Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Broad Interpretation of 'Similar Files' Under FOIA Exemption 6 in United States Department of State v. Washington Post Co. Introduction United States Department of State et al. v. Washington Post Co....
Extending Title IX Protections to Employment Discrimination: Analysis of North Haven Board of Education v. Bell Introduction North Haven Board of Education v. Bell, 456 U.S. 512 (1982), is a landmark...
Protection of Union Democrats Under the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act: Finnegan v. Leu Analysis Introduction Finnegan et al. v. Leu et al., 456 U.S. 431 (1982), is a landmark Supreme...
Antitrust Liability of Standard-Setting Organizations: ASME v. Hydrolevel Corp. Establishes Apparent Authority Rule Introduction In the landmark case American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Inc. v....
Affirming Implied Private Causes of Action under the Commodity Exchange Act Introduction The Supreme Court case Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith, Inc. v. Curran et al., 456 U.S. 353 (1982),...
Reaffirming the Integrity of Multiple Aggravating Circumstances in Capital Sentencing: Insights from ZANT v. STEPHENS (1982) Introduction ZANT, WARDEN v. STEPHENS, 456 U.S. 410 (1982), is a pivotal...
Judicial Discretion in Enforcing the Federal Water Pollution Control Act: Insights from Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo Introduction The United States Supreme Court case Weinberger, Secretary of...
Appellate Review of Discriminatory Intent under Title VII: Pullman-Standard v. Swint Introduction Pullman-Standard, a Division of Pullman, Inc. v. Swint et al. (456 U.S. 273, 1982) is a pivotal...
Denominational Neutrality in Charitable Solicitation Laws: Larson v. Valente Introduction Larson, Commissioner of Securities, Minnesota Department of Commerce, et al. v. Valente et al. (456 U.S. 228)...
Judicial Restriction on Medicare Part B Review: United States v. Erika, Inc. Introduction United States v. Erika, Inc., 456 U.S. 201 (1982), is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that...
Secondary Boycott Prohibition Affirmed in International Longshoremen's Association, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Allied International, Inc. Introduction International Longshoremen's Association, AFL-CIO, et...
Presumption of Impartiality in Quasi-Judicial Hearings Affirmed in Schweiker v. McClure et al. Introduction Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. McClure et al. is a pivotal 1982...
American Tobacco Co. v. Patterson: Expanding the Scope of §703(h) in Title VII Introduction American Tobacco Co. v. Patterson et al., 456 U.S. 63 (1982), represents a pivotal Supreme Court decision...
Defining Standards for Collateral Relief Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255: Analysis of UNITED STATES v. FRADY Introduction UNITED STATES v. FRADY, 456 U.S. 152 (1982), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that...
BROWN v. HARTLAGE: Affirming First Amendment Protections for Political Campaign Promises Introduction BROWN v. HARTLAGE is a landmark 1982 decision by the United States Supreme Court that addresses...
MILLS v. HABLUETZEL: Upholding Equal Protection in Paternity Statutes Introduction MILLS v. HABLUETZEL, 456 U.S. 91 (1982) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that scrutinized...
Procedural Default Bars Challenging Jury Instructions in Federal Habeas Review Introduction Engle, Correctional Superintendent v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 (1982), represents a significant decision by the...
Judicial Deference in Reapportionment: Upholding Legislative Judgments in Upham v. Seamon Introduction Upham et al. v. Seamon et al. (456 U.S. 37, 1982) is a landmark United States Supreme Court case...
Inclusion of Executive Agreements within "Treaty" Definitions under §106: An Examination of Weinberger v. Rossi Introduction Weinberger, Secretary of Defense, et al. v. Rossi et al., 456 U.S. 25...