Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Broad Interpretation of 'Similar Files' Under FOIA Exemption 6 in United States Department of State v. Washington Post

Broad Interpretation of 'Similar Files' Under FOIA Exemption 6 in United States Department of State v. Washington Post

Date: May 18, 1982
Broad Interpretation of 'Similar Files' Under FOIA Exemption 6 in United States Department of State v. Washington Post Co. Introduction United States Department of State et al. v. Washington Post Co....
Extending Title IX Protections to Employment Discrimination: Analysis of North Haven Board of Education v. Bell

Extending Title IX Protections to Employment Discrimination: Analysis of North Haven Board of Education v. Bell

Date: May 18, 1982
Extending Title IX Protections to Employment Discrimination: Analysis of North Haven Board of Education v. Bell Introduction North Haven Board of Education v. Bell, 456 U.S. 512 (1982), is a landmark...
Protection of Union Democrats Under the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act: Finnegan v. Leu Analysis

Protection of Union Democrats Under the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act: Finnegan v. Leu Analysis

Date: May 18, 1982
Protection of Union Democrats Under the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act: Finnegan v. Leu Analysis Introduction Finnegan et al. v. Leu et al., 456 U.S. 431 (1982), is a landmark Supreme...
Antitrust Liability of Standard-Setting Organizations: ASME v. Hydrolevel Corp. Establishes Apparent Authority Rule

Antitrust Liability of Standard-Setting Organizations: ASME v. Hydrolevel Corp. Establishes Apparent Authority Rule

Date: May 18, 1982
Antitrust Liability of Standard-Setting Organizations: ASME v. Hydrolevel Corp. Establishes Apparent Authority Rule Introduction In the landmark case American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Inc. v....
Affirming Implied Private Causes of Action under the Commodity Exchange Act

Affirming Implied Private Causes of Action under the Commodity Exchange Act

Date: May 4, 1982
Affirming Implied Private Causes of Action under the Commodity Exchange Act Introduction The Supreme Court case Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith, Inc. v. Curran et al., 456 U.S. 353 (1982),...
Reaffirming the Integrity of Multiple Aggravating Circumstances in Capital Sentencing: Insights from ZANT v. STEPHENS (1982)

Reaffirming the Integrity of Multiple Aggravating Circumstances in Capital Sentencing: Insights from ZANT v. STEPHENS (1982)

Date: May 4, 1982
Reaffirming the Integrity of Multiple Aggravating Circumstances in Capital Sentencing: Insights from ZANT v. STEPHENS (1982) Introduction ZANT, WARDEN v. STEPHENS, 456 U.S. 410 (1982), is a pivotal...
Judicial Discretion in Enforcing the Federal Water Pollution Control Act: Insights from Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo

Judicial Discretion in Enforcing the Federal Water Pollution Control Act: Insights from Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo

Date: Apr 28, 1982
Judicial Discretion in Enforcing the Federal Water Pollution Control Act: Insights from Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo Introduction The United States Supreme Court case Weinberger, Secretary of...
Appellate Review of Discriminatory Intent under Title VII: Pullman-Standard v. Swint

Appellate Review of Discriminatory Intent under Title VII: Pullman-Standard v. Swint

Date: Apr 28, 1982
Appellate Review of Discriminatory Intent under Title VII: Pullman-Standard v. Swint Introduction Pullman-Standard, a Division of Pullman, Inc. v. Swint et al. (456 U.S. 273, 1982) is a pivotal...
Enforcement of Freight Charges Despite Carrier’s Violation of ICC Credit Regulations: Analysis of Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Commercial Metals Co.

Enforcement of Freight Charges Despite Carrier’s Violation of ICC Credit Regulations: Analysis of Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Commercial Metals Co.

Date: Apr 28, 1982
Enforcement of Freight Charges Despite Carrier’s Violation of ICC Credit Regulations: Analysis of Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Commercial Metals Co. Introduction Southern Pacific...
Denominational Neutrality in Charitable Solicitation Laws: Larson v. Valente

Denominational Neutrality in Charitable Solicitation Laws: Larson v. Valente

Date: Apr 22, 1982
Denominational Neutrality in Charitable Solicitation Laws: Larson v. Valente Introduction Larson, Commissioner of Securities, Minnesota Department of Commerce, et al. v. Valente et al. (456 U.S. 228)...
Judicial Restriction on Medicare Part B Review: United States v. Erika, Inc.

Judicial Restriction on Medicare Part B Review: United States v. Erika, Inc.

Date: Apr 21, 1982
Judicial Restriction on Medicare Part B Review: United States v. Erika, Inc. Introduction United States v. Erika, Inc., 456 U.S. 201 (1982), is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that...
Secondary Boycott Prohibition Affirmed in ILA v. Allied International

Secondary Boycott Prohibition Affirmed in ILA v. Allied International

Date: Apr 21, 1982
Secondary Boycott Prohibition Affirmed in International Longshoremen's Association, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Allied International, Inc. Introduction International Longshoremen's Association, AFL-CIO, et...
Presumption of Impartiality in Quasi-Judicial Hearings Affirmed in Schweiker v. McClure

Presumption of Impartiality in Quasi-Judicial Hearings Affirmed in Schweiker v. McClure

Date: Apr 21, 1982
Presumption of Impartiality in Quasi-Judicial Hearings Affirmed in Schweiker v. McClure et al. Introduction Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. McClure et al. is a pivotal 1982...
American Tobacco Co. v. Patterson: Expanding the Scope of §703(h) in Title VII

American Tobacco Co. v. Patterson: Expanding the Scope of §703(h) in Title VII

Date: Apr 6, 1982
American Tobacco Co. v. Patterson: Expanding the Scope of §703(h) in Title VII Introduction American Tobacco Co. v. Patterson et al., 456 U.S. 63 (1982), represents a pivotal Supreme Court decision...
Defining Standards for Collateral Relief Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255: Analysis of UNITED STATES v. FRADY

Defining Standards for Collateral Relief Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255: Analysis of UNITED STATES v. FRADY

Date: Apr 6, 1982
Defining Standards for Collateral Relief Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255: Analysis of UNITED STATES v. FRADY Introduction UNITED STATES v. FRADY, 456 U.S. 152 (1982), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that...
BROWN v. HARTLAGE: Affirming First Amendment Protections for Political Campaign Promises

BROWN v. HARTLAGE: Affirming First Amendment Protections for Political Campaign Promises

Date: Apr 6, 1982
BROWN v. HARTLAGE: Affirming First Amendment Protections for Political Campaign Promises Introduction BROWN v. HARTLAGE is a landmark 1982 decision by the United States Supreme Court that addresses...
MILLS v. HABLUETZEL: Upholding Equal Protection in Paternity Statutes

MILLS v. HABLUETZEL: Upholding Equal Protection in Paternity Statutes

Date: Apr 6, 1982
MILLS v. HABLUETZEL: Upholding Equal Protection in Paternity Statutes Introduction MILLS v. HABLUETZEL, 456 U.S. 91 (1982) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that scrutinized...
Procedural Default Bars Challenging Jury Instructions in Federal Habeas Review

Procedural Default Bars Challenging Jury Instructions in Federal Habeas Review

Date: Apr 6, 1982
Procedural Default Bars Challenging Jury Instructions in Federal Habeas Review Introduction Engle, Correctional Superintendent v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107 (1982), represents a significant decision by the...
Judicial Deference in Reapportionment: Upholding Legislative Judgments in Upham v. Seamon

Judicial Deference in Reapportionment: Upholding Legislative Judgments in Upham v. Seamon

Date: Apr 2, 1982
Judicial Deference in Reapportionment: Upholding Legislative Judgments in Upham v. Seamon Introduction Upham et al. v. Seamon et al. (456 U.S. 37, 1982) is a landmark United States Supreme Court case...
Inclusion of Executive Agreements within "Treaty" Definitions under §106: An Examination of Weinberger v. Rossi

Inclusion of Executive Agreements within "Treaty" Definitions under §106: An Examination of Weinberger v. Rossi

Date: Apr 1, 1982
Inclusion of Executive Agreements within "Treaty" Definitions under §106: An Examination of Weinberger v. Rossi Introduction Weinberger, Secretary of Defense, et al. v. Rossi et al., 456 U.S. 25...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert