Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Per Se Taking Doctrine Applied to Agricultural Marketing Orders

Per Se Taking Doctrine Applied to Agricultural Marketing Orders

Date: Apr 23, 2015
Per Se Taking Doctrine Applied to Agricultural Marketing Orders Introduction In Mar v. Department of Agriculture, 135 S. Ct. 2419 (2015), the United States Supreme Court addressed a pivotal issue...
Non-Jurisdictional Time Limits under the Federal Tort Claims Act: Analysis of United States v. Kwai Fun Wong

Non-Jurisdictional Time Limits under the Federal Tort Claims Act: Analysis of United States v. Kwai Fun Wong

Date: Apr 23, 2015
Non-Jurisdictional Time Limits under the Federal Tort Claims Act: Analysis of United States v. Kwai Fun Wong Introduction In United States v. Kwai Fun Wong, 575 U.S. 402 (2015), the United States...
Limiting the Duration of Traffic Stops: Rodriguez v. United States Establishes New Constitutional Boundaries

Limiting the Duration of Traffic Stops: Rodriguez v. United States Establishes New Constitutional Boundaries

Date: Apr 22, 2015
Limiting the Duration of Traffic Stops: Rodriguez v. United States Establishes New Constitutional Boundaries Introduction In the landmark case of Dennys Rodriguez v. United States (575 U.S. 348,...
Natural Gas Act Does Not Preempt State Antitrust Actions on Price Manipulation

Natural Gas Act Does Not Preempt State Antitrust Actions on Price Manipulation

Date: Apr 22, 2015
Natural Gas Act Does Not Preempt State Antitrust Actions on Price Manipulation Introduction In the landmark case ONEOK, Inc., et al. v. LEARJET, Inc., et al. (575 U.S. 373, 2015), the United States...
McFadden v. United States: Clarifying the Knowledge Requirement for Controlled Substance Analogues

McFadden v. United States: Clarifying the Knowledge Requirement for Controlled Substance Analogues

Date: Apr 22, 2015
McFadden v. United States: Clarifying the Knowledge Requirement for Controlled Substance Analogues Introduction In Stephen Dominick McFadden, Petitioner v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2298 (2015), the...
Denial of Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Plan Confirmation Not Considered a Final Order

Denial of Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Plan Confirmation Not Considered a Final Order

Date: Apr 2, 2015
Denial of Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Plan Confirmation Not Considered a Final Order Introduction Louis B. Bullard v. Blue Hills Bank is a landmark case decided by the United States Supreme Court on April...
Disposition of Postpetition Wages upon Conversion from Chapter 13 to Chapter 7: Harris v. Viegelahn

Disposition of Postpetition Wages upon Conversion from Chapter 13 to Chapter 7: Harris v. Viegelahn

Date: Apr 2, 2015
Disposition of Postpetition Wages upon Conversion from Chapter 13 to Chapter 7: Harris v. Viegelahn Introduction The Supreme Court case Charles E. Harris, III v. Mary K. Viegelahn, Chapter 13...
Supreme Court Upholds Brulotte Precedent on Post-Expiration Patent Royalties

Supreme Court Upholds Brulotte Precedent on Post-Expiration Patent Royalties

Date: Apr 1, 2015
Supreme Court Upholds Brulotte Precedent on Post-Expiration Patent Royalties Introduction In the landmark case of Stephen Kimble et al. v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC, the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed...
Supremacy Clause Does Not Provide Private Cause of Action for Medicaid §30(A) Enforcement

Supremacy Clause Does Not Provide Private Cause of Action for Medicaid §30(A) Enforcement

Date: Apr 1, 2015
Supremacy Clause Does Not Provide Private Cause of Action for Medicaid §30(A) Enforcement Introduction In Richard Armstrong et al. v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc., 575 U.S. 320 (2015), the Supreme...
Supremacy Clause Does Not Grant Private Cause of Action for Medicaid §30(A): Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center

Supremacy Clause Does Not Grant Private Cause of Action for Medicaid §30(A): Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center

Date: Apr 1, 2015
Supremacy Clause Does Not Grant Private Cause of Action for Medicaid §30(A): Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center Introduction The landmark case Richard Armstrong et al. v. Exceptional Child Center,...
Good-Faith Belief in Patent Invalidity Not a Defense in Induced Infringement

Good-Faith Belief in Patent Invalidity Not a Defense in Induced Infringement

Date: Apr 1, 2015
Good-Faith Belief in Patent Invalidity Not a Defense in Induced Infringement Introduction The Supreme Court case COMMIL USA, LLC v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. (135 S. Ct. 1920) addresses a pivotal issue in...
Reaffirming AEDPA Standards: Woods v. Donald and the Limits of Cronic in Ineffective Assistance Claims

Reaffirming AEDPA Standards: Woods v. Donald and the Limits of Cronic in Ineffective Assistance Claims

Date: Mar 31, 2015
Reaffirming AEDPA Standards: Woods v. Donald and the Limits of Cronic in Ineffective Assistance Claims Introduction In Woods v. Donald, 575 U.S. 312 (2015), the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the...
Ke v. Brumfield: Reevaluating AEDPA's Standards for Atkins Claims

Ke v. Brumfield: Reevaluating AEDPA's Standards for Atkins Claims

Date: Mar 31, 2015
Ke v. Brumfield: Reevaluating AEDPA's Standards for Atkins Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Ke v. Brumfield, 135 S. Ct. 2269 (2015), the United States Supreme Court addressed critical...
Supreme Court Mandates Cost Consideration in EPA's Regulation of Power Plants under the Clean Air Act

Supreme Court Mandates Cost Consideration in EPA's Regulation of Power Plants under the Clean Air Act

Date: Mar 26, 2015
Supreme Court Mandates Cost Consideration in EPA's Regulation of Power Plants under the Clean Air Act Introduction In the landmark case Michigan, et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.,...
Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama: Redefining Racial Gerrymandering Standards

Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama: Redefining Racial Gerrymandering Standards

Date: Mar 26, 2015
Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama: Redefining Racial Gerrymandering Standards Introduction In Alabama Legislative Black Caucus, et al. v. Alabama et al., 575 U.S. 254 (2015), the United...
Supreme Court Clarifies Title VII’s Protection Against Pregnancy Discrimination

Supreme Court Clarifies Title VII’s Protection Against Pregnancy Discrimination

Date: Mar 26, 2015
Supreme Court Clarifies Title VII’s Protection Against Pregnancy Discrimination Introduction Case: Peggy Young, Petitioner v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) Court: Supreme Court of the United...
Clarifying Liability for Misleading Opinions and Omissions Under Section 11: Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers District Council Construction Industry Pension Fund

Clarifying Liability for Misleading Opinions and Omissions Under Section 11: Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers District Council Construction Industry Pension Fund

Date: Mar 25, 2015
Clarifying Liability for Misleading Opinions and Omissions Under Section 11: Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers District Council Construction Industry Pension Fund Introduction In Omnicare, Inc., et al. v....
Supreme Court Upholds Dewsnup’s Interpretation of Bankruptcy Code §506(d): Underwater Junior Liens Remain Enforceable

Supreme Court Upholds Dewsnup’s Interpretation of Bankruptcy Code §506(d): Underwater Junior Liens Remain Enforceable

Date: Mar 25, 2015
Supreme Court Upholds Dewsnup’s Interpretation of Bankruptcy Code §506(d): Underwater Junior Liens Remain Enforceable Introduction The Supreme Court case Bank of America, N.A. v. Caulket et al., 135...
Reinforcing Issue Preclusion in Trademark Registration: B & B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc.

Reinforcing Issue Preclusion in Trademark Registration: B & B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc.

Date: Mar 25, 2015
Reinforcing Issue Preclusion in Trademark Registration: B & B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc. Introduction The Supreme Court case B & B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc. addresses...
Issue Preclusion in Trademark Law: Supreme Court Upholds TTAB Decisions as Binding in Federal Courts

Issue Preclusion in Trademark Law: Supreme Court Upholds TTAB Decisions as Binding in Federal Courts

Date: Mar 25, 2015
Issue Preclusion in Trademark Law: Supreme Court Upholds TTAB Decisions as Binding in Federal Courts Introduction The Supreme Court's decision in B & B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc. (575...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert