Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Expansion of Private Action under §504 of the Rehabilitation Act: Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Darrone Introduction The United States Supreme Court case Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Darrone,...
Program-Specific Application of Title IX: An In-Depth Commentary on GROVE CITY COLLEGE v. BELL Introduction GROVE CITY COLLEGE v. BELL, 465 U.S. 555 (1984), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that...
United States v. Doe: Clarifying the Fifth Amendment's Scope on Business Records Introduction United States v. Doe, 465 U.S. 605 (1984), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that examines the...
Remanding Employment Discrimination Case: Reevaluating Evidentiary Standards in Title VII Litigation Introduction The case of John F. Lehman, Jr., Secretary of the Navy v. Yvonne G. Trout, decided by...
South Carolina v. Regan: Affirming State Sovereignty in Tax Legislation Introduction In the landmark case of South Carolina v. Regan, 465 U.S. 367 (1984), the U.S. Supreme Court addressed significant...
Minnesota v. Murphy (1984): Upholding Fifth Amendment Protections in Probation Interrogations Introduction Minnesota v. Murphy, 465 U.S. 420 (1984), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Cheyenne River Act of 1908: Upholding the Integrity of Indian Reservations Introduction The case of Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary, et al. v. Bartlett (465 U.S. 463, 1984) addresses a...
Interest-Free Intrafamily Demand Loans Constitute Taxable Gifts: Analysis of Dickman et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Introduction Dickman et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue is a...
Civil Forfeiture and Double Jeopardy: Insights from UNITED STATES v. ONE ASSORTMENT OF 89 FIREARMS Introduction UNITED STATES v. ONE ASSORTMENT OF 89 FIREARMS is a landmark 1984 decision by the...
Bildisco Ruling: Collective-Bargaining Agreements as Executory Contracts in Bankruptcy Introduction In the landmark case National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco, 465 U.S. 513 (1984), the United...
Public Officials Defined Broadly: Implications of DIXSON v. UNITED STATES on Federal Bribery Statutes Introduction Dixson v. United States (465 U.S. 482, 1984) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court...
Final Judgment Rule and Collateral Order Exception: Flanagan v. United States Introduction Flanagan et al. v. United States, 465 U.S. 259 (1984), is a seminal case in the realm of federal appellate...
Independent and Adequate State Grounds in Federal Review: Insights from Colorado v. Nunez Introduction Colorado v. Nunez, 465 U.S. 324 (1984), is a pivotal case that underscores the principles...
Preclearance Independence: Affirming Separate Submissions under the Voting Rights Act Introduction McCain et al. v. Lybrand et al. (465 U.S. 236, 1984) stands as a pivotal Supreme Court decision...
Standard of Appellate Review for Witherspoon Challenges Established in Texas v. Jimmy Lloyd Mead Introduction The case of Texas v. Jimmy Lloyd Mead, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on February 21,...
Privileges and Immunities Clause Extended to Municipal Ordinances: Commentary on United Building Construction Trades Council of Camden County v. Mayor and Council of Camden 1. Introduction The United...
Exclusive Representation in 'Meet and Confer' Provisions Upheld: Establishing Legal Boundaries of Constitutional Rights in Public Employee Consultations Introduction The case of MINNESOTA STATE BOARD...
Antone v. Dugger: Upholding Restrictions on Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions in Death Penalty Cases Introduction Antone v. Dugger, Superintendent, Florida State Prison, et al. (465 U.S. 200) is a...
Pulley v. Harris: Establishing the Limits of Proportionality Review in Capital Sentencing Introduction In Pulley, Warden v. Harris (465 U.S. 37, 1984), the United States Supreme Court addressed...
Claim Preclusion in Federal §1983 Suits: Analysis of MIGRA v. Warren City School District Board of Education Introduction MIGRA v. Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75 (1984),...