Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Supreme Court Clarifies Nonrequirement of Bond Hearings Under INA §1231(a)(6)

Supreme Court Clarifies Nonrequirement of Bond Hearings Under INA §1231(a)(6)

Date: Jun 14, 2022
Supreme Court Clarifies Nonrequirement of Bond Hearings Under INA §1231(a)(6) Introduction In the landmark case of TAE D. Johnson, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al....
Clarifying the Materiality of Errors in Mail-In Ballot Counting under 52 U.S.C. § 10101(a)(2)(B): The Supreme Court’s Ruling in Ritter v. Migliorii

Clarifying the Materiality of Errors in Mail-In Ballot Counting under 52 U.S.C. § 10101(a)(2)(B): The Supreme Court’s Ruling in Ritter v. Migliorii

Date: Jun 10, 2022
Clarifying the Materiality of Errors in Mail-In Ballot Counting under 52 U.S.C. § 10101(a)(2)(B): The Supreme Court’s Ruling in Ritter v. Migliorii Introduction The case of David Ritter v. Linda...
Supreme Court Denies Stay in Migliori v. Ritter: Implications for Mail-In Voting Rules

Supreme Court Denies Stay in Migliori v. Ritter: Implications for Mail-In Voting Rules

Date: Jun 10, 2022
Supreme Court Denies Stay in Migliori v. Ritter: Implications for Mail-In Voting Rules Introduction 596 U.S. ____ (2022) v. Linda Migliori, et al. David Ritter is a significant case adjudicated by...
Supreme Court Affirmation: Bivens Actions Limitations in Egbert v. Boule

Supreme Court Affirmation: Bivens Actions Limitations in Egbert v. Boule

Date: Jun 9, 2022
Supreme Court Affirmation: Bivens Actions Limitations in Egbert v. Boule Introduction In the landmark case Egbert v. Boule, the Supreme Court of the United States addressed the boundaries of the...
Saxon v. Southwest Airlines: Defining the Class of Workers Under the Federal Arbitration Act

Saxon v. Southwest Airlines: Defining the Class of Workers Under the Federal Arbitration Act

Date: Jun 7, 2022
Saxon v. Southwest Airlines: Defining the Class of Workers Under the Federal Arbitration Act Introduction Saxon v. Southwest Airlines Co. is a landmark Supreme Court case decided on June 6, 2022,...
Supreme Court Establishes Strict Uniformity in Bankruptcy Fee Structures

Supreme Court Establishes Strict Uniformity in Bankruptcy Fee Structures

Date: Jun 7, 2022
Supreme Court Establishes Strict Uniformity in Bankruptcy Fee Structures Introduction In the landmark case of Alfred H. Siegel, Trustee of the Circuit Citystores, Inc. Liquidating Trust v. John P....
Exemption of Ramp Supervisors from the Federal Arbitration Act: Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon

Exemption of Ramp Supervisors from the Federal Arbitration Act: Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon

Date: Jun 7, 2022
Exemption of Ramp Supervisors from the Federal Arbitration Act: Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon Introduction In the landmark decision of Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon, the United States Supreme...
Uniformity Requirement Reinforced in Siegel v. Fitzgerald

Uniformity Requirement Reinforced in Siegel v. Fitzgerald

Date: Jun 7, 2022
Uniformity Requirement Reinforced in Siegel v. Fitzgerald Introduction Siegel v. Fitzgerald is a landmark judgment delivered by the United States Supreme Court on June 6, 2022. The case centers on...
Medicaid Reimbursement for Future Medical Expenses: Gallardo v. Marstiller

Medicaid Reimbursement for Future Medical Expenses: Gallardo v. Marstiller

Date: Jun 7, 2022
Medicaid Reimbursement for Future Medical Expenses: Gallardo v. Marstiller Introduction Gallardo v. Marstiller is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court, decided on June 6, 2022. The...
Supreme Court Upholds Medicaid's Right to Reimburse from Future Medical Settlement Funds

Supreme Court Upholds Medicaid's Right to Reimburse from Future Medical Settlement Funds

Date: Jun 7, 2022
Supreme Court Upholds Medicaid's Right to Reimburse from Future Medical Settlement Funds Introduction The landmark case Gallardo v. Marstiller (2022) addressed a pivotal issue concerning Medicaid's...
Supreme Court Grants Vacatur of Fifth Circuit Stay, Upholding Preliminary Injunction on Texas HB20

Supreme Court Grants Vacatur of Fifth Circuit Stay, Upholding Preliminary Injunction on Texas HB20

Date: Jun 1, 2022
Supreme Court Grants Vacatur of Fifth Circuit Stay, Upholding Preliminary Injunction on Texas HB20 Introduction The landmark case NetChoice, LLC, dba NetChoice, et al. v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General...
Supreme Court Upholds Texas HB20: Redefining Regulation of Social Media Platforms

Supreme Court Upholds Texas HB20: Redefining Regulation of Social Media Platforms

Date: Jun 1, 2022
Supreme Court Upholds Texas HB20: Redefining Regulation of Social Media Platforms Introduction The landmark case, 596 U.S. __ (2022) v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas, Netchoice, LLC, DBA...
Shinn v. Martinez Ramirez: Supreme Court Restricts Federal Habeas Relief for Ineffective State Postconviction Counsel

Shinn v. Martinez Ramirez: Supreme Court Restricts Federal Habeas Relief for Ineffective State Postconviction Counsel

Date: May 24, 2022
Shinn v. Martinez Ramirez: Supreme Court Restricts Federal Habeas Relief for Ineffective State Postconviction Counsel Introduction Shinn v. Martinez Ramirez is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme...
Supreme Court Limits Arbitration-Specific Waiver Rules Under the FAA in Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.

Supreme Court Limits Arbitration-Specific Waiver Rules Under the FAA in Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.

Date: May 24, 2022
Supreme Court Limits Arbitration-Specific Waiver Rules Under the FAA in Morgan v. Sundance, Inc. Introduction In Morgan v. Sundance, Inc., the United States Supreme Court addressed a pivotal issue...
Shinn v. Ramirez and Jones: Restricting Federal Habeas Relief for Ineffective Postconviction Counsel under §2254(e)(2)

Shinn v. Ramirez and Jones: Restricting Federal Habeas Relief for Ineffective Postconviction Counsel under §2254(e)(2)

Date: May 24, 2022
Shinn v. Ramirez and Jones: Restricting Federal Habeas Relief for Ineffective Postconviction Counsel under §2254(e)(2) Introduction In the landmark cases of Shinn v. Ramirez and Shinn v. Jones, the...
Supreme Court Establishes Unified Waiver Standard for Arbitration Rights under FAA

Supreme Court Establishes Unified Waiver Standard for Arbitration Rights under FAA

Date: May 24, 2022
Supreme Court Establishes Unified Waiver Standard for Arbitration Rights under FAA Introduction In the landmark case of Robyn Morgan v. Sundance, Inc., the Supreme Court addressed the critical issue...
Limits on Federal Habeas Review for Ineffective Postconviction Counsel: Shinn v. Ramirez

Limits on Federal Habeas Review for Ineffective Postconviction Counsel: Shinn v. Ramirez

Date: May 24, 2022
Limits on Federal Habeas Review for Ineffective Postconviction Counsel: Shinn v. Ramirez Introduction Shinn v. Ramirez is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, delivered on...
Limitation on Post-Election Contributions Violates First Amendment Rights

Limitation on Post-Election Contributions Violates First Amendment Rights

Date: May 17, 2022
Limitation on Post-Election Contributions Violates First Amendment Rights Introduction In the landmark case Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz for Senate et al., the Supreme Court of the United...
Patel v. Garland: Federal Courts Bar on Reviewing Factual Findings in Discretionary Immigration Relief

Patel v. Garland: Federal Courts Bar on Reviewing Factual Findings in Discretionary Immigration Relief

Date: May 17, 2022
Patel v. Garland: Federal Courts Bar on Reviewing Factual Findings in Discretionary Immigration Relief Introduction Patel v. Garland is a landmark case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on May 16,...
Supreme Court Establishes Bar on Judicial Review of Discretionary-Relief Facts in Immigration Proceedings

Supreme Court Establishes Bar on Judicial Review of Discretionary-Relief Facts in Immigration Proceedings

Date: May 17, 2022
Supreme Court Establishes Bar on Judicial Review of Discretionary-Relief Facts in Immigration Proceedings Introduction In the landmark case of Pankajkumar S. Patel, et al. v. Merrick B. Garland,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert