Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Procedural Barriers in Appellate Timeliness: Insights from Anne NEEDHAM v. WHITE LABORATORIES, INC.

Procedural Barriers in Appellate Timeliness: Insights from Anne NEEDHAM v. WHITE LABORATORIES, INC.

Date: Oct 14, 1981
Procedural Barriers in Appellate Timeliness: Insights from Anne NEEDHAM v. WHITE LABORATORIES, INC. Introduction Anne NEEDHAM v. WHITE LABORATORIES, INC., 454 U.S. 927 (1981), represents a pivotal...
Denial of Certiorari Upholds Confession Admissibility in Absence of Counsel Presence

Denial of Certiorari Upholds Confession Admissibility in Absence of Counsel Presence

Date: Oct 14, 1981
Denial of Certiorari Upholds Confession Admissibility in Absence of Counsel Presence Introduction The case of Major Henry Johnson, Jr. v. Virginia (454 U.S. 920) presents a critical examination of...
Standing to Challenge Police Use of Choke-holds: City of Los Angeles v. Lyons

Standing to Challenge Police Use of Choke-holds: City of Los Angeles v. Lyons

Date: Sep 30, 1981
Standing to Challenge Police Use of Choke-holds: City of Los Angeles v. Lyons Introduction The case of City of Los Angeles v. Adolph Lyons addresses significant issues regarding the use of...
Standing of State Officials in Stay Applications: Insights from Graddick v. Newman

Standing of State Officials in Stay Applications: Insights from Graddick v. Newman

Date: Sep 3, 1981
Standing of State Officials in Stay Applications: Insights from Graddick v. Newman Introduction The case of Charles A. Graddick, Attorney General of Alabama, Applicant v. N. H. Newman (453 U.S. 928,...
Dames Moore v. Regan: Expansion of Presidential Authority under IEEPA

Dames Moore v. Regan: Expansion of Presidential Authority under IEEPA

Date: Jul 3, 1981
Dames Moore v. Regan: Expansion of Presidential Authority under IEEPA Introduction Dames Moore v. Regan, 453 U.S. 654 (1981), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Enhanced First Amendment Protections for Noncommercial Speech in Billboard Regulations: An Analysis of METROMEDIA, INC. v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO

Enhanced First Amendment Protections for Noncommercial Speech in Billboard Regulations: An Analysis of METROMEDIA, INC. v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO

Date: Jul 3, 1981
Enhanced First Amendment Protections for Noncommercial Speech in Billboard Regulations: An Analysis of METROMEDIA, INC. v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO Introduction METROMEDIA, INC. v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, 453...
Affirmation of Montana's Severance Tax Under the Commerce and Supremacy Clauses

Affirmation of Montana's Severance Tax Under the Commerce and Supremacy Clauses

Date: Jul 3, 1981
Affirmation of Montana's Severance Tax Under the Commerce and Supremacy Clauses Introduction In the landmark case Commonwealth Edison Co. et al. v. Montana et al., 453 U.S. 609 (1981), the United...
Supremacy of Filed Rate Doctrine Precludes State-Level Damages for Breach of Natural Gas Sale Contracts

Supremacy of Filed Rate Doctrine Precludes State-Level Damages for Breach of Natural Gas Sale Contracts

Date: Jul 3, 1981
Supremacy of Filed Rate Doctrine Precludes State-Level Damages for Breach of Natural Gas Sale Contracts Introduction In the landmark case of Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. Hall et al., 453 U.S. 571...
Robbins v. California: Strengthening Fourth Amendment Protections for Closed Containers in Vehicles

Robbins v. California: Strengthening Fourth Amendment Protections for Closed Containers in Vehicles

Date: Jul 2, 1981
Robbins v. California: Strengthening Fourth Amendment Protections for Closed Containers in Vehicles Introduction Robbins v. California, 453 U.S. 420 (1981), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that...
Expansion of Search Incident to Arrest in Automobiles: New York v. Belton

Expansion of Search Incident to Arrest in Automobiles: New York v. Belton

Date: Jul 2, 1981
Expansion of Search Incident to Arrest in Automobiles: New York v. Belton Introduction New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981), is a seminal United States Supreme Court decision that significantly...
Concurrent State-Court Jurisdiction Affirmed in OCSLA Personal Injury Cases

