Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Bowen v. City of New York: Equitable Tolling and Class Certification in Social Security Disability Claims

Bowen v. City of New York: Equitable Tolling and Class Certification in Social Security Disability Claims

Date: Jun 3, 1986
Bowen v. City of New York: Equitable Tolling and Class Certification in Social Security Disability Claims Introduction Bowen v. City of New York is a landmark 1986 decision by the United States...
Expanding Brady Rights: Monroe Dissent Highlights Post-Conviction Obligations

Expanding Brady Rights: Monroe Dissent Highlights Post-Conviction Obligations

Date: May 28, 1986
Expanding Brady Rights: Monroe Dissent Highlights Post-Conviction Obligations Introduction The case of Ronald S. Monroe v. Frank Blackburn, Warden (476 U.S. 1145) presents a pivotal moment in the...
Preemption of State Jurisdiction Under the NLRA: Insights from International Longshoremen's Association v. Davis

Preemption of State Jurisdiction Under the NLRA: Insights from International Longshoremen's Association v. Davis

Date: May 28, 1986
Preemption of State Jurisdiction Under the NLRA: Insights from International Longshoremen's Association v. Davis Introduction International Longshoremen's Association, AFL-CIO v. Davis, 476 U.S. 380...
Affirmation of Keogh: Private Shippers Denied Treble Damages in Antitrust Actions Involving ICC-Filed Rates

Affirmation of Keogh: Private Shippers Denied Treble Damages in Antitrust Actions Involving ICC-Filed Rates

Date: May 28, 1986
Affirmation of Keogh: Private Shippers Denied Treble Damages in Antitrust Actions Involving ICC-Filed Rates Introduction In the landmark case Square D Co. et al. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau,...
Louisiana PSC v. FCC: Supreme Court Upholds State Authority Over Depreciation in Intrastate Ratemaking

Louisiana PSC v. FCC: Supreme Court Upholds State Authority Over Depreciation in Intrastate Ratemaking

Date: May 28, 1986
Louisiana PSC v. FCC: Supreme Court Upholds State Authority Over Depreciation in Intrastate Ratemaking Introduction In the landmark case of Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal...
Standby Letters of Credit and FDIC Insurance: FDIC v. Philadelphia Gear Corp. Analysis

Standby Letters of Credit and FDIC Insurance: FDIC v. Philadelphia Gear Corp. Analysis

Date: May 28, 1986
Standby Letters of Credit and FDIC Insurance: FDIC v. Philadelphia Gear Corp. Analysis Introduction Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) v. Philadelphia Gear Corp., 476 U.S. 426 (1986), is a...
Limitations on Relitigating Habeas Claims Under Rule 9: Insights from STRAIGHT v. WAINWRIGHT

Limitations on Relitigating Habeas Claims Under Rule 9: Insights from STRAIGHT v. WAINWRIGHT

Date: May 21, 1986
Limitations on Relitigating Habeas Claims Under Rule 9: Insights from STRAIGHT v. WAINWRIGHT Introduction Ronald J. STRAIGHT v. WAINWRIGHT, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, 476 U.S. 1132...
Henderson v. United States: Clarifying Exclusions Under the Speedy Trial Act

Henderson v. United States: Clarifying Exclusions Under the Speedy Trial Act

Date: May 20, 1986
Henderson v. United States: Clarifying Exclusions Under the Speedy Trial Act Introduction Henderson et al. v. United States (476 U.S. 321, 1986) is a pivotal Supreme Court case that addressed...
Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Government Aerial Surveillance under the Fourth Amendment in DOW CHEMICAL CO. v. UNITED STATES

Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Government Aerial Surveillance under the Fourth Amendment in DOW CHEMICAL CO. v. UNITED STATES

Date: May 20, 1986
Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Government Aerial Surveillance under the Fourth Amendment in DOW CHEMICAL CO. v. UNITED STATES Introduction DOW CHEMICAL CO. v. UNITED STATES is a landmark case...
Reversing Race-Based Layoff Provisions: Insights from WYGANT ET AL. v. JACKSON BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL. (476 U.S. 267)

Reversing Race-Based Layoff Provisions: Insights from WYGANT ET AL. v. JACKSON BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL. (476 U.S. 267)

Date: May 20, 1986
Reversing Race-Based Layoff Provisions: Insights from WYGANT ET AL. v. JACKSON BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL. Introduction WYGANT ET AL. v. JACKSON BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL., 476 U.S. 267 (1986), is a...
California v. Ciarralo: A New Precedent on Aerial Surveillance and Fourth Amendment Rights

California v. Ciarralo: A New Precedent on Aerial Surveillance and Fourth Amendment Rights

Date: May 20, 1986
California v. Ciarralo: A New Precedent on Aerial Surveillance and Fourth Amendment Rights Introduction California v. Ciarralo, 476 U.S. 207 (1986), is a significant Supreme Court case that addressed...
Preserving the Secretary's Authority Beyond Statutory Deadlines: Brock v. Pierce County

Preserving the Secretary's Authority Beyond Statutory Deadlines: Brock v. Pierce County

Date: May 20, 1986
Preserving the Secretary's Authority Beyond Statutory Deadlines: Brock v. Pierce County Introduction Brock, Secretary of Labor v. Pierce County is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Remarriage and Survivor Benefits: Upholding Congressional Discretion in Social Security Act Amendments

Remarriage and Survivor Benefits: Upholding Congressional Discretion in Social Security Act Amendments

Date: May 20, 1986
Remarriage and Survivor Benefits: Upholding Congressional Discretion in Social Security Act Amendments Introduction BOWEN, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES v. OWENS ET AL., 476 U.S. 340 (1986),...
Double Jeopardy Protection Bars Prosecution Appeals After Demurrer: SMALIS v. Pennsylvania

Double Jeopardy Protection Bars Prosecution Appeals After Demurrer: SMALIS v. Pennsylvania

Date: May 6, 1986
Double Jeopardy Protection Bars Prosecution Appeals After Demurrer: SMALIS v. Pennsylvania Introduction SMALIS ET AL. v. PENNSYLVANIA (476 U.S. 140, 1986) is a landmark decision by the United States...
Death-Qualified Juries and the Sixth Amendment: Insights from Lockhart v. McCree

Death-Qualified Juries and the Sixth Amendment: Insights from Lockhart v. McCree

Date: May 6, 1986
Death-Qualified Juries and the Sixth Amendment: Insights from Lockhart v. McCree Introduction Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections v. McCree, 476 U.S. 162 (1986), is a landmark...
Double Jeopardy and Death Penalty Sentencing: The POLAND v. ARIZONA Decision

Double Jeopardy and Death Penalty Sentencing: The POLAND v. ARIZONA Decision

Date: May 6, 1986
Double Jeopardy and Death Penalty Sentencing: The POLAND v. ARIZONA Decision Introduction In the landmark case POLAND v. ARIZONA, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on May 5, 1986, the Court addressed...
Establishing Rigorous Standards for Judicial Standing: Insights from Diamond v. Charles

Establishing Rigorous Standards for Judicial Standing: Insights from Diamond v. Charles

Date: May 1, 1986
Establishing Rigorous Standards for Judicial Standing: Insights from Diamond v. Charles Introduction Diamond v. Charles is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case decided on April 30, 1986. The...
Batson v. Kentucky: Establishing Protections Against Racial Discrimination in Jury Selection

Batson v. Kentucky: Establishing Protections Against Racial Discrimination in Jury Selection

Date: May 1, 1986
Batson v. Kentucky: Establishing Protections Against Racial Discrimination in Jury Selection Introduction Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Turner v. Murray: Affirming the Right to Racial Bias Inquiry in Capital Sentencing

Turner v. Murray: Affirming the Right to Racial Bias Inquiry in Capital Sentencing

Date: May 1, 1986
Turner v. Murray: Affirming the Right to Racial Bias Inquiry in Capital Sentencing Introduction Turner v. Murray, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections is a landmark 1986 decision by the U.S....
Skipper v. South Carolina: Expanding the Scope of Mitigating Evidence in Capital Sentencing

Skipper v. South Carolina: Expanding the Scope of Mitigating Evidence in Capital Sentencing

Date: Apr 30, 1986
Skipper v. South Carolina: Expanding the Scope of Mitigating Evidence in Capital Sentencing Introduction Skipper v. South Carolina, 476 U.S. 1 (1986), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert