Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd.: Defining "Foreign or International Tribunal" under 28 U.S.C. §1782

ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd.: Defining "Foreign or International Tribunal" under 28 U.S.C. §1782

Date: Jun 14, 2022
ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd.: Defining "Foreign or International Tribunal" under 28 U.S.C. §1782 Introduction The Supreme Court case ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd., decided on...
Supreme Court Clarifies Detention Protocols Under INA §1231(a)(6): No Mandate for Bond Hearings After Six Months

Supreme Court Clarifies Detention Protocols Under INA §1231(a)(6): No Mandate for Bond Hearings After Six Months

Date: Jun 14, 2022
Supreme Court Clarifies Detention Protocols Under INA §1231(a)(6): No Mandate for Bond Hearings After Six Months Introduction The Supreme Court case Tae D. Johnson, Acting Director of U.S....
Limiting 28 U.S.C. §1782 to Governmental Tribunals: ZF Automotive US v. Luxshare, et al.

Limiting 28 U.S.C. §1782 to Governmental Tribunals: ZF Automotive US v. Luxshare, et al.

Date: Jun 14, 2022
Limiting 28 U.S.C. §1782 to Governmental Tribunals: ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd. et al. Introduction The United States Supreme Court delivered a pivotal decision on June 13, 2022, in the...
INA §1252(f)(1) Bars Class-Wide Injunctive Relief: Analysis of Garland v. Gonzalez

INA §1252(f)(1) Bars Class-Wide Injunctive Relief: Analysis of Garland v. Gonzalez

Date: Jun 14, 2022
INA §1252(f)(1) Bars Class-Wide Injunctive Relief: Analysis of Garland v. Gonzalez Introduction Garland v. Gonzalez is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court, adjudicated on June 13,...
Dual-Sovereignty Doctrine Affirmed in Denezpi v. United States

Dual-Sovereignty Doctrine Affirmed in Denezpi v. United States

Date: Jun 14, 2022
Dual-Sovereignty Doctrine Affirmed in Denezpi v. United States Introduction Denezpi v. United States is a landmark case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 13, 2022. The case revolves around...
Limits on Classwide Injunctive Relief under INA: Garland v. Aleman Gonzalez

Limits on Classwide Injunctive Relief under INA: Garland v. Aleman Gonzalez

Date: Jun 14, 2022
Limits on Classwide Injunctive Relief under INA: Garland v. Aleman Gonzalez Introduction In Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al. v. Esteban Aleman Gonzalez, et al., the United States Supreme...
Ensuring Effective Counsel in Death Penalty Proceedings: A Commentary on Andrus v. Texas

Ensuring Effective Counsel in Death Penalty Proceedings: A Commentary on Andrus v. Texas

Date: Jun 14, 2022
Ensuring Effective Counsel in Death Penalty Proceedings: A Commentary on Andrus v. Texas Introduction Andrus v. Texas (142 S. Ct. 1866, 2022) represents a significant case in the realm of capital...
Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez: Supreme Court Sets New Precedent on Immigration Detention Procedures

Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez: Supreme Court Sets New Precedent on Immigration Detention Procedures

Date: Jun 14, 2022
Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez: Supreme Court Sets New Precedent on Immigration Detention Procedures Introduction In Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez, the United States Supreme Court addressed a pivotal...
Supreme Court Limits Lower Courts’ Authority in Immigration Detention Cases through 8 U.S.C. § 1252(f)(1) Interpretation

Supreme Court Limits Lower Courts’ Authority in Immigration Detention Cases through 8 U.S.C. § 1252(f)(1) Interpretation

Date: Jun 14, 2022
Supreme Court Limits Lower Courts’ Authority in Immigration Detention Cases through 8 U.S.C. § 1252(f)(1) Interpretation Introduction In the landmark case Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al....
Judicial Errors of Law Under Rule 60(b)(1): An In-Depth Analysis of Kemp v. United States

Judicial Errors of Law Under Rule 60(b)(1): An In-Depth Analysis of Kemp v. United States

Date: Jun 14, 2022
Judicial Errors of Law Under Rule 60(b)(1): An In-Depth Analysis of Kemp v. United States Introduction Kemp v. United States is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, rendered on June 13,...
Supreme Court Clarifies Nonrequirement of Bond Hearings Under INA §1231(a)(6)

Supreme Court Clarifies Nonrequirement of Bond Hearings Under INA §1231(a)(6)

Date: Jun 14, 2022
Supreme Court Clarifies Nonrequirement of Bond Hearings Under INA §1231(a)(6) Introduction In the landmark case of TAE D. Johnson, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al....
Clarifying the Materiality of Errors in Mail-In Ballot Counting under 52 U.S.C. § 10101(a)(2)(B): The Supreme Court’s Ruling in Ritter v. Migliorii

Clarifying the Materiality of Errors in Mail-In Ballot Counting under 52 U.S.C. § 10101(a)(2)(B): The Supreme Court’s Ruling in Ritter v. Migliorii

Date: Jun 10, 2022
Clarifying the Materiality of Errors in Mail-In Ballot Counting under 52 U.S.C. § 10101(a)(2)(B): The Supreme Court’s Ruling in Ritter v. Migliorii Introduction The case of David Ritter v. Linda...
Supreme Court Denies Stay in Migliori v. Ritter: Implications for Mail-In Voting Rules

Supreme Court Denies Stay in Migliori v. Ritter: Implications for Mail-In Voting Rules

Date: Jun 10, 2022
Supreme Court Denies Stay in Migliori v. Ritter: Implications for Mail-In Voting Rules Introduction 596 U.S. ____ (2022) v. Linda Migliori, et al. David Ritter is a significant case adjudicated by...
Supreme Court Affirmation: Bivens Actions Limitations in Egbert v. Boule

Supreme Court Affirmation: Bivens Actions Limitations in Egbert v. Boule

Date: Jun 9, 2022
Supreme Court Affirmation: Bivens Actions Limitations in Egbert v. Boule Introduction In the landmark case Egbert v. Boule, the Supreme Court of the United States addressed the boundaries of the...
Saxon v. Southwest Airlines: Defining the Class of Workers Under the Federal Arbitration Act

Saxon v. Southwest Airlines: Defining the Class of Workers Under the Federal Arbitration Act

Date: Jun 7, 2022
Saxon v. Southwest Airlines: Defining the Class of Workers Under the Federal Arbitration Act Introduction Saxon v. Southwest Airlines Co. is a landmark Supreme Court case decided on June 6, 2022,...
Supreme Court Establishes Strict Uniformity in Bankruptcy Fee Structures

Supreme Court Establishes Strict Uniformity in Bankruptcy Fee Structures

Date: Jun 7, 2022
Supreme Court Establishes Strict Uniformity in Bankruptcy Fee Structures Introduction In the landmark case of Alfred H. Siegel, Trustee of the Circuit Citystores, Inc. Liquidating Trust v. John P....
Exemption of Ramp Supervisors from the Federal Arbitration Act: Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon

Exemption of Ramp Supervisors from the Federal Arbitration Act: Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon

Date: Jun 7, 2022
Exemption of Ramp Supervisors from the Federal Arbitration Act: Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon Introduction In the landmark decision of Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon, the United States Supreme...
Uniformity Requirement Reinforced in Siegel v. Fitzgerald

Uniformity Requirement Reinforced in Siegel v. Fitzgerald

Date: Jun 7, 2022
Uniformity Requirement Reinforced in Siegel v. Fitzgerald Introduction Siegel v. Fitzgerald is a landmark judgment delivered by the United States Supreme Court on June 6, 2022. The case centers on...
Medicaid Reimbursement for Future Medical Expenses: Gallardo v. Marstiller

Medicaid Reimbursement for Future Medical Expenses: Gallardo v. Marstiller

Date: Jun 7, 2022
Medicaid Reimbursement for Future Medical Expenses: Gallardo v. Marstiller Introduction Gallardo v. Marstiller is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court, decided on June 6, 2022. The...
Supreme Court Upholds Medicaid's Right to Reimburse from Future Medical Settlement Funds

Supreme Court Upholds Medicaid's Right to Reimburse from Future Medical Settlement Funds

Date: Jun 7, 2022
Supreme Court Upholds Medicaid's Right to Reimburse from Future Medical Settlement Funds Introduction The landmark case Gallardo v. Marstiller (2022) addressed a pivotal issue concerning Medicaid's...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.