Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Texas Case Commentaries

Municipal Bond Issuance and Taxation Limits: Insights from CITY OF AUSTIN ET AL. v. JOSEPH NALLE (85 Tex. 520)

Municipal Bond Issuance and Taxation Limits: Insights from CITY OF AUSTIN ET AL. v. JOSEPH NALLE (85 Tex. 520)

Date: May 26, 1893
Municipal Bond Issuance and Taxation Limits: Insights from CITY OF AUSTIN ET AL. v. JOSEPH NALLE (85 Tex. 520) Introduction The landmark case of CITY OF AUSTIN ET AL. v. JOSEPH NALLE, adjudicated by...
Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Statute of Limitations in Real Estate Conveyances: Insights from Titterington v. Chicago, Texas Mexican Central Railway (84 Tex. 218)

Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Statute of Limitations in Real Estate Conveyances: Insights from Titterington v. Chicago, Texas Mexican Central Railway (84 Tex. 218)

Date: Mar 27, 1892
Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Statute of Limitations in Real Estate Conveyances: Insights from Titterington v. Chicago, Texas Mexican Central Railway (84 Tex. 218) Introduction The case of...
Receivers of Railways Excluded From Proprietor and Owner Liability Under Article 2899

Receivers of Railways Excluded From Proprietor and Owner Liability Under Article 2899

Date: Feb 6, 1892
Receivers of Railways Excluded From Proprietor and Owner Liability Under Article 2899 Introduction The case of Mrs. S. S. Turner v. Cross and Eddy, Receivers (83 Tex. 218) adjudicated by the Supreme...
Protection of Bona Fide Purchasers in Community Property Transactions: Insights from J.R. Patty v. W.D. Middleton ET AL.

Protection of Bona Fide Purchasers in Community Property Transactions: Insights from J.R. Patty v. W.D. Middleton ET AL.

Date: Dec 19, 1891
Protection of Bona Fide Purchasers in Community Property Transactions: Insights from J.R. Patty v. W.D. Middleton ET AL. Introduction The case of J.R. Patty v. W.D. Middleton ET AL., adjudicated by...
Implied Authority of Railway Employees: International Great Northern Railway Co. v. Anderson

Implied Authority of Railway Employees: International Great Northern Railway Co. v. Anderson

Date: Dec 12, 1891
Implied Authority of Railway Employees: International Great Northern Railway Co. v. Anderson Introduction International Great Northern Railway Company v. Henry Anderson is a landmark decision by the...
Establishing Venue and Statute of Limitations in Negligence Cases: Ricker, Lee Co. v. D. D. Shoemaker Commentary

Establishing Venue and Statute of Limitations in Negligence Cases: Ricker, Lee Co. v. D. D. Shoemaker Commentary

Date: May 9, 1891
Establishing Venue and Statute of Limitations in Negligence Cases: Ricker, Lee Co. v. D. D. Shoemaker Commentary Introduction The case of Ricker, Lee Co. v. D. D. Shoemaker, decided by the Supreme...
Establishing Proper Measures of Damages and Handling of Jury Instructions in Fraud Cases: Baker et al. v. Ashe (1891)

Establishing Proper Measures of Damages and Handling of Jury Instructions in Fraud Cases: Baker et al. v. Ashe (1891)

Date: Mar 25, 1891
Establishing Proper Measures of Damages and Handling of Jury Instructions in Fraud Cases: Baker et al. v. Ashe (1891) Introduction Baker et al. v. Ashe, 80 Tex. 356 (1891), is a landmark case decided...
Negligence and Settlement in Railway Law: Analysis of Gulf, Colorado Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Charles Harriett (1891)

Negligence and Settlement in Railway Law: Analysis of Gulf, Colorado Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Charles Harriett (1891)

Date: Feb 28, 1891
Negligence and Settlement in Railway Law: Analysis of Gulf, Colorado Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Charles Harriett (1891) Introduction The case of Gulf, Colorado Santa Fe Railway Company v. Charles...
City of Brenham v. Brenham Water Company: Limiting Municipal Monopoly Powers

City of Brenham v. Brenham Water Company: Limiting Municipal Monopoly Powers

Date: Mar 26, 1887
City of Brenham v. Brenham Water Company: Limiting Municipal Monopoly Powers Introduction City of Brenham v. Brenham Water Company (67 Tex. 542, 1887) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Previous
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert