Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

From “Magic Words” to “Electioneering Communications”: McConnell v. FEC’s Soft‑Money Ban, Expanded Disclosure, and a Broadened Anticorruption Rationale

From “Magic Words” to “Electioneering Communications”: McConnell v. FEC’s Soft‑Money Ban, Expanded Disclosure, and a Broadened Anticorruption Rationale

Date: Dec 11, 2003
From “Magic Words” to “Electioneering Communications”: McConnell v. FEC’s Soft‑Money Ban, Expanded Disclosure, and a Broadened Anticorruption Rationale Introduction McCONNELL v. FEDERAL ELECTION...
VIRGINIA v. MARYLAND: Sovereign Riparian Rights Affirmed

VIRGINIA v. MARYLAND: Sovereign Riparian Rights Affirmed

Date: Dec 10, 2003
VIRGINIA v. MARYLAND: Sovereign Riparian Rights Affirmed Introduction VIRGINIA v. MARYLAND, 540 U.S. 56 (2003), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that resolved a longstanding...
Understanding the Implications of Certiorari Denials by the U.S. Supreme Court

Understanding the Implications of Certiorari Denials by the U.S. Supreme Court

Date: Dec 9, 2003
Understanding the Implications of Certiorari Denials by the U.S. Supreme Court Introduction On December 8, 2003, the United States Supreme Court issued a series of orders denying petitions for writs...
United States v. Banks: Defining Reasonable Wait Times and Exigent Circumstances in Knock-and-Announce Entries

United States v. Banks: Defining Reasonable Wait Times and Exigent Circumstances in Knock-and-Announce Entries

Date: Dec 3, 2003
United States v. Banks: Defining Reasonable Wait Times and Exigent Circumstances in Knock-and-Announce Entries 1. Introduction United States v. Banks is a landmark decision by the United States...
Distinguishing Disparate-Treatment and Disparate-Impact Claims under the ADA: Insights from Raytheon Co. v. Hernandez

Distinguishing Disparate-Treatment and Disparate-Impact Claims under the ADA: Insights from Raytheon Co. v. Hernandez

Date: Dec 3, 2003
Distinguishing Disparate-Treatment and Disparate-Impact Claims under the ADA: Insights from Raytheon Co. v. Hernandez Introduction Raytheon Co. v. Hernandez, 540 U.S. 44 (2003), is a pivotal Supreme...
Impact and Implications of Supreme Court's Denial of Certiorari on December 1, 2003

Impact and Implications of Supreme Court's Denial of Certiorari on December 1, 2003

Date: Dec 2, 2003
Impact and Implications of Supreme Court's Denial of Certiorari on December 1, 2003 Introduction On December 1, 2003, the United States Supreme Court issued a judgment denying petitions for writs of...
Understanding Certiorari Denial: Implications and Legal Context

Understanding Certiorari Denial: Implications and Legal Context

Date: Nov 18, 2003
Understanding Certiorari Denial: Implications and Legal Context Introduction On November 17, 2003, the United States Supreme Court issued a judgment titled CERTIORARI DENIED. This judgment...
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in TORRES v. MULLIN: Implications for Vienna Convention Compliance

Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in TORRES v. MULLIN: Implications for Vienna Convention Compliance

Date: Nov 18, 2003
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in TORRES v. MULLIN: Implications for Vienna Convention Compliance Introduction The case of Osbaldo Torres v. Mike Mullin, Warden (540 U.S. 1035) presents a...
Racial Preferences in Public Contracting: Analyzing Concrete Works of Colorado, Inc. v. City and County of Denver

Racial Preferences in Public Contracting: Analyzing Concrete Works of Colorado, Inc. v. City and County of Denver

Date: Nov 18, 2003
Racial Preferences in Public Contracting: Analyzing Concrete Works of Colorado, Inc. v. City and County of Denver Introduction The case of Concrete Works of Colorado, Inc. v. City and County of...
Barnhart v. Thomas: Supreme Court Upholds SSA's Interpretation of Disability Criteria

Barnhart v. Thomas: Supreme Court Upholds SSA's Interpretation of Disability Criteria

Date: Nov 13, 2003
Barnhart v. Thomas: Supreme Court Upholds SSA's Interpretation of Disability Criteria Introduction Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security v. Thomas is a pivotal 2003 United States Supreme Court...
Implications of Certiorari Denials by the U.S. Supreme Court

Implications of Certiorari Denials by the U.S. Supreme Court

Date: Nov 11, 2003
Implications of Certiorari Denials by the U.S. Supreme Court Introduction On November 10, 2003, the United States Supreme Court issued a series of orders denying petitions for writs of certiorari...
Impact of Mass Certiorari Denials by the U.S. Supreme Court on November 3, 2003

Impact of Mass Certiorari Denials by the U.S. Supreme Court on November 3, 2003

Date: Nov 4, 2003
Impact of Mass Certiorari Denials by the U.S. Supreme Court on November 3, 2003 Introduction On November 3, 2003, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a series of denials for petitions for writs of...
Limits on Federal Habeas Review in Capital Sentencing: The Mitchell v. Esparza Decision

Limits on Federal Habeas Review in Capital Sentencing: The Mitchell v. Esparza Decision

Date: Nov 4, 2003
Limits on Federal Habeas Review in Capital Sentencing: The Mitchell v. Esparza Decision Introduction In the landmark case of Mitchell, Warden v. Esparza, the United States Supreme Court addressed...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Closing Arguments: The Yarbrough v. Gentry Decision

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Closing Arguments: The Yarbrough v. Gentry Decision

Date: Oct 21, 2003
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Closing Arguments: The Yarbrough v. Gentry Decision Introduction Yarbrough, Warden, et al. v. Gentry, 540 U.S. 1 (2003), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Reaffirms Certiorari Standards through Denials on Multiple Petitions

Supreme Court Reaffirms Certiorari Standards through Denials on Multiple Petitions

Date: Oct 21, 2003
Supreme Court Reaffirms Certiorari Standards through Denials on Multiple Petitions Introduction On October 20, 2003, the United States Supreme Court issued a significant batch of orders denying...
Understanding Certiorari Denials: Insights from the U.S. Supreme Court's October 14, 2003 Decisions

Understanding Certiorari Denials: Insights from the U.S. Supreme Court's October 14, 2003 Decisions

Date: Oct 15, 2003
Understanding Certiorari Denials: Insights from the U.S. Supreme Court's October 14, 2003 Decisions Introduction On October 14, 2003, the United States Supreme Court issued a series of denials for...
Implications of the U.S. Supreme Court's Denial of Certiorari

Implications of the U.S. Supreme Court's Denial of Certiorari

Date: Oct 7, 2003
Implications of the U.S. Supreme Court's Denial of Certiorari Introduction On October 6, 2003, the United States Supreme Court issued a series of orders denying petitions for writs of certiorari...
Lawrence v. Texas: Overruling Bowers and Recognizing Private Liberties under Due Process

Lawrence v. Texas: Overruling Bowers and Recognizing Private Liberties under Due Process

Date: Jun 27, 2003
Lawrence v. Texas: Overruling Bowers and Recognizing Private Liberties under Due Process Introduction Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that transformed the...
Redistricting and Retrogression: U.S. Supreme Court Sets Standard in GEORGIA v. ASHCROFT

Redistricting and Retrogression: U.S. Supreme Court Sets Standard in GEORGIA v. ASHCROFT

Date: Jun 27, 2003
Redistricting and Retrogression: U.S. Supreme Court Sets Standard in GEORGIA v. ASHCROFT Introduction GEORGIA v. ASHCROFT, Attorney General et al. is a pivotal 2003 decision by the United States...
Enhancing Sixth Amendment Protections: Wiggins v. Smith and the Duty to Investigate Mitigating Evidence

Enhancing Sixth Amendment Protections: Wiggins v. Smith and the Duty to Investigate Mitigating Evidence

Date: Jun 27, 2003
Enhancing Sixth Amendment Protections: Wiggins v. Smith and the Duty to Investigate Mitigating Evidence Introduction Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510 (2003) is a landmark decision by the United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert