Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Texas Case Commentaries

Missouri, Kansas Texas Railway Co. v. Hannig: Standards for Negligence and Evidence Admissibility in Personal Injury Litigation

Missouri, Kansas Texas Railway Co. v. Hannig: Standards for Negligence and Evidence Admissibility in Personal Injury Litigation

Date: Dec 21, 1897
Missouri, Kansas Texas Railway Co. v. Hannig: Standards for Negligence and Evidence Admissibility in Personal Injury Litigation Introduction In the landmark case of Missouri, Kansas Texas Railway...
Equitable Injunctions for Trustees Against Unauthorized Executions: Insights from H. B. Sumner v. W. B. Crawford

Equitable Injunctions for Trustees Against Unauthorized Executions: Insights from H. B. Sumner v. W. B. Crawford

Date: Jun 25, 1897
Equitable Injunctions for Trustees Against Unauthorized Executions: Insights from H. B. Sumner v. W. B. Crawford Introduction The case of H. B. Sumner v. W. B. Crawford (91 Tex. 129) adjudicated by...
Statutory Interest Rates on Unliquidated Damages in Contract Breach: Insights from J.B. Watkins v. Guy W. Junker

Statutory Interest Rates on Unliquidated Damages in Contract Breach: Insights from J.B. Watkins v. Guy W. Junker

Date: Apr 13, 1897
Statutory Interest Rates on Unliquidated Damages in Contract Breach: Insights from J.B. Watkins v. Guy W. Junker Introduction The case of J.B. Watkins v. Guy W. Junker, adjudicated by the Supreme...
Standard of Evidence for Jury Consideration in Railway Negligence and Wrongful Death Cases

Standard of Evidence for Jury Consideration in Railway Negligence and Wrongful Death Cases

Date: Jan 26, 1897
Standard of Evidence for Jury Consideration in Railway Negligence and Wrongful Death Cases Introduction LIZZIE WASHINGTON v. MISSOURI, KANSAS AND TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY OF TEXAS (90 Tex. 314), decided...
Defining Proximate Cause in Railway Negligence: Insights from Texas and Pacific Railway Co. v. Bigham

Defining Proximate Cause in Railway Negligence: Insights from Texas and Pacific Railway Co. v. Bigham

Date: Dec 25, 1896
Defining Proximate Cause in Railway Negligence: Insights from Texas and Pacific Railway Co. v. Bigham Introduction The landmark case of Texas and Pacific Railway Company v. W. R. Bigham, decided on...
F. B. Choate v. San Antonio and Aransas Pass Railway Company: Defining Passenger Liability in Railway Injuries

F. B. Choate v. San Antonio and Aransas Pass Railway Company: Defining Passenger Liability in Railway Injuries

Date: Oct 20, 1896
F. B. Choate v. San Antonio and Aransas Pass Railway Company: Defining Passenger Liability in Railway Injuries Introduction The case of F. B. Choate v. San Antonio and Aransas Pass Railway Company...
Enhanced Duty of Care for Railway Operators Established in Texas and Pacific Railway Company v. Johanna Breadow (90 Tex. 26)

Enhanced Duty of Care for Railway Operators Established in Texas and Pacific Railway Company v. Johanna Breadow (90 Tex. 26)

Date: Jun 19, 1896
Enhanced Duty of Care for Railway Operators Established in Texas and Pacific Railway Company v. Johanna Breadow (90 Tex. 26) Introduction The case of Texas and Pacific Railway Company v. Johanna...
Revisiting Contributory Negligence in Railway Liability: Insights from Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railway Co. v. McGlamory

Revisiting Contributory Negligence in Railway Liability: Insights from Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railway Co. v. McGlamory

Date: Jun 5, 1896
Revisiting Contributory Negligence in Railway Liability: Insights from Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railway Co. v. McGlamory Introduction The case of Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railway Company et al....
Contributory Negligence in Railway Accidents: The Landmark Decision in Martha Jane Lee v. International and Great Northern Railway Company

Contributory Negligence in Railway Accidents: The Landmark Decision in Martha Jane Lee v. International and Great Northern Railway Company

Date: May 26, 1896
Contributory Negligence in Railway Accidents: The Landmark Decision in Martha Jane Lee v. International and Great Northern Railway Company Introduction The case of Martha Jane Lee v. International...
Assumption of Risk and Employer Negligence: Insights from H. D. Bonnet v. Galveston, Harrisburg San Antonio Railway Company

Assumption of Risk and Employer Negligence: Insights from H. D. Bonnet v. Galveston, Harrisburg San Antonio Railway Company

Date: Dec 24, 1895
Assumption of Risk and Employer Negligence: Insights from H. D. Bonnet v. Galveston, Harrisburg San Antonio Railway Company Introduction In the landmark case of H. D. Bonnet v. Galveston, Harrisburg...
Confirmation of Probate Sales and Collateral Attacks: Crawford v. McDonald

Confirmation of Probate Sales and Collateral Attacks: Crawford v. McDonald

Date: Nov 15, 1895
Confirmation of Probate Sales and Collateral Attacks: Crawford v. McDonald Introduction Clara M. Crawford et al. v. J. S. McDonald (88 Tex. 626), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Texas on November...
Husband's Authority to Convey Homestead Without Wife’s Consent Established in Marler v. Handy

Husband's Authority to Convey Homestead Without Wife’s Consent Established in Marler v. Handy

Date: Jun 25, 1895
Husband's Authority to Convey Homestead Without Wife’s Consent Established in Marler v. Handy Introduction Marler v. Handy is a seminal judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of Texas on June 24,...
Implied Promises in Joint Obligations and Statute of Limitations: The Landmark Decision in J.E. Faires v. M. Cockerell et al.

Implied Promises in Joint Obligations and Statute of Limitations: The Landmark Decision in J.E. Faires v. M. Cockerell et al.

Date: May 21, 1895
Implied Promises in Joint Obligations and Statute of Limitations: The Landmark Decision in J.E. Faires v. M. Cockerell et al. Introduction The case of J. E. Faires v. M. Cockerell et al., adjudicated...
Burden of Proof in Contributory Negligence: Gulf, Colorado Santa Fe Railway Co. v. T.D. Shieder

Burden of Proof in Contributory Negligence: Gulf, Colorado Santa Fe Railway Co. v. T.D. Shieder

Date: Apr 9, 1895
Burden of Proof in Contributory Negligence: Gulf, Colorado Santa Fe Railway Co. v. T.D. Shieder Introduction The case of Gulf, Colorado Santa Fe Railway Company v. T.D. Shieder, adjudicated by the...
Municipal Regulatory Authority and Equitable Relief: Insights from CITY OF AUSTIN v. Austin City Cemetery Association

Municipal Regulatory Authority and Equitable Relief: Insights from CITY OF AUSTIN v. Austin City Cemetery Association

Date: Dec 4, 1894
Municipal Regulatory Authority and Equitable Relief: Insights from CITY OF AUSTIN v. Austin City Cemetery Association Introduction The case of CITY OF AUSTIN v. Austin City Cemetery Association,...
Voluntary Custody Transfer and the Best Interests of the Child: Analysis of Hattie Legate v. R.A. Legate

Voluntary Custody Transfer and the Best Interests of the Child: Analysis of Hattie Legate v. R.A. Legate

Date: Oct 30, 1894
Voluntary Custody Transfer and the Best Interests of the Child: Analysis of Hattie Legate v. R.A. Legate Introduction Hattie Legate, by Next Friend, v. R. A. Legate is a landmark case adjudicated by...
Res Judicata in Land Title Disputes: Freeman v. McAninch et al.

Res Judicata in Land Title Disputes: Freeman v. McAninch et al.

Date: Jun 8, 1894
Res Judicata in Land Title Disputes: Freeman v. McAninch et al. Introduction In the landmark case of John D. Freeman v. J. F. McAninch et al. (87 Tex. 132, 1894), the Supreme Court of Texas addressed...
Confined Jury Instructions and Employer Negligence: Insights from Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. W.J. French

Confined Jury Instructions and Employer Negligence: Insights from Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. W.J. French

Date: Oct 27, 1893
Confined Jury Instructions and Employer Negligence: Insights from Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. W.J. French Introduction Texas Pacific Railway Company v. W.J. French, 86 Tex. 96 (1893), is a landmark...
Finality of Judgments and Corporate Forfeiture: Insights from THE TEXAS TRUNK RAILWAY COMPANY v. JACKSON BROS. (85 Tex. 605)

Finality of Judgments and Corporate Forfeiture: Insights from THE TEXAS TRUNK RAILWAY COMPANY v. JACKSON BROS. (85 Tex. 605)

Date: Jun 25, 1893
Finality of Judgments and Corporate Forfeiture: Insights from THE TEXAS TRUNK RAILWAY COMPANY v. JACKSON BROS. (85 Tex. 605) Introduction THE TEXAS TRUNK RAILWAY COMPANY v. JACKSON BROS. is a...
Burden of Proof in Admissibility of Ancient Instruments: Stooksbury v. Swan

Burden of Proof in Admissibility of Ancient Instruments: Stooksbury v. Swan

Date: Jun 16, 1893
Burden of Proof in Admissibility of Ancient Instruments: Stooksbury v. Swan Introduction The case of Mary E. Stooksbury et al. v. M. Swan et al. (85 Tex. 563) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert