Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

BALDWIN v. REESE: Defining 'Fair Presentation' for Federal Habeas Claims

BALDWIN v. REESE: Defining 'Fair Presentation' for Federal Habeas Claims

Date: Mar 3, 2004
BALDWIN v. REESE: Defining 'Fair Presentation' for Federal Habeas Claims Introduction BALDWIN v. REESE (541 U.S. 27, 2004) is a pivotal United States Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Muhammad v. Close: Clarifying §1983 Limitations in Prison Disciplinary Actions

Muhammad v. Close: Clarifying §1983 Limitations in Prison Disciplinary Actions

Date: Feb 26, 2004
Muhammad v. Close: Clarifying §1983 Limitations in Prison Disciplinary Actions Introduction Muhammad, aka Mease v. Close is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court rendered on February 25,...
Balancing Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses: Washington v. Davey

Balancing Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses: Washington v. Davey

Date: Feb 26, 2004
Balancing Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses: Washington v. Davey Introduction Washington v. Davey (540 U.S. 712, 2004) is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that addresses the delicate interplay...
United States Postal Service Immunity Under Antitrust Laws: Analyzing USPS v. Flamingo Industries

United States Postal Service Immunity Under Antitrust Laws: Analyzing USPS v. Flamingo Industries

Date: Feb 26, 2004
United States Postal Service Immunity Under Antitrust Laws: Analyzing USPS v. Flamingo Industries Introduction United States Postal Service v. Flamingo Industries (USA) Ltd. et al., 540 U.S. 736...
Supreme Court Expands 'Accident' Definition to Include Carrier Inaction Under Warsaw Convention

Supreme Court Expands 'Accident' Definition to Include Carrier Inaction Under Warsaw Convention

Date: Feb 25, 2004
Supreme Court Expands 'Accident' Definition to Include Carrier Inaction Under Warsaw Convention Introduction In Olympic Airways v. Husain, 540 U.S. 644 (2004), the United States Supreme Court...
General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline: ADEA Limits Age Discrimination Claims to Protect Older Workers

General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline: ADEA Limits Age Discrimination Claims to Protect Older Workers

Date: Feb 25, 2004
General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline: ADEA Limits Age Discrimination Claims to Protect Older Workers Introduction General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline et al., 540 U.S. 581 (2004), was...
Requirement of Actual Damages for Privacy Act Violations – DOE v. CHAO

Requirement of Actual Damages for Privacy Act Violations – DOE v. CHAO

Date: Feb 25, 2004
Requirement of Actual Damages for Privacy Act Violations – DOE v. CHAO Introduction DOE v. CHAO, Secretary of Labor, 540 U.S. 614 (2004), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case that clarified...
Enforcing the Particularity Requirement: Groh v. Ramirez and the Limits of Qualified Immunity

Enforcing the Particularity Requirement: Groh v. Ramirez and the Limits of Qualified Immunity

Date: Feb 25, 2004
Enforcing the Particularity Requirement: Groh v. Ramirez and the Limits of Qualified Immunity Introduction Groh v. Ramirez et al. (540 U.S. 551) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Revelation of Prosecutorial Concealment in Brady Claims: An Analysis of Banks v. Dretke

Revelation of Prosecutorial Concealment in Brady Claims: An Analysis of Banks v. Dretke

Date: Feb 25, 2004
Revelation of Prosecutorial Concealment in Brady Claims: An Analysis of Banks v. Dretke Introduction Banks v. Dretke, 540 U.S. 668 (2004), marks a significant Supreme Court decision addressing the...
Bad Faith Requirement in Preservation of Potentially Useful Evidence: Insights from ILLINOIS v. FISHER

Bad Faith Requirement in Preservation of Potentially Useful Evidence: Insights from ILLINOIS v. FISHER

Date: Feb 24, 2004
Bad Faith Requirement in Preservation of Potentially Useful Evidence: Insights from ILLINOIS v. FISHER 1. Introduction ILLINOIS v. FISHER (540 U.S. 544, 2004) is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that...
Deliberate Elicitation and Sixth Amendment Rights: Insights from Fellers v. United States

Deliberate Elicitation and Sixth Amendment Rights: Insights from Fellers v. United States

Date: Jan 27, 2004
Deliberate Elicitation and Sixth Amendment Rights: Insights from Fellers v. United States Introduction Fellers v. United States, 540 U.S. 519 (2004), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that...
Limiting Chapter 7 Attorney Fee Awards to §327-Appointed Attorneys: Lamie v. United States Trustee

Limiting Chapter 7 Attorney Fee Awards to §327-Appointed Attorneys: Lamie v. United States Trustee

Date: Jan 27, 2004
Limiting Chapter 7 Attorney Fee Awards to §327-Appointed Attorneys: Lamie v. United States Trustee Introduction Lamie v. United States Trustee is a pivotal Supreme Court case decided on January 26,...
Alaska DEC v. EPA: Supreme Court Affirms EPA Oversight of State BACT Determinations under Clean Air Act

Alaska DEC v. EPA: Supreme Court Affirms EPA Oversight of State BACT Determinations under Clean Air Act

Date: Jan 22, 2004
Alaska DEC v. EPA: Supreme Court Affirms EPA Oversight of State BACT Determinations under Clean Air Act Introduction Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. Environmental Protection...
Eleventh Amendment Does Not Bar Enforcement of Federal Consent Decrees: Comprehensive Analysis of FREW v. HAWKINS

Eleventh Amendment Does Not Bar Enforcement of Federal Consent Decrees: Comprehensive Analysis of FREW v. HAWKINS

Date: Jan 15, 2004
Eleventh Amendment Does Not Bar Enforcement of Federal Consent Decrees: Comprehensive Analysis of FREW v. HAWKINS Introduction FREW, ON BEHALF OF HER DAUGHTER, FREW, ET AL. v. HAWKINS, COMMISSIONER,...
Forfeiture of Time-Barred Claims in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Kontrick v. Ryan

Forfeiture of Time-Barred Claims in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Kontrick v. Ryan

Date: Jan 15, 2004
Forfeiture of Time-Barred Claims in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Kontrick v. Ryan Introduction Kontrick v. Ryan, 540 U.S. 443 (2004), is a seminal United States Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Illinois v. Lidster: Upholding Information-Seeking Highway Checkpoints under the Fourth Amendment

Illinois v. Lidster: Upholding Information-Seeking Highway Checkpoints under the Fourth Amendment

Date: Jan 14, 2004
Illinois v. Lidster: Upholding Information-Seeking Highway Checkpoints under the Fourth Amendment Introduction In Illinois v. Lidster, 540 U.S. 419 (2004), the United States Supreme Court addressed...
Trinko v. Verizon: Limiting Antitrust Claims in Regulated Telecommunications Markets

Trinko v. Verizon: Limiting Antitrust Claims in Regulated Telecommunications Markets

Date: Jan 14, 2004
Trinko v. Verizon: Limiting Antitrust Claims in Regulated Telecommunications Markets Introduction Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP, 540 U.S. 398 (2004), is a...
Fixed Return Investment Schemes as Securities: Insights from SEC v. Edwards

Fixed Return Investment Schemes as Securities: Insights from SEC v. Edwards

Date: Jan 14, 2004
Fixed Return Investment Schemes as Securities: Insights from SEC v. Edwards Introduction In the landmark case of SEC v. Edwards, the United States Supreme Court addressed a pivotal question in...
Castro v. United States: Enhanced Protections for Pro Se Habeas Corpus Applicants

Castro v. United States: Enhanced Protections for Pro Se Habeas Corpus Applicants

Date: Dec 16, 2003
Castro v. United States: Enhanced Protections for Pro Se Habeas Corpus Applicants Introduction Castro v. United States, 540 U.S. 375 (2003), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Establishing Probable Cause for Drug Possession in Shared Vehicle Contexts: Maryland v. Pringle

Establishing Probable Cause for Drug Possession in Shared Vehicle Contexts: Maryland v. Pringle

Date: Dec 16, 2003
Establishing Probable Cause for Drug Possession in Shared Vehicle Contexts: Maryland v. Pringle Introduction Maryland v. Pringle, 540 U.S. 366 (2003), is a landmark Supreme Court decision addressing...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert