Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Supreme Court Reaffirms Juror Selection Standards in Capital Cases

Supreme Court Reaffirms Juror Selection Standards in Capital Cases

Date: Dec 15, 2015
Supreme Court Reaffirms Juror Selection Standards in Capital Cases Introduction Randy WHITE, Warden v. Roger L. WHEELER (577 U.S. 73) represents a pivotal moment in the landscape of capital...
Federal Arbitration Act Preempts State Law: Enforcement of Class-Action Waivers Confirmed in DIRECTV v. Imburgia

Federal Arbitration Act Preempts State Law: Enforcement of Class-Action Waivers Confirmed in DIRECTV v. Imburgia

Date: Dec 15, 2015
Federal Arbitration Act Preempts State Law: Enforcement of Class-Action Waivers Confirmed in DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia Introduction In the landmark case of DIRECTV, Inc. v. Amy Imburgia et al., the...
Supreme Court Limits District Court Discretion in Congressional Apportionment Challenges: Shapiro v. McManus

Supreme Court Limits District Court Discretion in Congressional Apportionment Challenges: Shapiro v. McManus

Date: Dec 9, 2015
Supreme Court Limits District Court Discretion in Congressional Apportionment Challenges: Shapiro v. McManus Introduction Shapiro v. McManus is a landmark case in which the United States Supreme...
Reconciling Second Amendment Rights: Analyzing Arie S. Friedman v. City of Highland Park

Reconciling Second Amendment Rights: Analyzing Arie S. Friedman v. City of Highland Park

Date: Dec 8, 2015
Reconciling Second Amendment Rights: Analyzing Arie S. Friedman v. City of Highland Park Introduction The case of Arie S. Friedman, et al. v. City of Highland Park, Illinois pertains to the intricate...
Understanding OBB Personenverkehr AG v. Carol P. Sachs: Redefining the Commercial Activity Exception under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act

Understanding OBB Personenverkehr AG v. Carol P. Sachs: Redefining the Commercial Activity Exception under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act

Date: Dec 2, 2015
Understanding OBB Personenverkehr AG v. Carol P. Sachs: Redefining the Commercial Activity Exception under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act Introduction The case of OBB Personenverkehr AG v....
Supreme Court Grants Qualified Immunity to Officer in High-Speed Pursuit Case: Mullenix v. Luna

Supreme Court Grants Qualified Immunity to Officer in High-Speed Pursuit Case: Mullenix v. Luna

Date: Nov 10, 2015
Supreme Court Grants Qualified Immunity to Officer in High-Speed Pursuit Case: Mullenix v. Luna Introduction Chadrin Lee Mullenix v. Beatrice Luna, 577 U.S. 7 (2015), is a significant case...
Defining Legislative Authority in Redistricting: Supreme Court Ruling in Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission

Defining Legislative Authority in Redistricting: Supreme Court Ruling in Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission

Date: Jun 30, 2015
Defining Legislative Authority in Redistricting: Supreme Court Ruling in Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission Introduction The Supreme Court case Arizona State...
Clarifying Juror Conduct in Capital Cases: Insights from Joyner v. Barnes & Hurst

Clarifying Juror Conduct in Capital Cases: Insights from Joyner v. Barnes & Hurst

Date: Jun 30, 2015
Clarifying Juror Conduct in Capital Cases: Insights from Joyner v. Barnes & Hurst Introduction The Supreme Court case Carlton Joyner, Warden v. William Leroy Barnes and Jason Wayne Hurst, decided on...
Setting the Standard: Eighth Amendment Criteria for Challenging Execution Protocols Affirmed in Glossip v. Ke

Setting the Standard: Eighth Amendment Criteria for Challenging Execution Protocols Affirmed in Glossip v. Ke

Date: Jun 30, 2015
Setting the Standard: Eighth Amendment Criteria for Challenging Execution Protocols Affirmed in Glossip v. Ke Introduction Glossip v. Ke, 576 U.S. 863 (2015), is a significant Supreme Court case...
Cost Consideration Mandated in EPA's 'Appropriate and Necessary' Findings under the Clean Air Act

Cost Consideration Mandated in EPA's 'Appropriate and Necessary' Findings under the Clean Air Act

