Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Washington Case Commentaries

Capacity of Juveniles Under Age 12 in Criminal Proceedings: The Ramer Decision

Capacity of Juveniles Under Age 12 in Criminal Proceedings: The Ramer Decision

Date: Mar 12, 2004
Capacity of Juveniles Under Age 12 in Criminal Proceedings: The Ramer Decision Introduction The case of The State of Washington v. Andrew Ramer (151 Wn. 2d 106) represents a significant judicial...
Clarifying "True Threats": Insights from State v. Kilburn

Clarifying "True Threats": Insights from State v. Kilburn

Date: Feb 13, 2004
Clarifying "True Threats": Insights from State v. Kilburn Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington v. Martin Kilburn, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Washington on February 12,...
Clark v. Grasso: Reinforcing the Confrontation Clause in Child Hearsay Cases

Clark v. Grasso: Reinforcing the Confrontation Clause in Child Hearsay Cases

Date: Feb 6, 2004
Clark v. Grasso: Reinforcing the Confrontation Clause in Child Hearsay Cases Introduction Clark v. Grasso is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Washington that addresses the intricate...
Alford Pleas and Collateral Estoppel: Implications from Clark v. Baines

Alford Pleas and Collateral Estoppel: Implications from Clark v. Baines

Date: Feb 6, 2004
Alford Pleas and Collateral Estoppel: Implications from Clark v. Baines Introduction Clark v. Baines, 150 Wn. 2d 905 (2004), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Washington that addresses...
Washington Supreme Court Upholds Petition Method of Annexation: Independent Constitutional Analysis Affirmed

Washington Supreme Court Upholds Petition Method of Annexation: Independent Constitutional Analysis Affirmed

Date: Jan 30, 2004
Washington Supreme Court Upholds Petition Method of Annexation: Independent Constitutional Analysis Affirmed Introduction The consolidated cases of Grant County Fire Protection District No. 5 v. City...
State v. Covell Paul Thomas: Impact of Apprendi and Ring on Death Penalty Sentencing and Jury Instructions

State v. Covell Paul Thomas: Impact of Apprendi and Ring on Death Penalty Sentencing and Jury Instructions

Date: Jan 30, 2004
State v. Covell Paul Thomas: Impact of Apprendi and Ring on Death Penalty Sentencing and Jury Instructions Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington v. Covell Paul Thomas (150 Wn. 2d...
Requirement to Specify Controlled Substance in Charging Documents: Analysis of State v. Goodman

Requirement to Specify Controlled Substance in Charging Documents: Analysis of State v. Goodman

Date: Jan 16, 2004
Requirement to Specify Controlled Substance in Charging Documents: Analysis of State of Washington v. Goodman Introduction State of Washington v. Jay Lawrence Goodman, 150 Wn. 2d 774 (2004), is a...
Mount Adams School District v. William D. Cook: Affirming Arbitration Rights under Collective Bargaining Agreement

Mount Adams School District v. William D. Cook: Affirming Arbitration Rights under Collective Bargaining Agreement

Date: Dec 19, 2003
Mount Adams School District v. William D. Cook: Affirming Arbitration Rights under Collective Bargaining Agreement Introduction The case of Mount Adams School District v. William D. Cook revolved...
Establishing the Professional Judgment Standard for Foster Children's Substantive Due Process Rights in Washington State

Establishing the Professional Judgment Standard for Foster Children's Substantive Due Process Rights in Washington State

Date: Dec 19, 2003
Establishing the Professional Judgment Standard for Foster Children's Substantive Due Process Rights in Washington State Introduction In the landmark case of Braam et al. v. State of Washington,...
Lawful Warrantless Seizure of Inmate Property in Unrelated Investigations: The Cheatam Decision

Lawful Warrantless Seizure of Inmate Property in Unrelated Investigations: The Cheatam Decision

Date: Dec 12, 2003
Lawful Warrantless Seizure of Inmate Property in Unrelated Investigations: The Cheatam Decision Introduction State of Washington v. Jerry Dawayne Cheatam (150 Wn.2d 626) is a pivotal decision by the...
Washington Supreme Court Upholds Add-On Interest Calculation under IPFCA

Washington Supreme Court Upholds Add-On Interest Calculation under IPFCA

Date: Dec 12, 2003
Washington Supreme Court Upholds Add-On Interest Calculation under IPFCA Introduction Restaurant Development, Inc. (RDI), a Washington corporation, initiated a class action lawsuit against Cananwill,...
Washington Education Association v. Washington State Public Disclosure Commission: Clarifying the Boundaries of Advisory Guidelines in Administrative Law

Washington Education Association v. Washington State Public Disclosure Commission: Clarifying the Boundaries of Advisory Guidelines in Administrative Law

Date: Dec 12, 2003
Washington Education Association v. Washington State Public Disclosure Commission: Clarifying the Boundaries of Advisory Guidelines in Administrative Law Introduction In Washington Education...
Reasonable Fear Required for Felony Harassment Conviction: State v. C.G. Analysis

Reasonable Fear Required for Felony Harassment Conviction: State v. C.G. Analysis

Date: Dec 12, 2003
Reasonable Fear Required for Felony Harassment Conviction: State v. C.G. Analysis Introduction In the landmark case of State of Washington v. C.G., the Supreme Court of Washington addressed critical...
Conflict-Free Counsel and Prosecutorial Conduct in Dhaliwal v. State of Washington

Conflict-Free Counsel and Prosecutorial Conduct in Dhaliwal v. State of Washington

Date: Nov 21, 2003
Conflict-Free Counsel and Prosecutorial Conduct in Dhaliwal v. State of Washington Introduction The case of State of Washington v. Paramjit Singh Dhaliwal (150 Wn. 2d 559) presents significant legal...
STATE v. BALDWIN: Distinct Offenses Affirmed for Double Jeopardy and Vagueness of Sentencing Guidelines Overruled

STATE v. BALDWIN: Distinct Offenses Affirmed for Double Jeopardy and Vagueness of Sentencing Guidelines Overruled

Date: Nov 7, 2003
STATE v. BALDWIN: Distinct Offenses Affirmed for Double Jeopardy and Vagueness of Sentencing Guidelines Overruled Introduction State of Washington v. Jeanne Pearl Baldwin, 150 Wn. 2d 448 (2003),...
Clarifying Summary Judgment Standards in Insurance Bad Faith Claims: Smith v. Safeco

Clarifying Summary Judgment Standards in Insurance Bad Faith Claims: Smith v. Safeco

Date: Nov 7, 2003
Clarifying Summary Judgment Standards in Insurance Bad Faith Claims: Smith v. Safeco Introduction Janice M. Smith and Randal Smith, Individually and as Assignees v. Safeco Insurance Company;...
Establishing Parental Accountability in Enforcement of Parenting Plans: Insights from Rideout v. Rideout

Establishing Parental Accountability in Enforcement of Parenting Plans: Insights from Rideout v. Rideout

Date: Oct 3, 2003
Establishing Parental Accountability in Enforcement of Parenting Plans: Insights from Rideout v. Rideout Introduction In In the Matter of the Marriage of JOHN CHRISTOPHER RIDEOUT and SARA DIXON...
Clarification of Venue vs. Jurisdiction in Workers' Compensation Appeals under RCW 51.52.110

Clarification of Venue vs. Jurisdiction in Workers' Compensation Appeals under RCW 51.52.110

Date: Sep 26, 2003
Clarification of Venue vs. Jurisdiction in Workers' Compensation Appeals under RCW 51.52.110 Introduction The case of Daniel L. Dougherty v. The Department of Labor Industries for the State of...
Washington Supreme Court Requires Warrant for GPS Tracking on Vehicles

Washington Supreme Court Requires Warrant for GPS Tracking on Vehicles

Date: Sep 12, 2003
Washington Supreme Court Requires Warrant for GPS Tracking on Vehicles Introduction The case of State of Washington v. William Bradley Jackson addresses the critical issue of privacy rights in the...
One-Year Time Limitation Applied to Civil Restraint Petitions for Sexually Violent Predators: Turay v. Washington

One-Year Time Limitation Applied to Civil Restraint Petitions for Sexually Violent Predators: Turay v. Washington

Date: Aug 22, 2003
One-Year Time Limitation Applied to Civil Restraint Petitions for Sexually Violent Predators: Turay v. Washington Introduction In In the Matter of the Personal Restraint Petition of Richard Garrett...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert