Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Mesa v. California: Federal Defense Requirement for Removal of State Criminal Prosecutions

Mesa v. California: Federal Defense Requirement for Removal of State Criminal Prosecutions

Date: Feb 22, 1989
Mesa v. California: Federal Defense Requirement for Removal of State Criminal Prosecutions Introduction The case of Mesa et al. v. California, 489 U.S. 121 (1989), addresses the scope of federal...
BLANCHARD v. BERGERON: Expanding the Scope of Reasonable Attorney’s Fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988

BLANCHARD v. BERGERON: Expanding the Scope of Reasonable Attorney’s Fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Date: Feb 22, 1989
BLANCHARD v. BERGERON: Expanding the Scope of Reasonable Attorney’s Fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 Introduction BLANCHARD v. BERGERON et al., 489 U.S. 87 (1989), is a seminal United States Supreme Court...
Fort Wayne Books, Inc. v. Indiana: Upholding RICO for Obscenity Offenses While Restricting Pretrial Seizures

Fort Wayne Books, Inc. v. Indiana: Upholding RICO for Obscenity Offenses While Restricting Pretrial Seizures

Date: Feb 22, 1989
Fort Wayne Books, Inc. v. Indiana: Upholding RICO for Obscenity Offenses While Restricting Pretrial Seizures Introduction Fort Wayne Books, Inc. v. Indiana, 489 U.S. 46 (1989), is a pivotal United...
Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Limiting In Forma Pauperis Petitions Due to Repeated Frivolous Filings - IN RE McDONALD

Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Limiting In Forma Pauperis Petitions Due to Repeated Frivolous Filings - IN RE McDONALD

Date: Feb 22, 1989
Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Limiting In Forma Pauperis Petitions Due to Repeated Frivolous Filings - IN RE McDONALD Introduction IN RE McDONALD, 489 U.S. 180 (1989), is a pivotal Supreme Court...
Texas Monthly, Inc. v. Bullock: Limits on Religious Tax Exemptions Under the Establishment Clause

Texas Monthly, Inc. v. Bullock: Limits on Religious Tax Exemptions Under the Establishment Clause

Date: Feb 22, 1989
Texas Monthly, Inc. v. Bullock: Limits on Religious Tax Exemptions Under the Establishment Clause Introduction Texas Monthly, Inc. v. Bullock, 489 U.S. 1 (1989), is a landmark United States Supreme...
Federal Patent Preemption Over State Anti-Duplicating Laws: Bonito Boats Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats Inc.

Federal Patent Preemption Over State Anti-Duplicating Laws: Bonito Boats Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats Inc.

Date: Feb 22, 1989
Federal Patent Preemption Over State Anti-Duplicating Laws: Bonito Boats Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats Inc. Introduction Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc. (489 U.S. 141, 1989) is a...
Foreign Sovereign Immunity Under the FSIA: Insights from Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.

Foreign Sovereign Immunity Under the FSIA: Insights from Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.

Date: Jan 24, 1989
Foreign Sovereign Immunity Under the FSIA: Insights from Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp. Introduction Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp., 488 U.S. 428 (1989), is a...
Warrantless Aerial Surveillance and Reasonable Expectation of Privacy: An Analysis of Florida v. Riley

Warrantless Aerial Surveillance and Reasonable Expectation of Privacy: An Analysis of Florida v. Riley

Date: Jan 24, 1989
Warrantless Aerial Surveillance and Reasonable Expectation of Privacy: An Analysis of Florida v. Riley Introduction Florida v. Riley, 488 U.S. 445 (1989), is a landmark United States Supreme Court...
Strict Scrutiny Applied: The City of Richmond v. Croson Decision

Strict Scrutiny Applied: The City of Richmond v. Croson Decision

Date: Jan 24, 1989
Strict Scrutiny Applied: The City of Richmond v. Croson Decision Introduction In City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469 (1989), the United States Supreme Court addressed the...
Foreclosure of Double Jeopardy Claims by Guilty Pleas in Conspiracy Cases: UNITED STATES v. BROCE et al.

Foreclosure of Double Jeopardy Claims by Guilty Pleas in Conspiracy Cases: UNITED STATES v. BROCE et al.

Date: Jan 24, 1989
Foreclosure of Double Jeopardy Claims by Guilty Pleas in Conspiracy Cases: UNITED STATES v. BROCE et al. Introduction UNITED STATES v. BROCE et al., 488 U.S. 563 (1989), is a landmark Supreme Court...
Hamilton v. California: Mandating Death Penalty and the Imperative for Individualized Sentencing

Hamilton v. California: Mandating Death Penalty and the Imperative for Individualized Sentencing

Date: Jan 24, 1989
Hamilton v. California: Mandating Death Penalty and the Imperative for Individualized Sentencing Introduction Hamilton v. California (488 U.S. 1047, 1989) is a pivotal case that underscores the...
Equal Protection and Uniform Property Taxation: Supreme Court's Ruling in Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Webster County

Equal Protection and Uniform Property Taxation: Supreme Court's Ruling in Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Webster County

Date: Jan 19, 1989
Equal Protection and Uniform Property Taxation: Supreme Court's Ruling in Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Webster County Introduction The case of Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. County Commission...
Mistretta v. United States: Affirmation of Sentencing Guidelines and Separation of Powers

Mistretta v. United States: Affirmation of Sentencing Guidelines and Separation of Powers

Date: Jan 19, 1989
Mistretta v. United States: Affirmation of Sentencing Guidelines and Separation of Powers Introduction Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361 (1989), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that...
Protection of Elected Union Officials Under the LMRDA: Insights from Sheet Metal Workers' International Assn. v. Lynn

Protection of Elected Union Officials Under the LMRDA: Insights from Sheet Metal Workers' International Assn. v. Lynn

Date: Jan 19, 1989
Protection of Elected Union Officials Under the LMRDA: Insights from Sheet Metal Workers' International Assn. v. Lynn Introduction Sheet Metal Workers' International Assn. ET AL. v. Lynn, 488 U.S....
Duquesne Light Co. v. Barasch: State Utility Regulation on Cost Recovery and the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause

Duquesne Light Co. v. Barasch: State Utility Regulation on Cost Recovery and the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause

Date: Jan 12, 1989
Duquesne Light Co. v. Barasch: State Utility Regulation on Cost Recovery and the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause Introduction Duquesne Light Co. et al. v. Barasch et al., 488 U.S. 299 (1989), is a...
Reed v. United Transportation Union: State Residual Personal Injury Statutes Govern LMRDA §101(a)(2) Claims

Reed v. United Transportation Union: State Residual Personal Injury Statutes Govern LMRDA §101(a)(2) Claims

Date: Jan 12, 1989
Reed v. United Transportation Union: State Residual Personal Injury Statutes Govern LMRDA §101(a)(2) Claims Introduction Reed v. United Transportation Union ET AL., 488 U.S. 319 (1989), is a pivotal...
PERRY v. LEEKE: Defining the Boundaries of the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel During Defendant Testimony

PERRY v. LEEKE: Defining the Boundaries of the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel During Defendant Testimony

Date: Jan 11, 1989
PERRY v. LEEKE: Defining the Boundaries of the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel During Defendant Testimony Introduction PERRY v. LEEKE, 488 U.S. 272 (1989), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that...
Residual State Statutes of Limitations Applied to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims: Owens v. Okure

Residual State Statutes of Limitations Applied to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims: Owens v. Okure

Date: Jan 11, 1989
Application of Residual State Statutes of Limitations to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims: Owens v. Okure Introduction Owens et al. v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235 (1989) is a landmark decision by the United States...
Goldberg v. Sweet: Upholding Illinois' Telecommunications Tax Under the Commerce Clause

Goldberg v. Sweet: Upholding Illinois' Telecommunications Tax Under the Commerce Clause

Date: Jan 11, 1989
Goldberg v. Sweet: Upholding Illinois' Telecommunications Tax Under the Commerce Clause Introduction The Supreme Court case Goldberg et al. v. Sweet, Director, Illinois Department of Revenue, et al....
Broad Admissibility of Evaluative Conclusions under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(8)(C) – Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey

Broad Admissibility of Evaluative Conclusions under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(8)(C) – Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey

Date: Dec 13, 1988
Broad Admissibility of Evaluative Conclusions under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(8)(C) – Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey Introduction Beech Aircraft Corporation v. Rainey et al. (488 U.S. 153, 1988)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert