Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Counsel Consent Sufficient for Magistrate Judges to Preside over Felony Jury Selection

Counsel Consent Sufficient for Magistrate Judges to Preside over Felony Jury Selection

Date: May 13, 2008
Counsel Consent Sufficient for Magistrate Judges to Preside over Felony Jury Selection Introduction HOMERO GONZALEZ, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES (553 U.S. 242), decided on May 12, 2008, addresses a...
Affirmation of the Constitutionality of Indiana's Voter ID Law: Protecting Electoral Integrity

Affirmation of the Constitutionality of Indiana's Voter ID Law: Protecting Electoral Integrity

Date: Apr 29, 2008
Affirmation of the Constitutionality of Indiana's Voter ID Law: Protecting Electoral Integrity Introduction In the landmark case of WILLIAM CRAWFORD, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. MARION COUNTY ELECTION...
Upholding the Constitutionality of Indiana's Voter ID Law: A Comprehensive Commentary

Upholding the Constitutionality of Indiana's Voter ID Law: A Comprehensive Commentary

Date: Apr 29, 2008
Upholding the Constitutionality of Indiana's Voter ID Law: A Comprehensive Commentary 1. Introduction The United States Supreme Court, in the landmark case William Crawford et al. v. Marion County...
Virginia v. Moore: Upholding Fourth Amendment Protections in Arrests

Virginia v. Moore: Upholding Fourth Amendment Protections in Arrests

Date: Apr 24, 2008
Virginia v. Moore: Upholding Fourth Amendment Protections in Arrests Introduction Virginia v. David Lee Moore is a landmark judgment delivered by the United States Supreme Court on April 23, 2008....
Redefining "Felony Drug Offense" Under the Controlled Substances Act: Insights from Burgess v. United States

Redefining "Felony Drug Offense" Under the Controlled Substances Act: Insights from Burgess v. United States

Date: Apr 17, 2008
Redefining "Felony Drug Offense" Under the Controlled Substances Act: Insights from Burgess v. United States Introduction Burgess v. United States, 553 U.S. 124 (2008), is a landmark Supreme Court...
Affirming Eighth Amendment Compliance: U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Kentucky's Three-Drug Lethal Injection Protocol in Baze v. Rees

Affirming Eighth Amendment Compliance: U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Kentucky's Three-Drug Lethal Injection Protocol in Baze v. Rees

Date: Apr 17, 2008
Affirming Eighth Amendment Compliance: U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Kentucky's Three-Drug Lethal Injection Protocol in Baze v. Rees Introduction In Ralphp Baze and Thomas C. Bowling v. John D. Rees,...
Driving Under the Influence Not a "Violent Felony" under the Armed Career Criminal Act: Begay v. United States

Driving Under the Influence Not a "Violent Felony" under the Armed Career Criminal Act: Begay v. United States

Date: Apr 17, 2008
Driving Under the Influence Not a "Violent Felony" under the Armed Career Criminal Act: Begay v. United States Introduction In Larry Begay v. United States, 553 U.S. 137 (2008), the United States...
MeadWestvaco v. Illinois: Clarifying the Unitary Business Principle in State Tax Apportionment

MeadWestvaco v. Illinois: Clarifying the Unitary Business Principle in State Tax Apportionment

Date: Apr 16, 2008
MeadWestvaco v. Illinois: Clarifying the Unitary Business Principle in State Tax Apportionment Introduction MeadWestvaco Corporation v. Illinois Department of Revenue is a landmark decision by the...
Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co. v. United States: Enforcing IRS Refund Procedures for Constitutional Tax Claims

Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co. v. United States: Enforcing IRS Refund Procedures for Constitutional Tax Claims

Date: Apr 16, 2008
Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co. v. United States: Enforcing IRS Refund Procedures for Constitutional Tax Claims Introduction The Supreme Court case United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Company et...
Overlapping Riparian Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent in NEW JERSEY v. DELAWARE

Overlapping Riparian Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent in NEW JERSEY v. DELAWARE

Date: Apr 1, 2008
Overlapping Riparian Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent in NEW JERSEY v. DELAWARE Introduction The United States Supreme Court's decision in State of New Jersey v. State of...
Concurrent State Jurisdiction over Riparian Structures: Analysis of NEW JERSEY v. DELAWARE (2008)

Concurrent State Jurisdiction over Riparian Structures: Analysis of NEW JERSEY v. DELAWARE (2008)

Date: Apr 1, 2008
Concurrent State Jurisdiction over Riparian Structures: Analysis of NEW JERSEY v. DELAWARE (2008) Introduction The case of State of New Jersey v. State of Delaware, 552 U.S. 597 (2008), addressed a...
Exclusivity of FAA's Grounds for Arbitration Award Review Established in Hall Street v. Mattel

Exclusivity of FAA's Grounds for Arbitration Award Review Established in Hall Street v. Mattel

Date: Mar 26, 2008
Exclusivity of FAA's Grounds for Arbitration Award Review Established in Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc. Introduction Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576...
Medellín v. Texas: ICJ Judgments Not Directly Enforceable in U.S. States Without Congressional Action

Medellín v. Texas: ICJ Judgments Not Directly Enforceable in U.S. States Without Congressional Action

Date: Mar 26, 2008
Medellín v. Texas: ICJ Judgments Not Directly Enforceable in U.S. States Without Congressional Action Introduction Medellín v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491 (2008), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that...
Allen SNYDER v. LOUISIANA: Reinforcing Batson Protections Against Racial Peremptory Strikes

Allen SNYDER v. LOUISIANA: Reinforcing Batson Protections Against Racial Peremptory Strikes

Date: Mar 20, 2008
Allen SNYDER v. LOUISIANA: Reinforcing Batson Protections Against Racial Peremptory Strikes Introduction The case of Allen SNYDER v. LOUISIANA addressed critical issues surrounding the use of...
Upholding Associational Rights: The Supreme Court's Decision in Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party

Upholding Associational Rights: The Supreme Court's Decision in Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party

Date: Mar 19, 2008
Upholding Associational Rights: The Supreme Court's Decision in Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party Introduction In Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican...
Supreme Court Upholds Washington's Initiative 872: A Landmark Ruling on Political Parties' Associational Rights

Supreme Court Upholds Washington's Initiative 872: A Landmark Ruling on Political Parties' Associational Rights

Date: Mar 19, 2008
Supreme Court Upholds Washington's Initiative 872: A Landmark Ruling on Political Parties' Associational Rights Introduction The case of Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party...
Return of Capital in Criminal Tax Evasion: Boulware v. United States

Return of Capital in Criminal Tax Evasion: Boulware v. United States

Date: Mar 4, 2008
Return of Capital in Criminal Tax Evasion: Boulware v. United States Introduction The United States Supreme Court's decision in Michael H. Boulware v. United States, 552 U.S. 421 (2008), addresses a...
Defining a "Charge" Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Insights from Federal Express Corp. v. Kennedy

Defining a "Charge" Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Insights from Federal Express Corp. v. Kennedy

Date: Feb 28, 2008
Defining a "Charge" Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Insights from Federal Express Corp. v. Kennedy Introduction Federal Express Corporation v. Paul Holowecki et al., decided on...
Sprint/United Management Co. v. Mendelsohn: Clarifying Evidence Admissibility in Age Discrimination Litigation

Sprint/United Management Co. v. Mendelsohn: Clarifying Evidence Admissibility in Age Discrimination Litigation

Date: Feb 27, 2008
Sprint/United Management Co. v. Mendelsohn: Clarifying Evidence Admissibility in Age Discrimination Litigation Introduction The Supreme Court case Sprint/United Management Company v. Ellen...
Preemption of Common-Law Claims Under the Medical Device Amendments: Supreme Court's Decision in Riegel v. Medtronic

Preemption of Common-Law Claims Under the Medical Device Amendments: Supreme Court's Decision in Riegel v. Medtronic

Date: Feb 21, 2008
Preemption of Common-Law Claims Under the Medical Device Amendments: Supreme Court's Decision in Riegel v. Medtronic Introduction The Supreme Court's decision in Donna S. RIEGEL v. MEDTRONIC, INC.,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert