Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Eleventh Amendment Limits on Federal Court Enforcement of State Law: Pennhurst v. Halderman Commentary Introduction Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89 (1984), is a landmark...
McKaskle v. Wiggins: Defining the Role of Standby Counsel in Pro Se Defenses Introduction McKaskle v. Wiggins, 465 U.S. 168 (1984), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that clarifies the boundaries...
Supremacy of Federal Arbitration Act Over State Statutes: Southland Corp. v. Keating Introduction Southland Corp. et al. v. Keating et al., 465 U.S. 1 (1984), is a landmark United States Supreme...
Open Voir Dire: Establishing Transparency in Jury Selection Proceedings PRESS-ENTERPRISE CO. v. Superior Court of California, Riverside County (464 U.S. 501) U.S. Supreme Court, January 18, 1984...
McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood et al.: Reinforcing Standards for Juror Impartiality and New Trials Introduction McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood et al., 464 U.S. 548 (1984),...
Rule 23.1 Nonapplicability to Section 36(b) Actions: Insights from DAILY INCOME FUND, INC., ET AL. v. FOX Introduction In the landmark case of Daily Income Fund, Inc., et al. v. Fox, 464 U.S. 523...
Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.: Defining Fair Use and Limiting Contributory Copyright Infringement Introduction The landmark case of Sony Corporation of America et al. v....
Administrative Subpoenas Without Warrant: Donovan v. Lone Steer, Inc. Introduction Donovan, Secretary of Labor, et al. v. Lone Steer, Inc., 464 U.S. 408 (1984), is a pivotal United States Supreme...
Badaracco v. Commissioner: Unlimited Limitations Period for Fraudulent Tax Returns Introduction Badaracco v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 464 U.S. 386 (1984), is a seminal Supreme Court case...
Abuse of Writ of Habeas Corpus: Woodard v. Hutchins Introduction Woodard, Secretary of Corrections of North Carolina, et al. v. Hutchins (464 U.S. 377) is a significant Supreme Court decision...
Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Coastal Zone Management Act: OCS Lease Sales Excluded from §307(c)(1) Consistency Review Introduction Secretary of the Interior et al. v. California et al. (464 U.S....
Reinforcing Warrant Necessity in Postfire Investigations of Private Residences: Michigan v. Clifford ET AL. Introduction Michigan v. Clifford ET AL. (464 U.S. 287, 1984) is a pivotal U.S. Supreme...
U.S. Supreme Court Affirms State's Authority to Award Punitive Damages in Nuclear Contamination Cases: Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Introduction In the landmark case of SILKWOOD v. KERR-McGEE CORPoration,...
Limits on Collateral Estoppel Against the Government: Insights from United States v. Mendoza Introduction United States v. Mendoza (464 U.S. 154), decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on January 10,...
Mutual Defensive Collateral Estoppel in Federal Litigation: Insights from UNITED STATES v. STAUFFER CHEMICAL CO. Introduction UNITED STATES v. STAUFFER CHEMICAL CO., 464 U.S. 165 (1984), is a pivotal...
Strict Interpretation of Continuous Physical Presence in INS v. Phinpathya: Implications for Deportation Suspension Introduction Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Phinpathya, 464 U.S. 183...
Percentage Depletion on Advance Royalties and Lease Bonuses Affirmed in Commissioner v. Engle Introduction In Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Engle et ux., 464 U.S. 206 (1984), the United States...
Stay of Execution in Stephens v. Kemp Establishes New Standards for Habeas Corpus Applications in Capital Cases Introduction Alpha Otis O'Daniel Stephens v. Ralph Kemp, Superintendent, Georgia...
Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from McKaskle v. Conrado Vela Introduction The United States legal system operates under a dual court structure, wherein state and...
Double Jeopardy Protections in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Charlie Young, Jr. v. Georgia Introduction Charlie Young, Jr. v. Georgia (464 U.S. 1057) is a pivotal case that delves into the...