Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Supreme Court Upholds Class Certification for FLSA Overtime Claims in Tyson Foods Case

Supreme Court Upholds Class Certification for FLSA Overtime Claims in Tyson Foods Case

Date: Mar 23, 2016
Supreme Court Upholds Class Certification for FLSA Overtime Claims in Tyson Foods Case Introduction The U.S. Supreme Court delivered its judgment in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Peg Bouaphakeo, et al. (577...
Supreme Court Affirmation of Omaha Reservation Boundaries under the 1882 Act

Supreme Court Affirmation of Omaha Reservation Boundaries under the 1882 Act

Date: Mar 23, 2016
Supreme Court Affirmation of Omaha Reservation Boundaries under the 1882 Act Introduction In the landmark case NEBRASKA, et al. v. Mitch PARKER, et al., 577 U.S. 481 (2016), the United States Supreme...
Sturgeon v. National Park Service: Defining Federal Authority in Alaska's Conservation Lands

Sturgeon v. National Park Service: Defining Federal Authority in Alaska's Conservation Lands

Date: Mar 23, 2016
Sturgeon v. National Park Service: Defining Federal Authority in Alaska's Conservation Lands Introduction John Sturgeon v. Bert Frost is a pivotal 2016 U.S. Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Stun Guns Protected Under the Second Amendment: Analysis of Jaime Caetano v. Massachusetts

Stun Guns Protected Under the Second Amendment: Analysis of Jaime Caetano v. Massachusetts

Date: Mar 22, 2016
Stun Guns Protected Under the Second Amendment: Analysis of Jaime Caetano v. Massachusetts Introduction Jaime Caetano v. Massachusetts, 577 U.S. 411 (2016), is a landmark Supreme Court case that...
BRADY v. MARYLAND Reiterated: Prosecution's Failure to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence Violates Due Process Rights

BRADY v. MARYLAND Reiterated: Prosecution's Failure to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence Violates Due Process Rights

Date: Mar 8, 2016
BRADY v. MARYLAND Reiterated: Prosecution's Failure to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence Violates Due Process Rights Introduction Michael Wearry v. Burl Cain, Warden, 577 U.S. 385 (2016), is a...
Revisiting Public Transit Advertising as a Designated Public Forum: A Comprehensive Analysis of AFDI v. King County

Revisiting Public Transit Advertising as a Designated Public Forum: A Comprehensive Analysis of AFDI v. King County

Date: Mar 8, 2016
Revisiting Public Transit Advertising as a Designated Public Forum: A Comprehensive Analysis of AFDI v. King County Introduction American Freedom Defense Initiative, et al. v. King County, Washington...
Full Faith and Credit for Adoption Judgments: Supreme Court Affirms Recognition Under the Full Faith and Credit Clause in V.L. v. E.L.

Full Faith and Credit for Adoption Judgments: Supreme Court Affirms Recognition Under the Full Faith and Credit Clause in V.L. v. E.L.

Date: Mar 8, 2016
Full Faith and Credit for Adoption Judgments: Supreme Court Affirms Recognition Under the Full Faith and Credit Clause in V.L. v. E.L. Introduction V.L. v. E.L. is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Citizenship of Unincorporated Entities: Americold Realty Trust v. ConAgra Foods Establishes Key Jurisprudence

Citizenship of Unincorporated Entities: Americold Realty Trust v. ConAgra Foods Establishes Key Jurisprudence

Date: Mar 8, 2016
Citizenship of Unincorporated Entities: Americold Realty Trust v. ConAgra Foods Establishes Key Jurisprudence Introduction The United States Supreme Court case Americold Realty Trust v. ConAgra...
ERISA Preemption of State-Implemented Health Care Reporting: Insights from Gobeille v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

ERISA Preemption of State-Implemented Health Care Reporting: Insights from Gobeille v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Date: Mar 2, 2016
ERISA Preemption of State-Implemented Health Care Reporting: Insights from Gobeille v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Introduction The United States Supreme Court addressed a pivotal issue in Alfred...
Lockhart v. United States: 'Involving a Minor or Ward' Applies Solely to 'Abusive Sexual Conduct'

Lockhart v. United States: 'Involving a Minor or Ward' Applies Solely to 'Abusive Sexual Conduct'

Date: Mar 2, 2016
Lockhart v. United States: 'Involving a Minor or Ward' Applies Solely to 'Abusive Sexual Conduct' Introduction Avondale Lockhart v. United States is a significant Supreme Court decision that...
Justice Alito's Dissent in Ben-Levi v. Brown: Expanding Prisoners' Religious Rights

Justice Alito's Dissent in Ben-Levi v. Brown: Expanding Prisoners' Religious Rights

Date: Mar 1, 2016
Justice Alito's Dissent in Ben-Levi v. Brown: Expanding Prisoners' Religious Rights Introduction Ben-Levi v. Brown (No. 14–10186) is a significant case addressing the intersection of religious...
Proper Assessment of Sufficiency of Evidence and Statute of Limitations in Federal Criminal Cases: Insights from Musacchio v. United States

Proper Assessment of Sufficiency of Evidence and Statute of Limitations in Federal Criminal Cases: Insights from Musacchio v. United States

Date: Jan 26, 2016
Proper Assessment of Sufficiency of Evidence and Statute of Limitations in Federal Criminal Cases: Insights from Musacchio v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of Musacchio v. United...
Montgomery v. Louisiana: Establishing Retroactive Application of Substantive Constitutional Rules in Juvenile Sentencing

Montgomery v. Louisiana: Establishing Retroactive Application of Substantive Constitutional Rules in Juvenile Sentencing

Date: Jan 26, 2016
Montgomery v. Louisiana: Establishing Retroactive Application of Substantive Constitutional Rules in Juvenile Sentencing Introduction Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. 190 (2016), is a landmark...
Equitable Tolling in Indian Self-Determination Contracts: Menominee Indian Tribe v. United States

Equitable Tolling in Indian Self-Determination Contracts: Menominee Indian Tribe v. United States

Date: Jan 26, 2016
Equitable Tolling in Indian Self-Determination Contracts: Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. United States Introduction In Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. United States, the United States...
FERC v. Electric Power Supply Association: Establishing Federal Authority over Wholesale Demand Response Compensation

FERC v. Electric Power Supply Association: Establishing Federal Authority over Wholesale Demand Response Compensation

Date: Jan 26, 2016
FERC v. Electric Power Supply Association: Establishing Federal Authority over Wholesale Demand Response Compensation Introduction FERC v. Electric Power Supply Association, et al. (577 U.S. 260,...
Supreme Court Upholds Kansas Jury Instructions and Joint Sentencing in Kansas v. Carr (2016)

Supreme Court Upholds Kansas Jury Instructions and Joint Sentencing in Kansas v. Carr (2016)

Date: Jan 21, 2016
Supreme Court Upholds Kansas Jury Instructions and Joint Sentencing in Kansas v. Carr (2016) Introduction In the landmark case of Kansas v. Jonathan D. Carr, Kansas v. Reginald Dexter Carr, Jr., and...
Supreme Court Rules on ERISA Fiduciary Limits in Montanile v. Board of Trustees

Supreme Court Rules on ERISA Fiduciary Limits in Montanile v. Board of Trustees

Date: Jan 21, 2016
Supreme Court Rules on ERISA Fiduciary Limits in Montanile v. Board of Trustees Introduction In the landmark case of Robert Montanile v. Board of Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Health...
Unaccepted Rule 68 Settlement Offers Do Not Moot Plaintiff's Claims: Campbell-Ewald Company v. Gomez

Unaccepted Rule 68 Settlement Offers Do Not Moot Plaintiff's Claims: Campbell-Ewald Company v. Gomez

Date: Jan 21, 2016
Unaccepted Rule 68 Settlement Offers Do Not Moot Plaintiff's Claims: Campbell-Ewald Company v. Gomez Introduction Campbell-Ewald Company v. Jose Gomez, 577 U.S. ___ (2016), addressed two pivotal...
Hurst v. Florida: Upholding the Sixth Amendment Right to Jury-Guilt-Fact Sentencing

Hurst v. Florida: Upholding the Sixth Amendment Right to Jury-Guilt-Fact Sentencing

Date: Jan 13, 2016
Hurst v. Florida, analyzing its impact on the Sixth Amendment and capital sentencing procedures."> Hurst v. Florida: Upholding the Sixth Amendment Right to Jury-Guilt-Fact Sentencing Introduction The...
Supreme Court Establishes Per-Case Fee Assessment for Prisoner Litigation in Bruce v. Samuels

Supreme Court Establishes Per-Case Fee Assessment for Prisoner Litigation in Bruce v. Samuels

Date: Jan 13, 2016
Supreme Court Establishes Per-Case Fee Assessment for Prisoner Litigation in Bruce v. Samuels Introduction Antoine Bruce v. Charles E. Samuels, Jr., et al., 577 U.S. 82 (2016), is a pivotal Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert