Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
First Sale Doctrine Extended to Internationally Manufactured Copyrighted Works Introduction Supap Kirtsaeng, a Thai national, migrated to the United States to pursue higher education in mathematics....
Binding Nature of Precertification Stipulations in CAFA Jurisdiction: An Analysis of Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Knowles Introduction Standard Fire Insurance Company v. Greg Knowles is a landmark 2013...
Ste v. Levin: Gonzalez Act Abrogates FTCA's Intentional Tort Exception for Military Medical Personnel Introduction In Ste v. Levin, 133 S.Ct. 1224 (2013), the United States Supreme Court addressed a...
Overriding FTCA's Intentional Tort Exception: The Gonzalez Act in Ste v. Levin 1. Introduction In Ste v. Levin, 568 U.S. 503 (2013), the United States Supreme Court addressed a pivotal issue...
No Precertification Proof of Materiality Required for Securities-Fraud Class Actions Introduction The Supreme Court case Amgen Inc. et al. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds (133 S.Ct....
Fixed Five-Year Statute of Limitations for SEC Civil Penalties Established Introduction The United States Supreme Court delivered a landmark decision in Marc J. Gabelli and Bruce Alpert v. Securities...
SEC Civil Penalty Enforcement: Fixed Limitations Period Affirmed in Gabelli v. SEC Introduction The Supreme Court case Marc J. Gabelli and Bruce Alpert v. Securities and Exchange Commission (133...
Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans: Redefining Class Certification in Securities-Fraud Actions Introduction In the landmark case of Amgen Inc. et al. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust...
Standing under Article III in Surveillance Challenges: Clapper v. Amnesty International USA Introduction Clapper v. Amnesty International USA is a significant United States Supreme Court case decided...
Clapper v. Amnesty International USA: Supreme Court Sets Stricter Standards for Article III Standing in Surveillance Cases Introduction In Clapper v. Amnesty International USA, the United States...
Oli v. Marx: Rule 54(d)(1) Preserved in FDCPA Cost Awards Introduction Case: Oli v. Marx, 568 U.S. 371 (2013) Court: United States Supreme Court Decided: February 26, 2013 The Supreme Court's...
Supreme Court Affirms District Courts' Discretion to Award Costs in FDCPA Cases under Rule 54(d)(1) Introduction Olivea Marx v. General Revenue Corporation (133 S.Ct. 1166) is a landmark decision by...
Double Jeopardy Protections Uphold Substantive Acquittals Despite Judicial Errors: Analysis of Lamar Evans v. Michigan Introduction Lamar Evans v. Michigan is a significant U.S. Supreme Court case...
Double Jeopardy Bars Retrial Following Trial Court's Erroneous Acquittal Introduction In Lamar Evans v. Michigan, 568 U.S. 313 (2013), the United States Supreme Court addressed a critical issue...
Assessment of Plain Error at Appellate Review: Henderson v. United States Introduction Henderson v. United States, 568 U.S. 266 (2013), is a landmark case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court that...
State Courts Retain Jurisdiction Over Legal Malpractice Claims Involving Patent Law: Gunn v. Minton Introduction The case of Jerry W. Gunn, et al., Petitioners v. Vernon F. Minton, decided by the...
Rosel v. Chaidez: Supreme Court Affirms Non-Retroactive Application of Padilla v. Kentucky Introduction Rosel v. Chaidez, 133 S.Ct. 1103 (2013), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision addressing the...
Exclusive Federal Jurisdiction and State Legal Malpractice Claims: Gunn v. Minton Analysis Introduction In the landmark case of Jerry W. Gunn, et al., Petitioners v. Vernon F. Minton, the United...
Rosel v. Chaidez: Padilla Decision Not Retroactive to Final Convictions Introduction Rosel v. Chaidez, 568 U.S. 342 (2013), adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court, addresses the critical...
WILLIAMS v. CAVAZOS: Establishing the Rebuttable Presumption of Merit Adjudication for Unaddressed Federal Claims under AEDPA §2254(d) Introduction WILLIAMS v. CAVAZOS, 133 S.Ct. 1088 (2013), is a...