Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Pennsylvania Case Commentaries

Reilly v. SEPTA: Reinforcing Judicial Recusal Standards and No-Fault Act Interpretations

Reilly v. SEPTA: Reinforcing Judicial Recusal Standards and No-Fault Act Interpretations

Date: Mar 28, 1985
Reilly v. SEPTA: Reinforcing Judicial Recusal Standards and No-Fault Act Interpretations Introduction Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) is a landmark decision by...
Hospital Utilization Project v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: Redefining Charitable Exemptions in Taxation Law

Hospital Utilization Project v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: Redefining Charitable Exemptions in Taxation Law

Date: Feb 14, 1985
Hospital Utilization Project v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: Redefining Charitable Exemptions in Taxation Law Introduction In Hospital Utilization Project v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the...
Affirming the Commonwealth's Unrestricted Right to Appeal Suppression Orders and Adopting Reasonable Suspicion Standard for Prison Searches

Affirming the Commonwealth's Unrestricted Right to Appeal Suppression Orders and Adopting Reasonable Suspicion Standard for Prison Searches

Date: Jan 10, 1985
Affirming the Commonwealth's Unrestricted Right to Appeal Suppression Orders and Adopting Reasonable Suspicion Standard for Prison Searches Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Billy G....
Landlord Liability for Third-Party Criminal Acts: Insights from FELD v. MERRIAM et al.

Landlord Liability for Third-Party Criminal Acts: Insights from FELD v. MERRIAM et al.

Date: Dec 19, 1984
Landlord Liability for Third-Party Criminal Acts: Insights from FELD v. MERRIAM et al. Introduction The landmark case of Samuel Feld and Peggy Feld v. John W. Merriam and Thomas Wynne, Inc.,...
PENFLEX, INC. v. BRYSON ET AL.: Defining Unemployment Compensation Eligibility for Striking Employees Post-Contract Expiration

PENFLEX, INC. v. BRYSON ET AL.: Defining Unemployment Compensation Eligibility for Striking Employees Post-Contract Expiration

Date: Dec 8, 1984
PENFLEX, INC. v. BRYSON ET AL.: Defining Unemployment Compensation Eligibility for Striking Employees Post-Contract Expiration Introduction PENFLEX, INC. v. Kenneth BRYSON et al. and Commonwealth of...
Establishing Structured Guidelines for Child Support Calculations: MELZER v. WITSBERGER

Establishing Structured Guidelines for Child Support Calculations: MELZER v. WITSBERGER

Date: Jul 14, 1984
Establishing Structured Guidelines for Child Support Calculations: MELZER v. WITSBERGER Introduction In the landmark case of Arden E. Melzer v. Lynn L. Witsberger, decided on July 13, 1984, the...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Clemmons

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Clemmons

Date: Jun 29, 1984
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Clemmons Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Charlie Will Clemmons is a pivotal 1984 decision by the Supreme Court of...
Arsenal Coal v. Commonwealth: Establishing Equitable Relief for Preenforcement Regulatory Challenges

Arsenal Coal v. Commonwealth: Establishing Equitable Relief for Preenforcement Regulatory Challenges

Date: Jun 1, 1984
Arsenal Coal v. Commonwealth: Establishing Equitable Relief for Preenforcement Regulatory Challenges Introduction In Arsenal Coal Company et al. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court of...
Upholding Government Notice Requirements: The William James v. SEPTA Decision

Upholding Government Notice Requirements: The William James v. SEPTA Decision

Date: May 25, 1984
Upholding Government Notice Requirements: The William James v. SEPTA Decision Introduction William James v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) is a landmark decision by the...
Affirming the Death Penalty in Contract Killing: Commonwealth v. Frey

Affirming the Death Penalty in Contract Killing: Commonwealth v. Frey

Date: Apr 14, 1984
Affirming the Death Penalty in Contract Killing: Commonwealth v. Frey Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Roderick Herman Frey, Appellee, 504 Pa. 428 (1984), adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Clarifying 'Occupying' and Stacking of Uninsured Motorist Coverages: Utica Mutual Insurance Co. v. Contrisciane

Clarifying 'Occupying' and Stacking of Uninsured Motorist Coverages: Utica Mutual Insurance Co. v. Contrisciane

Date: Mar 17, 1984
Clarifying 'Occupying' and Stacking of Uninsured Motorist Coverages: Utica Mutual Insurance Co. v. Contrisciane Introduction The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania's decision in Utica Mutual Insurance Co....
Retention of Automatic Standing in Possessory Crimes: Insights from COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Larry Sell

Retention of Automatic Standing in Possessory Crimes: Insights from COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Larry Sell

Date: Dec 31, 1983
Retention of Automatic Standing in Possessory Crimes: Insights from COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Larry Sell Introduction The case of COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Larry Sell, decided by the...
Liability of Social Hosts for Serving Alcohol to Minors: Analysis of Congini v. Portersville Valve Company

Liability of Social Hosts for Serving Alcohol to Minors: Analysis of Congini v. Portersville Valve Company

Date: Dec 31, 1983
Liability of Social Hosts for Serving Alcohol to Minors: Analysis of Congini v. Portersville Valve Company Introduction Mark Congini v. Portersville Valve Company is a landmark case adjudicated by...
Reaffirming the Constitutionality of 0.10% BAC per Se DUI Laws: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Mikulan

Reaffirming the Constitutionality of 0.10% BAC per Se DUI Laws: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Mikulan

Date: Dec 31, 1983
Reaffirming the Constitutionality of 0.10% BAC per Se DUI Laws: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Mikulan Introduction In the landmark case Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Richard M. Mikulan, decided...
Affirming the Enforceability of Clear Exclusion Clauses in Insurance Contracts

Affirming the Enforceability of Clear Exclusion Clauses in Insurance Contracts

Date: Dec 31, 1983
Affirming the Enforceability of Clear Exclusion Clauses in Insurance Contracts Introduction The case of Standard Venetian Blind Co. and Sheldon B. Morris v. American Empire Insurance Co. addressed a...
Unconstitutional Notice Provision in Real Estate Tax Sale Law: First Pennsylvania Bank v. Lancaster County

Unconstitutional Notice Provision in Real Estate Tax Sale Law: First Pennsylvania Bank v. Lancaster County

Date: Dec 31, 1983
Unconstitutional Notice Provision in Real Estate Tax Sale Law: First Pennsylvania Bank v. Lancaster County Introduction The case of First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A. v. Lancaster County Tax Claim Bureau...
Thornburgh v. Lewis: Affirming Judicial Oversight in Legislative Budgetary Data Requests

Thornburgh v. Lewis: Affirming Judicial Oversight in Legislative Budgetary Data Requests

Date: Dec 31, 1983
Thornburgh v. Lewis: Affirming Judicial Oversight in Legislative Budgetary Data Requests Introduction The case of Governor Dick Thornburgh and Jay C. Waldman v. State Senator H. Craig Lewis, decided...
Commonwealth v. Cabeza: Establishing Retroactive Standards for Character Evidence Cross-Examination

Commonwealth v. Cabeza: Establishing Retroactive Standards for Character Evidence Cross-Examination

Date: Dec 30, 1983
Commonwealth v. Cabeza: Establishing Retroactive Standards for Character Evidence Cross-Examination Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Davico L. Cabeza is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Personal Liability of Corporate Officers Under Participation Theory: Insights from Wicks v. Milzoco Builders

Personal Liability of Corporate Officers Under Participation Theory: Insights from Wicks v. Milzoco Builders

Date: Dec 30, 1983
Personal Liability of Corporate Officers Under Participation Theory: Insights from Wicks v. Milzoco Builders Introduction The case of Robert B. Wicks and Lucy J. Wicks, Indi v. Milzoco Builders,...
Constructive Possession in Joint Residences: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Carl Macolino

Constructive Possession in Joint Residences: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Carl Macolino

Date: Dec 28, 1983
Constructive Possession in Joint Residences: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Carl Macolino Introduction The case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Carl Macolino (503 Pa. 201) adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert