Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Plain Error Review at Time of Appellate Consideration: Insights from Henderson v. United States Introduction Henderson v. United States (133 S.Ct. 1121) is a landmark Supreme Court decision...
Presumption of Merits Adjudication in Federal Habeas Review Under AEDPA: The Tara Williams Case Introduction Deborah K. Johnson, Acting Warden, Petitioner v. Tara Shene Williams, 568 U.S. 289 (2013),...
Florida v. Harris: Establishing Probable Cause Through Drug-Detection Dog Alerts Introduction The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Florida v. Harris, 133 S.Ct. 1050 (2013), marked a significant...
Establishing Probable Cause: The Significance of Florida v. Clayton Harris Introduction Florida v. Clayton Harris, 568 U.S. 237 (2013), is a pivotal U.S. Supreme Court decision that redefines the...
State-Action Immunity Requires Clear Articulation: Supreme Court in FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc. Introduction In Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., the United...
Chafin v. Chafin: Supreme Court Clarifies Mootness in Hague Convention Child Abduction Cases Introduction Chafin v. Chafin, 133 S.Ct. 1017 (2013), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Limiting Summers Exception to Immediate Vicinity: Chunon L. Bailey v. United States (2013) Introduction In the landmark case of Chunon L. Bailey, aka Polo, Petitioner v. United States, the United...
Chafin v. Chafin: Upholding Appellate Review Post-International Child Abduction Return Introduction The United States Supreme Court's decision in Jeffrey Lee Chafin v. Lynne Hales Chafin, 568 U.S....
Limiting Detention Incident to Search Warrants: Chunon L. Bailey v. United States Introduction Chunon L. Bailey, aka Polo, Petitioner v. United States (568 U.S. 186) is a significant U.S. Supreme...
Clear Articulation Standard for State-Action Immunity in Antitrust Law: Insights from FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc. Introduction FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc. is a landmark case...
Extension of Administrative Appeal Deadlines under Medicare: Sebelius v. Auburn Regional Medical Center Introduction Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Auburn Regional...
Non-Jurisdictional Time Limits in Medicare Appeals: Insights from Sebelius v. CESE Introduction In the landmark case of Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. CESE, the United...
Supreme Court Clarifies "Vessel" Definition: Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach Introduction In Fane Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida, 568 U.S. 115 (2013), the United States Supreme Court...
Clarifying Vessel Status: Supreme Court Establishes Practical Use Standard in Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach Introduction The landmark case of Fane Lozman v. The City of Riviera Beach, Florida,...
Burden of Proof in Withdrawal Defense for Conspiracy Charges: Cal v. Smith 1. Introduction In Calvin Smith v. United States, the Supreme Court addressed a pivotal issue concerning the burden of proof...
Defendant's Burden in Withdrawal Defense Upholding Due Process: Cal v. Smith Introduction Cal v. Smith is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that addresses the allocation of the...
Voluntary Cessation and Mootness in Trademark Enforcement: Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc. Introduction Already, LLC, dba Yums v. Nike, Inc. is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Covenant Not to Sue and Mootness in Trademark Litigation: Analysis of Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case Already, LLC, dba Yums v. Nike, Inc., 133 S.Ct. 721 (2013), the...
Flow Within Waterways Not a "Discharge" Under CWA: SCOTUS Rules in Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. NRDC Introduction The case of Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Natural...
Supreme Court Reaffirms No Statutory Right to Competence under 18 U.S.C. §§3599 and 4241 in Federal Habeas Proceedings Introduction The landmark Supreme Court decision in Ryan v. Gonzales & Terry...