Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Confrontation Clause Reinforced: Hemphill v. New York Establishes Strict Adherence to Sixth Amendment Rights

Confrontation Clause Reinforced: Hemphill v. New York Establishes Strict Adherence to Sixth Amendment Rights

Date: Jan 21, 2022
Confrontation Clause Reinforced: Hemphill v. New York Establishes Strict Adherence to Sixth Amendment Rights Introduction In the landmark case of Darrell Hemphill v. New York, 595 U.S. ____ (2022),...
Confrontation Clause Reinforced: Hemphill v. New York Sets New Precedent

Confrontation Clause Reinforced: Hemphill v. New York Sets New Precedent

Date: Jan 21, 2022
Confrontation Clause Reinforced: Hemphill v. New York Sets New Precedent Introduction Darrell Hemphill v. New York is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, delivered on...
Supreme Court Denies Mandamus in Whole Woman's Health: Implications for Abortion Rights Enforcement

Supreme Court Denies Mandamus in Whole Woman's Health: Implications for Abortion Rights Enforcement

Date: Jan 21, 2022
Supreme Court Denies Mandamus in Whole Woman's Health: Implications for Abortion Rights Enforcement Introduction In the landmark case IN RE WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH, ET AL. (142 S. Ct. 701), the Supreme...
Babcock v. Kijakazi: Clarifying the Scope of the Uniformed Services Exception in Windfall Elimination Provisions

Babcock v. Kijakazi: Clarifying the Scope of the Uniformed Services Exception in Windfall Elimination Provisions

Date: Jan 14, 2022
Babcock v. Kijakazi: Clarifying the Scope of the Uniformed Services Exception in Windfall Elimination Provisions Introduction Babcock v. Kijakazi is a significant Supreme Court decision that...
Supreme Court Upholds HHS Authority to Mandate COVID-19 Vaccinations for Medicare and Medicaid Facilities

Supreme Court Upholds HHS Authority to Mandate COVID-19 Vaccinations for Medicare and Medicaid Facilities

Date: Jan 14, 2022
Supreme Court Upholds HHS Authority to Mandate COVID-19 Vaccinations for Medicare and Medicaid Facilities Introduction In the pivotal case of Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et...
Supreme Court Reinforces Major Questions Doctrine, Limiting OSHA's Vaccine Mandate Authority

Supreme Court Reinforces Major Questions Doctrine, Limiting OSHA's Vaccine Mandate Authority

Date: Jan 14, 2022
Supreme Court Reinforces Major Questions Doctrine, Limiting OSHA's Vaccine Mandate Authority Introduction In the landmark case National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor, the...
Supreme Court Upholds Vaccine Mandate Without Religious Exemptions: Implications for First Amendment Rights

Supreme Court Upholds Vaccine Mandate Without Religious Exemptions: Implications for First Amendment Rights

Date: Dec 14, 2021
Supreme Court Upholds Vaccine Mandate Without Religious Exemptions: Implications for First Amendment Rights Introduction The Supreme Court of the United States adjudicated a significant case...
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson: Supreme Court Limits Pre-Enforcement Constitutional Challenges to Texas Heartbeat Act

Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson: Supreme Court Limits Pre-Enforcement Constitutional Challenges to Texas Heartbeat Act

Date: Dec 11, 2021
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson: Supreme Court Limits Pre-Enforcement Constitutional Challenges to Texas Heartbeat Act Introduction In the landmark case Whole Woman's Health, et al. v. Austin Reeve...
Supreme Court Establishes Equitable Apportionment as Sole Remedy for Interstate Groundwater Disputes

Supreme Court Establishes Equitable Apportionment as Sole Remedy for Interstate Groundwater Disputes

Date: Nov 23, 2021
Supreme Court Establishes Equitable Apportionment as Sole Remedy for Interstate Groundwater Disputes Introduction The Supreme Court of the United States, in the landmark case State of Mississippi v....
Equitable Apportionment Applied to Interstate Aquifers: Insights from State of Mississippi v. Tennessee

Equitable Apportionment Applied to Interstate Aquifers: Insights from State of Mississippi v. Tennessee

Date: Nov 23, 2021
Equitable Apportionment Applied to Interstate Aquifers: Insights from State of Mississippi v. Tennessee Introduction The Supreme Court case, State of Mississippi v. Tennessee, City of Memphis,...
Reevaluating the Age of Onset in Intellectual Disability Claims: A Commentary on Wesley Paul Coonce, Jr. v. United States

Reevaluating the Age of Onset in Intellectual Disability Claims: A Commentary on Wesley Paul Coonce, Jr. v. United States

Date: Nov 2, 2021
Reevaluating the Age of Onset in Intellectual Disability Claims: A Commentary on Wesley Paul Coonce, Jr. v. United States Introduction Wesley Paul Coonce, Jr. v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 25 (2021),...
Reaffirming Liberal Construction of Pro Se Habeas Petitions: RonRico Simmons, Jr. v. United States

Reaffirming Liberal Construction of Pro Se Habeas Petitions: RonRico Simmons, Jr. v. United States

Date: Nov 2, 2021
Reaffirming Liberal Construction of Pro Se Habeas Petitions: RonRico Simmons, Jr. v. United States Introduction RonRico Simmons, Jr. v. United States is a pivotal case that underscores the Supreme...
Supreme Court Denies Injunctive Relief Against Maine's COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate for Healthcare Workers

Supreme Court Denies Injunctive Relief Against Maine's COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate for Healthcare Workers

Date: Oct 30, 2021
Supreme Court Denies Injunctive Relief Against Maine's COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate for Healthcare Workers Introduction In the landmark case 595 U.S. __ (2021), the Supreme Court of the United States...
Supreme Court Denies Injunctive Relief in Maine's COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Case

Supreme Court Denies Injunctive Relief in Maine's COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Case

Date: Oct 30, 2021
Supreme Court Denies Injunctive Relief in Maine's COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Case Introduction In the landmark case of John DOES 1–3, et al. v. Janet T. Mills, Governor of Maine, et al., the Supreme...
United States v. Texas: Supreme Court's Decision to Defer on S.B. 8 Enforcement

United States v. Texas: Supreme Court's Decision to Defer on S.B. 8 Enforcement

Date: Oct 23, 2021
United States v. Texas: Supreme Court's Decision to Defer on S.B. 8 Enforcement 1. Introduction United States v. Texas, et al., No. 21A85 (21-588), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of the United...
Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in United States v. Texas: Implications for S.B. 8 Abortion Restrictions

Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in United States v. Texas: Implications for S.B. 8 Abortion Restrictions

Date: Oct 23, 2021
Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in United States v. Texas: Implications for S.B. 8 Abortion Restrictions Introduction United States v. Texas, 595 U.S. ____ (2021) represents a pivotal moment in the...
Supreme Court Grants Qualified Immunity in Rivas-Villegas v. Cortesluna: Implications for Police Use of Force

Supreme Court Grants Qualified Immunity in Rivas-Villegas v. Cortesluna: Implications for Police Use of Force

Date: Oct 19, 2021
Supreme Court Grants Qualified Immunity in Rivas-Villegas v. Cortesluna: Implications for Police Use of Force Introduction The case of Daniel Rivas-Villegas v. Ramon Cortesluna (142 S. Ct. 4),...
Supreme Court Upholds Qualified Immunity in Use of Force Case

Supreme Court Upholds Qualified Immunity in Use of Force Case

Date: Oct 19, 2021
Supreme Court Upholds Qualified Immunity in Use of Force Case Introduction In the landmark case of City of Tahlequah, Oklahoma, et al. v. Austin P. Bond, as Special Administrator of the Estate of...
Supreme Court Denies Injunctive Relief in Whole Woman’s Health v. Austin Reeve Jackson: Implications for Abortion Law Enforcement

Supreme Court Denies Injunctive Relief in Whole Woman’s Health v. Austin Reeve Jackson: Implications for Abortion Law Enforcement

Date: Sep 2, 2021
Supreme Court Denies Injunctive Relief in Whole Woman’s Health v. Austin Reeve Jackson: Implications for Abortion Law Enforcement Introduction The case of Whole Woman's Health et al. v. Austin Reeve...
Supreme Court Establishes Limits on CDC's Authority to Impose Eviction Moratorium

Supreme Court Establishes Limits on CDC's Authority to Impose Eviction Moratorium

Date: Aug 27, 2021
Supreme Court Establishes Limits on CDC's Authority to Impose Eviction Moratorium Introduction The Supreme Court of the United States addressed a pivotal case involving the Alabama Association of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert