Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Oregon Case Commentaries

Conversion Liability under Restatement (Second) of Torts §222A: Oregon Court of Appeals Establishes Comprehensive Jury Instruction Standards

Conversion Liability under Restatement (Second) of Torts §222A: Oregon Court of Appeals Establishes Comprehensive Jury Instruction Standards

Date: Mar 14, 2003
Conversion Liability under Restatement (Second) of Torts §222A: Oregon Court of Appeals Establishes Comprehensive Jury Instruction Standards Introduction The case of Beall Transport Equipment Co. v....
Reevaluation of Evidentiary Standards and Error Appraisal: State of Oregon v. Joseph Andrew Jury

Reevaluation of Evidentiary Standards and Error Appraisal: State of Oregon v. Joseph Andrew Jury

Date: Nov 21, 2002
Reevaluation of Evidentiary Standards and Error Appraisal: State of Oregon v. Joseph Andrew Jury Introduction The case of State of Oregon v. Joseph Andrew Jury (185 Or. App. 132, 2002) presents a...
Civil Forfeiture and Double Jeopardy: Insights from State of Oregon v. Selness/Miller

Civil Forfeiture and Double Jeopardy: Insights from State of Oregon v. Selness/Miller

Date: Sep 20, 2002
Civil Forfeiture and Double Jeopardy: Insights from State of Oregon v. Selness/Miller Introduction In State of Oregon v. Selness/Miller (334 Or. 515, 2002), the Oregon Supreme Court addressed a...
Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies 'Public Duty' Exception in Wrongful Discharge and Sets Standards for Intentional Infliction of Severe Emotional Distress

Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies 'Public Duty' Exception in Wrongful Discharge and Sets Standards for Intentional Infliction of Severe Emotional Distress

Date: Feb 23, 2002
Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies 'Public Duty' Exception in Wrongful Discharge and Sets Standards for Intentional Infliction of Severe Emotional Distress Introduction In the case of Kenneth Babick,...
Defense Counsel's Duty to Investigate Alibi Defense: Insights from LICHAU v. BALDWIN

Defense Counsel's Duty to Investigate Alibi Defense: Insights from LICHAU v. BALDWIN

Date: Feb 15, 2002
Defense Counsel's Duty to Investigate Alibi Defense: Insights from LICHAU v. BALDWIN Introduction The Oregon Supreme Court's decision in Daniel David Lichau v. G.H. Baldwin serves as a seminal case...
Clarifying Standards for Parental Unfitness and Child Detriment in Termination Proceedings: Insights from State ex rel SOSCF v. Stillman

Clarifying Standards for Parental Unfitness and Child Detriment in Termination Proceedings: Insights from State ex rel SOSCF v. Stillman

Date: Dec 21, 2001
Clarifying Standards for Parental Unfitness and Child Detriment in Termination Proceedings: Insights from State ex rel SOSCF v. Stillman Introduction The landmark case of State ex rel SOSCF v....
Reaffirming Contract Modifications: Bennett v. Farmers Insurance Co.

Reaffirming Contract Modifications: Bennett v. Farmers Insurance Co.

Date: Jun 2, 2001
Reaffirming Contract Modifications: Bennett v. Farmers Insurance Co. Introduction In Bennett v. Farmers Insurance Company of Oregon, the Oregon Supreme Court addressed significant issues surrounding...
Exclusive Remedy Provisions Unconstitutional Under Oregon's Remedy Clause: SMOTHERS v. GRESHAM TRANSFER, INC.

Exclusive Remedy Provisions Unconstitutional Under Oregon's Remedy Clause: SMOTHERS v. GRESHAM TRANSFER, INC.

Date: May 11, 2001
Exclusive Remedy Provisions Unconstitutional Under Oregon's Remedy Clause: SMOTHERS v. GRESHAM TRANSFER, INC. Introduction SMOTHERS v. GRESHAM TRANSFER, INC. is a landmark decision by the Oregon...
Affirmation of OMIA's Constitutionality in Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. Oregon State

Affirmation of OMIA's Constitutionality in Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. Oregon State

Date: Mar 9, 2001
Affirmation of OMIA's Constitutionality in Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. Oregon State Introduction In the landmark case of Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. Oregon State, the Oregon Supreme Court...
Ensuring Specificity and Unanimity in Aggravated Murder Indictments: Analysis of State v. Lotches

Ensuring Specificity and Unanimity in Aggravated Murder Indictments: Analysis of State v. Lotches

Date: Dec 30, 2000
Ensuring Specificity and Unanimity in Aggravated Murder Indictments: Analysis of State v. Lotches Introduction State of Oregon v. Ernest Noland Lotches, 331 Or. 455 (2000), is a pivotal decision by...
Preservation of Issues in Discovery Sanctions: Insights from State of Oregon v. Wyatt

Preservation of Issues in Discovery Sanctions: Insights from State of Oregon v. Wyatt

Date: Dec 2, 2000
Preservation of Issues in Discovery Sanctions: Insights from State of Oregon v. Wyatt Introduction State of Oregon v. Ralph Adrian Wyatt is a pivotal case decided by the Oregon Supreme Court on...
Recognition of Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Claims under ORS 659.030: Harris v. Pameco Corporation

Recognition of Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Claims under ORS 659.030: Harris v. Pameco Corporation

Date: Oct 5, 2000
Recognition of Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Claims under ORS 659.030: Harris v. Pameco Corporation Introduction In Mark Steven Harris v. Pameco Corporation, adjudicated by the Oregon Court of Appeals...
Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Single Statutory Violation in Aggravated Murder Sentencing

Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Single Statutory Violation in Aggravated Murder Sentencing

Date: Sep 15, 2000
Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Single Statutory Violation in Aggravated Murder Sentencing Introduction In the landmark case State of Oregon v. Jacob Barrett, the Oregon Supreme Court addressed the...
Rogers v. Oregon: Retroactive Sentencing Options and Protecting Allocution Rights in Death Penalty Cases

Rogers v. Oregon: Retroactive Sentencing Options and Protecting Allocution Rights in Death Penalty Cases

Date: May 5, 2000
Rogers v. Oregon: Retroactive Sentencing Options and Protecting Allocution Rights in Death Penalty Cases Introduction Rogers v. State of Oregon is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Oregon Supreme...
ERB's Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Unfair Labor Practices Affirmed in Ahern v. Oregon Public Employees Union

ERB's Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Unfair Labor Practices Affirmed in Ahern v. Oregon Public Employees Union

Date: Oct 16, 1999
ERB's Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Unfair Labor Practices Affirmed in Ahern v. Oregon Public Employees Union Introduction In the landmark case of Michael Ahern, Respondent, v. Oregon Public Employees...
Affirmed: Oregon Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentences in Barone v. State, Reinforcing Procedural and Evidentiary Standards

Affirmed: Oregon Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentences in Barone v. State, Reinforcing Procedural and Evidentiary Standards

Date: Jul 30, 1999
Affirmed: Oregon Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentences in Barone v. State, Reinforcing Procedural and Evidentiary Standards Introduction In the landmark case of State of Oregon v. Cesar Francesco...
Joint Tortfeasor Liability of Attorneys in Corporate Fiduciary Breaches: GRANEWICH v. HARDING

Joint Tortfeasor Liability of Attorneys in Corporate Fiduciary Breaches: GRANEWICH v. HARDING

Date: Jul 10, 1999
Joint Tortfeasor Liability of Attorneys in Corporate Fiduciary Breaches: GRANEWICH v. HARDING Introduction In the landmark case of GRANEWICH v. HARDING, the Oregon Supreme Court addressed the complex...
Clarification of OEC 401 Relevance Determination and Harmless Error Analysis in Impeachment Evidence: State v. Titus

Clarification of OEC 401 Relevance Determination and Harmless Error Analysis in Impeachment Evidence: State v. Titus

Date: May 21, 1999
Clarification of OEC 401 Relevance Determination and Harmless Error Analysis in Impeachment Evidence: State v. Titus Introduction The case of State of Oregon v. Tracey Mack Titus (328 Or. 475)...
Constitutionality of Oregon's Stalking Statute Affirmed: State of Oregon v. Rangel (1999)

Constitutionality of Oregon's Stalking Statute Affirmed: State of Oregon v. Rangel (1999)

Date: Feb 27, 1999
Constitutionality of Oregon's Stalking Statute Affirmed: State of Oregon v. Rangel (1999) Introduction State of Oregon v. Eduardo Tinoco Rangel is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Oregon Supreme...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in STATE OF OREGON v. MATTHEW DWIGHT THOMPSON: Legal Principles and Implications

Affirmation of Death Sentence in STATE OF OREGON v. MATTHEW DWIGHT THOMPSON: Legal Principles and Implications

Date: Feb 5, 1999
Affirmation of Death Sentence in STATE OF OREGON v. MATTHEW DWIGHT THOMPSON: Legal Principles and Implications Introduction In the case of State of Oregon v. Matthew Dwight Thompson, 328 Or. 248...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert