Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Seventh Amendment Constraints on Partial Retrials and Rigorous Daubert Analysis in Expert Testimony: Insights from Wyeth LLC v. Donna Scroggin

Seventh Amendment Constraints on Partial Retrials and Rigorous Daubert Analysis in Expert Testimony: Insights from Wyeth LLC v. Donna Scroggin

Date: Mar 17, 2010
Seventh Amendment Constraints on Partial Retrials and Rigorous Daubert Analysis in Expert Testimony: Insights from Wyeth LLC v. Donna Scroggin Introduction Wyeth LLC, ET AL., Petitioners v. Donna...
Attorneys Recognized as Debt Relief Agencies under BAPCPA: Supreme Court Upholds Regulatory Provisions

Attorneys Recognized as Debt Relief Agencies under BAPCPA: Supreme Court Upholds Regulatory Provisions

Date: Mar 9, 2010
Attorneys Recognized as Debt Relief Agencies under BAPCPA: Supreme Court Upholds Regulatory Provisions Introduction In the landmark case of Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A., et al. v. United States,...
Exclusion of Pretrial Motion Preparation Time Limited Under the Speedy Trial Act: BLOATE v. UNITED STATES

Exclusion of Pretrial Motion Preparation Time Limited Under the Speedy Trial Act: BLOATE v. UNITED STATES

Date: Mar 9, 2010
Exclusion of Pretrial Motion Preparation Time Limited Under the Speedy Trial Act: BLOATE v. UNITED STATES Introduction In the landmark case of Taylor James BLOATE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES,...
Milavetz v. United States: Defining and Regulating Debt Relief Agencies

Milavetz v. United States: Defining and Regulating Debt Relief Agencies

Date: Mar 9, 2010
Milavetz v. United States: Defining and Regulating Debt Relief Agencies Introduction Milavetz v. United States, 130 S.Ct. 1324 (2010), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that addresses the scope and...
ERISA Preemption and the Right to a Jury Trial: Insights from Graham v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

ERISA Preemption and the Right to a Jury Trial: Insights from Graham v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Date: Mar 5, 2010
ERISA Preemption and the Right to a Jury Trial: Insights from Graham v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Introduction Graham v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company is a landmark case adjudicated...
Supreme Court Clarifies Constructive Termination and Nonrenewal Standards under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act

Supreme Court Clarifies Constructive Termination and Nonrenewal Standards under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act

Date: Mar 3, 2010
Supreme Court Clarifies Constructive Termination and Nonrenewal Standards under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act 1. Introduction In the landmark case of Mac's Shell Service, Inc., et al. v....
Johnson v. United States: Redefining "Physical Force" Under the Armed Career Criminal Act

Johnson v. United States: Redefining "Physical Force" Under the Armed Career Criminal Act

Date: Mar 3, 2010
Johnson v. United States: Redefining "Physical Force" Under the Armed Career Criminal Act Introduction Curtis Darnell Johnson v. United States, 559 U.S. 133 (2010), is a landmark Supreme Court...
Non-Jurisdictional Nature of Copyright Registration: Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick et al.

Non-Jurisdictional Nature of Copyright Registration: Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick et al.

Date: Mar 3, 2010
Non-Jurisdictional Nature of Copyright Registration: Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick et al. Introduction Reed Elsevier, Inc., et al. v. Muchnick et al., 559 U.S. 154 (2010), is a landmark decision by...
Maryland v. Shatzer: Establishing the 14-Day Break in Custody Limit for Edwards Presumption

Maryland v. Shatzer: Establishing the 14-Day Break in Custody Limit for Edwards Presumption

Date: Feb 25, 2010
Maryland v. Shatzer: Establishing the 14-Day Break in Custody Limit for Edwards Presumption Introduction Maryland v. Michael Blaine Shatzer, Sr. (559 U.S. 98, 2010) is a landmark decision by the...
Supreme Court Upholds Adequate Miranda Advisement on Right to Counsel

Supreme Court Upholds Adequate Miranda Advisement on Right to Counsel

Date: Feb 24, 2010
Supreme Court Upholds Adequate Miranda Advisement on Right to Counsel Introduction Florida v. Powell, 559 U.S. 50 (2010) is a landmark United States Supreme Court case that examines the adequacy of...
Hertz Corp. v. Friend: Establishing the "Nerve Center" as the Principal Place of Business for Corporate Citizenship in Diversity Jurisdiction

Hertz Corp. v. Friend: Establishing the "Nerve Center" as the Principal Place of Business for Corporate Citizenship in Diversity Jurisdiction

Date: Feb 24, 2010
Hertz Corp. v. Friend: Establishing the "Nerve Center" as the Principal Place of Business for Corporate Citizenship in Diversity Jurisdiction Introduction In The Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77...
Wilkins v. Gaddy: Redefining Excessive Force Claims Under the Eighth Amendment

Wilkins v. Gaddy: Redefining Excessive Force Claims Under the Eighth Amendment

Date: Feb 23, 2010
Wilkins v. Gaddy: Redefining Excessive Force Claims Under the Eighth Amendment Introduction Jamey L. Wilkins, a North Carolina state prisoner, initiated a federal lawsuit against Officer Gaddy...
Reevaluating Demeanor-Based Batson Objections: Insights from Thaler v. Haynes

Reevaluating Demeanor-Based Batson Objections: Insights from Thaler v. Haynes

Date: Feb 23, 2010
Reevaluating Demeanor-Based Batson Objections: Insights from Thaler v. Haynes Introduction The United States Supreme Court case Thaler v. Haynes, 559 U.S. 43 (2010), addresses a critical aspect of...
Clarifying the Jurisprudence on Geneva Conventions Enforcement: Analysis of Noriega v. Pastrana

Clarifying the Jurisprudence on Geneva Conventions Enforcement: Analysis of Noriega v. Pastrana

Date: Jan 26, 2010
Clarifying the Jurisprudence on Geneva Conventions Enforcement: Analysis of Noriega v. Pastrana Introduction The case of Manuel Antonio Noriega v. George Pastrana (130 S. Ct. 1002) reached the United...
Causation in RICO Claims: Establishing a Direct Relationship

Causation in RICO Claims: Establishing a Direct Relationship

Date: Jan 26, 2010
Causation in RICO Claims: Establishing a Direct Relationship Introduction The Supreme Court case Hemi Group, LLC and Kai Gachupin v. City of New York, decided on January 25, 2010, addressed pivotal...
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission: Expanding Corporate Political Speech Rights

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission: Expanding Corporate Political Speech Rights

Date: Jan 22, 2010
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission: Expanding Corporate Political Speech Rights Introduction Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), stands as a pivotal...
Strategic Decision-Making in Federal Habeas Corpus Review: Insights from Holly Wood v. Richard F. Allen

Strategic Decision-Making in Federal Habeas Corpus Review: Insights from Holly Wood v. Richard F. Allen

Date: Jan 21, 2010
Strategic Decision-Making in Federal Habeas Corpus Review: Insights from Holly Wood v. Richard F. Allen Introduction Holly Wood v. Richard F. Allen, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections,...
Kucana v. Holder: Clarifying Judicial Review Scope for Statutory vs. Regulatory Discretion in Immigration Removal

Kucana v. Holder: Clarifying Judicial Review Scope for Statutory vs. Regulatory Discretion in Immigration Removal

Date: Jan 21, 2010
Kucana v. Holder: Clarifying Judicial Review Scope for Statutory vs. Regulatory Discretion in Immigration Removal Introduction The case of Agron Kucana v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General,...
Kucana v. Holder: Judicial Review of Reopening Motions in Immigration Proceedings

Kucana v. Holder: Judicial Review of Reopening Motions in Immigration Proceedings

Date: Jan 21, 2010
Kucana v. Holder: Judicial Review of Reopening Motions in Immigration Proceedings Introduction Agron Kucana v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General (2010) is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that...
U.S. Supreme Court Establishes Criteria for Non-State Entity Intervention in Original Jurisdiction Cases: South Carolina v. North Carolina

U.S. Supreme Court Establishes Criteria for Non-State Entity Intervention in Original Jurisdiction Cases: South Carolina v. North Carolina

Date: Jan 21, 2010
U.S. Supreme Court Establishes Criteria for Non-State Entity Intervention in Original Jurisdiction Cases: South Carolina v. North Carolina Introduction In the landmark case State of South Carolina v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert