Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
UNITED STATES v. MacDONALD: Defining the Scope of the Sixth Amendment's Speedy Trial Guarantee Introduction UNITED STATES v. MacDONALD, 456 U.S. 1 (1982), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that...
Federal Supremacy and Tax Immunity of Independent Contractors: Insights from United States v. New Mexico et al. (455 U.S. 720, 1982) Introduction United States v. New Mexico et al. is a significant...
Full Faith and Credit Applied to Jurisdictional Determinations: Insights from Underwriters National Assurance Co. v. North Carolina Life Accident Health Insurance Guaranty Association et al....
Application of the Railway Labor Act to State-Owned Railroads and the Tenth Amendment Introduction United Transportation Union v. Long Island Rail Road Co. et al., 455 U.S. 678 (1982), is a pivotal...
Santosky v. Kramer: Establishing 'Clear and Convincing Evidence' Standard in Parental Rights Termination Introduction Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982), is a landmark case in United States...
Clarifying 'Injury' and Presumptions in Workers' Compensation: U.S. Industries/Federal Sheet Metal v. Riley Introduction The case of U.S. Industries/Federal Sheet Metal, Inc., et al., v. Director,...
Defining Mootness in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Lane v. Williams Introduction The landmark case of Lane, Corrections Director v. Williams et al., 455 U.S. 624 (1982), addresses pivotal issues...
Broad Interpretation of Interstate Commerce in 18 U.S.C. §2314: McElroy v. United States Introduction McElroy v. United States, 455 U.S. 642 (1982), is a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed...
Collateral Estoppel and Double Jeopardy: Insights from Green v. Ohio Introduction F. Harrison Green v. Ohio, 455 U.S. 976 (1982), presents a critical examination of the interplay between the Double...
Reaffirming the Presumption of Correctness under 28 U.S.C §2254(d) in Federal Habeas Corpus Proceedings: An Analysis of SUMNER v. MATA Introduction Sumner, Warden v. Mata, 455 U.S. 591 (1982), is a...
Effective Assistance of Counsel Limited to Indispensable Appeals: Insights from Wainwright v. Torna Introduction The United States Supreme Court case, Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of...
Limits of Federal Habeas Review Under JACKSON v. VIRGINIA: Analysis of Charles Anderson, Warden v. Cornell Fuller Introduction Charles Anderson, Warden v. Cornell Fuller (455 U.S. 1028, 1982) is a...
Exclusive Benefit Requirement Under Section 302(c)(5): Revisiting United Mine Workers v. Robinson Introduction United Mine Workers of America Health Retirement Funds et al. v. Robinson et al., 455...
Bread PAC v. Federal Election Commission: Narrowing Standing for Expedited Judicial Review Introduction Bread Political Action Committee (PAC) et al. v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) et al., 455...
Marine Bank v. Weaver: Redefining 'Security' Under the Securities Exchange Act Introduction Marine Bank v. Weaver et ux. (455 U.S. 551) is a significant United States Supreme Court decision delivered...
Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside: Clarifying the Scope of Drug Paraphernalia Regulations Introduction The Supreme Court case Village of Hoffman Estates et al. v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.,...
Total Exhaustion Rule for Mixed Habeas Petitions Established in Rose v. Lundy Introduction Rose, Warden v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509 (1982), addressed a critical procedural matter in the realm of federal...
WHITE v. NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY: Clarifying the Applicability of Rule 59(e) to Attorney's Fees under § 1988 Introduction In White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment...
Supreme Court Upholds Mootness of Pretrial Bail Claims Post-Conviction Introduction In the landmark case Murphy v. Hunt (455 U.S. 478, 1982), the United States Supreme Court addressed the issue of...