Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Fourth Amendment Implications in Administrative Drug Testing: Analysis of NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION v. VON RAAB

Fourth Amendment Implications in Administrative Drug Testing: Analysis of NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION v. VON RAAB

Date: Mar 22, 1989
Fourth Amendment Implications in Administrative Drug Testing: Analysis of NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION v. VON RAAB Introduction The case of National Treasury Employees Union et al. v. Von Raab,...
Fourth Amendment Validation of FRA's Drug and Alcohol Testing Regulations for Railroad Employees

Fourth Amendment Validation of FRA's Drug and Alcohol Testing Regulations for Railroad Employees

Date: Mar 22, 1989
Fourth Amendment Validation of FRA's Drug and Alcohol Testing Regulations for Railroad Employees Introduction In the landmark case of SKINNER, SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION, ET AL. v. RAILWAY LABOR...
Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas: DUI Qualifies as a Petty Offense Under the Sixth Amendment

Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas: DUI Qualifies as a Petty Offense Under the Sixth Amendment

Date: Mar 7, 1989
Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas: DUI Qualifies as a Petty Offense Under the Sixth Amendment Introduction The Supreme Court case Blanton et al. v. City of North Las Vegas, Nevada (489 U.S. 538,...
No Private Cause of Action Under Title VII of CSRA for Union's Breach of Duty of Fair Representation

No Private Cause of Action Under Title VII of CSRA for Union's Breach of Duty of Fair Representation

Date: Mar 7, 1989
No Private Cause of Action Under Title VII of CSRA for Union's Breach of Duty of Fair Representation Introduction KARAHALIOS v. NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1263 is a landmark 1989...
Enforceability of State Arbitration Rules through Choice-of-Law Clauses under the FAA: Insights from Volt v. Stanford

Enforceability of State Arbitration Rules through Choice-of-Law Clauses under the FAA: Insights from Volt v. Stanford

Date: Mar 7, 1989
Enforceability of State Arbitration Rules through Choice-of-Law Clauses under the Federal Arbitration Act: Insights from Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior...
Residency Requirements for Bar Admission in the Virgin Islands Violate Privileges and Immunities Clause

Residency Requirements for Bar Admission in the Virgin Islands Violate Privileges and Immunities Clause

Date: Mar 7, 1989
Residency Requirements for Bar Admission in the Virgin Islands Violate Privileges and Immunities Clause Introduction In the landmark case of Barnard, Chairman of the Committee of Bar Examiners of the...
Upholding State Regulation of Gas Production under NGA: Northwest Central Pipeline Corp. v. KCC of Kansas

Upholding State Regulation of Gas Production under NGA: Northwest Central Pipeline Corp. v. KCC of Kansas

Date: Mar 7, 1989
Upholding State Regulation of Gas Production under NGA: Northwest Central Pipeline Corp. v. KCC of Kansas Introduction In Northwest Central Pipeline Corp. v. State Corporation Commission of Kansas et...
Supreme Court Upholds Employers' Right Not to Displace Junior Crossovers in Post-Strike Reinstatement

Supreme Court Upholds Employers' Right Not to Displace Junior Crossovers in Post-Strike Reinstatement

Date: Mar 1, 1989
Supreme Court Upholds Employers' Right Not to Displace Junior Crossovers in Post-Strike Reinstatement Introduction In the landmark case of Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Independent Federation of...
Establishing the "Deliberate Indifference" Standard for Municipal Liability under §1983 in City of Canton v. Harris

Establishing the "Deliberate Indifference" Standard for Municipal Liability under §1983 in City of Canton v. Harris

Date: Mar 1, 1989
Establishing the "Deliberate Indifference" Standard for Municipal Liability under §1983 in City of Canton v. Harris Introduction City of Canton, Ohio v. Harris et al., 489 U.S. 378 (1989), represents...
United States v. Stuart ET AL.: Enforcing Treaty-Based IRS Summons Without Prior Criminal Investigation Analogues

United States v. Stuart ET AL.: Enforcing Treaty-Based IRS Summons Without Prior Criminal Investigation Analogues

Date: Mar 1, 1989
United States v. Stuart ET AL.: Enforcing Treaty-Based IRS Summons Without Prior Criminal Investigation Analogues Introduction United States v. Stuart ET AL., 489 U.S. 353 (1989), is a significant...
Procedural Default and Caldwell Claims in Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from Dugger v. Adams

Procedural Default and Caldwell Claims in Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from Dugger v. Adams

Date: Mar 1, 1989
Procedural Default and Caldwell Claims in Federal Habeas Corpus: Insights from Dugger v. Adams Introduction Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. v. Adams is a pivotal U.S....
CASTILLE v. PEOPLES: Reinforcing Exhaustion Requirements for Federal Habeas Corpus

CASTILLE v. PEOPLES: Reinforcing Exhaustion Requirements for Federal Habeas Corpus

Date: Feb 23, 1989
CASTILLE v. PEOPLES: Reinforcing Exhaustion Requirements for Federal Habeas Corpus Introduction CASTILLE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, ET AL. v. PEOPLES (489 U.S. 346, 1989) is a...
Political Parties' Freedom of Speech and Association: Supreme Court Invalidates California’s Primary Endorsement Ban

Political Parties' Freedom of Speech and Association: Supreme Court Invalidates California’s Primary Endorsement Ban

Date: Feb 23, 1989
Political Parties' Freedom of Speech and Association: Supreme Court Invalidates California’s Primary Endorsement Ban Introduction EU, Secretary of State of California, et al. v. San Francisco County...
State's Duty to Protect Individuals: A Comprehensive Analysis of DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services

State's Duty to Protect Individuals: A Comprehensive Analysis of DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services

Date: Feb 23, 1989
State's Duty to Protect Individuals: A Comprehensive Analysis of DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services Introduction DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services,...
Postpetition Interest on Nonconsensual Oversecured Claims Under Bankruptcy Code §506(b)

Postpetition Interest on Nonconsensual Oversecured Claims Under Bankruptcy Code §506(b)

Date: Feb 23, 1989
Postpetition Interest on Nonconsensual Oversecured Claims Under Bankruptcy Code §506(b) Introduction In the landmark case United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc., 489 U.S. 235 (1989), the United...
Retroactivity of Batson and Fair Cross Section Requirements Affirmed – TEAGUE v. LANE

Retroactivity of Batson and Fair Cross Section Requirements Affirmed – TEAGUE v. LANE

Date: Feb 23, 1989
Retroactivity of Batson and Fair Cross Section Requirements Affirmed – TEAGUE v. LANE Introduction TEAGUE v. LANE, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections, et al. (489 U.S. 288, 1989) is a...
Extension of the 'Plain Statement' Rule to Federal Habeas Corpus Review in HARRIS v. REED

Extension of the 'Plain Statement' Rule to Federal Habeas Corpus Review in HARRIS v. REED

Date: Feb 23, 1989
Extension of the "Plain Statement" Rule to Federal Habeas Corpus Review in HARRIS v. REED Introduction HARRIS v. REED, Warden, et al., 489 U.S. 255 (1989), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court...
Deliberate Indifference in Prison Security: Analyzing Robert Dudley v. John Stubbs

Deliberate Indifference in Prison Security: Analyzing Robert Dudley v. John Stubbs

Date: Feb 22, 1989
Deliberate Indifference in Prison Security: Analyzing Robert Dudley v. John Stubbs Introduction Robert Dudley v. John Stubbs, 489 U.S. 1034 (1989), is a significant case addressing the application of...
Firestone v. Bruch: Establishing De Novo Review and Defining 'Participant' under ERISA

Firestone v. Bruch: Establishing De Novo Review and Defining 'Participant' under ERISA

Date: Feb 22, 1989
Firestone v. Bruch: Establishing De Novo Review and Defining 'Participant' under ERISA Introduction Firestone Tire Rubber Co. et al. v. Bruch et al., 489 U.S. 101 (1989), is a seminal United States...
Prejudgment Interest as a Rule 59(e) Motion: Insights from Osterneck v. Ernst Whinney

Prejudgment Interest as a Rule 59(e) Motion: Insights from Osterneck v. Ernst Whinney

Date: Feb 22, 1989
Prejudgment Interest as a Rule 59(e) Motion: Insights from Osterneck v. Ernst Whinney Introduction Osterneck et al. v. Ernst Whinney, 489 U.S. 169 (1989), presents a pivotal ruling by the United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert