Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Supreme Court Grants Vacatur of Fifth Circuit Stay, Upholding Preliminary Injunction on Texas HB20

Supreme Court Grants Vacatur of Fifth Circuit Stay, Upholding Preliminary Injunction on Texas HB20

Date: Jun 1, 2022
Supreme Court Grants Vacatur of Fifth Circuit Stay, Upholding Preliminary Injunction on Texas HB20 Introduction The landmark case NetChoice, LLC, dba NetChoice, et al. v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General...
Supreme Court Upholds Texas HB20: Redefining Regulation of Social Media Platforms

Supreme Court Upholds Texas HB20: Redefining Regulation of Social Media Platforms

Date: Jun 1, 2022
Supreme Court Upholds Texas HB20: Redefining Regulation of Social Media Platforms Introduction The landmark case, 596 U.S. __ (2022) v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas, Netchoice, LLC, DBA...
Shinn v. Martinez Ramirez: Supreme Court Restricts Federal Habeas Relief for Ineffective State Postconviction Counsel

Shinn v. Martinez Ramirez: Supreme Court Restricts Federal Habeas Relief for Ineffective State Postconviction Counsel

Date: May 24, 2022
Shinn v. Martinez Ramirez: Supreme Court Restricts Federal Habeas Relief for Ineffective State Postconviction Counsel Introduction Shinn v. Martinez Ramirez is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme...
Supreme Court Establishes Unified Waiver Standard for Arbitration Rights under FAA

Supreme Court Establishes Unified Waiver Standard for Arbitration Rights under FAA

Date: May 24, 2022
Supreme Court Establishes Unified Waiver Standard for Arbitration Rights under FAA Introduction In the landmark case of Robyn Morgan v. Sundance, Inc., the Supreme Court addressed the critical issue...
Limits on Federal Habeas Review for Ineffective Postconviction Counsel: Shinn v. Ramirez

Limits on Federal Habeas Review for Ineffective Postconviction Counsel: Shinn v. Ramirez

Date: May 24, 2022
Limits on Federal Habeas Review for Ineffective Postconviction Counsel: Shinn v. Ramirez Introduction Shinn v. Ramirez is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, delivered on...
Shinn v. Ramirez and Jones: Restricting Federal Habeas Relief for Ineffective Postconviction Counsel under §2254(e)(2)

Shinn v. Ramirez and Jones: Restricting Federal Habeas Relief for Ineffective Postconviction Counsel under §2254(e)(2)

Date: May 24, 2022
Shinn v. Ramirez and Jones: Restricting Federal Habeas Relief for Ineffective Postconviction Counsel under §2254(e)(2) Introduction In the landmark cases of Shinn v. Ramirez and Shinn v. Jones, the...
Supreme Court Limits Arbitration-Specific Waiver Rules Under the FAA in Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.

Supreme Court Limits Arbitration-Specific Waiver Rules Under the FAA in Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.

Date: May 24, 2022
Supreme Court Limits Arbitration-Specific Waiver Rules Under the FAA in Morgan v. Sundance, Inc. Introduction In Morgan v. Sundance, Inc., the United States Supreme Court addressed a pivotal issue...
Limitation on Post-Election Contributions Violates First Amendment Rights

Limitation on Post-Election Contributions Violates First Amendment Rights

Date: May 17, 2022
Limitation on Post-Election Contributions Violates First Amendment Rights Introduction In the landmark case Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz for Senate et al., the Supreme Court of the United...
Patel v. Garland: Federal Courts Bar on Reviewing Factual Findings in Discretionary Immigration Relief

Patel v. Garland: Federal Courts Bar on Reviewing Factual Findings in Discretionary Immigration Relief

Date: May 17, 2022
Patel v. Garland: Federal Courts Bar on Reviewing Factual Findings in Discretionary Immigration Relief Introduction Patel v. Garland is a landmark case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on May 16,...
Supreme Court Establishes Bar on Judicial Review of Discretionary-Relief Facts in Immigration Proceedings

Supreme Court Establishes Bar on Judicial Review of Discretionary-Relief Facts in Immigration Proceedings

Date: May 17, 2022
Supreme Court Establishes Bar on Judicial Review of Discretionary-Relief Facts in Immigration Proceedings Introduction In the landmark case of Pankajkumar S. Patel, et al. v. Merrick B. Garland,...
Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz: A Landmark Decision on Campaign Finance and the First Amendment

Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz: A Landmark Decision on Campaign Finance and the First Amendment

Date: May 17, 2022
Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz: A Landmark Decision on Campaign Finance and the First Amendment Introduction In the 2022 Supreme Court decision of Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz,...
Shurtleff v. Boston: Establishing Private Speech Rights in Government-Hosted Flag-Raising Programs

Shurtleff v. Boston: Establishing Private Speech Rights in Government-Hosted Flag-Raising Programs

Date: May 3, 2022
Shurtleff v. Boston: Establishing Private Speech Rights in Government-Hosted Flag-Raising Programs Introduction Shurtleff v. Boston is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court issued on May 2,...
Boston Flag-Raising Case Establishes Limits on Government-Speech Doctrine in First Amendment Jurisprudence

Boston Flag-Raising Case Establishes Limits on Government-Speech Doctrine in First Amendment Jurisprudence

Date: May 3, 2022
Boston Flag-Raising Case Establishes Limits on Government-Speech Doctrine in First Amendment Jurisprudence Introduction The Supreme Court case Harold Shurtleff, et al., Petitioners v. City of Boston,...
Denial of Stay of Execution in Deck v. Blair: Procedural Insights and the Enduring Legacy of Justice Stevens

Denial of Stay of Execution in Deck v. Blair: Procedural Insights and the Enduring Legacy of Justice Stevens

Date: May 3, 2022
Denial of Stay of Execution in Deck v. Blair: Procedural Insights and the Enduring Legacy of Justice Stevens Introduction The case of Carman Deck v. Paul Blair, Warden (No. 21-7542) presented before...
Emotional Distress Damages Unavailable Under Spending Clause Antidiscrimination Statutes

Emotional Distress Damages Unavailable Under Spending Clause Antidiscrimination Statutes

Date: Apr 29, 2022
Emotional Distress Damages Unavailable Under Spending Clause Antidiscrimination Statutes Introduction Jane Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller, P.L.L.C. is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Forum State Choice-of-Law Mandate in FSIA Property Claims: Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza

Forum State Choice-of-Law Mandate in FSIA Property Claims: Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza

Date: Apr 22, 2022
Forum State Choice-of-Law Mandate in FSIA Property Claims: Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation Introduction The Supreme Court case David Cassirer, et al., Petitioners v....
Racial Bias in Jury Selection Must Be Scrutinized: Analysis of KRISTOPHER LOVE v. TEXAS

Racial Bias in Jury Selection Must Be Scrutinized: Analysis of KRISTOPHER LOVE v. TEXAS

Date: Apr 19, 2022
Racial Bias in Jury Selection Must Be Scrutinized: Analysis of KRISTOPHER LOVE v. TEXAS Introduction KRISTOPHER LOVE v. TEXAS is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of the United...
Narrowing the Favorable Termination Requirement under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Thompson v. Clark and its Implications

Narrowing the Favorable Termination Requirement under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Thompson v. Clark and its Implications

Date: Apr 5, 2022
Narrowing the Favorable Termination Requirement under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Thompson v. Clark and its Implications Introduction In the landmark case Larry Thompson v. Pagiel Clark et al., decided by the...
Limitations on 'Look-Through' Jurisdiction in FAA Sections 9 and 10: Badgerow v. Walters

Limitations on 'Look-Through' Jurisdiction in FAA Sections 9 and 10: Badgerow v. Walters

Date: Apr 1, 2022
Limitations on 'Look-Through' Jurisdiction in FAA Sections 9 and 10: Badgerow v. Walters Introduction The Supreme Court case Denise A. Badgerow v. Greg Walters, et al. (142 S. Ct. 1310) addressed...
Presidential Authority in Military Operations Affirmed Over RFRA Claims: Austin v. U.S. Navy Seals

Presidential Authority in Military Operations Affirmed Over RFRA Claims: Austin v. U.S. Navy Seals

Date: Mar 26, 2022
Presidential Authority in Military Operations Affirmed Over RFRA Claims: Austin v. U.S. Navy Seals Introduction In Lloyd J. Austin, III, Secretary of Defense, et al. v. U.S. Navy Seals 1-26, et al....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert