Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

South Carolina Case Commentaries

STATE v. STANKO: Comprehensive Review and Affirmation of Conviction

STATE v. STANKO: Comprehensive Review and Affirmation of Conviction

Date: Apr 4, 2013
STATE v. STANKO: Comprehensive Review and Affirmation of Conviction Introduction In the case of The STATE, Respondent, v. Stephen Christopher Stanko, Appellant, Appellate Case No. 2010–154746, the...
South Carolina Supreme Court Affirms Dual Persona Doctrine as Exception to Workers' Compensation Exclusivity

South Carolina Supreme Court Affirms Dual Persona Doctrine as Exception to Workers' Compensation Exclusivity

Date: Feb 14, 2013
South Carolina Supreme Court Affirms Dual Persona Doctrine as Exception to Workers' Compensation Exclusivity Introduction In the landmark case of Suzanne Roerig Mendenall, Personal Representative v....
Admissibility and Harmlessness of Hearsay-Based Testimony in Child Abuse Proceedings: State v. Kromah

Admissibility and Harmlessness of Hearsay-Based Testimony in Child Abuse Proceedings: State v. Kromah

Date: Jan 24, 2013
Admissibility and Harmlessness of Hearsay-Based Testimony in Child Abuse Proceedings: State v. Kromah Introduction State v. Miama Kromah is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of South...
Impeaching Witness Credibility with Remote Convictions: A Commentary on State v. Black

Impeaching Witness Credibility with Remote Convictions: A Commentary on State v. Black

Date: Oct 4, 2012
Impeaching Witness Credibility with Remote Convictions: A Commentary on State v. Black Introduction State v. Jason Ervin Black is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of South Carolina on...
Supreme Court of South Carolina: Redundancy of Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Legal Malpractice Claims Affirmed in RFT Management v. Tinsley & Adams

Supreme Court of South Carolina: Redundancy of Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Legal Malpractice Claims Affirmed in RFT Management v. Tinsley & Adams

Date: Sep 20, 2012
Supreme Court of South Carolina: Redundancy of Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Legal Malpractice Claims Affirmed in RFT Management v. Tinsley & Adams Introduction RFT Management Co., L.L.C. v. TINSLEY &...
Two-Issue Rule and Contract Illegality in Atlantic Coast Builders v. Lewis

Two-Issue Rule and Contract Illegality in Atlantic Coast Builders v. Lewis

Date: May 17, 2012
Two-Issue Rule and Contract Illegality in Atlantic Coast Builders v. Lewis Introduction In Atlantic Coast Builders and Contractors, LLC v. Laura Lewis, 398 S.C. 323 (2012), the Supreme Court of South...
Strict Issue Preservation Rules in Arbitration Agreements: HERRON v. CENTURY BMW

Strict Issue Preservation Rules in Arbitration Agreements: HERRON v. CENTURY BMW

Date: Dec 20, 2011
Strict Issue Preservation Rules in Arbitration Agreements: HERRON v. CENTURY BMW Introduction The case of HERRON v. CENTURY BMW, decided by the Supreme Court of South Carolina on December 19, 2011,...
Two-Thirds Quorum Requirement for Veto Overrides Affirmed in South Carolina Supreme Court

Two-Thirds Quorum Requirement for Veto Overrides Affirmed in South Carolina Supreme Court

Date: Oct 21, 2011
Two-Thirds Quorum Requirement for Veto Overrides Affirmed in South Carolina Supreme Court Introduction In the landmark case of Board of Trustees of the School District of Fairfield County v. State of...
Jennings v. The State: Reinforcing Standards on Hearsay and Credibility in Child Abuse Cases

Jennings v. The State: Reinforcing Standards on Hearsay and Credibility in Child Abuse Cases

Date: Oct 20, 2011
Jennings v. The State: Reinforcing Standards on Hearsay and Credibility in Child Abuse Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Jennings v. The State (394 S.C. 473), the Supreme Court of South...
Single-Member LLCs Eligible for Residential Tax Ratio: SC Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Single-Member LLCs Eligible for Residential Tax Ratio: SC Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Date: Aug 30, 2011
Single-Member LLCs Eligible for Residential Tax Ratio: SC Supreme Court Sets New Precedent Introduction The Supreme Court of South Carolina delivered a landmark decision in the case of CFRE, LLC v....
Double Jeopardy and Forgery: An Analysis of STATE v. Donald M. Brandt

Double Jeopardy and Forgery: An Analysis of STATE v. Donald M. Brandt

Date: Jul 26, 2011
Double Jeopardy and Forgery: An Analysis of STATE v. Donald M. Brandt Introduction The case of STATE v. Donald M. Brandt, decided by the Supreme Court of South Carolina on July 25, 2011, presents a...
Defining 'Overt Act' in Attempted Criminal Sexual Conduct Cases: South Carolina's Application of the Substantial Step Test in STATE v. REID

Defining 'Overt Act' in Attempted Criminal Sexual Conduct Cases: South Carolina's Application of the Substantial Step Test in STATE v. REID

Date: Jul 12, 2011
Defining 'Overt Act' in Attempted Criminal Sexual Conduct Cases: South Carolina's Application of the Substantial Step Test in STATE v. REID Introduction State v. Jamey Allen Reid, 393 S.C. 325...
Preservation of Objections to Hearsay Evidence through Motions to Strike: State v. Byers

Preservation of Objections to Hearsay Evidence through Motions to Strike: State v. Byers

Date: May 24, 2011
Preservation of Objections to Hearsay Evidence through Motions to Strike: State v. Byers Introduction State v. Najjar De'Breece Byers is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of South...
Clarifying Appellate Review Standards in Family Court Matters: The Lewis v. Lewis Decision

Clarifying Appellate Review Standards in Family Court Matters: The Lewis v. Lewis Decision

Date: May 10, 2011
Clarifying Appellate Review Standards in Family Court Matters: The Lewis v. Lewis Decision Introduction In the landmark case of Roberta Hardy LEWIS, Petitioner, v. Joseph Terrell LEWIS, Respondent...
TURNER v. MILLIMAN: Reevaluating Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Health Insurance Policies

TURNER v. MILLIMAN: Reevaluating Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Health Insurance Policies

Date: Mar 29, 2011
TURNER v. MILLIMAN: Reevaluating Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Health Insurance Policies Introduction In TURNER v. MILLIMAN, the Supreme Court of South Carolina addressed critical issues...
Establishing the Presumption of a Meaningful Offer of UIM Coverage: South Carolina Supreme Court in Wiegand v. USAA

Establishing the Presumption of a Meaningful Offer of UIM Coverage: South Carolina Supreme Court in Wiegand v. USAA

Date: Feb 1, 2011
Establishing the Presumption of a Meaningful Offer of UIM Coverage: South Carolina Supreme Court in Wiegand v. USAA Introduction The case of Deborah J. Wiegand, individually, and as Personal...
Enhancing Sentencing Guidelines and Expert Testimony Reliability: Insights from Townsend v. United States and Watson v. Ford Motor Co.

Enhancing Sentencing Guidelines and Expert Testimony Reliability: Insights from Townsend v. United States and Watson v. Ford Motor Co.

Date: Sep 14, 2010
Enhancing Sentencing Guidelines and Expert Testimony Reliability: Insights from Townsend v. United States and Watson v. Ford Motor Co. Introduction This commentary explores two significant judicial...
STATE v. MATTISON: Affirming the Primacy of Intent in Accomplice Liability

STATE v. MATTISON: Affirming the Primacy of Intent in Accomplice Liability

Date: Aug 10, 2010
STATE v. MATTISON: Affirming the Primacy of Intent in Accomplice Liability Introduction Case Citation: The STATE, v. Amos Lamont Mattison, 388 S.C. 469 (2010) The case of The STATE, v. Amos Lamont...
Excluding Prospective Wages under the Payment of Wages Act: Insights from Mathis v. Brown Brown

Excluding Prospective Wages under the Payment of Wages Act: Insights from Mathis v. Brown Brown

Date: Aug 10, 2010
Excluding Prospective Wages under the Payment of Wages Act: Insights from Mathis v. Brown Brown Introduction The Supreme Court of South Carolina, in the case of Blair Mathis v. Brown Brown of South...
Affirmation of Governmental Immunity under S.C. Code Ann §15-78-60 in JONES v. LOTT

Affirmation of Governmental Immunity under S.C. Code Ann §15-78-60 in JONES v. LOTT

Date: Apr 20, 2010
Affirmation of Governmental Immunity under S.C. Code Ann §15-78-60 in JONES v. LOTT Introduction In the landmark case of Willie L. Jones, Personal Representative v. Office of the Estate of Chad Jones...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert