Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
South Carolina v. North Carolina: Expanding Intervention Standards in Original Jurisdiction Cases Introduction South Carolina v. North Carolina (558 U.S. 256, 2010) is a pivotal United States Supreme...
Supreme Court Upholds Deference to State Factual Findings Under §2254(d)(2) in Habeas Corpus Review Introduction In the landmark case Holly Wood v. Richard F. Allen, Commissioner, Alabama Department...
Enhanced Public Access During Voir Dire: Presley v. Georgia Introduction Presley v. Georgia (558 U.S. 209, 2010) is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case that redefined the boundaries of the...
Presley v. Georgia: Reinforcing the Sixth Amendment Right to a Public Jury Selection and Mandating Alternative Considerations to Courtroom Closure Introduction Presley v. Georgia, 558 U.S. 209...
Impact of Procedural Errors in Capital Trials: An Analysis of Marcus A. Wellons v. Hilton Hall Introduction Marcus A. Wellons v. Hilton Hall, 558 U.S. 220 (2010), is a significant United States...
NRG Power Marketing LLC v. Maine Public Utilities Commission: Expanding the Mobile–Sierra Doctrine to Noncontracting Parties Introduction The Supreme Court case NRG Power Marketing, LLC, et al. v....
Extending the Mobile-Sierra Presumption to All Rate Challenges An Analysis of NRG Power Marketing, LLC v. Maine Public Utilities Commission Introduction The United States Supreme Court case NRG Power...
Supreme Court Enforces Procedural Protocols in Broadcasting Trials: Stay in Hollingsworth v. Perry Introduction Dennis Hollingsworth, et al. v. Kristin M. Perry, et al., 558 U.S. 183 (2010), presents...
Supreme Court Upholds Jury Instructions in Death Sentencing, Distinguishing MILLS v. MARYLAND Introduction In the landmark case of Keith Smith, Warden v. Frank G. Spisak, Jr. (558 U.S. 139, 2010),...
Supreme Court Clarifies Application of Jackson Standard in Habeas Corpus Petitions Concerning DNA Evidence Reliability Introduction In the landmark case of E.K. McDaniel, Warden, et al. v. Troy Brown...
Reaffirming Deference to Trial Courts in Assessing DNA Evidence under the Jackson Standard Introduction In E.K. McDANIEL, Warden, et al., Petitioners, v. Troy BROWN, 558 U.S. 120 (2010), the United...
Collateral Order Doctrine and Attorney-Client Privilege: Insights from Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Norman Carpenter Introduction In Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Norman Carpenter, 558 U.S. 100 (2009),...
Jurisdictional Clarity under the Railway Labor Act: Insights from Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers (2009) Introduction In Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of...
Determining Mootness in Property Seizure Cases: Insights from ALVAREZ v. SMITH Et Al. Introduction In ALVAREZ, COOK COUNTY STATE'S ATTORNEY v. SMITH ET AL. (558 U.S. 87), decided on December 8, 2009,...
Discretionary Procedural Rules as Adequate State Grounds in Federal Habeas Review: An Analysis of Beard v. Kindler, 558 U.S. 53 (2009) Introduction Beard v. Kindler, 558 U.S. 53 (2009), is a...
Adequacy of Discretionary State Procedural Rules under the Adequate State Ground Doctrine: Kindler v. Beard Introduction Kindler v. Beard, 130 S.Ct. 612 (2009), addressed a pivotal question in...
Emergency Aid Exception Reinforced in Michigan v. Jeremy Fisher Introduction Michigan v. Jeremy Fisher (558 U.S. 45, 2009) represents a pivotal Supreme Court decision that clarifies and reinforces...
Supreme Court Upholds Procedural Barriers to Eighth Amendment 'Intolerable Delay' Claims in Death Penalty Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Cecil C. Johnson, Petitioner, v. Phil Bredesen,...
Enhancing the Standard for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Sentencing: Porter v. McCollum Introduction Porter v. McCollum (558 U.S. 30, 2009) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that addresses...
Enhancing the Strickland Standard: Porter v. McCollum on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Sentencing Introduction George Porter, Jr. v. Bill McCollum, Attorney General of Florida, et al., 130...