Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

United States v. Vogel Fertilizer Co.: Defining Brother-Sister Controlled Groups

United States v. Vogel Fertilizer Co.: Defining Brother-Sister Controlled Groups

Date: Jan 14, 1982
United States v. Vogel Fertilizer Co.: Defining Brother-Sister Controlled Groups Introduction United States v. Vogel Fertilizer Co. is a landmark 1982 United States Supreme Court case that addressed...
Citizenship Requirements for Peace Officers: Upholding State Sovereignty in Public Employment

Citizenship Requirements for Peace Officers: Upholding State Sovereignty in Public Employment

Date: Jan 13, 1982
Citizenship Requirements for Peace Officers: Upholding State Sovereignty in Public Employment Introduction In Cabell, Acting Chief Probation Officer of Los Angeles County, et al. v. Chavez-Salido et...
Supreme Court Reinforces Article III Standing Requirements in Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United

Supreme Court Reinforces Article III Standing Requirements in Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United

Date: Jan 13, 1982
Supreme Court Reinforces Article III Standing Requirements in Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United Introduction Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of...
Stability of Multiemployer Bargaining Units Affirmed in Bonanno Linen Service Decision

Stability of Multiemployer Bargaining Units Affirmed in Bonanno Linen Service Decision

Date: Jan 13, 1982
Stability of Multiemployer Bargaining Units Affirmed in Bonanno Linen Service, Inc. v. NLRB Introduction Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (454 U.S. 404),...
Limits on Application of Two-Step Pay Increase Rule for WS to GS Promotions Established

Limits on Application of Two-Step Pay Increase Rule for WS to GS Promotions Established

Date: Jan 13, 1982
Limits on Application of Two-Step Pay Increase Rule for WS to GS Promotions Established Introduction United States v. Clark et al. (454 U.S. 555, 1982) is a pivotal Supreme Court case that delves...
Texaco, Inc. v. Short: Upholding the Constitutional Validity of Mineral Lapse Statutes

Texaco, Inc. v. Short: Upholding the Constitutional Validity of Mineral Lapse Statutes

Date: Jan 13, 1982
Texaco, Inc. v. Short: Upholding the Constitutional Validity of Mineral Lapse Statutes Introduction Texaco, Inc., et al. v. Short et al. (454 U.S. 516) is a landmark United States Supreme Court case...
Supreme Court Reinforces §403(a) of the Bankruptcy Reform Act: Implications for Dismissal and Refilling under the New Code

Supreme Court Reinforces §403(a) of the Bankruptcy Reform Act: Implications for Dismissal and Refilling under the New Code

Date: Jan 12, 1982
Supreme Court Reinforces §403(a) of the Bankruptcy Reform Act: Implications for Dismissal and Refilling under the New Code Introduction The case of Central Trust Co., Rochester, N.Y. v. Official...
Clarifying Preclearance and Reconsideration Requests under the Voting Rights Act: Insights from Blanding v. DuBOSE

Clarifying Preclearance and Reconsideration Requests under the Voting Rights Act: Insights from Blanding v. DuBOSE

Date: Jan 12, 1982
Clarifying Preclearance and Reconsideration Requests under the Voting Rights Act: Insights from Blanding v. DuBOSE Introduction Blanding et al. v. DuBOSE et al., 454 U.S. 393 (1982), is a pivotal...
Liberal Construction of Pro Se Pleadings in Federal Courts: Analysis of Boag v. MacDougall

Liberal Construction of Pro Se Pleadings in Federal Courts: Analysis of Boag v. MacDougall

Date: Jan 12, 1982
Liberal Construction of Pro Se Pleadings in Federal Courts: Analysis of Boag v. MacDougall Introduction Boag v. MacDougall, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, 454 U.S. 364 (1982), is a...
Davis v. Hutto: Federal Courts and Legislative Sentencing Discretion under the Eighth Amendment

Davis v. Hutto: Federal Courts and Legislative Sentencing Discretion under the Eighth Amendment

Date: Jan 12, 1982
Davis v. Hutto: Federal Courts and Legislative Sentencing Discretion under the Eighth Amendment Introduction In Davis v. Hutto, the United States Supreme Court addressed the interplay between federal...
Federal Jurisdiction in Fraud Cases: Insights from Yazoo County Industrial Development Corp. v. Suthoff

Federal Jurisdiction in Fraud Cases: Insights from Yazoo County Industrial Development Corp. v. Suthoff

Date: Jan 12, 1982
Federal Jurisdiction in Fraud Cases: Insights from Yazoo County Industrial Development Corp. v. Suthoff Introduction The case of Yazoo County Industrial Development Corporation v. Jonez P. Suthoff...
Limits on Indefinite Pretrial Commitment: A Reevaluation of JACKSON v. INDIANA

Limits on Indefinite Pretrial Commitment: A Reevaluation of JACKSON v. INDIANA

Date: Jan 12, 1982
Limits on Indefinite Pretrial Commitment: A Reevaluation of JACKSON v. INDIANA Introduction Florida v. Willie Allen Garrett, 454 U.S. 1004 (1981), presents a critical examination of the...
Polk County v. Dodson: Public Defenders' Representation Excluded from 'Under Color of State Law' Liability under §1983

Polk County v. Dodson: Public Defenders' Representation Excluded from 'Under Color of State Law' Liability under §1983

Date: Dec 15, 1981
Polk County v. Dodson: Public Defenders' Representation Excluded from 'Under Color of State Law' Liability under §1983 Introduction Polk County et al. v. Dodson (454 U.S. 312, 1981) is a landmark...
Constitutionality of Inconsistent Verdicts in Bench Trials: Insights from Harris v. Rivera

Constitutionality of Inconsistent Verdicts in Bench Trials: Insights from Harris v. Rivera

Date: Dec 15, 1981
Constitutionality of Inconsistent Verdicts in Bench Trials: Insights from Harris v. Rivera Introduction Harris v. Rivera, 454 U.S. 339 (1981), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case that...
Limits on Contributions to Ballot Measure Committees Unconstitutional: Insights from CITIZENS AGAINST RENT CONTROL v. CITY OF BERKELEY

Limits on Contributions to Ballot Measure Committees Unconstitutional: Insights from CITIZENS AGAINST RENT CONTROL v. CITY OF BERKELEY

Date: Dec 15, 1981
Limits on Contributions to Ballot Measure Committees Unconstitutional: Insights from CITIZENS AGAINST RENT CONTROL v. CITY OF BERKELEY Introduction Citizens Against Rent Control/Coalition for Fair...
Affirming the Constitutionality of Strip-Search Policies in Detention Centers Under the Fourth Amendment

Affirming the Constitutionality of Strip-Search Policies in Detention Centers Under the Fourth Amendment

Date: Dec 12, 1981
Affirming the Constitutionality of Strip-Search Policies in Detention Centers Under the Fourth Amendment Introduction The case J. Elwood Clements and Carol J. Sachtleben v. Lucy N. Logan, No. A-480...
Content-Neutral Regulation of Speech in Public Universities: Analyzing Widmar v. Vincent

Content-Neutral Regulation of Speech in Public Universities: Analyzing Widmar v. Vincent

Date: Dec 9, 1981
Content-Neutral Regulation of Speech in Public Universities: Analyzing Widmar v. Vincent Introduction Widmar v. Vincent, 454 U.S. 263 (1981), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno: Establishing Limits on Forum Non Conveniens in International Litigation

Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno: Establishing Limits on Forum Non Conveniens in International Litigation

Date: Dec 9, 1981
Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno: Establishing Limits on Forum Non Conveniens in International Litigation Introduction Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno, Personal Representative of the Estates of Fehilly et al....
Interpretation of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2): Necessity of Invidious Discrimination for a Private Right of Action

Interpretation of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2): Necessity of Invidious Discrimination for a Private Right of Action

Date: Dec 8, 1981
Interpretation of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2): Necessity of Invidious Discrimination for a Private Right of Action Introduction Versie Kimble v. D. J. McDuffy Inc., 454 U.S. 1110 (1981), presents a pivotal...
Reaffirming Federal Exclusivity in Quiet Title Actions: Commentary on KEY v. WISE

Reaffirming Federal Exclusivity in Quiet Title Actions: Commentary on KEY v. WISE

Date: Dec 8, 1981
Reaffirming Federal Exclusivity in Quiet Title Actions: Commentary on KEY v. WISE Introduction The case of Alf Key et al. v. Louise P. Wise et al, reported at 454 U.S. 1103 (1981), presents a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert