Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Procedural Barriers in Labor Relations: EEOC v. FLRA (1986)

Procedural Barriers in Labor Relations: EEOC v. FLRA (1986)

Date: Apr 30, 1986
Procedural Barriers in Labor Relations: EEOC v. FLRA (1986) Introduction Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Federal Labor Relations Authority et al. (476 U.S. 19) is a pivotal 1986 United...
Sanctioning Frivolous Appeals: Insights from Bret Clark v. Florida

Sanctioning Frivolous Appeals: Insights from Bret Clark v. Florida

Date: Apr 29, 1986
Sanctioning Frivolous Appeals: Insights from Bret Clark v. Florida Introduction Bret Clark v. Florida (475 U.S. 1134) is a landmark case that underscores the judiciary's stance on frivolous...
Maine v. Jay G. Thibodeau: Clarifying Custodial Interrogation Standards

Maine v. Jay G. Thibodeau: Clarifying Custodial Interrogation Standards

Date: Apr 29, 1986
Maine v. Jay G. Thibodeau: Clarifying Custodial Interrogation Standards Introduction Maine v. Jay G. Thibodeau (475 U.S. 1144) is a pivotal case that delves into the complexities surrounding...
Enhancing Judicial Impartiality: Lessons from Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Lavoie et al.

Enhancing Judicial Impartiality: Lessons from Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Lavoie et al.

Date: Apr 23, 1986
Enhancing Judicial Impartiality: Lessons from Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Lavoie et al. Introduction The case of Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Lavoie et al., decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on April...
Substantial Relation Test for Tax-Exempt Organizations' Advertising Income Established in United States v. American College of Physicians

Substantial Relation Test for Tax-Exempt Organizations' Advertising Income Established in United States v. American College of Physicians

Date: Apr 23, 1986
Substantial Relation Test for Tax-Exempt Organizations' Advertising Income Established in United States v. American College of Physicians Introduction United States v. American College of Physicians...
SORENSON v. SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY ET AL.: Upholding Interception of Excess Earned-Income Credit for Child Support Obligations

SORENSON v. SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY ET AL.: Upholding Interception of Excess Earned-Income Credit for Child Support Obligations

Date: Apr 23, 1986
SORENSON v. SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY ET AL.: Upholding Interception of Excess Earned-Income Credit for Child Support Obligations Introduction SORENSON v. SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY ET AL. is a...
Standardized Probable Cause in Obscenity Seizures: New York v. P.J. Video, Inc.

Standardized Probable Cause in Obscenity Seizures: New York v. P.J. Video, Inc.

Date: Apr 23, 1986
Standardized Probable Cause in Obscenity Seizures: New York v. P.J. Video, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case New York v. P.J. Video, Inc., DBA Network Video, et al., the United States Supreme...
Denied Certiorari in Son H. Fleming v. Ralph Kemp: Implications for Sixth Amendment Rights

Denied Certiorari in Son H. Fleming v. Ralph Kemp: Implications for Sixth Amendment Rights

Date: Apr 22, 1986
Denied Certiorari in Son H. Fleming v. Ralph Kemp: Implications for Sixth Amendment Rights Introduction The case of Son H. Fleming v. Ralph Kemp, Superintendent, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification...
Standard of Review for FLSA Seaman Exemption Determinations: Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. Worthington et al.

Standard of Review for FLSA Seaman Exemption Determinations: Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. Worthington et al.

Date: Apr 22, 1986
Standard of Review for FLSA Seaman Exemption Determinations: Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. Worthington et al. Introduction Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. Worthington et al. is a landmark case decided by the...
Permissibility of Attorney's Fee Waivers in Civil Rights Class Actions: Supreme Court Upholds Judicial Discretion

Permissibility of Attorney's Fee Waivers in Civil Rights Class Actions: Supreme Court Upholds Judicial Discretion

Date: Apr 22, 1986
Permissibility of Attorney's Fee Waivers in Civil Rights Class Actions: Supreme Court Upholds Judicial Discretion Introduction In the landmark case of Evans v. Jeff D. et al. (475 U.S. 717, 1986),...
City of Los Angeles v. Heller: Clarifying Municipal Liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

City of Los Angeles v. Heller: Clarifying Municipal Liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Date: Apr 22, 1986
City of Los Angeles v. Heller: Clarifying Municipal Liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Introduction In the landmark case City of Los Angeles et al. v. Heller, 475 U.S. 796 (1986), the United States...
Balancing Defamation and Free Speech: Insights from Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps

Balancing Defamation and Free Speech: Insights from Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps

Date: Apr 22, 1986
Balancing Defamation and Free Speech: Insights from Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps Introduction Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc., et al. v. Hepps et al., 475 U.S. 767 (1986), is a landmark...
Delaware v. Van Arsdall: Reaffirming Harmless Error Analysis in Confrontation Clause Violations

Delaware v. Van Arsdall: Reaffirming Harmless Error Analysis in Confrontation Clause Violations

Date: Apr 8, 1986
Delaware v. Van Arsdall: Reaffirming Harmless Error Analysis in Confrontation Clause Violations Introduction Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673 (1986), marks a pivotal moment in the interpretation...
United States v. City of Fulton: Upholding Interim Hydroelectric Power Rate Increases

United States v. City of Fulton: Upholding Interim Hydroelectric Power Rate Increases

Date: Apr 8, 1986
United States v. City of Fulton: Upholding Interim Hydroelectric Power Rate Increases Introduction United States v. City of Fulton et al., 475 U.S. 657 (1986), is a landmark Supreme Court case that...
Arbitration Clause Interpretation in Collective Bargaining Agreements: Insights from ATT Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers of America

Arbitration Clause Interpretation in Collective Bargaining Agreements: Insights from ATT Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers of America

Date: Apr 8, 1986
Arbitration Clause Interpretation in Collective Bargaining Agreements: Insights from ATT Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers of America Case: ATT Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers...
Affirming the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel during Post-Arraignment Interrogations

Affirming the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel during Post-Arraignment Interrogations

Date: Apr 2, 1986
Affirming the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel during Post-Arraignment Interrogations Introduction Michigan v. Jackson, 475 U.S. 625 (1986), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Machinists Pre-emption Limits Municipal Authority in Franchise Renewals: Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles

Machinists Pre-emption Limits Municipal Authority in Franchise Renewals: Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles

Date: Apr 2, 1986
Machinists Pre-emption Limits Municipal Authority in Franchise Renewals: Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles Introduction Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles is a landmark...
Reaffirmation of Miranda Rights: Johnny Watkins Jr. v. Virginia

Reaffirmation of Miranda Rights: Johnny Watkins Jr. v. Virginia

Date: Apr 1, 1986
Reaffirmation of Miranda Rights: Johnny Watkins Jr. v. Virginia Introduction The case of Johnny Watkins Jr. v. Virginia, 475 U.S. 1099 (1986), presents a significant examination of the Fifth...
California v. Albert Greenwood Brown, Jr.: Reinforcing Eighth Amendment Protections in Capital Sentencing

California v. Albert Greenwood Brown, Jr.: Reinforcing Eighth Amendment Protections in Capital Sentencing

Date: Mar 28, 1986
California v. Albert Greenwood Brown, Jr.: Reinforcing Eighth Amendment Protections in Capital Sentencing Introduction California v. Albert Greenwood Brown, Jr., No. A-699, decided on March 27, 1986,...
Summary Judgment Standards in Antitrust Conspiracy Cases: Insights from Matsushita vs. Zenith

Summary Judgment Standards in Antitrust Conspiracy Cases: Insights from Matsushita vs. Zenith

Date: Mar 27, 1986
Summary Judgment Standards in Antitrust Conspiracy Cases: Insights from Matsushita vs. Zenith Introduction Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., et al. v. Zenith Radio Corp. et al. (475 U.S. 574,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert