Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Golan v. Saada: Clarifying the Scope of Ameliorative Measures under the Hague Convention

Golan v. Saada: Clarifying the Scope of Ameliorative Measures under the Hague Convention

Date: Jun 16, 2022
Golan v. Saada: Clarifying the Scope of Ameliorative Measures under the Hague Convention Introduction Golan v. Saada, a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2022, addresses the obligations...
Dismissal of Certiorari in ARIZONA v. SAN FRANCISCO: Implications for Administrative Law and Public Charge Rule

Dismissal of Certiorari in ARIZONA v. SAN FRANCISCO: Implications for Administrative Law and Public Charge Rule

Date: Jun 16, 2022
Dismissal of Certiorari in ARIZONA v. SAN FRANCISCO: Implications for Administrative Law and Public Charge Rule Introduction The case of Arizona, et al., Petitioners v. City and County of San...
Clear and Unmistakable Error Doctrine in Veterans Affairs: George v. McDonough

Clear and Unmistakable Error Doctrine in Veterans Affairs: George v. McDonough

Date: Jun 16, 2022
Clear and Unmistakable Error Doctrine in Veterans Affairs: George v. McDonough Introduction George v. McDonough, 142 S. Ct. 1953 (2022), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that clarifies the scope...
FAA Preempts California's Iskanian Rule on Arbitration of PAGA Claims

FAA Preempts California's Iskanian Rule on Arbitration of PAGA Claims

Date: Jun 16, 2022
FAA Preempts California's Iskanian Rule on Arbitration of PAGA Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Angie Moriana, the Supreme Court of the United States...
Uniform Medicare Reimbursement Rates for 340B Hospitals Must Follow Acquisition Cost Surveys: A Landmark Supreme Court Decision

Uniform Medicare Reimbursement Rates for 340B Hospitals Must Follow Acquisition Cost Surveys: A Landmark Supreme Court Decision

Date: Jun 16, 2022
Uniform Medicare Reimbursement Rates for 340B Hospitals Must Follow Acquisition Cost Surveys: A Landmark Supreme Court Decision Introduction In the pivotal case of American Hospital Association, et...
FAA Preempts California's PAGA Waiver Restrictions in Viking River Cruises v. Moriana

FAA Preempts California's PAGA Waiver Restrictions in Viking River Cruises v. Moriana

Date: Jun 16, 2022
FAA Preempts California's PAGA Waiver Restrictions in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana Introduction In Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed a pivotal issue...
HHS Restricts Medicare Reimbursements for 340B Hospitals Without Required Cost Survey

HHS Restricts Medicare Reimbursements for 340B Hospitals Without Required Cost Survey

Date: Jun 16, 2022
HHS Restricts Medicare Reimbursements for 340B Hospitals Without Required Cost Survey: Comprehensive Analysis of American Hospital Assn. v. Becerra Introduction American Hospital Association et al....
Limitation on Collateral Relief for Veterans' Benefits Claims Based on Subsequent Regulatory Changes

Limitation on Collateral Relief for Veterans' Benefits Claims Based on Subsequent Regulatory Changes

Date: Jun 16, 2022
Limitation on Collateral Relief for Veterans' Benefits Claims Based on Subsequent Regulatory Changes Introduction In the landmark case 596 U.S. ___ (2022) v. Denis R. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans...
Clear and Unmistakable Error in Veterans Benefits: George v. McDonough

Clear and Unmistakable Error in Veterans Benefits: George v. McDonough

Date: Jun 16, 2022
Clear and Unmistakable Error in Veterans Benefits: George v. McDonough Introduction In the landmark case of Kevin R. George v. Denis R. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 142 S. Ct. 1953...
ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd.: Defining "Foreign or International Tribunal" under 28 U.S.C. §1782

ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd.: Defining "Foreign or International Tribunal" under 28 U.S.C. §1782

Date: Jun 14, 2022
ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd.: Defining "Foreign or International Tribunal" under 28 U.S.C. §1782 Introduction The Supreme Court case ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd., decided on...
Mistake Includes Judicial Errors of Law under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1)

Mistake Includes Judicial Errors of Law under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1)

Date: Jun 14, 2022
Mistake Includes Judicial Errors of Law under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) Introduction Dexter Earl Kemp v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 1856 (2022), is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Supreme Court Clarifies Detention Protocols Under INA §1231(a)(6): No Mandate for Bond Hearings After Six Months

Supreme Court Clarifies Detention Protocols Under INA §1231(a)(6): No Mandate for Bond Hearings After Six Months

Date: Jun 14, 2022
Supreme Court Clarifies Detention Protocols Under INA §1231(a)(6): No Mandate for Bond Hearings After Six Months Introduction The Supreme Court case Tae D. Johnson, Acting Director of U.S....
Limiting 28 U.S.C. §1782 to Governmental Tribunals: ZF Automotive US v. Luxshare, et al.

Limiting 28 U.S.C. §1782 to Governmental Tribunals: ZF Automotive US v. Luxshare, et al.

Date: Jun 14, 2022
Limiting 28 U.S.C. §1782 to Governmental Tribunals: ZF Automotive US, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd. et al. Introduction The United States Supreme Court delivered a pivotal decision on June 13, 2022, in the...
INA §1252(f)(1) Bars Class-Wide Injunctive Relief: Analysis of Garland v. Gonzalez

INA §1252(f)(1) Bars Class-Wide Injunctive Relief: Analysis of Garland v. Gonzalez

Date: Jun 14, 2022
INA §1252(f)(1) Bars Class-Wide Injunctive Relief: Analysis of Garland v. Gonzalez Introduction Garland v. Gonzalez is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court, adjudicated on June 13,...
Dual-Sovereignty Doctrine Affirmed in Denezpi v. United States

Dual-Sovereignty Doctrine Affirmed in Denezpi v. United States

Date: Jun 14, 2022
Dual-Sovereignty Doctrine Affirmed in Denezpi v. United States Introduction Denezpi v. United States is a landmark case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 13, 2022. The case revolves around...
Limits on Classwide Injunctive Relief under INA: Garland v. Aleman Gonzalez

Limits on Classwide Injunctive Relief under INA: Garland v. Aleman Gonzalez

Date: Jun 14, 2022
Limits on Classwide Injunctive Relief under INA: Garland v. Aleman Gonzalez Introduction In Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al. v. Esteban Aleman Gonzalez, et al., the United States Supreme...
Ensuring Effective Counsel in Death Penalty Proceedings: A Commentary on Andrus v. Texas

Ensuring Effective Counsel in Death Penalty Proceedings: A Commentary on Andrus v. Texas

Date: Jun 14, 2022
Ensuring Effective Counsel in Death Penalty Proceedings: A Commentary on Andrus v. Texas Introduction Andrus v. Texas (142 S. Ct. 1866, 2022) represents a significant case in the realm of capital...
Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez: Supreme Court Sets New Precedent on Immigration Detention Procedures

Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez: Supreme Court Sets New Precedent on Immigration Detention Procedures

Date: Jun 14, 2022
Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez: Supreme Court Sets New Precedent on Immigration Detention Procedures Introduction In Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez, the United States Supreme Court addressed a pivotal...
Supreme Court Limits Lower Courts’ Authority in Immigration Detention Cases through 8 U.S.C. § 1252(f)(1) Interpretation

Supreme Court Limits Lower Courts’ Authority in Immigration Detention Cases through 8 U.S.C. § 1252(f)(1) Interpretation

Date: Jun 14, 2022
Supreme Court Limits Lower Courts’ Authority in Immigration Detention Cases through 8 U.S.C. § 1252(f)(1) Interpretation Introduction In the landmark case Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al....
Judicial Errors of Law Under Rule 60(b)(1): An In-Depth Analysis of Kemp v. United States

Judicial Errors of Law Under Rule 60(b)(1): An In-Depth Analysis of Kemp v. United States

Date: Jun 14, 2022
Judicial Errors of Law Under Rule 60(b)(1): An In-Depth Analysis of Kemp v. United States Introduction Kemp v. United States is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, rendered on June 13,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert