington v. Collette S. DeVries is a pivotal case...
Insufficient Record Reconstruction and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: An Analysis of State v. Tilton

Insufficient Record Reconstruction and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: An Analysis of State v. Tilton

Date: Jul 11, 2003
Insufficient Record Reconstruction and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: An Analysis of State v. Tilton Introduction State of Washington v. Nathaniel E. Tilton, 149 Wn. 2d 775 (2003), addresses...
Supreme Court of Washington Clarifies SVPA Commitment Standards and Actuarial Evidence Admissibility

Supreme Court of Washington Clarifies SVPA Commitment Standards and Actuarial Evidence Admissibility

Date: Jul 11, 2003
Supreme Court of Washington Clarifies SVPA Commitment Standards and Actuarial Evidence Admissibility Introduction The Supreme Court of Washington's decision in In the Matter of the Detention of...
Reinforcing Fair Trial Rights: Rohrich v. State of Washington Establishes Actual Prejudice Standard for CrR 8.3(b) Dismissals

Reinforcing Fair Trial Rights: Rohrich v. State of Washington Establishes Actual Prejudice Standard for CrR 8.3(b) Dismissals

Date: Jun 20, 2003
Reinforcing Fair Trial Rights: Rohrich v. State of Washington Establishes Actual Prejudice Standard for CrR 8.3(b) Dismissals Introduction In the landmark case The State of Washington v. Gregory...
Defining Essential Job Functions in Disability Accommodation: The Davis v. Microsoft Decision

Defining Essential Job Functions in Disability Accommodation: The Davis v. Microsoft Decision

Date: Jun 6, 2003
Defining Essential Job Functions in Disability Accommodation: The Davis v. Microsoft Decision Introduction The case of Thomas DAVIS v. MICROSOFT CORPoration addressed critical issues surrounding...
Indivisibility of Plea Agreements in Multiple Charge Cases: Insights from State v. Turley

Indivisibility of Plea Agreements in Multiple Charge Cases: Insights from State v. Turley

Date: May 23, 2003
Indivisibility of Plea Agreements in Multiple Charge Cases: Insights from State v. Turley A Comprehensive Commentary on 149 Wn. 2d 395 Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert