Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Class-of-One Theory Not Applicable in Public Employment: Analysis of Engquist v. Oregon Department of Agriculture

Class-of-One Theory Not Applicable in Public Employment: Analysis of Engquist v. Oregon Department of Agriculture

Date: Jun 10, 2008
Class-of-One Theory Not Applicable in Public Employment: Analysis of Engquist v. Oregon Department of Agriculture Introduction The case of Engquist v. Oregon Department of Agriculture, 553 U.S. 591...
Patent Exhaustion Applies to Method Patents: Analysis of Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.

Patent Exhaustion Applies to Method Patents: Analysis of Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc.

Date: Jun 10, 2008
Patent Exhaustion Applies to Method Patents: Analysis of Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc. Introduction The United States Supreme Court's decision in Quanta Computer, Inc., et al. v. LG...
Intent Requirement in False Claims Act: Allison Engine Co. v. United States

Intent Requirement in False Claims Act: Allison Engine Co. v. United States

Date: Jun 10, 2008
Intent Requirement in False Claims Act: Allison Engine Co. v. United States Introduction The Supreme Court case Allison Engine Company, Inc. v. United States (553 U.S. 662, 2008) addresses the...
RICO Claims Without Plaintiff Reliance: Supreme Court in Bridge v. Phoenix Bond Indemnity Co.

RICO Claims Without Plaintiff Reliance: Supreme Court in Bridge v. Phoenix Bond Indemnity Co.

Date: Jun 10, 2008
RICO Claims Without Plaintiff Reliance: Supreme Court in Bridge v. Phoenix Bond Indemnity Co. Introduction In the landmark case of John Bridge et al. v. Phoenix Bond Indemnity Co. et al., decided on...
EAJA Paralegal Fee Recovery at Prevailing Market Rates Established in Richlin Security Service Co. v. Chertoff

EAJA Paralegal Fee Recovery at Prevailing Market Rates Established in Richlin Security Service Co. v. Chertoff

Date: Jun 3, 2008
EAJA Paralegal Fee Recovery at Prevailing Market Rates Established in Richlin Security Service Co. v. Chertoff Introduction Richlin Security Service Company (hereinafter "Richlin") appealed a...
Regalado Cuellar v. United States: Redefining the 'Designed to Conceal' Standard in Money Laundering

Regalado Cuellar v. United States: Redefining the 'Designed to Conceal' Standard in Money Laundering

Date: Jun 3, 2008
Regalado Cuellar v. United States: Redefining the 'Designed to Conceal' Standard in Money Laundering Introduction Regalado Cuellar v. United States, 553 U.S. 550 (2008), is a landmark decision by the...
Interpretation of "Proceeds" as "Profits" under 18 U.S.C. § 1956: United States v. Santos and Diaz

Interpretation of "Proceeds" as "Profits" under 18 U.S.C. § 1956: United States v. Santos and Diaz

Date: Jun 3, 2008
Interpretation of "Proceeds" as "Profits" under 18 U.S.C. § 1956: United States v. Santos and Diaz Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Efrain Santos and Benedicto Diaz, the United...
42 U.S.C. § 1981 Encompasses Retaliation Claims: Comprehensive Commentary on CBOCS West, Inc. v. Humphries

42 U.S.C. § 1981 Encompasses Retaliation Claims: Comprehensive Commentary on CBOCS West, Inc. v. Humphries

Date: May 28, 2008
42 U.S.C. § 1981 Encompasses Retaliation Claims: Comprehensive Commentary on CBOCS West, Inc. v. Humphries Introduction In the landmark case of CBOCS West, Inc. v. Hedrick G. Humphries, 553 U.S. 442...
Reinstatement of Gubernatorial Appointments After Judicial Nullification Does Not Constitute a 'Change' under VRA Section 5

Reinstatement of Gubernatorial Appointments After Judicial Nullification Does Not Constitute a 'Change' under VRA Section 5

Date: May 28, 2008
Reinstatement of Gubernatorial Appointments After Judicial Nullification Does Not Constitute a 'Change' under VRA Section 5 Introduction In the landmark case Bob Riley, Governor of Alabama, Appellant...
Retaliation Claims Under Federal-Sector ADEA: Analysis of Gomez-Perez v. Potter

Retaliation Claims Under Federal-Sector ADEA: Analysis of Gomez-Perez v. Potter

Date: May 28, 2008
Retaliation Claims Under Federal-Sector ADEA: Analysis of Gomez-Perez v. Potter Introduction Myrna Gomez-Perez v. John E. Potter, 553 U.S. 474 (2008), represents a pivotal moment in the...
Interpretation of 'Maximum Term of Imprisonment' in ACCA: The Rodriguez Precedent

Interpretation of 'Maximum Term of Imprisonment' in ACCA: The Rodriguez Precedent

Date: May 20, 2008
Interpretation of 'Maximum Term of Imprisonment' in ACCA: The Rodriguez Precedent Introduction In the landmark case UNITED STATES v. GINO RODRIQUEZ, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on May 19, 2008,...
Kentucky v. Davis: Upholding State Sovereignty in Municipal Bond Taxation under the Dormant Commerce Clause

Kentucky v. Davis: Upholding State Sovereignty in Municipal Bond Taxation under the Dormant Commerce Clause

Date: May 20, 2008
Kentucky v. Davis: Upholding State Sovereignty in Municipal Bond Taxation under the Dormant Commerce Clause Introduction In the landmark case Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. George W. Davis et...
Temporal Nexus Suffices for §844(h)(2) Conviction: Insights from United States v. Ahmed Ressam

Temporal Nexus Suffices for §844(h)(2) Conviction: Insights from United States v. Ahmed Ressam

Date: May 20, 2008
Temporal Nexus Suffices for §844(h)(2) Conviction: Insights from United States v. Ahmed Ressam Introduction In United States v. Ahmed Ressam, 553 U.S. 272 (2008), the Supreme Court addressed a...
United States v. Williams: Supreme Court Upholds Anti-Pandering Child Pornography Statute Against First Amendment and Vagueness Challenges

United States v. Williams: Supreme Court Upholds Anti-Pandering Child Pornography Statute Against First Amendment and Vagueness Challenges

Date: May 20, 2008
United States v. Williams: Supreme Court Upholds Anti-Pandering Child Pornography Statute Against First Amendment and Vagueness Challenges Introduction The Supreme Court case United States v. Michael...
Counsel Consent Sufficient for Magistrate Judges to Preside over Felony Jury Selection

Counsel Consent Sufficient for Magistrate Judges to Preside over Felony Jury Selection

Date: May 13, 2008
Counsel Consent Sufficient for Magistrate Judges to Preside over Felony Jury Selection Introduction HOMERO GONZALEZ, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES (553 U.S. 242), decided on May 12, 2008, addresses a...
Affirmation of the Constitutionality of Indiana's Voter ID Law: Protecting Electoral Integrity

Affirmation of the Constitutionality of Indiana's Voter ID Law: Protecting Electoral Integrity

Date: Apr 29, 2008
Affirmation of the Constitutionality of Indiana's Voter ID Law: Protecting Electoral Integrity Introduction In the landmark case of WILLIAM CRAWFORD, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. MARION COUNTY ELECTION...
Upholding the Constitutionality of Indiana's Voter ID Law: A Comprehensive Commentary

Upholding the Constitutionality of Indiana's Voter ID Law: A Comprehensive Commentary

Date: Apr 29, 2008
Upholding the Constitutionality of Indiana's Voter ID Law: A Comprehensive Commentary 1. Introduction The United States Supreme Court, in the landmark case William Crawford et al. v. Marion County...
Virginia v. Moore: Upholding Fourth Amendment Protections in Arrests

Virginia v. Moore: Upholding Fourth Amendment Protections in Arrests

Date: Apr 24, 2008
Virginia v. Moore: Upholding Fourth Amendment Protections in Arrests Introduction Virginia v. David Lee Moore is a landmark judgment delivered by the United States Supreme Court on April 23, 2008....
Redefining "Felony Drug Offense" Under the Controlled Substances Act: Insights from Burgess v. United States

Redefining "Felony Drug Offense" Under the Controlled Substances Act: Insights from Burgess v. United States

Date: Apr 17, 2008
Redefining "Felony Drug Offense" Under the Controlled Substances Act: Insights from Burgess v. United States Introduction Burgess v. United States, 553 U.S. 124 (2008), is a landmark Supreme Court...
Affirming Eighth Amendment Compliance: U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Kentucky's Three-Drug Lethal Injection Protocol in Baze v. Rees

Affirming Eighth Amendment Compliance: U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Kentucky's Three-Drug Lethal Injection Protocol in Baze v. Rees

Date: Apr 17, 2008
Affirming Eighth Amendment Compliance: U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Kentucky's Three-Drug Lethal Injection Protocol in Baze v. Rees Introduction In Ralphp Baze and Thomas C. Bowling v. John D. Rees,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert