Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Vega v. Tekoh: Clarification on Miranda Violations and §1983 Claims

Vega v. Tekoh: Clarification on Miranda Violations and §1983 Claims

Date: Jun 24, 2022
Vega v. Tekoh: Clarification on Miranda Violations and §1983 Claims Introduction Vega v. Tekoh is a significant 2022 decision by the United States Supreme Court that addresses the intersection of...
Supreme Court Upholds Legislative Leaders' Right to Intervene in Federal Litigation: Berger v. NAACP

Supreme Court Upholds Legislative Leaders' Right to Intervene in Federal Litigation: Berger v. NAACP

Date: Jun 24, 2022
Supreme Court Upholds Legislative Leaders' Right to Intervene in Federal Litigation: Berger v. NAACP Introduction The recent Supreme Court decision in Philip E. Berger, et al. v. North Carolina State...
Extending §1983 to Method-of-Execution Claims: Insights from Michael Nance v. Commissioner of Georgia Department of Corrections

Extending §1983 to Method-of-Execution Claims: Insights from Michael Nance v. Commissioner of Georgia Department of Corrections

Date: Jun 24, 2022
Extending §1983 to Method-of-Execution Claims: Insights from Michael Nance v. Commissioner of Georgia Department of Corrections Introduction Michael Nance v. Timothy C. Ward, Commissioner, Georgia...
Bruen v. Superintendent of New York State Police: Expanding Second Amendment Protections for Public Carry

Bruen v. Superintendent of New York State Police: Expanding Second Amendment Protections for Public Carry

Date: Jun 24, 2022
Bruen v. Superintendent of New York State Police: Expanding Second Amendment Protections for Public Carry Introduction The United States Supreme Court, in the landmark case Bruen v. Superintendent of...
Twyford v. Warden: Limiting All Writs Act in Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Twyford v. Warden: Limiting All Writs Act in Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Date: Jun 22, 2022
Twyford v. Warden: Limiting the Use of the All Writs Act for Evidence Gathering in Habeas Corpus Proceedings Introduction Twyford v. Warden is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court,...
Carson v. Makin: Upholding Religious Neutrality in State-Funded Tuition Assistance

Carson v. Makin: Upholding Religious Neutrality in State-Funded Tuition Assistance

Date: Jun 22, 2022
Carson v. Makin: Upholding Religious Neutrality in State-Funded Tuition Assistance Introduction Carson v. Makin is a landmark case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 21, 2022. The case...
Reaffirming AEDPA Deference: An In-Depth Analysis of Tim Shoop v. August Cassano

Reaffirming AEDPA Deference: An In-Depth Analysis of Tim Shoop v. August Cassano

Date: Jun 22, 2022
Reaffirming AEDPA Deference: An In-Depth Analysis of Tim Shoop v. August Cassano Introduction Tim Shoop, Warden v. August Cassano (142 S. Ct. 2051), adjudicated on June 21, 2022, presents a critical...
Supreme Court Affirms Attempted Hobbs Act Robbery Excluded from "Crimes of Violence" under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)

Supreme Court Affirms Attempted Hobbs Act Robbery Excluded from "Crimes of Violence" under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)

Date: Jun 22, 2022
Supreme Court Affirms Attempted Hobbs Act Robbery Excluded from "Crimes of Violence" under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A) Introduction The case of United States v. Justin Eugene Taylor addressed a critical...
Limiting the All Writs Act in Habeas Proceedings: Twyford v. Shoop

Limiting the All Writs Act in Habeas Proceedings: Twyford v. Shoop

Date: Jun 22, 2022
Limiting the All Writs Act in Habeas Proceedings: Twyford v. Shoop Introduction Twyford v. Shoop is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States issued on June 21, 2022. The case...
Maine's Tuition Assistance Program Exclusion of Religious Schools Violates First Amendment Free Exercise Clause

Maine's Tuition Assistance Program Exclusion of Religious Schools Violates First Amendment Free Exercise Clause

Date: Jun 22, 2022
Maine's Tuition Assistance Program Exclusion of Religious Schools Violates First Amendment Free Exercise Clause Introduction In the landmark case of David Carson, as Parent and Next Friend of O. C.,...
Supremacy Clause Reinforced: United States v. Washington

Supremacy Clause Reinforced: United States v. Washington

Date: Jun 22, 2022
Supremacy Clause Reinforced: United States v. Washington Introduction United States v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court decision delivered on June 21, 2022, addressing the constitutionality of...
Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. DaVita Inc.: Establishing Uniformity in Coverage under the Medicare Secondary Payer Statute

Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. DaVita Inc.: Establishing Uniformity in Coverage under the Medicare Secondary Payer Statute

Date: Jun 22, 2022
Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. DaVita Inc.: Establishing Uniformity in Coverage under the Medicare Secondary Payer Statute Introduction In the landmark case of Marietta...
Clarifying the Boundaries of "Crime of Violence": United States v. Taylor Establishes Limits on Enhancements under §924(c)

Clarifying the Boundaries of "Crime of Violence": United States v. Taylor Establishes Limits on Enhancements under §924(c)

Date: Jun 22, 2022
Clarifying the Boundaries of "Crime of Violence": United States v. Taylor Establishes Limits on Enhancements under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) Introduction United States v. Taylor, decided on June 21, 2022,...
Supremacy Clause and Intergovernmental Immunity: United States v. Washington

Supremacy Clause and Intergovernmental Immunity: United States v. Washington

Date: Jun 22, 2022
Supremacy Clause and Intergovernmental Immunity: United States v. Washington Introduction United States v. Washington, et al., 142 S. Ct. 1976 (2022), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that delves into...
Uniform Benefits for Outpatient Dialysis Under Medicare Secondary Payer: Marietta v. DaVita

Uniform Benefits for Outpatient Dialysis Under Medicare Secondary Payer: Marietta v. DaVita

Date: Jun 22, 2022
Uniform Benefits for Outpatient Dialysis Under Medicare Secondary Payer: Marietta v. DaVita Introduction The case of Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan, et al. v. DaVita Inc., et...
Supreme Court Sets Precedent on HHS Medicare Reimbursement Practices: American Hospital Association v. Becerra

Supreme Court Sets Precedent on HHS Medicare Reimbursement Practices: American Hospital Association v. Becerra

Date: Jun 16, 2022
Supreme Court Sets Precedent on HHS Medicare Reimbursement Practices: American Hospital Association v. Becerra Introduction In the landmark case American Hospital Association, et al. v. Xavier...
Supreme Court Clarifies Discretionary Standards in Hague Convention Child Abduction Cases

Supreme Court Clarifies Discretionary Standards in Hague Convention Child Abduction Cases

Date: Jun 16, 2022
Supreme Court Clarifies Discretionary Standards in Hague Convention Child Abduction Cases Introduction In the landmark case Narkis Aliza Golan v. Isacco Jacky Saada (142 S. Ct. 1880), the Supreme...
Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas: Defining Gaming Regulations on Tribal Lands

Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas: Defining Gaming Regulations on Tribal Lands

Date: Jun 16, 2022
Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas: Defining Gaming Regulations on Tribal Lands Introduction Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, delivered on...
Federal Prohibition Framework for Tribal Gaming Established in Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas

Federal Prohibition Framework for Tribal Gaming Established in Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas

Date: Jun 16, 2022
Federal Prohibition Framework for Tribal Gaming Established in Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas Introduction The case of Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas marks a significant development in the interplay...
Uniform Medicare Reimbursement Rates for 340B Hospitals Must Follow Acquisition Cost Surveys: A Landmark Supreme Court Decision

Uniform Medicare Reimbursement Rates for 340B Hospitals Must Follow Acquisition Cost Surveys: A Landmark Supreme Court Decision

Date: Jun 16, 2022
Uniform Medicare Reimbursement Rates for 340B Hospitals Must Follow Acquisition Cost Surveys: A Landmark Supreme Court Decision Introduction In the pivotal case of American Hospital Association, et...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert