Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

UNITED STATES v. MacDONALD: Defining the Scope of the Sixth Amendment's Speedy Trial Guarantee

UNITED STATES v. MacDONALD: Defining the Scope of the Sixth Amendment's Speedy Trial Guarantee

Date: Apr 1, 1982
UNITED STATES v. MacDONALD: Defining the Scope of the Sixth Amendment's Speedy Trial Guarantee Introduction UNITED STATES v. MacDONALD, 456 U.S. 1 (1982), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that...
Federal Supremacy and Tax Immunity of Independent Contractors: Insights from United States v. New Mexico (1982)

Federal Supremacy and Tax Immunity of Independent Contractors: Insights from United States v. New Mexico (1982)

Date: Mar 25, 1982
Federal Supremacy and Tax Immunity of Independent Contractors: Insights from United States v. New Mexico et al. (455 U.S. 720, 1982) Introduction United States v. New Mexico et al. is a significant...
Full Faith and Credit Applied to Jurisdictional Determinations: Insights from Underwriters National Assurance v. North Carolina

Full Faith and Credit Applied to Jurisdictional Determinations: Insights from Underwriters National Assurance v. North Carolina

Date: Mar 25, 1982
Full Faith and Credit Applied to Jurisdictional Determinations: Insights from Underwriters National Assurance Co. v. North Carolina Life Accident Health Insurance Guaranty Association et al....
Application of the Railway Labor Act to State-Owned Railroads and the Tenth Amendment

Application of the Railway Labor Act to State-Owned Railroads and the Tenth Amendment

Date: Mar 25, 1982
Application of the Railway Labor Act to State-Owned Railroads and the Tenth Amendment Introduction United Transportation Union v. Long Island Rail Road Co. et al., 455 U.S. 678 (1982), is a pivotal...
Santosky v. Kramer: Establishing 'Clear and Convincing Evidence' Standard in Parental Rights Termination

Santosky v. Kramer: Establishing 'Clear and Convincing Evidence' Standard in Parental Rights Termination

Date: Mar 25, 1982
Santosky v. Kramer: Establishing 'Clear and Convincing Evidence' Standard in Parental Rights Termination Introduction Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982), is a landmark case in United States...
Clarifying 'Injury' and Presumptions in Workers' Compensation: U.S. Industries/Federal Sheet Metal v. Riley

Clarifying 'Injury' and Presumptions in Workers' Compensation: U.S. Industries/Federal Sheet Metal v. Riley

Date: Mar 24, 1982
Clarifying 'Injury' and Presumptions in Workers' Compensation: U.S. Industries/Federal Sheet Metal v. Riley Introduction The case of U.S. Industries/Federal Sheet Metal, Inc., et al., v. Director,...
Defining Mootness in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Lane v. Williams

Defining Mootness in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Lane v. Williams

Date: Mar 24, 1982
Defining Mootness in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Lane v. Williams Introduction The landmark case of Lane, Corrections Director v. Williams et al., 455 U.S. 624 (1982), addresses pivotal issues...
Broad Interpretation of Interstate Commerce in 18 U.S.C. §2314: McElroy v. United States

Broad Interpretation of Interstate Commerce in 18 U.S.C. §2314: McElroy v. United States

Date: Mar 24, 1982
Broad Interpretation of Interstate Commerce in 18 U.S.C. §2314: McElroy v. United States Introduction McElroy v. United States, 455 U.S. 642 (1982), is a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed...
Collateral Estoppel and Double Jeopardy: Insights from Green v. Ohio

Collateral Estoppel and Double Jeopardy: Insights from Green v. Ohio

Date: Mar 23, 1982
Collateral Estoppel and Double Jeopardy: Insights from Green v. Ohio Introduction F. Harrison Green v. Ohio, 455 U.S. 976 (1982), presents a critical examination of the interplay between the Double...
Reaffirming the Presumption of Correctness under 28 U.S.C §2254(d) in Federal Habeas Corpus Proceedings: An Analysis of SUMNER v. MATA

Reaffirming the Presumption of Correctness under 28 U.S.C §2254(d) in Federal Habeas Corpus Proceedings: An Analysis of SUMNER v. MATA

Date: Mar 23, 1982
Reaffirming the Presumption of Correctness under 28 U.S.C §2254(d) in Federal Habeas Corpus Proceedings: An Analysis of SUMNER v. MATA Introduction Sumner, Warden v. Mata, 455 U.S. 591 (1982), is a...
Effective Assistance of Counsel Limited to Indispensable Appeals: Insights from Wainwright v. Torna

Effective Assistance of Counsel Limited to Indispensable Appeals: Insights from Wainwright v. Torna

Date: Mar 23, 1982
Effective Assistance of Counsel Limited to Indispensable Appeals: Insights from Wainwright v. Torna Introduction The United States Supreme Court case, Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of...
Limits of Federal Habeas Review Under JACKSON v. VIRGINIA: Analysis of Charles Anderson, Warden v. Cornell Fuller

Limits of Federal Habeas Review Under JACKSON v. VIRGINIA: Analysis of Charles Anderson, Warden v. Cornell Fuller

Date: Mar 12, 1982
Limits of Federal Habeas Review Under JACKSON v. VIRGINIA: Analysis of Charles Anderson, Warden v. Cornell Fuller Introduction Charles Anderson, Warden v. Cornell Fuller (455 U.S. 1028, 1982) is a...
Exclusive Benefit Requirement Under Section 302(c)(5): Revisiting United Mine Workers v. Robinson

Exclusive Benefit Requirement Under Section 302(c)(5): Revisiting United Mine Workers v. Robinson

Date: Mar 9, 1982
Exclusive Benefit Requirement Under Section 302(c)(5): Revisiting United Mine Workers v. Robinson Introduction United Mine Workers of America Health Retirement Funds et al. v. Robinson et al., 455...
Bread PAC v. Federal Election Commission: Narrowing Standing for Expedited Judicial Review

Bread PAC v. Federal Election Commission: Narrowing Standing for Expedited Judicial Review

Date: Mar 9, 1982
Bread PAC v. Federal Election Commission: Narrowing Standing for Expedited Judicial Review Introduction Bread Political Action Committee (PAC) et al. v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) et al., 455...
Marine Bank v. Weaver: Redefining 'Security' Under the Securities Exchange Act

Marine Bank v. Weaver: Redefining 'Security' Under the Securities Exchange Act

Date: Mar 9, 1982
Marine Bank v. Weaver: Redefining 'Security' Under the Securities Exchange Act Introduction Marine Bank v. Weaver et ux. (455 U.S. 551) is a significant United States Supreme Court decision delivered...
Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside: Clarifying the Scope of Drug Paraphernalia Regulations

Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside: Clarifying the Scope of Drug Paraphernalia Regulations

Date: Mar 4, 1982
Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside: Clarifying the Scope of Drug Paraphernalia Regulations Introduction The Supreme Court case Village of Hoffman Estates et al. v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.,...
Establishing the Total Exhaustion Rule in Rose v. Lundy

Establishing the Total Exhaustion Rule in Rose v. Lundy

Date: Mar 4, 1982
Total Exhaustion Rule for Mixed Habeas Petitions Established in Rose v. Lundy Introduction Rose, Warden v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509 (1982), addressed a critical procedural matter in the realm of federal...
Supreme Court Upholds Bankruptcy Clause Uniformity: Striking Down RITA's Single-Debtor Employee Protections

Supreme Court Upholds Bankruptcy Clause Uniformity: Striking Down RITA's Single-Debtor Employee Protections

Date: Mar 3, 1982
Supreme Court Upholds Bankruptcy Clause Uniformity: Striking Down RITA's Single-Debtor Employee Protections Introduction The case Railway Labor Executives' Assn. v. Gibbons, Trustee, et al. (455 U.S....
WHITE v. NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY: Clarifying the Applicability of Rule 59(e) to Attorney's Fees under § 1988

WHITE v. NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY: Clarifying the Applicability of Rule 59(e) to Attorney's Fees under § 1988

Date: Mar 3, 1982
WHITE v. NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY: Clarifying the Applicability of Rule 59(e) to Attorney's Fees under § 1988 Introduction In White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment...
Supreme Court Upholds Mootness of Pretrial Bail Claims Post-Conviction

Supreme Court Upholds Mootness of Pretrial Bail Claims Post-Conviction

Date: Mar 3, 1982
Supreme Court Upholds Mootness of Pretrial Bail Claims Post-Conviction Introduction In the landmark case Murphy v. Hunt (455 U.S. 478, 1982), the United States Supreme Court addressed the issue of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert