Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

South Carolina v. North Carolina: Expanding Intervention Standards in Original Jurisdiction Cases

South Carolina v. North Carolina: Expanding Intervention Standards in Original Jurisdiction Cases

Date: Jan 21, 2010
South Carolina v. North Carolina: Expanding Intervention Standards in Original Jurisdiction Cases Introduction South Carolina v. North Carolina (558 U.S. 256, 2010) is a pivotal United States Supreme...
Supreme Court Upholds Deference to State Factual Findings Under §2254(d)(2) in Habeas Corpus Review

Supreme Court Upholds Deference to State Factual Findings Under §2254(d)(2) in Habeas Corpus Review

Date: Jan 21, 2010
Supreme Court Upholds Deference to State Factual Findings Under §2254(d)(2) in Habeas Corpus Review Introduction In the landmark case Holly Wood v. Richard F. Allen, Commissioner, Alabama Department...
Enhanced Public Access During Voir Dire: Presley v. Georgia

Enhanced Public Access During Voir Dire: Presley v. Georgia

Date: Jan 20, 2010
Enhanced Public Access During Voir Dire: Presley v. Georgia Introduction Presley v. Georgia (558 U.S. 209, 2010) is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case that redefined the boundaries of the...
Presley v. Georgia: Reinforcing the Sixth Amendment Right to a Public Jury Selection and Mandating Alternative Considerations to Courtroom Closure

Presley v. Georgia: Reinforcing the Sixth Amendment Right to a Public Jury Selection and Mandating Alternative Considerations to Courtroom Closure

Date: Jan 20, 2010
Presley v. Georgia: Reinforcing the Sixth Amendment Right to a Public Jury Selection and Mandating Alternative Considerations to Courtroom Closure Introduction Presley v. Georgia, 558 U.S. 209...
Impact of Procedural Errors in Capital Trials: An Analysis of Marcus A. Wellons v. Hilton Hall

Impact of Procedural Errors in Capital Trials: An Analysis of Marcus A. Wellons v. Hilton Hall

Date: Jan 20, 2010
Impact of Procedural Errors in Capital Trials: An Analysis of Marcus A. Wellons v. Hilton Hall Introduction Marcus A. Wellons v. Hilton Hall, 558 U.S. 220 (2010), is a significant United States...
NRG Power Marketing LLC v. Maine Public Utilities Commission: Expanding the Mobile–Sierra Doctrine to Noncontracting Parties

NRG Power Marketing LLC v. Maine Public Utilities Commission: Expanding the Mobile–Sierra Doctrine to Noncontracting Parties

Date: Jan 14, 2010
NRG Power Marketing LLC v. Maine Public Utilities Commission: Expanding the Mobile–Sierra Doctrine to Noncontracting Parties Introduction The Supreme Court case NRG Power Marketing, LLC, et al. v....
Extending the Mobile-Sierra Presumption to All Rate Challenges: An Analysis of NRG Power Marketing, LLC v. Maine Public Utilities Commission

Extending the Mobile-Sierra Presumption to All Rate Challenges: An Analysis of NRG Power Marketing, LLC v. Maine Public Utilities Commission

Date: Jan 14, 2010
Extending the Mobile-Sierra Presumption to All Rate Challenges An Analysis of NRG Power Marketing, LLC v. Maine Public Utilities Commission Introduction The United States Supreme Court case NRG Power...
Supreme Court Enforces Procedural Protocols in Broadcasting Trials: Stay in Hollingsworth v. Perry

Supreme Court Enforces Procedural Protocols in Broadcasting Trials: Stay in Hollingsworth v. Perry

Date: Jan 14, 2010
Supreme Court Enforces Procedural Protocols in Broadcasting Trials: Stay in Hollingsworth v. Perry Introduction Dennis Hollingsworth, et al. v. Kristin M. Perry, et al., 558 U.S. 183 (2010), presents...
Supreme Court Upholds Jury Instructions in Death Sentencing, Distinguishing MILLS v. MARYLAND

Supreme Court Upholds Jury Instructions in Death Sentencing, Distinguishing MILLS v. MARYLAND

Date: Jan 13, 2010
Supreme Court Upholds Jury Instructions in Death Sentencing, Distinguishing MILLS v. MARYLAND Introduction In the landmark case of Keith Smith, Warden v. Frank G. Spisak, Jr. (558 U.S. 139, 2010),...
Supreme Court Clarifies Application of Jackson Standard in Habeas Corpus Petitions Concerning DNA Evidence Reliability

Supreme Court Clarifies Application of Jackson Standard in Habeas Corpus Petitions Concerning DNA Evidence Reliability

Date: Jan 12, 2010
Supreme Court Clarifies Application of Jackson Standard in Habeas Corpus Petitions Concerning DNA Evidence Reliability Introduction In the landmark case of E.K. McDaniel, Warden, et al. v. Troy Brown...
Reaffirming Deference to Trial Courts in Assessing DNA Evidence under the Jackson Standard

Reaffirming Deference to Trial Courts in Assessing DNA Evidence under the Jackson Standard

Date: Jan 12, 2010
Reaffirming Deference to Trial Courts in Assessing DNA Evidence under the Jackson Standard Introduction In E.K. McDANIEL, Warden, et al., Petitioners, v. Troy BROWN, 558 U.S. 120 (2010), the United...
Collateral Order Doctrine and Attorney-Client Privilege: Insights from Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Norman Carpenter

Collateral Order Doctrine and Attorney-Client Privilege: Insights from Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Norman Carpenter

Date: Dec 9, 2009
Collateral Order Doctrine and Attorney-Client Privilege: Insights from Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Norman Carpenter Introduction In Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Norman Carpenter, 558 U.S. 100 (2009),...
Jurisdictional Clarity under the Railway Labor Act: Insights from Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers (2009)

Jurisdictional Clarity under the Railway Labor Act: Insights from Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers (2009)

Date: Dec 9, 2009
Jurisdictional Clarity under the Railway Labor Act: Insights from Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers (2009) Introduction In Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of...
Determining Mootness in Property Seizure Cases: Insights from ALVAREZ v. SMITH Et Al.

Determining Mootness in Property Seizure Cases: Insights from ALVAREZ v. SMITH Et Al.

Date: Dec 9, 2009
Determining Mootness in Property Seizure Cases: Insights from ALVAREZ v. SMITH Et Al. Introduction In ALVAREZ, COOK COUNTY STATE'S ATTORNEY v. SMITH ET AL. (558 U.S. 87), decided on December 8, 2009,...
Discretionary Procedural Rules as Adequate State Grounds in Federal Habeas Review: An Analysis of Beard v. Kindler

Discretionary Procedural Rules as Adequate State Grounds in Federal Habeas Review: An Analysis of Beard v. Kindler

Date: Dec 9, 2009
Discretionary Procedural Rules as Adequate State Grounds in Federal Habeas Review: An Analysis of Beard v. Kindler, 558 U.S. 53 (2009) Introduction Beard v. Kindler, 558 U.S. 53 (2009), is a...
Adequacy of Discretionary State Procedural Rules under the Adequate State Ground Doctrine: Kindler v. Beard

Adequacy of Discretionary State Procedural Rules under the Adequate State Ground Doctrine: Kindler v. Beard

Date: Dec 9, 2009
Adequacy of Discretionary State Procedural Rules under the Adequate State Ground Doctrine: Kindler v. Beard Introduction Kindler v. Beard, 130 S.Ct. 612 (2009), addressed a pivotal question in...
Emergency Aid Exception Reinforced in Michigan v. Jeremy Fisher

Emergency Aid Exception Reinforced in Michigan v. Jeremy Fisher

Date: Dec 8, 2009
Emergency Aid Exception Reinforced in Michigan v. Jeremy Fisher Introduction Michigan v. Jeremy Fisher (558 U.S. 45, 2009) represents a pivotal Supreme Court decision that clarifies and reinforces...
Supreme Court Upholds Procedural Barriers to Eighth Amendment 'Intolerable Delay' Claims in Death Penalty Cases

Supreme Court Upholds Procedural Barriers to Eighth Amendment 'Intolerable Delay' Claims in Death Penalty Cases

Date: Dec 3, 2009
Supreme Court Upholds Procedural Barriers to Eighth Amendment 'Intolerable Delay' Claims in Death Penalty Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Cecil C. Johnson, Petitioner, v. Phil Bredesen,...
Enhancing the Standard for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Sentencing: Porter v. McCollum

Enhancing the Standard for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Sentencing: Porter v. McCollum

Date: Dec 1, 2009
Enhancing the Standard for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Sentencing: Porter v. McCollum Introduction Porter v. McCollum (558 U.S. 30, 2009) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that addresses...
Enhancing the Strickland Standard: Porter v. McCollum on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Sentencing

Enhancing the Strickland Standard: Porter v. McCollum on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Sentencing

Date: Dec 1, 2009
Enhancing the Strickland Standard: Porter v. McCollum on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Sentencing Introduction George Porter, Jr. v. Bill McCollum, Attorney General of Florida, et al., 130...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert