Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Reevaluating the Age of Onset in Intellectual Disability Claims: A Commentary on Wesley Paul Coonce, Jr. v. United States

Reevaluating the Age of Onset in Intellectual Disability Claims: A Commentary on Wesley Paul Coonce, Jr. v. United States

Date: Nov 2, 2021
Reevaluating the Age of Onset in Intellectual Disability Claims: A Commentary on Wesley Paul Coonce, Jr. v. United States Introduction Wesley Paul Coonce, Jr. v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 25 (2021),...
Reaffirming Liberal Construction of Pro Se Habeas Petitions: RonRico Simmons, Jr. v. United States

Reaffirming Liberal Construction of Pro Se Habeas Petitions: RonRico Simmons, Jr. v. United States

Date: Nov 2, 2021
Reaffirming Liberal Construction of Pro Se Habeas Petitions: RonRico Simmons, Jr. v. United States Introduction RonRico Simmons, Jr. v. United States is a pivotal case that underscores the Supreme...
Supreme Court Denies Injunctive Relief Against Maine's COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate for Healthcare Workers

Supreme Court Denies Injunctive Relief Against Maine's COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate for Healthcare Workers

Date: Oct 30, 2021
Supreme Court Denies Injunctive Relief Against Maine's COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate for Healthcare Workers Introduction In the landmark case 595 U.S. __ (2021), the Supreme Court of the United States...
Supreme Court Denies Injunctive Relief in Maine's COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Case

Supreme Court Denies Injunctive Relief in Maine's COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Case

Date: Oct 30, 2021
Supreme Court Denies Injunctive Relief in Maine's COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Case Introduction In the landmark case of John DOES 1–3, et al. v. Janet T. Mills, Governor of Maine, et al., the Supreme...
United States v. Texas: Supreme Court's Decision to Defer on S.B. 8 Enforcement

United States v. Texas: Supreme Court's Decision to Defer on S.B. 8 Enforcement

Date: Oct 23, 2021
United States v. Texas: Supreme Court's Decision to Defer on S.B. 8 Enforcement 1. Introduction United States v. Texas, et al., No. 21A85 (21-588), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of the United...
Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in United States v. Texas: Implications for S.B. 8 Abortion Restrictions

Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in United States v. Texas: Implications for S.B. 8 Abortion Restrictions

Date: Oct 23, 2021
Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in United States v. Texas: Implications for S.B. 8 Abortion Restrictions Introduction United States v. Texas, 595 U.S. ____ (2021) represents a pivotal moment in the...
Supreme Court Grants Qualified Immunity in Rivas-Villegas v. Cortesluna: Implications for Police Use of Force

Supreme Court Grants Qualified Immunity in Rivas-Villegas v. Cortesluna: Implications for Police Use of Force

Date: Oct 19, 2021
Supreme Court Grants Qualified Immunity in Rivas-Villegas v. Cortesluna: Implications for Police Use of Force Introduction The case of Daniel Rivas-Villegas v. Ramon Cortesluna (142 S. Ct. 4),...
Supreme Court Upholds Qualified Immunity in Use of Force Case

Supreme Court Upholds Qualified Immunity in Use of Force Case

Date: Oct 19, 2021
Supreme Court Upholds Qualified Immunity in Use of Force Case Introduction In the landmark case of City of Tahlequah, Oklahoma, et al. v. Austin P. Bond, as Special Administrator of the Estate of...
Supreme Court Denies Injunctive Relief in Whole Woman’s Health v. Austin Reeve Jackson: Implications for Abortion Law Enforcement

Supreme Court Denies Injunctive Relief in Whole Woman’s Health v. Austin Reeve Jackson: Implications for Abortion Law Enforcement

Date: Sep 2, 2021
Supreme Court Denies Injunctive Relief in Whole Woman’s Health v. Austin Reeve Jackson: Implications for Abortion Law Enforcement Introduction The case of Whole Woman's Health et al. v. Austin Reeve...
Supreme Court Establishes Limits on CDC's Authority to Impose Eviction Moratorium

Supreme Court Establishes Limits on CDC's Authority to Impose Eviction Moratorium

Date: Aug 27, 2021
Supreme Court Establishes Limits on CDC's Authority to Impose Eviction Moratorium Introduction The Supreme Court of the United States addressed a pivotal case involving the Alabama Association of...
Reevaluating the "Actual Malice" Standard in Defamation Law: Insights from SHKELZEN BERISHA v. GUY LAWSON

Reevaluating the "Actual Malice" Standard in Defamation Law: Insights from SHKELZEN BERISHA v. GUY LAWSON

Date: Jul 3, 2021
Reevaluating the "Actual Malice" Standard in Defamation Law: Insights from SHKELZEN BERISHA v. GUY LAWSON, ET AL. 594 U.S. __ (2021) Introduction The landmark case Shkelzen Berisha v. Guy Lawson, et...
Reaffirming the Presumption of Effective Counsel: Supreme Court Sets New Standard in Dunn v. Reeves

Reaffirming the Presumption of Effective Counsel: Supreme Court Sets New Standard in Dunn v. Reeves

Date: Jul 3, 2021
Reaffirming the Presumption of Effective Counsel: Supreme Court Sets New Standard in Dunn v. Reeves Introduction Dunn v. Reeves, 141 S. Ct. 2405 (2021), is a landmark decision by the United States...
RLUIPA and Religious Exemptions: Analyzing AMOS MAST v. FILLMORE COUNTY Decision

RLUIPA and Religious Exemptions: Analyzing AMOS MAST v. FILLMORE COUNTY Decision

Date: Jul 3, 2021
RLUIPA and Religious Exemptions: Analyzing Amos Mast et al. v. Fillmore County, Minnesota, et al. Introduction The case of Amos Mast et al. v. Fillmore County, Minnesota, et al. addresses the...
Arizona Voting Regulations Upheld: A New Precedent in Voting Rights Law

Arizona Voting Regulations Upheld: A New Precedent in Voting Rights Law

Date: Jul 2, 2021
Arizona Voting Regulations Upheld: A New Precedent in Voting Rights Law Introduction In the landmark decision of Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., Petitioners v. Democratic National...
BRNOVICH v. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE: Upholding Arizona's Voting Regulations under VRA §2

BRNOVICH v. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE: Upholding Arizona's Voting Regulations under VRA §2

Date: Jul 2, 2021
BRNOVICH v. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE: Upholding Arizona's Voting Regulations under VRA §2 Introduction In the landmark case Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al. v. Democratic National...
Strict First Amendment Protection for Charitable Donor Anonymity: A New Precedent

Strict First Amendment Protection for Charitable Donor Anonymity: A New Precedent

Date: Jul 2, 2021
Strict First Amendment Protection for Charitable Donor Anonymity: A New Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Rob Bonta, the Supreme Court of the...
Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta: Supreme Court Sets New Standard for Charitable Donor Disclosure under First Amendment

Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta: Supreme Court Sets New Standard for Charitable Donor Disclosure under First Amendment

Date: Jul 2, 2021
Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta: Supreme Court Sets New Standard for Charitable Donor Disclosure under First Amendment Introduction Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Rob Bonta is a...
Delegation of Federal Eminent Domain Power to Private Parties: PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey Establishes Precedent

Delegation of Federal Eminent Domain Power to Private Parties: PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey Establishes Precedent

Date: Jun 30, 2021
Delegation of Federal Eminent Domain Power to Private Parties: PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey Establishes Precedent Introduction PennEast Pipeline Co., LLC v. New Jersey et al. is a landmark...
Refining Assignor Estoppel in Patent Law: Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc.

Refining Assignor Estoppel in Patent Law: Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc.

Date: Jun 30, 2021
Refining Assignor Estoppel in Patent Law: Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc. Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc. (141 S. Ct. 2298, 2021)...
Supreme Court Upholds Pipeline Company's Authority to Condemn State-Owned Rights-of-Way Under the Natural Gas Act

Supreme Court Upholds Pipeline Company's Authority to Condemn State-Owned Rights-of-Way Under the Natural Gas Act

Date: Jun 30, 2021
Supreme Court Upholds Pipeline Company's Authority to Condemn State-Owned Rights-of-Way Under the Natural Gas Act Introduction In the landmark case Penneast Pipeline Company, LLC v. New Jersey (141...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert