Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Oregon Case Commentaries

Admissibility of Battered Woman Syndrome Testimony and Prior Acts Evidence in Criminal Trials: STATE v. STEVENS

Admissibility of Battered Woman Syndrome Testimony and Prior Acts Evidence in Criminal Trials: STATE v. STEVENS

Date: Dec 18, 1998
Admissibility of Battered Woman Syndrome Testimony and Prior Acts Evidence in Criminal Trials: STATE v. STEVENS (328 Or. 116) Introduction In State of Oregon v. Gary Todd Stevens, the Oregon Supreme...
Establishing Implicit Threats in Third-Degree Robbery: Oregon Supreme Court's Decision in STATE v. HALL

Establishing Implicit Threats in Third-Degree Robbery: Oregon Supreme Court's Decision in STATE v. HALL

Date: Oct 6, 1998
Establishing Implicit Threats in Third-Degree Robbery: Oregon Supreme Court's Decision in STATE v. HALL Introduction State of Oregon v. Teddy Hall, 327 Or. 568 (1998), represents a pivotal case in...
Limits of Authority in Traffic Stops: Comprehensive Analysis of STATE v. TOEVS

Limits of Authority in Traffic Stops: Comprehensive Analysis of STATE v. TOEVS

Date: Sep 25, 1998
Limits of Authority in Traffic Stops: Comprehensive Analysis of STATE v. TOEVS Introduction State of Oregon v. Leslie Lee Toevs, 327 Or. 525 (1998), is a landmark decision by the Oregon Supreme Court...
Separate-Vote Requirement in State Constitutional Amendments: Analysis of Armatta et al. v. Kitzhaber et al.

Separate-Vote Requirement in State Constitutional Amendments: Analysis of Armatta et al. v. Kitzhaber et al.

Date: Jun 26, 1998
Separate-Vote Requirement in State Constitutional Amendments: Analysis of Armatta et al. v. Kitzhaber et al. Introduction In the landmark case of Armatta et al. v. Kitzhaber et al., the Oregon...
Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Clear Guidelines for Appellate Attorney Fee Awards under ORS 20.075

Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Clear Guidelines for Appellate Attorney Fee Awards under ORS 20.075

Date: Apr 24, 1998
Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Clear Guidelines for Appellate Attorney Fee Awards under ORS 20.075 Introduction The Oregon Supreme Court, in the case of Terry B. McCARTHY, Petitioner on Review, v....
ORS Chapter 419B Insufficient as Substitute for Parental Consent in Adoptions: Oregon Supreme Court in MICHELS v. HODGES

ORS Chapter 419B Insufficient as Substitute for Parental Consent in Adoptions: Oregon Supreme Court in MICHELS v. HODGES

Date: Mar 27, 1998
ORS Chapter 419B Insufficient as Substitute for Parental Consent in Adoptions: Oregon Supreme Court in MICHELS v. HODGES Introduction MICHELS v. HODGES is a landmark decision by the Oregon Supreme...
STULL v. HOKE: Defining the Commencement of Civil Actions for Incarcerated Indigent Plaintiffs

STULL v. HOKE: Defining the Commencement of Civil Actions for Incarcerated Indigent Plaintiffs

Date: Nov 15, 1997
STULL v. HOKE: Defining the Commencement of Civil Actions for Incarcerated Indigent Plaintiffs Introduction In the landmark case of STULL v. HOKE, the Oregon Supreme Court addressed a pivotal issue...
Shift in Burden of Production Under ORCP 47 C: Analysis of JONES v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPoration

Shift in Burden of Production Under ORCP 47 C: Analysis of JONES v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPoration

Date: Jun 27, 1997
Shift in Burden of Production Under ORCP 47 C: Analysis of JONES v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPoration Introduction JONES v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPoration, 325 Or. 404 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1997), is a pivotal...
Strict Construction of Restrictive Covenants in Residential Subdivisions: YOGMAN v. PARROTT

Strict Construction of Restrictive Covenants in Residential Subdivisions: YOGMAN v. PARROTT

Date: May 31, 1997
Strict Construction of Restrictive Covenants in Residential Subdivisions: YOGMAN v. PARROTT Introduction YOGMAN v. PARROTT is a landmark decision by the Oregon Supreme Court that clarifies the...
Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Reinforced: Analysis of State v. Sawyer

Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Reinforced: Analysis of State v. Sawyer

Date: Feb 22, 1997
Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Reinforced: Analysis of State of Oregon ex rel Mark Huddleston v. Honorable L.L. Sawyer Introduction The case of State of Oregon ex rel Mark Huddleston v. Honorable L.L....
Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Standards for 'Intrusion Upon Seclusion' in Privacy Torts

Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Standards for 'Intrusion Upon Seclusion' in Privacy Torts

Date: Dec 28, 1996
Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Standards for 'Intrusion Upon Seclusion' in Privacy Torts Introduction In the landmark case of Sergio Mauri v. Re et al., the Oregon Supreme Court addressed critical...
State of Oregon v. Marco Antonio Montez, II: Affirmation of Death Sentence Under Revised Sentencing Guidelines

State of Oregon v. Marco Antonio Montez, II: Affirmation of Death Sentence Under Revised Sentencing Guidelines

Date: Nov 22, 1996
State of Oregon v. Marco Antonio Montez, II: Affirmation of Death Sentence Under Revised Sentencing Guidelines Introduction State of Oregon v. Marco Antonio Montez, II is a seminal case adjudicated...
Defamation and Contractual Liability Established in Slover v. Oregon State Board of Clinical Social Workers

Defamation and Contractual Liability Established in Slover v. Oregon State Board of Clinical Social Workers

Date: Nov 21, 1996
Defamation and Contractual Liability Established in Slover v. Oregon State Board of Clinical Social Workers Introduction Slover v. Oregon State Board of Clinical Social Workers is a pivotal case...
Duty of Care in Negligent Misrepresentation: CONWAY v. PACIFIC UNIVERSITY

Duty of Care in Negligent Misrepresentation: CONWAY v. PACIFIC UNIVERSITY

Date: Oct 12, 1996
Duty of Care in Negligent Misrepresentation: CONWAY v. PACIFIC UNIVERSITY Introduction Case Citation: Patrick W. CONWAY v. PACIFIC UNIVERSITY, 324 Or. 231 (Or. 1996) Court: Oregon Supreme Court Date:...
Admissibility of Victim Impact Evidence in Oregon Capital Cases: Insights from STATE v. GUZEK

Admissibility of Victim Impact Evidence in Oregon Capital Cases: Insights from STATE v. GUZEK

Date: Feb 14, 1996
Admissibility of Victim Impact Evidence in Oregon Capital Cases: Insights from State of Oregon v. Guzek Introduction In the landmark case of State of Oregon v. Randy Lee Guzek (322 Or. 245, 1996),...
Oregon Supreme Court Reinforces Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Post-Conviction Relief

Oregon Supreme Court Reinforces Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Post-Conviction Relief

Date: Sep 29, 1995
Oregon Supreme Court Reinforces Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Post-Conviction Relief Introduction In the landmark case of Clifford Wayne STEVENS v. STATE OF OREGON, decided on...
McGANTY v. STAUDENRAUS: Establishing Intent Standards in Emotional Distress and Constructive Discharge, and Clarifying Third-Party Liability in Economic Relations

McGANTY v. STAUDENRAUS: Establishing Intent Standards in Emotional Distress and Constructive Discharge, and Clarifying Third-Party Liability in Economic Relations

Date: Sep 9, 1995
McGANTY v. STAUDENRAUS: Establishing Intent Standards in Emotional Distress and Constructive Discharge, and Clarifying Third-Party Liability in Economic Relations Introduction McGANTY v. STAUDENRAUS...
Mandatory Book Depreciation in Valuation of Nonprofit Elderly Housing: GANGLE v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Analysis

Mandatory Book Depreciation in Valuation of Nonprofit Elderly Housing: GANGLE v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Analysis

Date: Aug 10, 1995
Mandatory Book Depreciation in Valuation of Nonprofit Elderly Housing: GANGLE v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Analysis Introduction The case of Jim GANGLE, Lane County Assessor v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and...
Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Admissibility Limits for Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) Test in DUII Cases

Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Admissibility Limits for Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) Test in DUII Cases

Date: Jul 8, 1995
Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Admissibility Limits for Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) Test in DUII Cases Introduction In the landmark case of State of Oregon v. Albert R. O'Key, decided on July...
Apportionment of Fault Limited to Parties under ORS 18.480: DAVIS v. O'BRIEN

Apportionment of Fault Limited to Parties under ORS 18.480: DAVIS v. O'BRIEN

Date: Apr 7, 1995
Apportionment of Fault Limited to Parties under ORS 18.480: DAVIS v. O'BRIEN Introduction The case of DAVIS v. O'BRIEN, adjudicated by the Oregon Supreme Court on April 6, 1995, addresses a pivotal...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert