Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

South Dakota Case Commentaries

Bego v. Gordon: Reaffirming and Refining Sovereign Immunity Doctrine for School District Employees in South Dakota

Bego v. Gordon: Reaffirming and Refining Sovereign Immunity Doctrine for School District Employees in South Dakota

Date: Jun 11, 1987
Bego v. Gordon: Reaffirming and Refining Sovereign Immunity Doctrine for School District Employees in South Dakota Introduction In Bego v. Gordon, Hobart G. Peterson, Lenhardt Aman and the Montrose...
Safety Code Compliance and Comparative Negligence: South Dakota Supreme Court's Decision in Lovell v. Oahe Electric Cooperative

Safety Code Compliance and Comparative Negligence: South Dakota Supreme Court's Decision in Lovell v. Oahe Electric Cooperative

Date: Feb 13, 1986
Safety Code Compliance and Comparative Negligence: South Dakota Supreme Court's Decision in Lovell v. Oahe Electric Cooperative Introduction The case of Roger Lovell; Earl Lovell and Blanche Lovell...
Clarifying the Insurer’s Duty to Defend in Ambiguous Third-Party Complaints: Hawkeye-Security Insurance Company v. Clifford

Clarifying the Insurer’s Duty to Defend in Ambiguous Third-Party Complaints: Hawkeye-Security Insurance Company v. Clifford

Date: Apr 18, 1985
Clarifying the Insurer’s Duty to Defend in Ambiguous Third-Party Complaints: Hawkeye-Security Insurance Company v. Clifford Introduction The case of Hawkeye-Security Insurance Company v. Allen A....
Independent Enforceability of Housing Allowances Separate from Child Support in Divorce Settlements

Independent Enforceability of Housing Allowances Separate from Child Support in Divorce Settlements

Date: Apr 4, 1985
Independent Enforceability of Housing Allowances Separate from Child Support in Divorce Settlements Introduction The case of Sharon R. Malcolm v. Kirk G. Malcolm (365 N.W.2d 863) adjudicated by the...
South Dakota Supreme Court Upholds 'Grandfather Clause' in SDCL 35-4-5.5: Reinstates Wholesale Liquor License to Famous Brands, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court Upholds 'Grandfather Clause' in SDCL 35-4-5.5: Reinstates Wholesale Liquor License to Famous Brands, Inc.

Date: Apr 26, 1984
South Dakota Supreme Court Upholds 'Grandfather Clause' in SDCL 35-4-5.5: Reinstates Wholesale Liquor License to Famous Brands, Inc. Introduction The case of Famous Brands, Inc. v. Secretary of...
Establishing the Boundaries of Host-Guest Relationships in Auto Accidents: Tranby and Ste v. Long

Establishing the Boundaries of Host-Guest Relationships in Auto Accidents: Tranby and Ste v. Long

Date: Apr 26, 1984
Establishing the Boundaries of Host-Guest Relationships in Auto Accidents: Tranby and Ste v. Long Introduction The case of Al Tranby and Steven Long v. Kevin Brodock, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing Validity of Out-of-Jurisdiction Arrests in Implied Consent Law: IN RE MEHRER

Establishing Validity of Out-of-Jurisdiction Arrests in Implied Consent Law: IN RE MEHRER

Date: Jan 6, 1979
Establishing Validity of Out-of-Jurisdiction Arrests in Implied Consent Law: IN RE MEHRER Introduction In re Michael Richard Mehrer, 273 N.W.2d 194 (Supreme Court of South Dakota, 1979), is a pivotal...
Product Liability and Warranty Breach: The Shaffer v. Honeywell Decision

Product Liability and Warranty Breach: The Shaffer v. Honeywell Decision

Date: Jan 1, 1977
Product Liability and Warranty Breach: The Shaffer v. Honeywell Decision Introduction The case of Robert J. Shaffer et al. v. Honeywell, Inc., adjudicated by the Supreme Court of South Dakota in...
Declaratory Judgment Affirms Constitutional Supremacy in Gubernatorial Candidacy under SDCL 12-6-2

Declaratory Judgment Affirms Constitutional Supremacy in Gubernatorial Candidacy under SDCL 12-6-2

Date: Jan 10, 1974
Declaratory Judgment Affirms Constitutional Supremacy in Gubernatorial Candidacy under SDCL 12-6-2 Introduction The case of Kneip v. Herseth (87 S.D. 642) before the Supreme Court of South Dakota...
Brewer v. Mattern: Establishing Standards for Willful and Wanton Misconduct in Automobile Guest Statute Cases

Brewer v. Mattern: Establishing Standards for Willful and Wanton Misconduct in Automobile Guest Statute Cases

Date: Dec 30, 1970
Brewer v. Mattern: Establishing Standards for Willful and Wanton Misconduct in Automobile Guest Statute Cases Introduction Brewer v. Mattern, 85 S.D. 356 (Supreme Court of South Dakota, 1970), is a...
Assessment of Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence in In re Estate of Hobelsberger

Assessment of Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence in In re Estate of Hobelsberger

Date: Dec 5, 1970
Assessment of Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence in In re Estate of Hobelsberger Introduction The case of In re Estate of Hobelsberger (85 S.D. 282) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of South...
Expansive Interpretation of South Dakota's Long Arm Statute Establishes Robust Personal Jurisdiction Standards

Expansive Interpretation of South Dakota's Long Arm Statute Establishes Robust Personal Jurisdiction Standards

Date: Sep 17, 1968
Expansive Interpretation of South Dakota's Long Arm Statute Establishes Robust Personal Jurisdiction Standards Introduction The case Ventling et al. v. Kraft (83 S.D. 465) adjudicated by the Supreme...
Exemplary Damages in Tortious Interference: HANNAHS v. NOAH Commentary

Exemplary Damages in Tortious Interference: HANNAHS v. NOAH Commentary

Date: May 14, 1968
Exemplary Damages in Tortious Interference: HANNAHS v. NOAH Commentary Introduction The case of HANNAHS, Respondent v. NOAH, Executrix, Appellant (83 S.D. 296) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Wilson v. Great Northern Railway Company: Reaffirming the Necessity of Trial in Negligence Cases

Wilson v. Great Northern Railway Company: Reaffirming the Necessity of Trial in Negligence Cases

Date: Mar 19, 1968
Wilson v. Great Northern Railway Company: Reaffirming the Necessity of Trial in Negligence Cases Introduction Wilson v. Great Northern Railway Company is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court...
Previous
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert