Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Bankruptcy Code §330(a)(1) Does Not Permit Awards for Fee-Defense Litigation – BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. v. ASARCO LLC.

Bankruptcy Code §330(a)(1) Does Not Permit Awards for Fee-Defense Litigation – BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. v. ASARCO LLC.

Date: Feb 26, 2015
Bankruptcy Code §330(a)(1) Does Not Permit Awards for Fee-Defense Litigation – BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. v. ASARCO LLC. Introduction BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. et al., Petitioners v. ASARCO LLC. is a landmark...
Narrow Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 1519 Limits Scope to Information-Preserving Tangible Objects

Narrow Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 1519 Limits Scope to Information-Preserving Tangible Objects

Date: Feb 26, 2015
Narrow Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 1519 Limits Scope to Information-Preserving Tangible Objects Introduction The Supreme Court case John L. YATES v. UNITED STATES, 574 U.S. 528 (2015), addressed...
Limiting State-Action Antitrust Immunity: North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC

Limiting State-Action Antitrust Immunity: North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC

Date: Feb 26, 2015
Limiting State-Action Antitrust Immunity: North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC Introduction North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission, 574 U.S. 494...
Employment Discrimination Under Title VII: EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.

Employment Discrimination Under Title VII: EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.

Date: Feb 26, 2015
Employment Discrimination Under Title VII: EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores,...
Glenn TIBBLE v. EDISON INTERNATIONAL: Enhancing Fiduciary Duty Under ERISA

Glenn TIBBLE v. EDISON INTERNATIONAL: Enhancing Fiduciary Duty Under ERISA

Date: Feb 25, 2015
Glenn TIBBLE v. EDISON INTERNATIONAL: Enhancing Fiduciary Duty Under ERISA Introduction In Glenn Tibble, et al. v. Edison International et al. (135 S. Ct. 1823), the United States Supreme Court...
Clarifying § 922(g): Supreme Court Rules on Felon’s Transfer of Firearms

Clarifying § 922(g): Supreme Court Rules on Felon’s Transfer of Firearms

Date: Feb 25, 2015
Clarifying § 922(g): Supreme Court Rules on Felon’s Transfer of Firearms Introduction In the landmark case of Tony Henderson, Petitioner v. United States (135 S.Ct. 1780, 2015), the United States...
Kansas v. Nebraska and Colorado: Reinforcement and Adjustment of Interstate Water Allocation Compact

Kansas v. Nebraska and Colorado: Reinforcement and Adjustment of Interstate Water Allocation Compact

Date: Feb 25, 2015
Kansas v. Nebraska and Colorado: Reinforcement and Adjustment of Interstate Water Allocation Compact Introduction Kansas v. Nebraska and Colorado (574 U.S. 445) is a significant United States Supreme...
Supreme Court Upholds "Three Strikes" Rule for In Forma Pauperis Status of Prisoners

Supreme Court Upholds "Three Strikes" Rule for In Forma Pauperis Status of Prisoners

Date: Feb 24, 2015
Supreme Court Upholds "Three Strikes" Rule for In Forma Pauperis Status of Prisoners Introduction In Andre Lee Coleman v. Todd Tolleson, 135 S. Ct. 1759 (2015), the United States Supreme Court...
Constitutional Limits on Due Process in Spousal Visa Denials: Analysis of Kerry v. Din

Constitutional Limits on Due Process in Spousal Visa Denials: Analysis of Kerry v. Din

Date: Feb 24, 2015
Constitutional Limits on Due Process in Spousal Visa Denials: Analysis of Kerry v. Din Introduction In Kerry v. Din, 135 S. Ct. 2128 (2015), the United States Supreme Court addressed a critical...
M & G Polymers USA, LLC v. Hobert Freel TACKETT: Reinforcing Ordinary Contract Principles in Collective-Bargaining Agreements

M & G Polymers USA, LLC v. Hobert Freel TACKETT: Reinforcing Ordinary Contract Principles in Collective-Bargaining Agreements

Date: Jan 27, 2015
M & G Polymers USA, LLC v. Hobert Freel TACKETT: Reinforcing Ordinary Contract Principles in Collective-Bargaining Agreements Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case M & G Polymers USA, LLC, et...
Independent Appellate Rights in Multidistrict Litigation: Gelboim v. Bank of America

Independent Appellate Rights in Multidistrict Litigation: Gelboim v. Bank of America

Date: Jan 22, 2015
Independent Appellate Rights in Multidistrict Litigation: Gelboim v. Bank of America Introduction Gelboim v. Bank of America Corporation et al., 574 U.S. 405 (2015), represents a pivotal decision by...
Supreme Court Clarifies 'Specifically Prohibited by Law' in Whistleblower Protection Act Excludes Regulations

Supreme Court Clarifies 'Specifically Prohibited by Law' in Whistleblower Protection Act Excludes Regulations

Date: Jan 22, 2015
Supreme Court Clarifies 'Specifically Prohibited by Law' in Whistleblower Protection Act Excludes Regulations Introduction In Department of Homeland Security v. Robert J. MacLean, the United States...
Supreme Court Rules Jury Should Determine Tacking in Trademark Priority Disputes

Supreme Court Rules Jury Should Determine Tacking in Trademark Priority Disputes

Date: Jan 22, 2015
Supreme Court Rules Jury Should Determine Tacking in Trademark Priority Disputes Introduction The landmark case of HANA FINANCIAL, INC. v. HANA BANK, et al. (574 U.S. 418) addressed a pivotal issue...
Time-Limitation on Traffic Stops: Supreme Court Confirms Fourth Amendment Protections in Rodríguez v. United States

Time-Limitation on Traffic Stops: Supreme Court Confirms Fourth Amendment Protections in Rodríguez v. United States

Date: Jan 22, 2015
Time-Limitation on Traffic Stops: Supreme Court Confirms Fourth Amendment Protections in Rodríguez v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of Dennys Rodríguez v. United States, 135 S.Ct....
Establishing Disparate-Impact Liability under the Fair Housing Act: A Comprehensive Analysis

Establishing Disparate-Impact Liability under the Fair Housing Act: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Jan 22, 2015
Establishing Disparate-Impact Liability under the Fair Housing Act: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction In Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project,...
RLUIPA Strengthens Religious Rights of Inmates: Insights from Holt v. Hobbs

RLUIPA Strengthens Religious Rights of Inmates: Insights from Holt v. Hobbs

Date: Jan 21, 2015
RLUIPA Strengthens Religious Rights of Inmates: Insights from Holt v. Hobbs Introduction The Supreme Court case Gregory Houston HOLT, aka Abdul Maalik Muhammad v. Ray HOBBS, Director, Arkansas...
Substitution of Counsel in Habeas Corpus: Insights from Christeson v. Roper

Substitution of Counsel in Habeas Corpus: Insights from Christeson v. Roper

Date: Jan 21, 2015
Substitution of Counsel in Habeas Corpus: Insights from Christeson v. Roper Introduction Mark A. Christeson v. Don Roper, Warden, 574 U.S. 373 (2015) is a landmark Supreme Court case that delves into...
Clarifying the Presumption of Judicial Vindictiveness: Insights from Mar v. Plumley

Clarifying the Presumption of Judicial Vindictiveness: Insights from Mar v. Plumley

Date: Jan 21, 2015
Clarifying the Presumption of Judicial Vindictiveness: Insights from Mar v. Plumley Introduction Marvin Plumley, Warden v. Timothy Jared Austin is a pivotal case that touches upon the intricate issue...
Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Private Enforcement of Medicaid Funding Requirements

Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Private Enforcement of Medicaid Funding Requirements

Date: Jan 21, 2015
Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Private Enforcement of Medicaid Funding Requirements Introduction In Richard Armstrong et al. v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc., 135 S. Ct. 1378 (2015), the United...
First Amendment Permits States to Restrict Judicial Candidates' Personal Fund Solicitation

First Amendment Permits States to Restrict Judicial Candidates' Personal Fund Solicitation

Date: Jan 21, 2015
First Amendment Permits States to Restrict Judicial Candidates' Personal Fund Solicitation Introduction In the landmark case of Lanell Williams–Yulee v. The Florida Bar, adjudicated by the United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.