Concurrent State-Court Jurisdiction Affirmed in OCSLA Personal Injury Cases

Date: Jul 2, 1981
Concurrent State-Court Jurisdiction Affirmed in OCSLA Personal Injury Cases Introduction Gulf Offshore Co., a Division of Pool Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp. et al., 453 U.S. 473 (1981), is a landmark...
Reasonable Access Rights for Federal Candidates Under § 312(a)(7): CBS, Inc. v. FCC Commentary

Reasonable Access Rights for Federal Candidates Under § 312(a)(7): CBS, Inc. v. FCC Commentary

Date: Jul 2, 1981
Reasonable Access Rights for Federal Candidates Under § 312(a)(7): CBS, Inc. v. FCC Introduction CBS, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission (FCC), 453 U.S. 367 (1981), is a landmark Supreme Court...
Flexibility in Conveying Miranda Rights: Insights from California v. Prysock

Flexibility in Conveying Miranda Rights: Insights from California v. Prysock

Date: Jun 30, 1981
Flexibility in Conveying Miranda Rights: Insights from California v. Prysock Introduction California v. Prysock, 453 U.S. 355 (1981), is a significant United States Supreme Court case that addresses...
Defining Prima Facie Standards in Title VII: Analysis of United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Louis H. Aikens

Defining Prima Facie Standards in Title VII: Analysis of United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Louis H. Aikens

Date: Jun 30, 1981
Defining Prima Facie Standards in Title VII: Analysis of United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Louis H. Aikens Introduction The Supreme Court case United States Postal Service Board of...
Employer-Selected Trust Fund Trustees Not "Representatives" Under §8(b)(1)(B): An Analysis of NLRB v. AMAX Coal Co.

Employer-Selected Trust Fund Trustees Not "Representatives" Under §8(b)(1)(B): An Analysis of NLRB v. AMAX Coal Co.

Date: Jun 30, 1981
Employer-Selected Trust Fund Trustees Not "Representatives" Under §8(b)(1)(B): An Analysis of NLRB v. AMAX Coal Co. Introduction NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. AMAX COAL CO., A DIVISION OF AMAX,...
Haig v. Agee (1981): Affirming Executive Authority in Passport Revocation for National Security

Haig v. Agee (1981): Affirming Executive Authority in Passport Revocation for National Security

Date: Jun 30, 1981
Haig v. Agee (1981): Affirming Executive Authority in Passport Revocation for National Security Introduction Haig, Secretary of State v. Agee is a landmark 1981 Supreme Court decision that addresses...
Federal Preemption of State Community Property Laws in Military Retirement Benefits: McCARTY v. McCARTY

Federal Preemption of State Community Property Laws in Military Retirement Benefits: McCARTY v. McCARTY

Date: Jun 27, 1981
Federal Preemption of State Community Property Laws in Military Retirement Benefits: McCARTY v. McCARTY Introduction The Supreme Court case McCARTY v. McCARTY, 453 U.S. 210 (1981), addressed a...
Supreme Court Limits Jury Trial Rights in ADEA Actions Against the Federal Government

Supreme Court Limits Jury Trial Rights in ADEA Actions Against the Federal Government

Date: Jun 27, 1981
Supreme Court Limits Jury Trial Rights in ADEA Actions Against the Federal Government Introduction Lehman, Secretary of the Navy v. Nakshian, 453 U.S. 156 (1981), is a landmark decision by the United...
Affirmation of the $5,000 Contribution Limit in Federal Election Campaigns

Affirmation of the $5,000 Contribution Limit in Federal Election Campaigns

Date: Jun 27, 1981
Affirmation of the $5,000 Contribution Limit in Federal Election Campaigns Introduction California Medical Association et al. v. Federal Election Commission et al., 453 U.S. 182 (1981), is a landmark...
Municipal Immunity from Punitive Damages under Section 1983: Analysis of CITY OF NEWPORT ET AL. v. FACT CONCERTS, INC., ET AL.

Municipal Immunity from Punitive Damages under Section 1983: Analysis of CITY OF NEWPORT ET AL. v. FACT CONCERTS, INC., ET AL.

Date: Jun 27, 1981
Municipal Immunity from Punitive Damages under Section 1983: Analysis of City of Newport et al. v. Fact Concerts, Inc., et al. (453 U.S. 247) Introduction In the landmark case City of Newport et al....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert