Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

South Carolina Case Commentaries

Preservation of Objections to Hearsay Evidence through Motions to Strike: State v. Byers

Preservation of Objections to Hearsay Evidence through Motions to Strike: State v. Byers

Date: May 24, 2011
Preservation of Objections to Hearsay Evidence through Motions to Strike: State v. Byers Introduction State v. Najjar De'Breece Byers is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of South...
Clarifying Appellate Review Standards in Family Court Matters: The Lewis v. Lewis Decision

Clarifying Appellate Review Standards in Family Court Matters: The Lewis v. Lewis Decision

Date: May 10, 2011
Clarifying Appellate Review Standards in Family Court Matters: The Lewis v. Lewis Decision Introduction In the landmark case of Roberta Hardy LEWIS, Petitioner, v. Joseph Terrell LEWIS, Respondent...
TURNER v. MILLIMAN: Reevaluating Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Health Insurance Policies

TURNER v. MILLIMAN: Reevaluating Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Health Insurance Policies

Date: Mar 29, 2011
TURNER v. MILLIMAN: Reevaluating Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Health Insurance Policies Introduction In TURNER v. MILLIMAN, the Supreme Court of South Carolina addressed critical issues...
Establishing the Presumption of a Meaningful Offer of UIM Coverage: South Carolina Supreme Court in Wiegand v. USAA

Establishing the Presumption of a Meaningful Offer of UIM Coverage: South Carolina Supreme Court in Wiegand v. USAA

Date: Feb 1, 2011
Establishing the Presumption of a Meaningful Offer of UIM Coverage: South Carolina Supreme Court in Wiegand v. USAA Introduction The case of Deborah J. Wiegand, individually, and as Personal...
Enhancing Sentencing Guidelines and Expert Testimony Reliability: Insights from Townsend v. United States and Watson v. Ford Motor Co.

Enhancing Sentencing Guidelines and Expert Testimony Reliability: Insights from Townsend v. United States and Watson v. Ford Motor Co.

Date: Sep 14, 2010
Enhancing Sentencing Guidelines and Expert Testimony Reliability: Insights from Townsend v. United States and Watson v. Ford Motor Co. Introduction This commentary explores two significant judicial...
STATE v. MATTISON: Affirming the Primacy of Intent in Accomplice Liability

STATE v. MATTISON: Affirming the Primacy of Intent in Accomplice Liability

Date: Aug 10, 2010
STATE v. MATTISON: Affirming the Primacy of Intent in Accomplice Liability Introduction Case Citation: The STATE, v. Amos Lamont Mattison, 388 S.C. 469 (2010) The case of The STATE, v. Amos Lamont...
Excluding Prospective Wages under the Payment of Wages Act: Insights from Mathis v. Brown Brown

Excluding Prospective Wages under the Payment of Wages Act: Insights from Mathis v. Brown Brown

Date: Aug 10, 2010
Excluding Prospective Wages under the Payment of Wages Act: Insights from Mathis v. Brown Brown Introduction The Supreme Court of South Carolina, in the case of Blair Mathis v. Brown Brown of South...
Affirmation of Governmental Immunity under S.C. Code Ann §15-78-60 in JONES v. LOTT

Affirmation of Governmental Immunity under S.C. Code Ann §15-78-60 in JONES v. LOTT

Date: Apr 20, 2010
Affirmation of Governmental Immunity under S.C. Code Ann §15-78-60 in JONES v. LOTT Introduction In the landmark case of Willie L. Jones, Personal Representative v. Office of the Estate of Chad Jones...
Exclusion of Enterprise Goodwill in Professional Practices from Equitable Distribution: Analysis of Dickert v. Dickert

Exclusion of Enterprise Goodwill in Professional Practices from Equitable Distribution: Analysis of Dickert v. Dickert

Date: Mar 30, 2010
Exclusion of Enterprise Goodwill in Professional Practices from Equitable Distribution: Analysis of Dickert v. Dickert Introduction James W. Dickert v. Carolyn H. Dickert is a landmark case...
State v. Quincy Jovan Allen: Affirmation of Death Penalty Sentencing Standards

State v. Quincy Jovan Allen: Affirmation of Death Penalty Sentencing Standards

Date: Nov 17, 2009
State v. Quincy Jovan Allen: Affirmation of Death Penalty Sentencing Standards Introduction State v. Quincy Jovan Allen is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of South Carolina on November...
Revisiting Malice Inferrals: South Carolina Supreme Court Reforms Murder Conviction Protocols

Revisiting Malice Inferrals: South Carolina Supreme Court Reforms Murder Conviction Protocols

Date: Oct 13, 2009
Revisiting Malice Inferrals: South Carolina Supreme Court Reforms Murder Conviction Protocols Introduction In the landmark case of The STATE v. Johnny Rufus Belcher, 385 S.C. 597 (2009), the Supreme...
Proper Pleading Requirements for Civil Conspiracy: Hackworth v. Greywood Athammett LLC

Proper Pleading Requirements for Civil Conspiracy: Hackworth v. Greywood Athammett LLC

Date: Aug 13, 2009
Proper Pleading Requirements for Civil Conspiracy: Hackworth v. Greywood Athammett LLC Introduction The case of Deborah Kay Hackworth and Edman Hackworth v. Greywood Athammett, LLC revolves around a...
State v. Neuman: Upholding the Constitutionality of Hostage-Taking Statutes in Correctional Facilities

State v. Neuman: Upholding the Constitutionality of Hostage-Taking Statutes in Correctional Facilities

Date: Jun 30, 2009
State v. Neuman: Upholding the Constitutionality of Hostage-Taking Statutes in Correctional Facilities Introduction The STATE v. Vincent Neuman, Sr., 384 S.C. 395 (2009), is a pivotal case...
Affirming the Gatekeeping Role: Admissibility of Dog Tracking Evidence Under SC Rule 702

Affirming the Gatekeeping Role: Admissibility of Dog Tracking Evidence Under SC Rule 702

Date: Apr 28, 2009
Affirming the Gatekeeping Role: Admissibility of Dog Tracking Evidence Under SC Rule 702 Introduction In the landmark case The STATE v. Gary A. WHITE, 382 S.C. 265 (2009), the Supreme Court of South...
Clarifying Sales Tax Exemptions on Medical Devices: South Carolina Supreme Court Reverses Administrative Law Court in Home Medical Systems, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Revenue

Clarifying Sales Tax Exemptions on Medical Devices: South Carolina Supreme Court Reverses Administrative Law Court in Home Medical Systems, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Revenue

Date: Apr 21, 2009
Clarifying Sales Tax Exemptions on Medical Devices: South Carolina Supreme Court Reverses Administrative Law Court in Home Medical Systems, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Revenue Introduction...
Condition Precedent in Real Estate Contracts: Insights from Carlyle McGILL v. Tracy MOORE

Condition Precedent in Real Estate Contracts: Insights from Carlyle McGILL v. Tracy MOORE

Date: Jan 21, 2009
Condition Precedent in Real Estate Contracts: Insights from Carlyle McGILL v. Tracy MOORE Introduction The Supreme Court of South Carolina, in Carlyle McGILL, Appellant, v. Tracy MOORE et al.,...
STATE v. Gaines: Admissibility of Prior Online Communications and Clarification on Entrapment in Criminal Solicitation of a Minor

STATE v. Gaines: Admissibility of Prior Online Communications and Clarification on Entrapment in Criminal Solicitation of a Minor

Date: Oct 7, 2008
STATE v. Gaines: Admissibility of Prior Online Communications and Clarification on Entrapment in Criminal Solicitation of a Minor Introduction In State v. Gaines, the Supreme Court of South Carolina...
STATE v. FLETCHER: Clarifying Admissibility of Prior Bad Acts in Child Abuse Homicide Cases

STATE v. FLETCHER: Clarifying Admissibility of Prior Bad Acts in Child Abuse Homicide Cases

Date: Aug 5, 2008
STATE v. FLETCHER: Clarifying Admissibility of Prior Bad Acts in Child Abuse Homicide Cases Introduction STATE v. FLETCHER is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of South Carolina, adjudicated...
USAA v. Clegg: Clarifying the Duty to Defend in Non-Owned Vehicle Claims

USAA v. Clegg: Clarifying the Duty to Defend in Non-Owned Vehicle Claims

Date: Apr 29, 2008
USAA v. Clegg: Clarifying the Duty to Defend in Non-Owned Vehicle Claims Introduction The case of USAA Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Deborah J. Clegg (377 S.C. 643) delivered by the...
South Carolina Supreme Court Upholds Adulthood Trial and Reaffirms Juvenile Competency Standards in Double Homicide Case

South Carolina Supreme Court Upholds Adulthood Trial and Reaffirms Juvenile Competency Standards in Double Homicide Case

Date: Jul 19, 2007
South Carolina Supreme Court Upholds Adulthood Trial and Reaffirms Juvenile Competency Standards in Double Homicide Case Introduction In the landmark case of The STATE, Respondent, v. Christopher...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert