Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Expansion of Private Action under §504 of the Rehabilitation Act: Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Darrone

Expansion of Private Action under §504 of the Rehabilitation Act: Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Darrone

Date: Feb 29, 1984
Expansion of Private Action under §504 of the Rehabilitation Act: Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Darrone Introduction The United States Supreme Court case Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Darrone,...
Program-Specific Application of Title IX: An In-Depth Commentary on GROVE CITY COLLEGE v. BELL

Program-Specific Application of Title IX: An In-Depth Commentary on GROVE CITY COLLEGE v. BELL

Date: Feb 29, 1984
Program-Specific Application of Title IX: An In-Depth Commentary on GROVE CITY COLLEGE v. BELL Introduction GROVE CITY COLLEGE v. BELL, 465 U.S. 555 (1984), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that...
United States v. Doe: Clarifying the Fifth Amendment's Scope on Business Records

United States v. Doe: Clarifying the Fifth Amendment's Scope on Business Records

Date: Feb 29, 1984
United States v. Doe: Clarifying the Fifth Amendment's Scope on Business Records Introduction United States v. Doe, 465 U.S. 605 (1984), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that examines the...
Remanding Employment Discrimination Case: Reevaluating Evidentiary Standards in Title VII Litigation

Remanding Employment Discrimination Case: Reevaluating Evidentiary Standards in Title VII Litigation

Date: Feb 28, 1984
Remanding Employment Discrimination Case: Reevaluating Evidentiary Standards in Title VII Litigation Introduction The case of John F. Lehman, Jr., Secretary of the Navy v. Yvonne G. Trout, decided by...
South Carolina v. Regan: Affirming State Sovereignty in Tax Legislation

South Carolina v. Regan: Affirming State Sovereignty in Tax Legislation

Date: Feb 23, 1984
South Carolina v. Regan: Affirming State Sovereignty in Tax Legislation Introduction In the landmark case of South Carolina v. Regan, 465 U.S. 367 (1984), the U.S. Supreme Court addressed significant...
Minnesota v. Murphy (1984): Upholding Fifth Amendment Protections in Probation Interrogations

Minnesota v. Murphy (1984): Upholding Fifth Amendment Protections in Probation Interrogations

Date: Feb 23, 1984
Minnesota v. Murphy (1984): Upholding Fifth Amendment Protections in Probation Interrogations Introduction Minnesota v. Murphy, 465 U.S. 420 (1984), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Cheyenne River Act of 1908: Upholding the Integrity of Indian Reservations

Cheyenne River Act of 1908: Upholding the Integrity of Indian Reservations

Date: Feb 23, 1984
Cheyenne River Act of 1908: Upholding the Integrity of Indian Reservations Introduction The case of Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary, et al. v. Bartlett (465 U.S. 463, 1984) addresses a...
Interest-Free Intrafamily Demand Loans Constitute Taxable Gifts: Analysis of Dickman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Interest-Free Intrafamily Demand Loans Constitute Taxable Gifts: Analysis of Dickman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Date: Feb 23, 1984
Interest-Free Intrafamily Demand Loans Constitute Taxable Gifts: Analysis of Dickman et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Introduction Dickman et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue is a...
Civil Forfeiture and Double Jeopardy: Insights from UNITED STATES v. ONE ASSORTMENT OF 89 FIREARMS

Civil Forfeiture and Double Jeopardy: Insights from UNITED STATES v. ONE ASSORTMENT OF 89 FIREARMS

Date: Feb 23, 1984
Civil Forfeiture and Double Jeopardy: Insights from UNITED STATES v. ONE ASSORTMENT OF 89 FIREARMS Introduction UNITED STATES v. ONE ASSORTMENT OF 89 FIREARMS is a landmark 1984 decision by the...
Bildisco Ruling: Collective-Bargaining Agreements as Executory Contracts in Bankruptcy

Bildisco Ruling: Collective-Bargaining Agreements as Executory Contracts in Bankruptcy

Date: Feb 23, 1984
Bildisco Ruling: Collective-Bargaining Agreements as Executory Contracts in Bankruptcy Introduction In the landmark case National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco, 465 U.S. 513 (1984), the United...
Public Officials Defined Broadly: Implications of DIXSON v. UNITED STATES on Federal Bribery Statutes

Public Officials Defined Broadly: Implications of DIXSON v. UNITED STATES on Federal Bribery Statutes

Date: Feb 23, 1984
Public Officials Defined Broadly: Implications of DIXSON v. UNITED STATES on Federal Bribery Statutes Introduction Dixson v. United States (465 U.S. 482, 1984) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court...
Final Judgment Rule and Collateral Order Exception: Flanagan v. United States

Final Judgment Rule and Collateral Order Exception: Flanagan v. United States

Date: Feb 22, 1984
Final Judgment Rule and Collateral Order Exception: Flanagan v. United States Introduction Flanagan et al. v. United States, 465 U.S. 259 (1984), is a seminal case in the realm of federal appellate...
Independent and Adequate State Grounds in Federal Review: Insights from Colorado v. Nunez

Independent and Adequate State Grounds in Federal Review: Insights from Colorado v. Nunez

Date: Feb 22, 1984
Independent and Adequate State Grounds in Federal Review: Insights from Colorado v. Nunez Introduction Colorado v. Nunez, 465 U.S. 324 (1984), is a pivotal case that underscores the principles...
Preclearance Independence: Affirming Separate Submissions under the Voting Rights Act

Preclearance Independence: Affirming Separate Submissions under the Voting Rights Act

Date: Feb 22, 1984
Preclearance Independence: Affirming Separate Submissions under the Voting Rights Act Introduction McCain et al. v. Lybrand et al. (465 U.S. 236, 1984) stands as a pivotal Supreme Court decision...
Standard of Appellate Review for Witherspoon Challenges Established in Texas v. Jimmy Lloyd Mead

Standard of Appellate Review for Witherspoon Challenges Established in Texas v. Jimmy Lloyd Mead

Date: Feb 22, 1984
Standard of Appellate Review for Witherspoon Challenges Established in Texas v. Jimmy Lloyd Mead Introduction The case of Texas v. Jimmy Lloyd Mead, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on February 21,...
Privileges and Immunities Clause Extended to Municipal Ordinances: Commentary on United Building Construction Trades Council of Camden County v. Mayor and Council of Camden

Privileges and Immunities Clause Extended to Municipal Ordinances: Commentary on United Building Construction Trades Council of Camden County v. Mayor and Council of Camden

Date: Feb 22, 1984
Privileges and Immunities Clause Extended to Municipal Ordinances: Commentary on United Building Construction Trades Council of Camden County v. Mayor and Council of Camden 1. Introduction The United...
Exclusive Representation in 'Meet and Confer' Provisions Upheld: Establishing Legal Boundaries of Constitutional Rights in Public Employee Consultations

Exclusive Representation in 'Meet and Confer' Provisions Upheld: Establishing Legal Boundaries of Constitutional Rights in Public Employee Consultations

Date: Feb 22, 1984
Exclusive Representation in 'Meet and Confer' Provisions Upheld: Establishing Legal Boundaries of Constitutional Rights in Public Employee Consultations Introduction The case of MINNESOTA STATE BOARD...
Antone v. Dugger: Upholding Restrictions on Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions in Death Penalty Cases

Antone v. Dugger: Upholding Restrictions on Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions in Death Penalty Cases

Date: Jan 26, 1984
Antone v. Dugger: Upholding Restrictions on Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions in Death Penalty Cases Introduction Antone v. Dugger, Superintendent, Florida State Prison, et al. (465 U.S. 200) is a...
Pulley v. Harris: Establishing the Limits of Proportionality Review in Capital Sentencing

Pulley v. Harris: Establishing the Limits of Proportionality Review in Capital Sentencing

Date: Jan 24, 1984
Pulley v. Harris: Establishing the Limits of Proportionality Review in Capital Sentencing Introduction In Pulley, Warden v. Harris (465 U.S. 37, 1984), the United States Supreme Court addressed...
Claim Preclusion in Federal §1983 Suits: Analysis of MIGRA v. Warren City School District Board of Education

Claim Preclusion in Federal §1983 Suits: Analysis of MIGRA v. Warren City School District Board of Education

Date: Jan 24, 1984
Claim Preclusion in Federal §1983 Suits: Analysis of MIGRA v. Warren City School District Board of Education Introduction MIGRA v. Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75 (1984),...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert