Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Brent Taylor v. Robert A. Sturgell: Supreme Court Rejects Virtual Representation for Claim Preclusion Introduction The case of Brent Taylor, Petitioner v. Robert A. Sturgell, Acting Administrator,...
BOUMEDIENE v. BUSH: Affirming Habeas Corpus Rights for Guantanamo Detainees Introduction BOUMEDIENE v. BUSH (2008) is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that fundamentally reshaped the...
Habeas Corpus Does Not Preclude Transfer of U.S. Citizens Detained by Multinational Forces: MUNAF v. GEREN Introduction The Supreme Court case Mohammad Munaf, et al. v. Pete Geren, Secretary of The...
BOUMEDIENE v. BUSH: Reinforcing Habeas Corpus Rights for Guantanamo Detainees Introduction BOUMEDIENE v. BUSH, 553 U.S. 723 (2008), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Irizarry v. United States: Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Rule 32(h) to Sentencing Variances Post-Booker Introduction Irizarry v. United States, 553 U.S. 708 (2008), is a pivotal case in...
Supreme Court Clarifies Rule 19(b) in the Context of Foreign Sovereign Immunity Introduction The case Republic of the Philippines, et al. v. Jerry S. Pimentel addresses significant issues at the...
Class-of-One Theory Not Applicable in Public Employment: Analysis of Engquist v. Oregon Department of Agriculture Introduction The case of Engquist v. Oregon Department of Agriculture, 553 U.S. 591...
Patent Exhaustion Applies to Method Patents: Analysis of Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc. Introduction The United States Supreme Court's decision in Quanta Computer, Inc., et al. v. LG...
Intent Requirement in False Claims Act: Allison Engine Co. v. United States Introduction The Supreme Court case Allison Engine Company, Inc. v. United States (553 U.S. 662, 2008) addresses the...
RICO Claims Without Plaintiff Reliance: Supreme Court in Bridge v. Phoenix Bond Indemnity Co. Introduction In the landmark case of John Bridge et al. v. Phoenix Bond Indemnity Co. et al., decided on...
EAJA Paralegal Fee Recovery at Prevailing Market Rates Established in Richlin Security Service Co. v. Chertoff Introduction Richlin Security Service Company (hereinafter "Richlin") appealed a...
Regalado Cuellar v. United States: Redefining the 'Designed to Conceal' Standard in Money Laundering Introduction Regalado Cuellar v. United States, 553 U.S. 550 (2008), is a landmark decision by the...
Interpretation of "Proceeds" as "Profits" under 18 U.S.C. § 1956: United States v. Santos and Diaz Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Efrain Santos and Benedicto Diaz, the United...
42 U.S.C. § 1981 Encompasses Retaliation Claims: Comprehensive Commentary on CBOCS West, Inc. v. Humphries Introduction In the landmark case of CBOCS West, Inc. v. Hedrick G. Humphries, 553 U.S. 442...
Reinstatement of Gubernatorial Appointments After Judicial Nullification Does Not Constitute a 'Change' under VRA Section 5 Introduction In the landmark case Bob Riley, Governor of Alabama, Appellant...
Retaliation Claims Under Federal-Sector ADEA: Analysis of Gomez-Perez v. Potter Introduction Myrna Gomez-Perez v. John E. Potter, 553 U.S. 474 (2008), represents a pivotal moment in the...
Interpretation of 'Maximum Term of Imprisonment' in ACCA: The Rodriguez Precedent Introduction In the landmark case UNITED STATES v. GINO RODRIQUEZ, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on May 19, 2008,...
Kentucky v. Davis: Upholding State Sovereignty in Municipal Bond Taxation under the Dormant Commerce Clause Introduction In the landmark case Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. George W. Davis et...
Temporal Nexus Suffices for §844(h)(2) Conviction: Insights from United States v. Ahmed Ressam Introduction In United States v. Ahmed Ressam, 553 U.S. 272 (2008), the Supreme Court addressed a...
United States v. Williams: Supreme Court Upholds Anti-Pandering Child Pornography Statute Against First Amendment and Vagueness Challenges Introduction The Supreme Court case United States v. Michael...