Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Pennsylvania Case Commentaries

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Upholds Regular-Use Exclusion Precluding UIM Benefits for Police Officers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Upholds Regular-Use Exclusion Precluding UIM Benefits for Police Officers

Date: Oct 20, 2011
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Upholds Regular-Use Exclusion Precluding UIM Benefits for Police Officers Introduction In the case of Robert C. Williams, Appellant v. GEICO Government Employees...
Workers' Compensation Exclusion in Employer-Sponsored Underinsured Motorist Policies Violates Public Policy

Workers' Compensation Exclusion in Employer-Sponsored Underinsured Motorist Policies Violates Public Policy

Date: Oct 20, 2011
Workers' Compensation Exclusion in Employer-Sponsored Underinsured Motorist Policies Violates Public Policy Introduction In the landmark case of Frank D. Heller and Beverly A. Heller v. Pennsylvania...
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Chamberlain: Upholding Death Sentences and Clarifying Due Process Obligations

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Chamberlain: Upholding Death Sentences and Clarifying Due Process Obligations

Date: Oct 15, 2011
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Chamberlain: Upholding Death Sentences and Clarifying Due Process Obligations Introduction In Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Terry Ray Chamberlain, the Supreme Court...
Clarifying Hybrid Representation and Pro Se Appeals in Pennsylvania: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Nia Cooper

Clarifying Hybrid Representation and Pro Se Appeals in Pennsylvania: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Nia Cooper

Date: Sep 30, 2011
Clarifying Hybrid Representation and Pro Se Appeals in Pennsylvania: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Nia Cooper Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Nia Cooper, Appellant (27 A.3d 994) is a...
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Affirms Standards for Ineffective Assistance Claims in Post-Conviction Relief: Commonwealth v. Hutchinson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Affirms Standards for Ineffective Assistance Claims in Post-Conviction Relief: Commonwealth v. Hutchinson

Date: Aug 23, 2011
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Affirms Standards for Ineffective Assistance Claims in Post-Conviction Relief: Commonwealth v. Hutchinson Introduction In the landmark case Commonwealth of Pennsylvania...
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Rejects Hybrid Representation: In-Depth Analysis of Commonwealth v. Jette

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Rejects Hybrid Representation: In-Depth Analysis of Commonwealth v. Jette

Date: Jun 23, 2011
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Rejects Hybrid Representation: In-Depth Analysis of Commonwealth v. Jette Introduction The case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Jules Jette, decided on June 22, 2011,...
Affirmation of Multiple Capital Homicide Convictions: No Double Jeopardy Violation in Commonwealth v. Spotz

Affirmation of Multiple Capital Homicide Convictions: No Double Jeopardy Violation in Commonwealth v. Spotz

Date: Apr 30, 2011
Affirmation of Multiple Capital Homicide Convictions: No Double Jeopardy Violation in Commonwealth v. Spotz Introduction The case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Mark Newton Spotz, decided on...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Commonwealth v. Houser: Evaluating Aggravating Circumstances and Self-Defense Claims

Affirmation of Death Sentence in Commonwealth v. Houser: Evaluating Aggravating Circumstances and Self-Defense Claims

Date: Apr 30, 2011
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Commonwealth v. Houser: Evaluating Aggravating Circumstances and Self-Defense Claims Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Darien Houser, 18 A.3d 1128 (Pa....
Establishing Boundaries on "Unknown Facts" in PCRA Timeliness Exceptions: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Edward Watts

Establishing Boundaries on "Unknown Facts" in PCRA Timeliness Exceptions: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Edward Watts

Date: Apr 29, 2011
Establishing Boundaries on "Unknown Facts" in PCRA Timeliness Exceptions: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Edward Watts Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Edward Watts (23 A.3d 980) is a...
Willful Misconduct in Unemployment Compensation: Insights from Diane Chapman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Willful Misconduct in Unemployment Compensation: Insights from Diane Chapman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Date: Apr 26, 2011
Willful Misconduct in Unemployment Compensation: Insights from Diane Chapman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review Introduction The case of Diane Chapman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of...
Reversing Summary Judgment: Clarifying the Discovery Rule and Reasonable Diligence in Pennsylvania Negligence Actions

Reversing Summary Judgment: Clarifying the Discovery Rule and Reasonable Diligence in Pennsylvania Negligence Actions

Date: Apr 5, 2011
Reversing Summary Judgment: Clarifying the Discovery Rule and Reasonable Diligence in Pennsylvania Negligence Actions Introduction The case of David and Leslie Gleason et al. v. Borough of Moosic, et...
Establishing the Duty of Capital Defense Counsel to Investigate and Present Mitigating Evidence: Commonwealth v. Donyell A. Paddy

Establishing the Duty of Capital Defense Counsel to Investigate and Present Mitigating Evidence: Commonwealth v. Donyell A. Paddy

Date: Mar 31, 2011
Establishing the Duty of Capital Defense Counsel to Investigate and Present Mitigating Evidence: Commonwealth v. Donyell A. Paddy Introduction In the landmark case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v....
Affirmation of Denial of Post Conviction Relief in Commonwealth v. James Melvin Smith

Affirmation of Denial of Post Conviction Relief in Commonwealth v. James Melvin Smith

Date: Mar 30, 2011
Affirmation of Denial of Post Conviction Relief in Commonwealth v. James Melvin Smith Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. James Melvin Smith (17 A.3d 873) is a significant case adjudicated...
Strict Enforcement of Rule 1925(b) Waiver in Post-Conviction Appeals: COMMONWEALTH v. HILL

Strict Enforcement of Rule 1925(b) Waiver in Post-Conviction Appeals: COMMONWEALTH v. HILL

Date: Mar 12, 2011
Strict Enforcement of Rule 1925(b) Waiver in Post-Conviction Appeals: COMMONWEALTH v. HILL Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Donnetta Hill, 16 A.3d 484 (Pa. 2011), is a pivotal case...
Commonwealth v. Lesko: Upholding PCRA Time-Bar Restrictions in Post-Conviction Relief

Commonwealth v. Lesko: Upholding PCRA Time-Bar Restrictions in Post-Conviction Relief

Date: Feb 25, 2011
Commonwealth v. Lesko: Upholding PCRA Time-Bar Restrictions in Post-Conviction Relief Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. John C. Lesko is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Expansion of Attorney-Client Privilege: Gillard v. AIG Insurance Co.

Expansion of Attorney-Client Privilege: Gillard v. AIG Insurance Co.

Date: Feb 24, 2011
Expansion of Attorney-Client Privilege: Gillard v. AIG Insurance Co. Introduction In Gillard v. AIG Insurance Co., the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania addressed a pivotal issue concerning the scope of...
Reaffirming Competitive Bidding in Public Procurement: Brayman Constr. Corp. v. PennDOT

Reaffirming Competitive Bidding in Public Procurement: Brayman Constr. Corp. v. PennDOT

Date: Feb 23, 2011
Reaffirming Competitive Bidding in Public Procurement: Brayman Constr. Corp. v. PennDOT Introduction In Brayman Construction Corporation and Stephen M. Muck, Appellants/Cross-Appellees v....
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion for Vehicle Stops: Commonwealth v. Holmes

Establishing Reasonable Suspicion for Vehicle Stops: Commonwealth v. Holmes

Date: Feb 23, 2011
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion for Vehicle Stops: Commonwealth v. Holmes Introduction Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Jason Holmes is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania,...
Restoration of Employer Subrogation Rights for Heart and Lung Act Benefits: OLIVER v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH

Restoration of Employer Subrogation Rights for Heart and Lung Act Benefits: OLIVER v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH

Date: Jan 29, 2011
Restoration of Employer Subrogation Rights for Heart and Lung Act Benefits: OLIVER v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH Introduction OLIVER v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH is a landmark decision rendered by the Supreme Court...
Interpretation of Settlement Agreements and Obligatory Payment Terms: LESKO v. FRANKFORD HOSPITAL-BUCKS COUNTY

Interpretation of Settlement Agreements and Obligatory Payment Terms: LESKO v. FRANKFORD HOSPITAL-BUCKS COUNTY

Date: Jan 20, 2011
Interpretation of Settlement Agreements and Obligatory Payment Terms: LESKO v. FRANKFORD HOSPITAL-BUCKS COUNTY Introduction In the landmark case LESKO v. FRANKFORD HOSPITAL-BUCKS COUNTY, the Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert