Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Standing under Article III in Surveillance Challenges: Clapper v. Amnesty International USA Introduction Clapper v. Amnesty International USA is a significant United States Supreme Court case decided...
Clapper v. Amnesty International USA: Supreme Court Sets Stricter Standards for Article III Standing in Surveillance Cases Introduction In Clapper v. Amnesty International USA, the United States...
Oli v. Marx: Rule 54(d)(1) Preserved in FDCPA Cost Awards Introduction Case: Oli v. Marx, 568 U.S. 371 (2013) Court: United States Supreme Court Decided: February 26, 2013 The Supreme Court's...
Supreme Court Affirms District Courts' Discretion to Award Costs in FDCPA Cases under Rule 54(d)(1) Introduction Olivea Marx v. General Revenue Corporation (133 S.Ct. 1166) is a landmark decision by...
Double Jeopardy Protections Uphold Substantive Acquittals Despite Judicial Errors: Analysis of Lamar Evans v. Michigan Introduction Lamar Evans v. Michigan is a significant U.S. Supreme Court case...
Double Jeopardy Bars Retrial Following Trial Court's Erroneous Acquittal Introduction In Lamar Evans v. Michigan, 568 U.S. 313 (2013), the United States Supreme Court addressed a critical issue...
Assessment of Plain Error at Appellate Review: Henderson v. United States Introduction Henderson v. United States, 568 U.S. 266 (2013), is a landmark case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court that...
State Courts Retain Jurisdiction Over Legal Malpractice Claims Involving Patent Law: Gunn v. Minton Introduction The case of Jerry W. Gunn, et al., Petitioners v. Vernon F. Minton, decided by the...
Rosel v. Chaidez: Supreme Court Affirms Non-Retroactive Application of Padilla v. Kentucky Introduction Rosel v. Chaidez, 133 S.Ct. 1103 (2013), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision addressing the...
Exclusive Federal Jurisdiction and State Legal Malpractice Claims: Gunn v. Minton Analysis Introduction In the landmark case of Jerry W. Gunn, et al., Petitioners v. Vernon F. Minton, the United...
Rosel v. Chaidez: Padilla Decision Not Retroactive to Final Convictions Introduction Rosel v. Chaidez, 568 U.S. 342 (2013), adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court, addresses the critical...
WILLIAMS v. CAVAZOS: Establishing the Rebuttable Presumption of Merit Adjudication for Unaddressed Federal Claims under AEDPA §2254(d) Introduction WILLIAMS v. CAVAZOS, 133 S.Ct. 1088 (2013), is a...
Plain Error Review at Time of Appellate Consideration: Insights from Henderson v. United States Introduction Henderson v. United States (133 S.Ct. 1121) is a landmark Supreme Court decision...
Presumption of Merits Adjudication in Federal Habeas Review Under AEDPA: The Tara Williams Case Introduction Deborah K. Johnson, Acting Warden, Petitioner v. Tara Shene Williams, 568 U.S. 289 (2013),...
State-Action Immunity Requires Clear Articulation: Supreme Court in FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc. Introduction In Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., the United...
Florida v. Harris: Establishing Probable Cause Through Drug-Detection Dog Alerts Introduction The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Florida v. Harris, 133 S.Ct. 1050 (2013), marked a significant...
Establishing Probable Cause: The Significance of Florida v. Clayton Harris Introduction Florida v. Clayton Harris, 568 U.S. 237 (2013), is a pivotal U.S. Supreme Court decision that redefines the...
Chafin v. Chafin: Supreme Court Clarifies Mootness in Hague Convention Child Abduction Cases Introduction Chafin v. Chafin, 133 S.Ct. 1017 (2013), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Limiting Summers Exception to Immediate Vicinity: Chunon L. Bailey v. United States (2013) Introduction In the landmark case of Chunon L. Bailey, aka Polo, Petitioner v. United States, the United...
Chafin v. Chafin: Upholding Appellate Review Post-International Child Abduction Return Introduction The United States Supreme Court's decision in Jeffrey Lee Chafin v. Lynne Hales Chafin, 568 U.S....