Date: Jun 30, 2015
Cost Consideration Mandated in EPA's 'Appropriate and Necessary' Findings under the Clean Air Act Introduction The Supreme Court case Michigan, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency,...
Prosecutorial Vindictiveness and Certificate of Appealability: An In-Depth Analysis of Jordan v. Fisher

Prosecutorial Vindictiveness and Certificate of Appealability: An In-Depth Analysis of Jordan v. Fisher

Date: Jun 30, 2015
Prosecutorial Vindictiveness and Certificate of Appealability: An In-Depth Analysis of Jordan v. Fisher Introduction The case of Richard Gerald Jordan v. Marshall L. Fisher, Commissioner, Mississippi...
Residual Clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act Declared Unconstitutional Due to Vagueness

Residual Clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act Declared Unconstitutional Due to Vagueness

Date: Jun 27, 2015
Residual Clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act Declared Unconstitutional Due to Vagueness Introduction In the landmark case of Samuel James Johnson v. United States (576 U.S. 591, 2015), the United...
Obergefell v. Hodges: Establishing the Right to Same-Sex Marriage Nationwide

Obergefell v. Hodges: Establishing the Right to Same-Sex Marriage Nationwide

Date: Jun 27, 2015
Obergefell v. Hodges: Establishing the Right to Same-Sex Marriage Nationwide Introduction Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) represents a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Supreme Court Establishes Accessibility of Affordable Care Act Tax Credits on Both State and Federal Exchanges

Supreme Court Establishes Accessibility of Affordable Care Act Tax Credits on Both State and Federal Exchanges

Date: Jun 26, 2015
Supreme Court Establishes Accessibility of Affordable Care Act Tax Credits on Both State and Federal Exchanges Introduction In the landmark case Da v. d King, et al., 576 U.S. 473 (2015), the United...
Establishing Disparate-Impact Liability under the Fair Housing Act: Keller v. Inclusive Communities Project

Establishing Disparate-Impact Liability under the Fair Housing Act: Keller v. Inclusive Communities Project

Date: Jun 26, 2015
Establishing Disparate-Impact Liability under the Fair Housing Act: Keller v. Inclusive Communities Project Introduction Keller v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc. (576 U.S. 519, 2015) is a...
Reserve Requirement as a Per Se Taking: 'Mar v. Horne' Establishes New Fifth Amendment Precedent

Reserve Requirement as a Per Se Taking: 'Mar v. Horne' Establishes New Fifth Amendment Precedent

Date: Jun 23, 2015
Reserve Requirement as a Per Se Taking: Marvin D. Horne v. Department of Agriculture Establishes New Fifth Amendment Precedent Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case, Marvin D. Horne, et al.,...
City of Los Angeles v. Naranjibhai Patel: Establishing the Need for Precompliance Review in Administrative Searches

City of Los Angeles v. Naranjibhai Patel: Establishing the Need for Precompliance Review in Administrative Searches

Date: Jun 23, 2015
City of Los Angeles v. Naranjibhai Patel: Establishing the Need for Precompliance Review in Administrative Searches Introduction In the landmark case City of Los Angeles v. Naranjibhai Patel (576...
Supreme Court Upholds Brulotte: Affirming the Unenforceability of Post-Expiration Patent Royalties

Supreme Court Upholds Brulotte: Affirming the Unenforceability of Post-Expiration Patent Royalties

Date: Jun 23, 2015
Supreme Court Upholds Brulotte: Affirming the Unenforceability of Post-Expiration Patent Royalties Introduction In the landmark case of Stephen Kimble et al. v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC, decided on...
Objective Reasonableness Standard in Excessive Force Claims: Kingsley v. Hendrickson

Objective Reasonableness Standard in Excessive Force Claims: Kingsley v. Hendrickson

Date: Jun 23, 2015
Objective Reasonableness Standard in Excessive Force Claims: Kingsley v. Hendrickson Introduction Michael B. Kingsley v. Stan Hendrickson et al. is a landmark 2015 decision by the United States...
Ke v. Brumfield: Supreme Court Refines Standards for Intellectual Disability Claims in Capital Cases

Ke v. Brumfield: Supreme Court Refines Standards for Intellectual Disability Claims in Capital Cases

Date: Jun 19, 2015
Ke v. Brumfield: Supreme Court Refines Standards for Intellectual Disability Claims in Capital Cases Introduction In the landmark case Ke v. Brumfield, 576 U.S. 305 (2015), the United States Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert