Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Eleventh Amendment Limits on Federal Court Enforcement of State Law: Pennhurst v. Halderman Commentary

Eleventh Amendment Limits on Federal Court Enforcement of State Law: Pennhurst v. Halderman Commentary

Date: Jan 24, 1984
Eleventh Amendment Limits on Federal Court Enforcement of State Law: Pennhurst v. Halderman Commentary Introduction Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89 (1984), is a landmark...
McKaskle v. Wiggins: Defining the Role of Standby Counsel in Pro Se Defenses

McKaskle v. Wiggins: Defining the Role of Standby Counsel in Pro Se Defenses

Date: Jan 24, 1984
McKaskle v. Wiggins: Defining the Role of Standby Counsel in Pro Se Defenses Introduction McKaskle v. Wiggins, 465 U.S. 168 (1984), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that clarifies the boundaries...
Supremacy of Federal Arbitration Act Over State Statutes: Southland Corp. v. Keating

Supremacy of Federal Arbitration Act Over State Statutes: Southland Corp. v. Keating

Date: Jan 24, 1984
Supremacy of Federal Arbitration Act Over State Statutes: Southland Corp. v. Keating Introduction Southland Corp. et al. v. Keating et al., 465 U.S. 1 (1984), is a landmark United States Supreme...
Open Voir Dire: Establishing Transparency in Jury Selection Proceedings – PRESS-ENTERPRISE CO. v. Superior Court of California

Open Voir Dire: Establishing Transparency in Jury Selection Proceedings – PRESS-ENTERPRISE CO. v. Superior Court of California

Date: Jan 19, 1984
Open Voir Dire: Establishing Transparency in Jury Selection Proceedings PRESS-ENTERPRISE CO. v. Superior Court of California, Riverside County (464 U.S. 501) U.S. Supreme Court, January 18, 1984...
McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood et al.: Reinforcing Standards for Juror Impartiality and New Trials

McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood et al.: Reinforcing Standards for Juror Impartiality and New Trials

Date: Jan 19, 1984
McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood et al.: Reinforcing Standards for Juror Impartiality and New Trials Introduction McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood et al., 464 U.S. 548 (1984),...
Rule 23.1 Nonapplicability to Section 36(b) Actions: Insights from DAILY INCOME FUND, INC. v. FOX

Rule 23.1 Nonapplicability to Section 36(b) Actions: Insights from DAILY INCOME FUND, INC. v. FOX

Date: Jan 19, 1984
Rule 23.1 Nonapplicability to Section 36(b) Actions: Insights from DAILY INCOME FUND, INC., ET AL. v. FOX Introduction In the landmark case of Daily Income Fund, Inc., et al. v. Fox, 464 U.S. 523...
Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.: Defining Fair Use and Limiting Contributory Copyright Infringement

Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.: Defining Fair Use and Limiting Contributory Copyright Infringement

Date: Jan 18, 1984
Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.: Defining Fair Use and Limiting Contributory Copyright Infringement Introduction The landmark case of Sony Corporation of America et al. v....
Administrative Subpoenas Without Warrant: Donovan v. Lone Steer, Inc. Commentary

Administrative Subpoenas Without Warrant: Donovan v. Lone Steer, Inc. Commentary

Date: Jan 18, 1984
Administrative Subpoenas Without Warrant: Donovan v. Lone Steer, Inc. Introduction Donovan, Secretary of Labor, et al. v. Lone Steer, Inc., 464 U.S. 408 (1984), is a pivotal United States Supreme...
Badaracco v. Commissioner: Unlimited Limitations Period for Fraudulent Tax Returns

Badaracco v. Commissioner: Unlimited Limitations Period for Fraudulent Tax Returns

Date: Jan 18, 1984
Badaracco v. Commissioner: Unlimited Limitations Period for Fraudulent Tax Returns Introduction Badaracco v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 464 U.S. 386 (1984), is a seminal Supreme Court case...
Abuse of Writ of Habeas Corpus: Woodard v. Hutchins

Abuse of Writ of Habeas Corpus: Woodard v. Hutchins

Date: Jan 14, 1984
Abuse of Writ of Habeas Corpus: Woodard v. Hutchins Introduction Woodard, Secretary of Corrections of North Carolina, et al. v. Hutchins (464 U.S. 377) is a significant Supreme Court decision...
Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Coastal Zone Management Act: OCS Lease Sales Excluded from §307(c)(1) Consistency Review

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Coastal Zone Management Act: OCS Lease Sales Excluded from §307(c)(1) Consistency Review

Date: Jan 12, 1984
Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Coastal Zone Management Act: OCS Lease Sales Excluded from §307(c)(1) Consistency Review Introduction Secretary of the Interior et al. v. California et al. (464 U.S....
Reinforcing Warrant Necessity in Postfire Investigations of Private Residences: Michigan v. Clifford ET AL.

Reinforcing Warrant Necessity in Postfire Investigations of Private Residences: Michigan v. Clifford ET AL.

Date: Jan 12, 1984
Reinforcing Warrant Necessity in Postfire Investigations of Private Residences: Michigan v. Clifford ET AL. Introduction Michigan v. Clifford ET AL. (464 U.S. 287, 1984) is a pivotal U.S. Supreme...
U.S. Supreme Court Affirms State's Authority to Award Punitive Damages in Nuclear Contamination Cases: Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee

U.S. Supreme Court Affirms State's Authority to Award Punitive Damages in Nuclear Contamination Cases: Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee

Date: Jan 12, 1984
U.S. Supreme Court Affirms State's Authority to Award Punitive Damages in Nuclear Contamination Cases: Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Introduction In the landmark case of SILKWOOD v. KERR-McGEE CORPoration,...
Limits on Collateral Estoppel Against the Government: Insights from United States v. Mendoza

Limits on Collateral Estoppel Against the Government: Insights from United States v. Mendoza

Date: Jan 11, 1984
Limits on Collateral Estoppel Against the Government: Insights from United States v. Mendoza Introduction United States v. Mendoza (464 U.S. 154), decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on January 10,...
Mutual Defensive Collateral Estoppel in Federal Litigation: Insights from UNITED STATES v. STAUFFER CHEMICAL CO.

Mutual Defensive Collateral Estoppel in Federal Litigation: Insights from UNITED STATES v. STAUFFER CHEMICAL CO.

Date: Jan 11, 1984
Mutual Defensive Collateral Estoppel in Federal Litigation: Insights from UNITED STATES v. STAUFFER CHEMICAL CO. Introduction UNITED STATES v. STAUFFER CHEMICAL CO., 464 U.S. 165 (1984), is a pivotal...
Strict Interpretation of Continuous Physical Presence in INS v. Phinpathya: Implications for Deportation Suspension

Strict Interpretation of Continuous Physical Presence in INS v. Phinpathya: Implications for Deportation Suspension

Date: Jan 11, 1984
Strict Interpretation of Continuous Physical Presence in INS v. Phinpathya: Implications for Deportation Suspension Introduction Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Phinpathya, 464 U.S. 183...
Percentage Depletion on Advance Royalties and Lease Bonuses Affirmed in Commissioner v. Engle

Percentage Depletion on Advance Royalties and Lease Bonuses Affirmed in Commissioner v. Engle

Date: Jan 11, 1984
Percentage Depletion on Advance Royalties and Lease Bonuses Affirmed in Commissioner v. Engle Introduction In Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Engle et ux., 464 U.S. 206 (1984), the United States...
Stay of Execution in Stephens v. Kemp Establishes New Standards for Habeas Corpus Applications in Capital Cases

Stay of Execution in Stephens v. Kemp Establishes New Standards for Habeas Corpus Applications in Capital Cases

Date: Jan 10, 1984
Stay of Execution in Stephens v. Kemp Establishes New Standards for Habeas Corpus Applications in Capital Cases Introduction Alpha Otis O'Daniel Stephens v. Ralph Kemp, Superintendent, Georgia...
Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from McKaskle v. Conrado Vela

Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from McKaskle v. Conrado Vela

Date: Jan 10, 1984
Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from McKaskle v. Conrado Vela Introduction The United States legal system operates under a dual court structure, wherein state and...
Double Jeopardy Protections in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Charlie Young, Jr. v. Georgia

Double Jeopardy Protections in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Charlie Young, Jr. v. Georgia

Date: Jan 4, 1984
Double Jeopardy Protections in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Charlie Young, Jr. v. Georgia Introduction Charlie Young, Jr. v. Georgia (464 U.S. 1057) is a pivotal case that delves into the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert