Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Oregon Case Commentaries

Balancing Premises Warrants and Guest Privacy: Oregon Supreme Court Decision in State v. Bonnie Walker

Balancing Premises Warrants and Guest Privacy: Oregon Supreme Court Decision in State v. Bonnie Walker

Date: Jul 29, 2011
Balancing Premises Warrants and Guest Privacy: Oregon Supreme Court Decision in State v. Bonnie Walker Introduction In the case of State of Oregon v. Bonnie Lou Walker (350 Or. 540, 2011), the Oregon...
Limits on Introducing Non-Evidenced Facts in Closing Arguments: CLER v. PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM-OREGON

Limits on Introducing Non-Evidenced Facts in Closing Arguments: CLER v. PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM-OREGON

Date: Dec 31, 2010
Limits on Introducing Non-Evidenced Facts in Closing Arguments: CLER v. PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM-OREGON Introduction CLER v. PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM-OREGON is a pivotal decision by the Oregon...
Oregon Supreme Court Abandons Subjective Component of Holmes Seizure Test

Oregon Supreme Court Abandons Subjective Component of Holmes Seizure Test

Date: Dec 10, 2010
Oregon Supreme Court Abandons Subjective Component of Holmes Seizure Test Introduction In the case of Levi Juddson Whitney v. Nicole Ray Whitney (349 Or. 297), the Oregon Supreme Court addressed...
Court of Appeals Establishes Strict Standards for Juvenile Dependency Jurisdiction in Cases of Parental Substance Abuse

Court of Appeals Establishes Strict Standards for Juvenile Dependency Jurisdiction in Cases of Parental Substance Abuse

Date: Jul 29, 2010
Court of Appeals Establishes Strict Standards for Juvenile Dependency Jurisdiction in Cases of Parental Substance Abuse Introduction In the landmark case of In the Matter of K.A.M., a Child, decided...
Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Rigorous Standards for Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Rigorous Standards for Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

Date: Jun 5, 2010
Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Rigorous Standards for Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Cases Introduction In State of Oregon v. Lupoli, 348 Or. 346 (2010), the Oregon Supreme Court addressed...
Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Strict Limits on Traffic Stop Extensions under Article I, Section 9

Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Strict Limits on Traffic Stop Extensions under Article I, Section 9

Date: Feb 12, 2010
Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Strict Limits on Traffic Stop Extensions under Article I, Section 9 Introduction In the landmark decision of State of Oregon v. Michael K. Rodgers and Anthony Douglas...
Oregon Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Admissibility of Child Sexual Abuse Diagnoses

Oregon Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Admissibility of Child Sexual Abuse Diagnoses

Date: Oct 2, 2009
Oregon Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Admissibility of Child Sexual Abuse Diagnoses Introduction In the landmark case of State of Oregon v. Kermit Eugene Southard, decided by the Oregon Supreme...
Proportionality of Mandatory Sentences in Sexual Abuse Cases Under Oregon Constitution

Proportionality of Mandatory Sentences in Sexual Abuse Cases Under Oregon Constitution

Date: Sep 25, 2009
Proportionality of Mandatory Sentences in Sexual Abuse Cases Under Oregon Constitution Introduction In the landmark cases of State of Oregon v. Veronica Rodriguez and State of Oregon v. Darryl...
Defining 'Secret Confinement' and Merger of Sexual Abuse Charges in STATE v. PARKINS

Defining 'Secret Confinement' and Merger of Sexual Abuse Charges in STATE v. PARKINS

Date: Jun 26, 2009
Defining 'Secret Confinement' and Merger of Sexual Abuse Charges in STATE v. PARKINS Introduction State of Oregon v. Steven Donald Parkins, 346 Or. 333 (2009), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Mere Inaction Not Constitutive of 'Physical Interference or Obstacle' under ORS 162.235: STATE v. GAINES

Mere Inaction Not Constitutive of 'Physical Interference or Obstacle' under ORS 162.235: STATE v. GAINES

Date: May 1, 2009
Mere Inaction Not Constitutive of 'Physical Interference or Obstacle' under ORS 162.235: STATE v. GAINES Introduction In State of Oregon v. Artissa Dehonda Gaines, the Oregon Supreme Court addressed...
State of Oregon v. Michael Andre Davis: Upholding Death Sentence amidst Due Process Considerations and Evidentiary Integrity

State of Oregon v. Michael Andre Davis: Upholding Death Sentence amidst Due Process Considerations and Evidentiary Integrity

Date: Jan 1, 2009
State of Oregon v. Michael Andre Davis: Upholding Death Sentence amidst Due Process Considerations and Evidentiary Integrity Introduction The case of State of Oregon v. Michael Andre Davis centers...
Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies Jury Trial Rights on Executory Accords and Reaffirms Entitlement to Prejudgment Interest in Settlement Disputes

Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies Jury Trial Rights on Executory Accords and Reaffirms Entitlement to Prejudgment Interest in Settlement Disputes

Date: Sep 19, 2008
Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies Jury Trial Rights on Executory Accords and Reaffirms Entitlement to Prejudgment Interest in Settlement Disputes Introduction In McDowell Welding Pipefitting, Inc. v....
Preservation Requirements in Post-Conviction Relief: Insights from PEEPLES v. LAMPERT

Preservation Requirements in Post-Conviction Relief: Insights from PEEPLES v. LAMPERT

Date: Aug 15, 2008
Preservation Requirements in Post-Conviction Relief: Insights from PEEPLES v. LAMPERT Introduction In the landmark case of PEEPLES v. LAMPERT, decided by the Oregon Supreme Court on August 14, 2008,...
No Wage Claims for Missed Rest Periods: Insights from Gafur v. Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital

No Wage Claims for Missed Rest Periods: Insights from Gafur v. Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital

Date: May 16, 2008
No Wage Claims for Missed Rest Periods: Insights from Gafur v. Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital Introduction Gafur and Wing v. Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center is a pivotal case...
Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies Jury's Role in Consecutive Sentencing Following Apprendi Decision

Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies Jury's Role in Consecutive Sentencing Following Apprendi Decision

Date: Mar 18, 2008
Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies Jury's Role in Consecutive Sentencing Following Apprendi Decision Introduction The Oregon Supreme Court's decision in State of Oregon v. Thomas Eugene Ice, 343 Or. 248...
Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Plain Error Doctrine in Sentencing: State of Oregon v. Ramírez

Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Plain Error Doctrine in Sentencing: State of Oregon v. Ramírez

Date: Feb 14, 2008
Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Plain Error Doctrine in Sentencing: State of Oregon v. Ramírez Introduction State of Oregon v. Ramírez, 343 Or. 505 (2008), is a pivotal decision by the...
Appellate Discretion in 'Plain Error' Sentencing Claims: Comprehensive Analysis of STATE v. FULTS

Appellate Discretion in 'Plain Error' Sentencing Claims: Comprehensive Analysis of STATE v. FULTS

Date: Dec 14, 2007
Appellate Discretion in 'Plain Error' Sentencing Claims: Comprehensive Analysis of STATE v. FULTS Introduction The case of STATE OF OREGON, Petitioner on Review, v. DAVID LESTER FULTS, Respondent on...
Broad Interpretation of Anti-Assignment Clauses Affirmed by Oregon Supreme Court

Broad Interpretation of Anti-Assignment Clauses Affirmed by Oregon Supreme Court

Date: Nov 17, 2006
Broad Interpretation of Anti-Assignment Clauses Affirmed by Oregon Supreme Court Introduction The case of Krystal Holloway v. Republic Indemnity Company of America presents a pivotal examination of...
Measure 3 Validated: Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Single Amendment with Closely Related Provisions under Separate-Vote Requirement

Measure 3 Validated: Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Single Amendment with Closely Related Provisions under Separate-Vote Requirement

Date: Oct 20, 2006
Measure 3 Validated: Oregon Supreme Court Affirms Single Amendment with Closely Related Provisions under Separate-Vote Requirement Introduction In Lincoln Interagency Narcotics Team (LINT) v....
Reynolds v. Markley: Affirming Lawyers' Privilege in Clients' Fiduciary Breaches

Reynolds v. Markley: Affirming Lawyers' Privilege in Clients' Fiduciary Breaches

Date: Sep 9, 2006
Reynolds v. Markley: Affirming Lawyers' Privilege in Clients' Fiduciary Breaches Introduction In Reynolds v. Markley, the Oregon Supreme Court addressed a critical legal question regarding the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert